
Trump's golfing weekend in Scotland is an even bigger headache than his state visit
At home, Trump is embroiled in linked controversies that seem to have come out of the blue. Having seen off most of the legal challenges to the orders he issued in his first days back in office, he now faces a quasi-rebellion from his hitherto loyal and largely unquestioning base over a case that has little obvious bearing on high politics at all.
These die-hard Trumpists were disappointed by official findings that the accused child-trafficker and convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, did indeed die by suicide in prison and that there is, and was, no secret client list. They had shared a conspiracy theory that Epstein was part of a shadowy elite, that he had been killed to keep him quiet, and that after Trump came to power, the truth would emerge.
Now, Trump is himself being accused of an establishment cover-up, and is confronting a social media storm that even this master of the medium is struggling to control.
Trump has also launched lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal, its proprietor, Rupert Murdoch, and two journalists, denying a report of links between Trump and Epstein, including a bawdy birthday greeting allegedly sent by Trump. The prospect of a court confrontation between the two titans is tantalising.
Trump has also ordered files relating to the Epstein case to be published, and both his attorney general and Congress want to question Ghislaine Maxwell – the only person convicted in connection with the case so far. It may be surmised that they hope to tempt Maxwell with a reduction in her 20-year sentence and persuade her to offer some 'helpful' evidence.
With only a year until the start of the midterm congressional election campaign, Trump needs to keep his base intact. No wonder four days in the wilds of Scotland – the homeland of his late mother and two Trump-owned golf courses, including a new resort on the Menie Estate, outside Aberdeen – might look like a welcome distraction.
His foes on this side of the Atlantic are already tuning up – wags have put up a spoof sign at his golf course near Aberdeen that says 'twinned with Epstein Island' – and elaborate police and security operations are in train. When Trump last visited his Scottish businesses two years ago, he was not president. Now, even on a private visit, he requires presidential-level security, at least some of which must be supplied and paid for by the host country.
The timing of this trip, less than one month before Trump's unprecedented second state visit to the UK, adds risk. Any infelicities, real or perceived, on either side now are in danger of negatively colouring the later visit, the invitation for which was conveyed by Keir Starmer during his trip to the White House soon after Trump's inauguration.
Since then, content, timing and tone have all been in contention. The recent state visit by France's President Macron, with its especially high pageantry, address to parliament, and prominent deployment of the Prince and Princess of Wales, seemed top-of-the-line. Like the Macrons, the Trumps will stay at Windsor Castle, but this occasion has been timed to exclude the possibility of a parliamentary address and the visit to Balmoral that Trump angled for. Nor, the Palace has made clear, will the King be meeting Trump during his golfing weekend. The private and state visits are wisely being kept distinct.
At government level, in contrast, a different choice has been made. The prime minister is expected to hold talks with Trump, potentially on every current issue, from trade tariffs to Ukraine, in or near Aberdeen, and possibly at Trump's golf course. There will also be a meeting with Scotland's first minister, John Swinney, who has decided that it is his duty 'to engage, to protect and to promote the interests of the people of Scotland', despite vocal opposition from other groups.
Now, it could be said that Starmer, in particular, was damned if he did and damned if he didn't. Given that the decision has been taken, however, the aim must be to limit any damage. Anything that smacks of paying tribute must be avoided, and that includes meeting Trump at his golf course and any announcement about awarding the 2028 British Open to the now Trump-owned Turnberry, as the president would reportedly like.
By meeting Trump in Scotland, Starmer risks not only becoming the focus of protests himself but also party to the negative blowback from British public opinion. As much can go wrong as go right. The prime minister should have followed the Palace and left all official encounters for the main event, where the protocol is clear and risks of all kinds are minimised. After all, there are fewer than four weeks to wait.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Judge orders halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
A judge has ordered the halt of construction of a Florida detention facility Donald Trump had nicknamed 'Alligator Alcatraz' and where he claimed would be held some of the most 'menacing' and 'vicious' people on the planet. The facility, operated by the state and with its costs reimbursed by the federal government, opened two months ago with the intention of housing undocumented migrants rounded up as part of the president's immigration crackdown. It is located in the Florida Everglades, something Mr Trump said made it the ideal place to hold the detainees. Yet, its location near Big Cypress National Preserve was something seized on by environmental activists who filed a lawsuit arguing the site threatens the environmentally sensitive wetlands. They are home to many protected plants and animals. 'We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperilled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,' said Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades. At the hearing in Miami on Thursday, US District Judge Kathleen Williams issued an order halting new construction for the next week but did not suspend operations at the facility. A spokesperson for Republican Governor Ron DeSantis denounced the ruling but said it 'will have no impact on immigration enforcement in Florida'. 'Alligator Alcatraz will remain operational, continuing to serve as a force multiplier to enhance deportation efforts,' said spokesperson Alex Lanfranconi. Mr Trump made a crackdown on immigration a centre part of his campaign for a second term in the Oval Office. Polls show his policies on deportations are largely popular, though not some of his most extreme steps, such as the rounding up of farm workers and day labourers. When Mr Trump visited the site at the beginning of July, he told reporters: 'It's known as Alligator Alcatraz, which is very appropriate because I looked outside and that's not a place I want to go hiking.' He added: 'But very soon, this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.' Mr Trump has also spoken several times of his wish to reopen the original Alcatraz prison, located in the waters off San Francisco and administration officials have toured the facility, which closed as a jail in 1963. In May, he wrote on Truth Social he was ordering all his staff to work towards reopening the prison to house 'America's most ruthless and violent offenders'. He added: 'For too long, America has been plagued by vicious, violent and repeat Criminal Offenders, the dregs of society, who will never contribute anything other than Misery and Suffering.'


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fourth court blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order nationwide
August 7(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide by a fourth court on Thursday, after a judge issued an injunction in a class action covering children born anywhere in the United States who would be affected by it. U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, sided with immigrant rights advocates who asked her to halt Trump's order, marking the latest decision to show the limits of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that curtailed the ability of judges to block his directive and other policies nationwide. Trump's executive order, which he issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. Every court to address the merits of order have agreed, and three judges including Boardman earlier this year halted nationwide the enforcement of the policy, which is part of the Republican president's hardline immigration agenda. The 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 sided with the administration by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to issue decisions stopping Trump's citizenship order from taking effect nationally. The Supreme Court's ruling notably held out the possibility that a lower court judge could halt a federal policy across the country if it was challenged in a class action on behalf of a nationwide group. Immigrant rights advocates seized on that holding and launched two proposed class actions that same day, including the one before Boardman, who had earlier in the same case concluded in February that Trump's order was likely unconstitutional. Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, in her February decision said Trump's order interpreted the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment "in a manner that the Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected and no court in the country has ever endorsed." Boardman in a July 16 opinion said she would once again block the policy nationally by granting children class action status at the request of groups including CASA and Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. But she did not immediately do so, saying because her original decision was still on appeal, she would need the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to return the case to her. It did so recently by dismissing the Trump administration's appeal. The case is Casa Inc. et al v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 8:25-cv-00201. For the plaintiffs: Joseph Mead of Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and Conchita Cruz of Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. For the United States: Brad Rosenberg of the U.S. Department of Justice Read more: US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to block presidential policies


BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
US offers $50m reward for arrest of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro
The US has doubled a reward for information leading to the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to $50m (£37.2m), accusing him of being "one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world".US President Donald Trump is a long-time critic of Maduro, who returned to office in January following an election marred by vote-rigging allegations. The results were widely rejected by the international General Pam Bondi said the US would double its already announced reward of $25m (£18.6m), and said Maduro was directly linked to drug smuggling Venezuelan government has not publicly responded to Bondi's remarks but Maduro has previously denied such claims. During Trump's first term, the US government charged Maduro and other high-ranking Venezuelan officials with a range of offences, including narco-terrorism, corruption and drug trafficking. At the time, the US Department of Justice claimed Maduro had worked with the Colombian rebel group Farc to "use cocaine as a weapon to 'flood' the United States".In a video posted on X on Thursday, Bondi accused Maduro of coordinating with groups like Tren de Aragua - a Venezuelan gang that the Trump administration has declared a terrorist organisation - and the Sinaloa Cartel, a powerful criminal network based in claimed the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) had "seized 30 tons of cocaine linked to Maduro and his associates, with nearly seven tons linked to Maduro himself".Maduro has previously rejected US claims he has direct involvement in drug comments are an extension of long-running tensions between the US and Venezuelan government - but the attorney general did not provide any further indication over how the government envisioned the renewed appeal and cash incentive would yield - who is leader of the United Socialist Party and succeeded Hugo Chavez in 2013 - has been repeatedly accused of repressing opposition groups and silencing dissent in Venezuela, including with the use of weathered protests in the wake of last year's contested election and has retained his grip on in June, Hugo Carvajal - formerly the head of Venezuela's military intelligence - was convicted of several drug trafficking charges after being arrested in Madrid and put on trial in the had been a feared spymaster who went by the name El Pollo, or The Chicken, but fled Venezuela after calling on the army to back an opposition candidate and overthrow initially denied the drug charges but later changed his plea to guilty, fuelling speculation he had cut a deal with US authorities for a lesser sentence in exchange for incriminating information about UK and EU announced sanctions against Maduro's government following his return to office earlier this year.