Drug taken by millions of women could raise breast cancer risk in young women, study finds
The treatment, also known as HRT, was first linked to the disease more than two decades ago, with debate about its safety causing confusion and concern for millions of women ever since.
Most studies examining the risk have been explored in older women, who take it to help menopause symptoms. In the young it is often taken after gynaecological surgery or during perimenopause.
But US scientists have now discovered that oestrogen plus synthetic progesterone HRT increased the risk of breast cancer in women under 55 by a tenth.
Yet, oestrogen HRT alone appeared to decrease the risk by almost a sixth.
Experts today, who labelled the findings important, said they should now influence a clinician's decision whether to prescribing the drug to certain women is the best course of action.
They did, however, caution that the risk of developing breast cancer due to HRT remains 'small' and is 'outweighed by the benefits'.
Writing in the prestigious journal Lancet Oncology, scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, based in North Carolina, said: 'The findings can be used to augment clinical recommendations for hormone therapy use in young women, for whom guidance was previously scarce.
They added: 'Oestrogen [only] hormone therapy use appears to decrease breast cancer risk and oestrogen plus progesterone appears to increase breast cancer risk.'
Back in 2018, fewer than 1.3 million NHS patients were being prescribed HRT, a safe and cheap medicine proven to effectively combat the most debilitating menopause symptoms.
Today this figure has doubled, with about 2.6 million women now on the medication, which replenishes the female sex hormones oestrogen and progesterone that are lost during the menopause.
There are different types of HRT available which contain different hormones—some are oestrogen alone, others contain progestogen while a third type contains both—and can be taken in the form of gels, patches or pills.
Previous research has suggested women who have already been through the menopause have an increased risk of breast cancer taking oestrogen plus progesterone HRT, due to longer exposure to the hormone.
In the fresh study, scientists examined data drawn from previous studies of 459,476 women aged 16 to 54 years old.
Two per cent of this group (8,455) developed young-onset breast cancer, which means the disease was diagnosed before they were 55 years old.
Some 15 per cent of women involved in the study reported using HRT, with oestrogen plus progestin HRT and oestrogen HRT being the most common types.
They found that oestrogen appeared to reduce the risk of young breast cancer by 14 per cent while oestrogen plus progestin therapy increased risk by 10 per cent.
Responding to the findings, Dr Kotryna Temcinaite, head of research communications at the charity Breast Cancer Now, said: 'This large scale study offers useful insights for women aged under 55.
'These results are largely in line with what we already know about taking HRT for menopausal symptoms and its effects on breast cancer risk—for most people, the risk of developing breast cancer because of taking HRT is small and is outweighed by the benefits.
'The risk is higher the longer you take it, and the risk is higher with combined HRT compared to oestrogen-only HRT.
'Taking HRT is a very personal decision and, as such, it's vital that everyone has the information they need on the benefits and risks, discusses them with their GP or specialist team and is supported to make the choice that's right for them.'
Separate research has previously linked HRT tablets—which are less commonly used in the UK—with an increased risk of blood clots and strokes.
One in seven women in the UK are diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime around 56,000 a year—making it the most common cancer in the UK.
The figure stands at roughly 300,000 annually in the US. Around 85 per cent of women diagnosed with breast cancer survive more than five years.
Earlier this year, however, a shock NHS survey found women are avoiding mammograms because they are worried about being topless, think it will hurt, or haven't found a lump.
Figures show that currently a third of women asked for screening do not attend. That rises to almost half of women who are invited for the first time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump dubbed himself the ‘father of IVF' on the campaign trail. But his pledge to mandate insurance cover has disappeared
Donald Trump's vow to expand in vitro fertilization (IVF) access to millions of Americans is on hold, with White House officials backing away from plans to require Obamacare health plans to include the service as an essential health benefit, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The Post reported that White House officials have privately moved away from the prospect of pushing for legislation to address the issue despite it being one of Trump's signature campaign promises, citing two persons with knowledge of internal discussions in Trumpworld. A senior administration official also acknowledged to the newspaper that changing Obamacare to force insurers to cover new services would require congressional action, not an executive order. The president has governed largely by executive fiat in his second term as he grapples with a closely-divded Congress and an unruly GOP majority in the House of Representatives. He's used those executive orders to dismantle whole parts of the federal government, including USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The president even tried to take an axe to the Department of Education, though that battle is still being waged in the courts. The Supreme Court recently cleared the way for Trump to cut roughly a quarter of the agency's staff. But many of Trump's campaign promises lie outside of his ability to influence via the hiring or firing of people and redirection of agency resources or agendas. In 2024, he laid out no direct path for his goal to expand IVF access, only telling voters that insurance companies would be forced to cover it. Still, he proclaimed himself the 'father of IVF' at at Fox News town hall, and promised during an NBC News interview: 'We are going to be, under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment. We're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay.' At the time, there was little to no acknowledgment of the fact that many if not most conservatives still oppose the Affordable Care Act and the same healthcare exchanges which Trump was now promising to utilize as he sought to use the power of the federal government to expand healthcare coverage. Now, with the passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' without any provisions expanding IVF access, and with the prospect of further policy gains before the midterms growing dimmer, it's unclear when the White House would have another chance to press the issue in Congress. In February, the president signed an executive order directing his advisers to 'submit to the President a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.' It's been crickets on the issue since then. In 2024, many of Trump's critics and the media pointed out that the policy would essentially amount to a reversal or at the very least coming in sharp contrast to the first Trump administration's efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which ended in failure, and a contradiction of the conservative view that government should not exercise that level of control over Americans' health care decisions. The president's promise thrilled his party's natalists, embodied by Vice President JD Vance and an army of right-wing immigration hawks who fear the changing American demographics brought on as a result of falling birth rates and high levels of migration. It also wowed some of his Democratic and left-leaning critics, who see the policy as a means of furthering their goal of expanding access to healthcare for poorer Americans. For Vance, the issue of declining U.S. birth rates predates his MAGA heel-turn. In 2019, he told a gathering of conservatives in Washington: 'Our people aren't having enough children to replace themselves. That should bother us.' 'We want babies not just because they are economically useful. We want more babies because children are good. And we believe children are good, because we are not sociopaths,' the future vice president added at the time. Two years later, he'd tell a right-leaning podcast: 'I think we have to go to war against the anti-child ideology that exists in our country.' During the 2024 campaign, those views emerged again as Vance attacked Democrats as 'childless cat ladies' and leaned heavily into attacking the left for supposedly being anti-family. Progressives fought back, pointing to efforts to expand the child tax credit and other benefits that aid young families under Joe Biden and other Democratic administrations, including the passage of Barack Obama's signature law: the Affordable Care Act.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ancient 250-mile mystery blob is headed straight for New York City
A massive blob of hot rock underneath New England appears to be part of an ancient 'wave' that's moving towards millions of Americans in New York. Scientists said this nearly 250-mile blob called the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA) is roughly 125 miles underground, stretching across Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. A team from the University of Southampton in the UK and the Helmholtz Center for Geosciences in Germany found it using seismic tomography, a method that's like taking a CT scan of the Earth. Unlike typical hot spots near volcanoes, this blob is far inland, hidden beneath the ancient Appalachian Mountains, and it's still moving south, towards New York and New Jersey. Until now, these kinds of mysterious underground formations have only been seen near volcanoes or around the border of tectonic plates. However, New England isn't near either of these. Researchers concluded that it's part of a slow-moving 'mantle wave,' a chain of sinking and rising rock set in motion over 90 million years ago when North America split from Europe near the Labrador Sea, which sits between Canada and Greenland. The NAA's slow creep of roughly 12 miles every million years suggests it will reach New York City in about 15 million years. However, the new study noted that this immense moving blob is not alone, and older blobs could be part of an ongoing 'drip' of heavy rock sinking like a glob of syrup in water under the US. Tom Gernon, lead author of the study and Professor of Earth Science at the University of Southampton, said: 'This thermal upwelling has long been a puzzling feature of North American geology. 'It lies beneath part of the continent that's been tectonically quiet for 180 million years, so the idea it was just a leftover from when the landmass broke apart never quite stacked up.' This discovery has challenged the idea that the eastern US is a 'geologically dead' area, hinting that similar drips, like the Central Appalachian Anomaly (CAA) further south, may have shaped America's mountains millions of years ago. 'The 'mantle wave' refers to a newly-discovered chain reaction of convective instabilities in the mantle that begins when a continent starts to rift,' said Gernon. The study author and his team found that the NAA was likely formed by a Rayleigh-Taylor instability, a process where the mantle became unstable during an ancient breakup of the tectonic plates. The breakup caused a 'drip' of denser material sinking into the mantle, pulling lighter, hotter rock upward to create these blobs, where earthquake waves move slower due to the hotter, less dense rock. This may contribute to fewer earthquakes in the Northeast because the blob creates a softer, more flexible mantle that absorbs tectonic stress, reducing the chance of sudden crustal breaks. However, geologists have noted that the region's overall stability generally comes from its old, thick crust formed long ago. The team's findings, published in the journal Geology, revealed the NAA is currently located near the boundary of a deep geological structure formed by the Laramide Orogeny, suggesting its position is influenced by an ancient tectonic breakup. The Laramide Orogeny, active around 1.5 million years ago, was a period when the Earth's crust was compressed and folded, creating major mountain ranges like the Rockies and leaving a thickened layer of crust beneath parts of the eastern US. By linking the NAA's current position to a tectonic feature from millions of years ago, the study revealed how past continental shifts guide today's underground movements, baffling scientists who thought the eastern US was geologically stable. 'These 'drips' migrate inland over time, away from the rift. We think this same process might explain unusual seismic patterns beneath the Appalachians. The timing lines up perfectly,' Gernon explained to Newsweek. The researchers also proposed that the drips are part of a chain reaction, where one sinking blob triggers another, moving inland over millions of years like a slow underground conveyor belt. For example, the Central Appalachian Anomaly, found in parts of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, is likely an older drip from this same chain, formed around 135 million years ago. 'It's not a literal wave, but a progressive flow and deformation of mantle material that behaves like a wave in how it propagates,' Gernon noted. Study authors said this process might still be active, as the mantle continues to shift slowly, potentially creating new blobs in the future, though limited seismic data from areas like Newfoundland makes it hard to confirm if newer drips exist yet.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a relationships expert: these are the commonly missed signs that your female friends are TOXIC (and how to cut them off)
I have gone through more friendship break-ups than I care to admit and, controversially, I believe that makes me a better friend. It might even keep me younger too. A study last week revealed that toxic friendships cause premature biological ageing, comparable to that triggered by smoking. New York University found that social exchanges with so-called frenemies can cause chemical changes to DNA by keeping the body in a state of high stress.
