Publish district-wise list of 65 lakh deleted voters in Bihar draft rolls with reasons: SC tells EC
The list should be displayed on the websites of the state's district electoral officers and chief electoral officer, the court said.
The court said the poll body must also state the reason for each deletion, such as death, migration or double registration.
Sharing the list as well as the reasons for deletions will improve 'voter confidence' in the institution, the Supreme Court added.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi passed the directions in response to petitions challenging the voter roll revision in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, expected in October or November.
The draft roll published on August 1 showed that 65.6 lakh names were removed from the list. Of these, 22 lakh were due to deaths, 36 lakh were of people who had permanently shifted or were untraceable and seven lakh were duplicate entries, the Election Commission had said then.
During the hearing on Thursday, Kant said that the poll body should issue a 'layman-friendly' notice informing the public where they can find the list of deleted voters and name the website, Live Law reported.
'If Poonam Devi has been omitted, Poonam Devi must be able to know that she has been deleted and why she has been deleted,' the judge said.
Kant added that the documents should be searchable based on Elector Photo Identity Card numbers.
Scroll had reported on Saturday that the Election Commission had replaced the digital draft voter lists in Bihar with scanned images of the voter lists on its official websites.
The digital draft lists are machine-readable and easier to analyse for errors and patterns on a large scale. The scanned versions make this process harder.
On Thursday, the court also directed the Election Commission to specify in public notices that the excluded persons, at the time of submitting their claims for inclusion in the final list, can also furnish their Aadhaar cards.
'Your list of 11 documents seems citizen-friendly, but Aadhaar and EPIC [Electoral Photo Identity Card] are readily available,' Live Law quoted Bagchi as saying. 'Your notice can say that those who have not submitted [their claims] so far, they can submit their Aadhaar and EPIC also.'
These two documents were not among the poll body's 11 accepted proofs of identity. Several petitioners had objected to the exclusion of Aadhaar, the most widely held ID, from the list of permissible documents calling it ' absurd '.
The court has directed the Election Commission to take these steps by Tuesday.
Bihar voter roll revision
The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24.
As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote.
Voters born before July 1, 1987, were required to show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, had to also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents.
Those born after December 2, 2004, needed proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents.
The draft voter list, published on August 1, comprises electors who submitted their enumeration forms to the poll panel between June 24 and July 26.
They will now have to produce proof of citizenship to make it to the final list that will be published on September 30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: What will PM Modi's 12th Independence Day speech focus on?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will deliver his 12th consecutive Independence Day address to the nation on Friday from the Red Fort premises. In the centrepiece annual event, the PM is expected to lay out his government's agenda, present its report card, make important policy and programme announcements and speak on major national issues. While Modi spent most of the time of his speech reeling out statistics about the work done by his government in multiple sectors over the last decade, calling for faster reforms and promising to work harder in his third term, the few ideological and political points he made stood out. Reframing the BJP's demand for a common civil code to do away with the Muslim personal law as a call for a 'secular civil code', Modi said India has had a 'communal civil code' for long. 'The Supreme Court has repeatedly discussed a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India. It is true that the civil code that we have is a communal civil code. It is based on discrimination. It is our duty to fulfil the vision of our constitution makers,' said the PM. The framing was a well-thought-out answer to the Opposition's accusation over decades that the BJP wants UCC because it wants to replace the Muslim personal law on issues such as marriage and inheritance that affect the Muslim community. Recalling that the Constitution placed the vision for UCC in the Directive Principles of State Policy and that the state should strive towards it — Article 44 talks about the need for it — Modi painted the opponents of the idea as the backers of a 'communal' civil code, using the language of the Opposition to hit out at it. In a clear hint that he would not change his politics because the BJP had fallen short of a majority on its own, Modi had called for simultaneous elections at the Lok Sabha and the state Assemblies. He pointed out that the Ram Nath Kovind Committee, which had been set up to study the idea's feasibility, had given a good recommendation for the same. This time, the PM faces two challenges. One, a tense trade standoff between India and the US after President Donald Trump imposed tariffs of up to 50 per cent on India even as bilateral negotiations continue for a deal. Two, the Opposition's growing protests against the Special Intensive Roll (SIR) exercise in Bihar. All eyes will be on the PM's response to these two key discussions. In her first detailed public remarks on Operation Sindoor, President Droupadi Murmu Thursday hailed the country's 'steely resolve' in responding to the Pahalgam terrorist attack and pointed to how the world has taken note of India's stance on fighting terror. Addressing the nation on the eve of the 79th Independence Day, President Murmu said, 'I believe Operation Sindoor will go down in history as an example in humanity's fight against terrorism.' In her 22-minute address, the President also dwelt at length on India's resilience amid stress in the global economy, and the contribution of farmers and workers towards the country's GDP growth. 'In the economic field, our achievements are all the more noticeable… With a GDP growth rate of 6.5 percent in the last fiscal, India is the fastest growing among the major economies in the world,' Murmu said. 'Even amid stress in the global economy, demand at home is pacing ahead. Inflation has remained under control. Exports are rising. All key indicators show the economy in the pink of health. This is as much due to carefully calibrated reforms and sagacious economic management as due to the hard work and dedication of our workers and farmers,' the President said. On Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack, the President said, 'This year we had to face the scourge of terrorism. Killing innocent citizens on holiday in Kashmir was cowardly and utterly inhuman. India responded in a decisive manner and with steely resolve. Operation Sindoor showed that our armed forces are prepared to meet any eventuality when it comes to guarding the nation… With strategic clarity and technical capability, they destroyed terrorist hubs across the border.'
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
J&K HC fixes Sept 26 for hearing MLA nomination case
The Jammu and Kashmir high court on Thursday granted time to petitioner Ravinder Sharma, J&K Congress spokesperson, to file a rejoinder in the MLA nomination case and fixed its next hearing on September 26. Senior Supreme Court lawyer Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi is representing Sharma in the case. (File) 'In the significant case regarding the nomination of five MLAs to J&K assembly , the HC on Thursday fixed September 26 as next date for hearing while allowing the petitioner and others to file rejoinder if any, before the court adjudicated the matter,' said Sharma in a statement issued here. A division bench comprising justice Sanjeev Kumar and justice Rajesh Sekhri on Thursday accepted Sharma's plea and allowed him and others to file rejoinder before the next date of hearing. Following response of the Union home ministry before the J&K HC describing nomination of five MLAs to the legislative assembly as it's prerogative, petitioner Ravinder Sharma on August 11 had said that he will file a rejoinder to the reply submitted by the Centre before the HC fixed the date for the final hearing. Senior Supreme Court lawyer Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi is representing Sharma in the case. Sharma further said that as a petitioner he has challenged provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act that allow the LG to nominate five MLAs without the aid and advice of the council of ministers and in excess of the sanctioned strength of the J&K Assembly—114 members (90 elected and 24 reserved for PoJK). 'The five nominations are over and above the total strength of 114, which is wrong,' he asserted. 'Moreover, such nominations can turn a minority into a majority, or a majority into a minority, which goes against the basic structure of the Constitution', he added.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Impose Trump's illogical tariff on China, US importers too: Amitabh Kant
Former NITI Aayog CEO and G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant on Thursday termed the additional 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Indian goods as "totally arbitrary" and lacking "any logic," urging that India should consider imposing similar duties on other countries, including US, which still imports critical minerals from Russia. "India should never bend. We should look at a long-term perspective. The Prime Minister has invested a lot in this relationship with the United States over the last decade. We should adopt a long-term perspective and ultimately win the game against the United States," Kant told ANI. He pointed out that other major economies, such as Turkey, the EU, and China, also import significant quantities of energy and minerals from Russia or China. "A 25 per cent tariff is arbitrary. It is not comprehensible to me because then you should also be imposing a 25 per cent tariff on China and Turkey. But you should also be imposing it on Europe, which is a very major importer of gas from Russia, and you should also be imposing it on many of the importers in the United States, as the United States is importing a lot of critical minerals from Russia; all critical minerals are still being imported from China. So it doesn't stand to any logic," he said. Kant also urged India to maintain its strategic autonomy and energy security in the face of proposed US tariffs, saying that India should prioritise its national interests and not compromise on its energy security, especially considering that India's oil imports from Russia are significantly lower than those of China or Turkey. The US has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. "I'm a believer that India should not compromise on its energy security or its strategic autonomy. We are here for a long-term game, and we must win the long-term war. My belief is that we built up a relationship with the United States over two and a half decades, which was bipartisan. And this attempt to put a 50 per cent duty does not stand to logic because we import oil," he said. Earlier, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India, citing matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws. He claimed that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had termed the US move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," and said New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
