The 4 copper plate inscriptions that detail reign, deeds of King Rajendra Chola
These inscriptions shed light on Chola lineage, temple endowments, and military expeditions. The books, Sozhar Ceppedugal by Ve. Mahadevan and Ka. Sankaranarayanan (Tamil University, Thanjavur) and Sozhar Kaala Ceppedugal by former IAS officer M. Rajendran (Akani Publishers), provide insights into copper plate inscriptions of various Chola kings, especially Rajendra Chola.
Tiruvalangadu Plates
The Tiruvalangadu Copper Plates were first mentioned in the Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for 1903-04. A detailed account appeared in the Madras Epigraphical Report of 1916. The plates were later published in Volume III of South Indian Inscriptions by epigraphist Rao Bahadur H. Krishna Sastri. This set comprised 31 copper plates, with the first 10 inscribed in Sanskrit and the remaining 21 in Tamil. The inscription was divided into three parts: the Sanskrit section, the first Tamil section, and the second Tamil section. According to epigraphist V. Venkayya, the Tamil parts were considered earlier, with the Sanskrit section possibly added later. The second Tamil section referred to the sixth regnal year of Rajendra Chola I, placing it around 1018 CE.
The plates were linked together by a circular copper seal with royal emblems, including two fly-whisks on either side of a royal parasol, a tiger (the Chola emblem), two fishes (the Pandya emblem), a bow (the Chera emblem), a boar (the Chalukya emblem), a Swastik, and two lamps. Weighing 93.05 kilograms, these plates recorded the royal order of Rajendra Chola gifting Palaiyanur village to the Tiruvalangadu Shiva temple (in Tiruvallur district).
The Sanskrit section, with 271 lines, traced the Chola genealogy in a mythological lineage starting from the Sun. The Tamil section contained 524 lines, of which 145 lines described the royal order, 281 lines described the boundaries of the land grants, and 98 lines outlined the tax exemptions and other privileges.
Karanthai Plates
The Karanthai Copper Plates were discovered in a field at Puthur village near Ammapettai in Papanasam taluk of Thanjavur district. Initially referred to as the Puthur Copper Plates, they were renamed after being preserved by the Karanthai Tamil Sangam at Karunthattankudi, near Thanjavur, in the late 1940s. They had reportedly been discovered six decades earlier on land belonging to Sevu Pandiyan. The Karanthai Tamil Sangam acquired the plates with assistance from a local development officer.
The set comprised 57 copper plates, weighing 111.73 kilograms, linked by two large copper rings, one of which was broken. The remaining ring bore the royal seal featuring the emblems of the Cholas, the Pandyas, the Cheras, and the Chalukyas, along with lamps, the royal parasol, and fly-whisks. Scholars identified three distinct sections, likely composed at different stages. The first section, written in Sanskrit and numbered continuously, appeared to have been compiled later. The second section, consisting of 22 plates inscribed in Tamil with 1,042 lines, detailed a major land donation. The third section, also in Tamil, comprised 32 plates and 1,456 lines, recording information about temples and listing land grants to 1,080 Brahmins. Several of the 54 Tamil plates bore the word 'Thiribu', referencing the gifted village — Thiribhuvana Mahadevi Chaturvedimangalam — named in honour of Rajendra Chola's mother. The plates were issued in 1020 CE (his eighth regnal year).
Tirukkalar Plates
The Tirukkalar Copper Plates were discovered at the Parijathavaneswarar Temple at Tirukkalar, a village nearly 20 kilometres southeast of Mannargudi, in Tiruvarur district. The temple yielded a set of five copper plates inscribed in Tamil and 23 stone inscriptions, all from the Chola period. The five plates, weighing 6.59 kilograms, were linked by a copper ring. The earliest among them was dated to around 1030 CE (the 18th regnal year of Rajendra Chola).
These plates detailed a land grant made to the Mahadevar Temple at Tirukkalar, which was part of the 'Purangkaranbai Nadu' in the 'Arulmozhi Deva Valanadu'. Of the 30 lines inscribed on the plate, 28 narrated the king's genealogy and achievements, while the final two lines detailed the land donation.
Esalam Plates
The Esalam Copper Plates were discovered at Esalam near Tindivanam on July 11, 1987, during the renovation of a Shiva temple. The finds included 15 copper plates, several bronze icons, and ritual objects. Esalam was the first site where all three types of historical artefacts were unearthed together. A similar triad was later found at Tiruindalur (in Mayiladuthurai district) in 2010.
R. Nagasamy, then Director of the Tamil Nadu State Department of Archaeology, studied the plates and confirmed that they belonged to the reign of Rajendra Chola. They were dated to 1036 CE (his 24th regnal year). Among the bronze icons was a statue of Sarva Siva Pandithar, believed to be Rajendra Chola's guru.
These plates, engraved on both sides, were bound by a copper ring with a seal bearing the emblems of the Cholas, the Pandyas, the Cheras, and the Chalukyas, along with lamps, the royal parasol, and fly-whisks. The plates contained 424 lines: 80 in Sanskrit and 344 in Tamil. The inscriptions opened with Rajendra Chola's genealogy in Sanskrit. The Tamil portion detailed his land grants to the temple built by Sarva Siva Pandithar and listed the regions conquered during his reign. His 'meikeerthi' (royal eulogy) said the famous Vidyadhara Torana was brought from Kadaram (Kedah in Malaysia) and was depicted on the seal of this set of copper plates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
The hidden tax we all pay: Why civic sense is a core economic issue
The other day, I saw a child from one of Patna's top-tier private schools carelessly throw a chips packet from a moving school bus onto the roadside. A mundane act of littering, witnessed countless times in various spectacles, by me and many, I am afraid. It is tempting to dismiss it as bad manners. It is not. It's a tax—one paid not in rupees, but in degraded public space. This wasn't just litter—it was a reminder that while our schools proudly laser-focused on teaching Artificial Intelligence, coding, and STEM innovation, they often fail to impart the most basic lesson of modern citizenship: civic responsibility. Civic sense – the discipline of common courtesy and care for shared spaces – is more than mere etiquette. Civic sense is not a 'soft skill.' It's a public good with strong positive spillovers: when people properly dispose of waste, obey traffic rules, and respect public property, everyone benefits from cleaner streets, safer roads, and healthier neighborhoods. In effect, a well-behaved citizen creates a benefit for society (better air, faster traffic, less disease) that no market would adequately price. Conversely, every thrown candy wrapper, every illegal parking, and every wasted hour in traffic imposes hidden costs on others – costs that individuals seldom pay for. But in the Indian equilibrium, such restraint is rare. People free-ride, and the result is predictable: public space as tragedy-of-the-commons. For example, take the entrenched habit of spitting gutka and betel nuts. This isn't just bad manners—it's an economic drag. Indian Railways spends around ₹1,200 crore every year cleaning gutka stains from stations and trains. The cost isn't borne by the spitters, but by the taxpayer. That is public money poured into cleaning up private bad habits, enough to pay for nearly ten new India's semi-high-speed train, 16-coach trainset Vande Bharat Express! That's the textbook definition of a negative externality or neighbourhoods effect: private actions imposing public costs. In economic terms, each spittle stain or bit of litter creates a negative externality – a preventable social cost borne by taxpayers, transit users, and commuters. It is the opposite of investment: by fouling shared spaces, individuals erode the very infrastructure that makes economic activity possible. Take another instance of garbage disposal by the management in Patna. Civic agencies, armed with JCB machines, dutifully scoop filth from clogged drains, only to dump it on the roadside, where it festers for days—or months—until trucks arrive. By the time the municipal truck arrives to transport it to the outskirts, rain, wind, and street runoff have already returned the trash to its original home: the drain. This isn't waste management; it's waste circulation. Traffic is another case study in everyday economics gone wrong: when one driver blocks a lane, especially the right and middle ones, the lost minutes and extra fuel for dozens of other drivers add up to real economic losses. According to experts, congestion can consume millions of hours and tons of fuel nationally, translating into billions of dollars of forgone productivity (in Europe and the US, congestion wastes hours at a cost of ~US$30–63 billion per year). In India's big cities the figures are staggering. Every minute that a commuter loses in traffic is time that could have been spent working or educating a child. That is called the opportunity cost of congestion. Cleanliness and order, by contrast, produce positive externalities: tidy streets encourage more walking and commerce; reliable rules encourage greater investment and social trust; shared respect for property lowers policing costs. Economists describe this as a market failure: goods that are free and public tend to be overused or undervalued. Roads, parks, public transit and clean air are 'non-excludable' and 'non-rivalrous,' but they become congested and dirty if too many act selfishly. The classic rule of thumb (Vincent Ostrom's) is that we should set the level of collective action or government at the scale of the problem (the externality). Right now, much of our civic infrastructure is centralized in faraway city hall, while the consequences are felt on every neighborhood road and by every commuter. When citizens pay nearly no direct price to drive on a congested road or dump waste in the street, they tend to do so recklessly. That is why economists argue for aligning incentives: charge motorists for use of busy lanes, and prosecute habitual litterers or queue-cutters with visible penalties. Which brings us back to schools. Given these challenges, why does our school system not address them head-on? Today's Indian education is famed for its emphasis on math, science and careers, and it has produced top engineers, doctors and businessmen – a fact even critics of civic sense readily acknowledge. It has become 'an ignorable subject,' a multiple-choice hurdle to clear at age 13 and promptly forget. We teach rules in theory, not the lived reality of the social contract. In 1942, Britain's Beveridge Report identified five 'giant evils' that stood in the way of post-war progress: Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor, and Idleness. India may have reduced some of these, but we have quietly bred another: Indifference. Until we treat civic sense as a core subject—taught in classrooms, modelled by leaders, and enforced in public—our cities will remain stupid in practice. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
A Bed Of Flowers, A Glass Of Milk, And A Shy Bride: 'Suhagraat' Beyond Filmy Symbols
The term ' Suhagraat ' is derived from two words: ' Suhag ' and ' Raat '. Suhag stems from the Sanskrit word ' Saubhagya ' or ' Subhagya ', denoting a woman's marital good fortune, her husband's long life, and happiness. Raat simply means night, referring specifically to the first night after marriage. Therefore, Suhagraat literally translates to 'the night of marital good fortune', marking the moment when husband and wife grow intimately close for the first time. Historical Origins: During the medieval period, especially among the Mughal and Rajput royal households, Suhagraat evolved into a ceremonial event that accompanied the grandeur of marriage. Traditions included preparing a rose-adorned bed, applying fragrant perfumes, and guiding the nervous bride to sit beside the groom. With the advent of British rule, Victorian ideals merged with Indian customs, imbuing Suhagraat with a more emotional and sacred dimension. Over time, it grew from a mere night of union into a full-fledged ritual. Regional Variations Across India: India's vast cultural diversity brings with it various names and traditions, though the sentiment behind Suhagraat remains largely the same: the first night shared by the newlyweds. In Bengal, it is called Phoolshayya, bed of flowers. In Tamil Nadu, it is known as Iravu Thiruma whereas in Maharashtra, it goes by Pahili Raat, meaning first night. In Rajasthan and Punjab, the term Suhagraat is common, with slight regional variations. Despite linguistic differences, the essence remains consistent: the symbolic beginning of the couple's marital journey. Depiction in Films and Literature: In the 20th century, Indian cinema redefined the popular image of Suhagraat. Films often portrayed flower-laden beds, glasses of milk, bashful brides, the soft jingle of bangles, and veils concealing shy smiles. This cinematic representation fused sensuality with tradition, embedding a romantic and ritualistic narrative into public imagination. What was once a private ritual became a cultural motif. Modern-Day Perceptions: In contemporary society, particularly in urban areas, Suhagraat is increasingly viewed as a personal experience rather than a rigid tradition. For many modern couples, who may already share emotional or physical intimacy before marriage, Suhagraat has become more of a symbolic gesture. For others, especially in rural or traditional settings, it remains a deeply significant and often mysterious event, filled with expectation and emotion. To the younger generation, it may represent not just a night of romance, but the emotional beginning of a shared life. Traditional Symbols and Their Meanings: The bed of flowers, often central to the Suhagraat setting, symbolises beauty, purity, and sensuality. The fragrant petals not only enhance the romantic atmosphere but also represent the blossoming of a new relationship. The glass of milk, traditionally offered to the couple, signifies love, strength, and vitality. It is seen as a nourishing gesture, both literal and symbolic, meant to energise and bless the couple as they embark on their life together. The veil, typically worn by the bride, denotes modesty, grace, and adherence to tradition. It creates a sense of mystery and shyness, reinforcing the emotional vulnerability and respectful boundaries that mark the beginning of a marriage. These elements are not just ornamental or ritualistic, they each represent an emotional and psychological transition. Suhagraat, in its many forms, is more than just a night of intimacy. It stands as a reflection of evolving customs, deeply rooted emotions, and the timeless nature of human connection.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
TNPSC Group 4 Results: Expected Date, Cut-Off Impact, And Why Luck May Play A Big Role
The TNPSC Group 4 is an important exam in Tamil Nadu and the competition was intense as of the 13.89 lakh applicants, 11.48 lakh appeared for the exam, meaning around 287 candidates vied for each post. The overall success rate was less than 0.35%, or roughly 3.5 selections for every 1,000 candidates. (News18 Tamil) 3/9 This year's Group 4 exam has been described as one of the toughest in recent memory. According to candidates and invigilators, more than half of the 100 Tamil questions were unusually complex and outside the standard syllabus.(News18 Tamil) The selection process is based solely on a single written stage comprising 200 questions, with no negative marking for incorrect answers. This format means that luck often plays a significant role in determining the final outcome. (News18 Tamil) For instance, one candidate might answer 150-160 questions correctly and guess the rest, while another might correctly answer only 50–-0 and rely heavily on guesswork, in some cases, by choosing the same option for all unknown questions. While the difference between candidates scoring 50 and 170 is obvious, distinguishing between those scoring 170 and 170.01 is almost impossible. (News18 Tamil) Kunal Mangal, a Harvard PhD holder, has extensively studied TNPSC competitive exams. His research examined why so many young people continue to pursue government jobs in a privatised, globalised economy, whether such exams can reliably identify the most suitable candidates, and how much of the outcome depends on luck. (News18 Tamil) Luck appears to matter most for well-prepared candidates who answer nearly all questions correctly. For these candidates, scoring in the 160-170 range could mean the difference between selection and rejection. Those who put in little preparation or rely solely on random guessing are far less likely to benefit. (News18 Tamil)
