Two saved after climbing down cliff for dropped phone, California officials say
The rescue took place between Mile Rock Beach and Deadman's Point on Saturday, June 7, the San Francisco Fire Department said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.
The visitors were enjoying a view of the Golden Gate Bridge when one dropped a phone over the edge at about 3:30 p.m., firefighters reported on Instagram.
They climbed down the cliff after the phone and became stuck, firefighters said.
Rescuers used ropes to save the two in an operation that took about one hour, the department said. The tourists were not injured but were issued a ticket.
They could be fined up to $300 apiece, SF Gate reported.
The visitors are from Seattle, KRON reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Mom-of-Three Hits Her Limit at In-Laws'—Her Decision Changes Everything
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A mom has no regrets after leaving her in-laws' lake house five days early with her three children. Every summer, Kelly Hubbell (@mysagehaus) and her three children—6, 4 and 2—make the long trek from Portland, Oregon, to her husband's family's lake house in Northern New York. "It's beautiful, nostalgic, and full of people we love," Hubbell, 37, told Newsweek. "But it's also a lot; a five-hour flight, two-hour drive and a ferry." Kelly Hubbell stares at the camera on a flight, left, with her daughter and son sitting next to her, right. Kelly Hubbell stares at the camera on a flight, left, with her daughter and son sitting next to her, right. @mysagehaus In the past, Hubbell said that she tries to go with the flow and will show up with a smile on her face. However, this summer, she reached her breaking point. She was sick, her toddler had just learned to crawl, and routines were completely off. "And then came a six-hour BBQ on the water," Hubbell said. "With three kids going in three directions and no one else actively on duty, I was maxed out. So, we made the call to leave five days early." Predictably, the family was surprised by the mom's swift exit. Her husband was also disappointed but, ultimately, he was supportive and understanding of Hubbell's decision. The mom of three spoke of the invisible pressure that often comes with these annual trips. "Like many women in a partnership, I've often felt a quiet pressure—whether internal or societal—to be the one who keeps the peace, makes things work and doesn't rock the boat," Hubbell said. "I feel a responsibility to make sure everything runs smoothly for everyone." It is the kind of emotional labor many moms silently shoulder until, as Hubbell said, they just can't anymore. Hubbell publicly shared her reasons for leaving the lake house early in a reel on Instagram, which has amassed thousands of views. Many moms on the platform understood her decision, posting messages of support. "Congrats to you for being strong enough to know your mental health matters more than societal stigma," one user wrote. "I get it! We just returned for a family (of 20) vacation. Not just our routines … but your own space!! We love them dearly but we do things differently," another commented. However, it also sparked fierce debate in the comments. "Most of the harshest comments came from men, and they all carried the same message: moms should be quiet; grateful; do it all without complaint," Hubbell said. "But I won't be quiet. Because every time I speak up, more moms [message] me to say, 'Thank you for saying this out loud.'" The experience only solidified Hubbell's commitment to her broader mission: supporting mothers before they burn out. She is the founder and CEO of Sage Haus, a company helping families hire house managers, meal prep chefs and family assistants. And what is Hubbell's message for other moms? "You are not failing because you need help," she said. "You are functioning in a broken system, and if something isn't working, you're allowed to say so. You're allowed to walk away. You're allowed to protect your peace."
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
'Fawning' is Gen Z's new fight-or-flight response
Meg Josephson grew up as a people-pleaser. Raised in a home she describes as volatile, she remembers monitoring her father's reactions, desperately trying to smooth tensions over. "Being a perfectionist and being kind of always on was very protective for me," Josephson told Business Insider. "It was the one thing in my control to kind of keep my dad's moods at bay." Once she left home, however, she realized that people-pleasing was her default response, even when no one was actually mad at her. It was when she started going to therapy herself that she learned how much she relied on the fawn response to fear — placating instead of entering fight, flight, or freeze. Healing from her fawning inspired her to become a therapist. Now, she said, many of her Gen Z clients and social media followers seem to especially struggle with people-pleasing. "Social media and digital communication have played a huge, huge, huge role in the Gen Z fawn response," Josephson said. Online life magnifies rejection and makes it so much easier to seek validation, meaning Gen Zers with people-pleasing tendencies can get stuck in a never-ending, approval-hunting loop, she said. Josephson titled her upcoming book " Are You Mad at Me?", out August 5, because she hears it so often in everyday conversations. Luckily, being a people-pleaser isn't a fixed trait, she said. Even Gen Zers can shed that identity — if they're willing to let it go. Warpspeed rejection The classic precursor for people-pleasing is if you were If being raised in a dysfunctional environment s or by emotionally immature parents. contributes to people-pleasing behavior, That wouldn't make Gen Zers are not a unique generation. Reactive or abusive parents have existed forever. Still, it's the online world Gen Zers grew up in that primes them to feel abandoned more often, triggering a need for reassurance that their relationships are stable. "There are so many ways to connect now, and because of that, there are so many ways to feel forgotten," Josephson said. While past generations were limited to in-person interactions, letters, or phone calls, Gen Zers can feel validated — or rejected by — so much more. Their best friend not "liking" their Instagram photo. A crush leaving their DM on read. A group of their friends posting a Snapchat without them. This can lead them to fawning, which Josephson considers "almost a more modernized threat response" compared to fight or flight. An unanswered text may not be frightening enough to trigger physically running away, but it can pressure someone to send more clarifying texts in the frantic hope that their friend isn't upset with them. The fawn response, at its core, is "I need this external validation to know that I'm safe," she said. To complicate matters even more, online life is both rife with posts about how people should behave and opportunities to be misunderstood. "We don't hold a lot of room for nuance because we want digestible, short, snappy information," Josephson said. She said one of the first steps to healing is realizing that we're all inundated with high expectations, heightening "this ridiculous standard that we hold ourselves to internally." An endless supply of reassurance Perpetual people-pleasers might fall into a common trap: rampant reassurance-seeking. It can look like texting "Are you mad at me?" to a friend or asking your partner if they're still into the relationship. Validation-seeking can become a cycle because "we're getting this relief for a split second," Josephson said. But done in excess, it can strain relationships, she said. Disorders like relationship OCD, for example, can manifest as constantly needing positive feedback from a romantic partner — an ultimately unsustainable dynamic. Some people ask the group chats to weigh in on their Hinge date, post about their friends in anonymous forums, or even consult ChatGPT. Still, Josephson said that too much outsourcing is a bad idea. AI, in particular, is a dangerous crutch. ChatGPT "does have the intelligence to validate, but because it's not a real relationship with a real person, there's a limitation," Josephson said. The chatbot may empathetically respond with all the reasons your friend probably isn't mad at you, but probably won't tell you that you're asking that question way too often. There are over 140 million TikTok posts about being a people-pleaser. While social media posts can help identify and relate to a problem, they can also nudge people into viewing their people-pleasing as a permanent personality trait. Josephson said that she works with clients to move away from labels that can keep them stuck. "It's not an identity, but rather it's a self-protective pattern," she said. "It's this younger part of you that has learned to be on high alert to manage people's moods as a way to protect you, but that doesn't mean you always need protecting now." One of the best starting points is pausing — putting the phone down or taking a beat in the middle of a heated conversation. A moment of mindfulness, "even if it's just for 10 seconds," can help you acknowledge the fear without immediately reacting to it, Josephson said. "If you're oversharing because you want to feel understood, pause. What do you actually want to say, versus what's coming from a place of fawning?" Done consistently, this practice becomes the stepping stone for other habits, like tolerating discomfort in a conflict or setting boundaries. You might still end that pause in the same place — worrying that you've unknowingly angered someone. The difference is in what you'll do next.
The Verge
2 days ago
- The Verge
X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM.
Posted Aug 1, 2025 at 7:09 PM UTC X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM. It's a relatively narrow legal defeat, though. The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court ruled that X — Twitter, at the time of the lawsuit — isn't protected by Section 230 for failing to report known child sexual abuse material to authorities, nor for designing a bad system to let users flag it. (It hasn't been held liable for either; that will be argued later.) But the court found Section 230 blocked claims that it 'amplified' CSAM by failing to scrub offending hashtags, and it said the controversial FOSTA exception didn't come into play. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Adi Robertson Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Speech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Twitter - X
