‘How dare you': Former minister Alan Shatter criticised in committee on Israeli settlements bill
Former justice minister Alan Shatter has been criticised for comparing a ban on trade with Israeli settlements to TV sitcom Father Ted, with one TD asking 'how dare you' use that description.
Ex-Fine Gael TD Mr Shatter opposes the Irish Government's draft law banning trade with Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands that have been deemed illegal by the UN's top court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Government decide on €13bn Apple tax windfall & AIB shares sale cash spend in new €100bn national development plan
THE coalition is set to pump close to €100 billion into energy and water infrastructure, new schools, housing, and State-run creches over the next 5 years under plans for the Apple tax windfall to be announced. A newly refreshed National Development Plan will be published on Tuesday and will see the Advertisement Coalition sources differed on the level of increased investment that will be announced with some suggesting it could be as high as €100bn while others claimed it would be €90bn. This would see an extra €20bn to €30bn in State spending on building projects over the next 5 years. The money is coming from the A large part of the new injection of cash will be specifically targeted at water and energy infrastructure along with a 'once in a generation' investment in housing projects around the country. Advertisement Read more in Money The plan will also include cash commitments to major transport and health projects. The NDP will also include commitments to build more schools, special education schools and State-run childcare centres. The extra investment is coming from the €13bn Apple tax and the billions of euro the Government has taken in from the sale of AIB shares over recent years. Public Expenditure Minister Advertisement Most read in The Irish Sun Government leaders will hold one final meeting over the weekend to finalise the National Development Plan funds before it is announced on Tuesday. Minister Chambers has encouraged Government leaders to agree bumper investment in key capital projects as a way to help protect against the economic shock of The Any such tariffs would result in retaliatory taxes from the EU on American goods and would devastate the Advertisement Minister Chambers believes that the best way to protect the Irish economy from a trade shock is to create thousands of jobs in State building projects around the country through direct exchequer funding. Improving Ireland's water, energy and housing infrastructure will also help make the country a more attractive option for international businesses to invest in and create jobs here. 1 Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers has spent the past few months negotiating with key ministers Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Government scrambling to avoid recession as fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war established
Coalition scrambling to avoid recession as jobs and businesses in the firing line The Government is planning to do 'everything it possibly can' to avoid a recession, as the Sunday Independent can reveal details of a new fund for those Irish businesses worst affected by US tariffs. With US president Donald Trump pushing to impose a 15pc minimum tariff rate on all EU goods, the Government is now bracing for 'quite stark' impacts on the Irish economy — even if the new rate is lower than the 'devastating' 30pc tariffs Trump previously floated.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
CAP battle starts as EU plans to overhaul farmer payments
The European Commission this week outlined long-anticipated proposals to radically overhaul the system of financial supports for the agricultural sector across the European Union. The top-line changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) would see ringfenced funding for farming cut by more than a fifth, with supports for agriculture merged with those for rural areas into a single fund. In brass tax, this would mean a fall in guaranteed CAP funding from €387 billion down to €300 billion over the course of the EU budget cycle from 2028. Around 120,000 Irish farmers receive roughly €2bn annually in CAP payments, and much of this money essentially makes a huge cohort of Irish farms viable. Given this, it was no surprise to see farming organisations here quickly coming out of the blocks to condemn the proposals. The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) warned the move would put food security at risk, while the group representing dairy farmers, the ICMSA, said there would be immediate upward pressure on food prices. A number of Irish MEPs also came out against the plans, which the Commission argues would allow for "stronger synergies between policies", and create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget. Now the horse-trading really gets going as member states, through the Council of Ministers, start the long process of agreeing on an approach to the proposals, before painstaking talks with the parliament in Brussels and the Commission begin. Ultimately, it could take over two years before any agreement is in place for the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028. Ireland will likely play a key role in this process, as we will hold the rolling six-month EU presidency for the second half of next year. This means that what the EU Commission is proposing and what eventually ends up happening might well be very different. Based on what I've written so far, it might seem the changes suggested are largely negative, but are there any positives in there for farmers across the bloc? Well, from what the Commission has outlined, it wants to make a strong play to encourage more young farmers into the profession. And this is in response to one of the major issues threatening the future of family farms both here in Ireland and across the EU. The average age of a farmer in Ireland is pushing 60, and with high income volatility and increased regulation farming isn't seen as an attractive career path in the way it would have to previous generations. A recent Teagasc report showed farm incomes were up across the board last year, but it also highlighted severe differences in farmer earnings from one year to the next. Paired with that, the level of environmental regulations farmers have to adhere to, and biodiversity and other targets that need to be met is only rising. These are welcome moves to protect our environment but they come at a price, and add layers of complexity to the job. In an attempt to address the challenge of generational renewal, the Commission has recommended that CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity". This would mean that farmers who are of pension age would no longer receive supports under CAP. In addition, the proposals would hugely increase supports for young farmers starting out, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000. The changes would also give individual member states more autonomy when it comes to doling out funds to farmers and rural areas, and can steer money in one direction of the other based on what is deemed more necessary. This could bring a shift in the well-worn path of supports going directly to farmers in less-well-off regions, as opposed to the areas themselves getting the money. So farmers could still benefit from rural EU funding, just not directly. However, the Commission's proposals are just proposals at this stage and will need approval at various stages of the EU decision-making process if they are to become part of the EU budget. The Irish Government hasn't wasted any time in putting domestic structures in place to decide on the country's stance on all this. On Thursday, the day after the EU proposals, Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon held the first meeting of what he calls the "CAP Consultation Committee". He called the Commission's CAP recommendations a "starting point", adding "we have been through considerable reforms before and we've managed to negotiate through them in the past and we'll do the same again". The minister's positive take might given some of the stakeholders at that CAP committee some reassurance. Ireland's response to this will be pretty much an all-inclusive one. The stakeholders gathered together by the minister include five Government departments, a host of State agencies, farmer organisations, business groups, as well as academics. IFA President Francie Gorman was giving his reaction to the Commission's CAP proposals on Wednesday's RTÉ Six-One News, in which he summed up the complexities associated with finding the right funding model for farmers. He welcomed the EU's renewed focus on bringing along more young farmers but pointed out: "If you want the next generation of farmers coming home, along with all the measures that we bring in to support young farmers, we still have to have viable farms for them to come into." Essentially, however well-intentioned it is, the idea of giving newer farmers more financial support at the expense of older ones could prove to be a misguided one if it kills off the very farms its trying to protect. Like most budget-related considerations, it will come down to finding a balance. And with the next EU budget not kicking in until 2028, at least there is sufficient time to try and get this balance right. But there's no doubt that between now and 2028, many battles will be fought as competing interests vie for pieces of a potentially smaller pie of EU funding.
