
Trump's broad tariffs go into effect
The White House said that starting just after midnight, goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union (EU) would face tariff rates of 10% or higher.
Advertisement
Products from the EU, Japan and South Korea will be taxed at 15%, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh will be taxed at 20%.
President Donald Trump in the Oval Office in Washington (Alex Brandon/AP)
For places such as the EU, Japan and South Korea, Mr Trump also expects them to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US.
'I think the growth is going to be unprecedented,' Mr Trump said on Wednesday afternoon.
He added that the US was 'taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs', but he could not provide a specific figure for revenues because 'we don't even know what the final number is' regarding tariff rates.
Advertisement
Despite the uncertainty, the Trump White House is confident that the onset of his broad tariffs will provide clarity about the path of the world's largest economy.
Now that companies understand the direction the US is headed, the administration believes it can ramp up new investments and jump-start hiring in ways that can rebalance the US economy as a manufacturing power.
But so far, there are signs of self-inflicted wounds to America as companies and consumers alike brace for the impact of new taxes.
What the data has shown is a US economy that changed in April with Mr Trump's initial rollout of tariffs, an event that led to market drama, a negotiating period and Mr Trump's ultimate decision to start his universal tariffs on Thursday.
Advertisement
A customer shops in a grain isle at New India Bazar in Fremont, California, where most merchandise is imported from India and Canada (Noah Berger/AP)
After April, economic reports show that hiring began to stall, inflationary pressures crept upward and home values in key markets started to decline, said John Silvia, chief executive of Dynamic Economic Strategy.
'A less productive economy requires fewer workers,' Mr Silvia said in an analysis note.
'But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences.'
Even then, the ultimate transformations of the tariffs are unknown and could play out over months, if not years.
Advertisement
Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly.
'We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion – it's not like that,' said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University.
'It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down.'
The Statue of Liberty is seen near Port Liberty Terminals in New York (Frank Franklin II/AP)
Mr Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent trade deficit.
Advertisement
But importers sought to avoid the taxes by importing more goods before the taxes went into effect.
As a result, the 582.7 billion dollar trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38% higher than in 2024.
Total construction spending has dropped 2.9% over the past year.
The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Mr Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated.
The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin on Thursday or Friday.
An employee counts US dollar notes at a money changer in Jakarta, Indonesia (Tatan Syuflana/AP)
The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from August 1 said the higher tax rates would start in seven days.
On Wednesday morning, Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was asked if the new tariffs began at midnight on Thursday, and he said reporters should check with the US Trade Representative's Office.
Mr Trump on Wednesday announced additional 25% tariffs to be imposed on India for its buying of Russian oil, bringing its total import taxes to 50%.
He has said that import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs and announced 100% tariffs on computer chips, meaning the US economy could remain in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact.
The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is also under challenge.
The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a US appeals court could cause Mr Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority.
Even people who worked with Mr Trump during his first term are sceptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House of Representatives speaker, who has emerged as a Trump critic.
Tropical spices are displayed for sale at a Presidente Supermarket in North Miami, Florida (Marta Lavandier/AP)
'There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions,' Mr Ryan told CNBC on Wednesday.
'I think choppy waters are ahead because I think they're going to have some legal challenges.'
Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25% from its April low.
The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Mr Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months.
As of now, Mr Trump still foresees an economic boom while the rest of the world and American voters wait nervously.
'There's one person who can afford to be cavalier about the uncertainty that he's creating, and that's Donald Trump,' said Rachel West, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation who worked in the Biden White House on labour policy.
'The rest of Americans are already paying the price for that uncertainty.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
CureVac settles patent dispute litigation with Pfizer and BioNTech
Aug 7 (Reuters) - CureVac ( opens new tab said on Thursday that the company and GSK (GSK.L), opens new tab have entered an agreement to a resolve patent dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab and BioNTech ( opens new tab related to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. As part of the settlement, CureVac and GSK will receive a combined payment of $740 million and single-digit royalties on sales of COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. going forward. CureVac will also grant BioNTech and Pfizer a non-exclusive license to manufacture, use, import and sell mRNA-based COVID-19 and influenza products in the U.S.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
BOJ debated chance of resuming rate hike, July summary shows
TOKYO, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Some Bank of Japan policymakers warned of mounting inflationary pressures and one signaled the chance of resuming interest rate increases by year-end, a summary of opinions at the July meeting showed, keeping alive the possibility of a near-term rate hike. While several board members warned of lingering uncertainty over the fallout from U.S. tariffs, one welcomed Japan's trade deal with the U.S. as "great progress" that heightened the likelihood of achieving the BOJ's forecast, the summary showed on Friday. One member said the BOJ needed "at least two to three more months" to assess the impact of U.S. tariffs, adding the impact on Japan's economy could remain "minimal" if the U.S. economy withstands the hit better than initially thought, it showed. "In that case, it may be possible for the Bank to exit from its current wait-and-see stance, perhaps as early as the end of this year," the member, whose identity was not disclosed, was quoted as saying. A few others in the nine-member board also signaled the possibility of resuming interest rate hikes. The BOJ must continue to raise rates when possible because its policy rate, at 0.5%, is below levels considered neutral to the economy, another opinion showed, adding that the bank should not become overly cautious and "miss the opportunity" to hike. "It's important to raise rates in a timely manner" to avoid being forced to hike rapidly later and inflict huge damage to the economy, a third opinion showed. Some warned of growing inflationary risk with one opinion saying the BOJ is "now at a phase where it needs to place more emphasis on the upside risks to prices", the summary showed. At the July 30-31 meeting, the BOJ kept rates steady at 0.5% but revised up its inflation forecasts and offered a less gloomy outlook on the economy than three months ago. In a quarterly outlook report released after the meeting, the BOJ also spelled out explicitly for the first time the risks of persistent food price rises fanning broad-based inflation - laying the groundwork for resuming interest rate hikes. The hawkish tilt reflected receding pessimism over U.S. tariffs, after Japan struck a trade deal with President Donald Trump last month that lowered levies for imports of goods, including its mainstay automobiles. A Reuters poll last month showed a majority of economists expect another rate hike by year-end. Swap rates indicate a 54% chance the BOJ will raise rates to 0.75% in October and a 71% chance in December.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Judge dismisses US consumer watchdog lawsuit against Experian
Aug 7 (Reuters) - A lawsuit filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau against credit rating giant Experian (EXPN.L), opens new tab over credit report accuracy was dismissed on Wednesday, according to a court filing. The lawsuit, filed by the agency in January under the Biden administration, alleged that Ireland-based Experian had failed American consumers who had challenged the accuracy of their reports. Judge Michelle Williams of the Central District of California federal court dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, allowing the CFPB to file an amended complaint if it wished to do so. The lawsuit was one of the few that had not been abandoned by the Trump administration, which has rolled back the activities of the agency by reducing its workforce by about 90%. The agency dismissed more than 22 cases that were pending against companies such as JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab, Wells Fargo (WFC.N), opens new tab, Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab and Capital One (COF.N), opens new tab. The CFPB and Experian did not respond to requests for comment.