Shocking Antarctica discovery sends climate change deniers into mass celebration
Scientists have made a shocking discovery in Antarctica that has climate change deniers claiming there's now proof global warming is just a hoax.
Researchers from Tongji University in Shanghai found the frozen continent suddenly reversed its decades-long trend of catastrophic melting and actually gained record amounts of ice in recent years.
Although the Antarctic Ice Sheet had been losing ice at an alarming rate for nearly two decades, between 2002 and 2020, that trend sharply changed in 2021.
From 2021 through 2023, the study found unusually 'intense snowfall' in Antarctica helped build up layers of fresh ice, an event that also caused sea level rise to slow as well.
The world's sea levels have been growing in height as ocean temperatures rise and more glaciers melt due to global warming, threatening to flood major coastal cities worldwide.
Overall, scientists found that this three-year climate reversal cut the annual rise in global sea level rise by nearly 15 percent, a significant difference.
Before this recent change in Antarctica, the study calculated that the ice sheet lost about 120 billion tons of ice per year over the previous two decades. Between 2021 and 2023, the continent gained roughly 108 billion tons of ice each year.
While the researchers noted that the surprising results only reflect a temporary change in Antarctica's weather patterns that could eventually change back, climate change skeptics quickly pounced on the findings on social media.
'Ice grew in Antarctica! Climate change is a hoax!' one person said on X.
'LOL, climate crisis my butt. Antarctica has more ice now than ever before,' another climate skeptic wrote.
'Climate Crisis?' You mean that there is too much ice building in Antarctica?' a sarcastic X user added.
The scientists who made the discovery found that, between 2021 and 2023, abnormal weather patterns brought more moisture to the continent, especially the Eastern half of Antarctica.
These patterns were likely caused by shifts in winds or storms, possibly influenced by climate changes, but the study authors made sure to note that this change was an 'unprecedented' event.
Despite the historic gains in ice growth throughout Antarctica from 2021 to 2023, the study revealed that the continent suffered a net loss of 1.848 trillion tons of ice over the last two decades.
This ice loss added about 5.99 millimeters (roughly a quarter of an inch) to global sea levels by February 2020.
The connection between snow melting and sea level rise has real consequences. Rising sea levels can flood coastal cities, erode beaches, and harm ecosystems.
Recent studies have argued that climate change is the major driving factor for flooding problems in major cities like New Orleans, which is now sinking as that entire Gulf Coast area erodes.
In fact, climate scientists have warned that the rising sea levels triggered by melting Antarctic glaciers has now put over two dozen cities at higher risk of sinking over the next three decades.
Despite the evidence that climate change is doing widespread damage, a University of Cambridge professor said skeptics still have a valid argument about so-called 'climate alarmists.'
Mike Hulme told DailyMail.com that climate alarmists have created so much distrust and ill will among the public by blaming almost all of society's issues on the climate emergency.
'Climate change is cited as the sole explanation for everything going wrong in the world. Drought, famine, flooding, wars, racism – you name it. And if it's bad, it's down to global warming caused by humans,' Professor Hulme said.
'I disagree with the doom-mongers. Climate change is not like a comet approaching Earth. There is no good scientific or historical evidence that it will lead to human extinction or the collapse of human civilization,' the professor of human geography added.
To Hulme's point, the new study revealed a much more complicated picture of what's happening at the South Pole.
While this study and others have uncovered trends linked to climate change, such as ice melting speeding up and oceans becoming hotter, the same research can find wild swings where temperatures drop and appear to debunk those trends.
From 2021 through 2023, scientists said the main reason Antarctica was able to rebuild so much of its ice was because of 'large precipitation anomalies' - or massive snow totals that can't be counted on year after year.
Just like in other regions that get snow throughout the world, blizzards don't strike every single year like clockwork, which is why the scientists believe this reversal may be a temporary event.
While climate deniers are taking a victory lap right now, the study published in Science China Earth Sciences still showed a concerning trend developing throughout the 21st century.
The study noted that the second decade of the 21st century (2011-2020) saw twice as much ice loss compared to the first (2002-2010).
This dramatic increase in melting was driven by ice loss in West Antarctica and increasing losses in East Antarctica's Wilkes Land and Queen Mary Land.
Meanwhile, the stunning turnaround between 2021 and 2023 was driven by massive snowfalls in East Antarctica, particularly in areas like Dronning Maud Land and Enderby Land. This also helped driven down sea level rise to 5.10 millimeters by 2023.
Despite gaining ice overall, West Antarctica actually continued to lose ice due to warm ocean water melting glaciers from below - contributing to sea level rise.
The study estimated that if all the ice in East Antarctica's Wilkes Land melted, it could raise sea levels by over 171 feet.
Even smaller losses, like those from the continent's Totten glacier (12.8 feet of potential rise), could have major impacts around the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
NASA shelving social media accounts as budget fears grow
NASA is consolidating its social media presence, reducing over 400 accounts to 35 to improve user experience and messaging. NASA's social media accounts, including those for the Mars rovers and Voyager spacecraft, have assured followers that their missions will continue despite the changes. Some social media followers worried that streamlining communications may make it more challenging to engage with NASA, while others saw it as a necessary step to improve content quality. The consolidation comes amid concerns about potential personnel reductions and a proposed budget that slashes funding for science programs by nearly 25 percent. The proposed budget would cut funding for space missions, climate monitoring satellites, and the Mars Sample Return mission, leading to criticism from scientists who warn of devastating consequences for space exploration and research.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Peanuts or almonds? Rice or millet? Planet-friendly grocery shopping choices go beyond cutting meat
It's one of the most impactful climate decisions we make, and we make it multiple times a day. The U.N. estimates about a third of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, the main driver of climate change, come from food. That pollution can come from several links in the food supply chain: how farmland is treated, how crops are grown, how food is processed and how it's ultimately transported. Maybe you've already heard the short answer to minimizing your diet's impact on the planet: eat more plants and fewer animals. The data backs up that suggestion. Emissions from meat-rich diets are four times higher than that of vegan diets. But so much focus on meats overshadows many other food choices that also impact the environment and can contribute to global warming. Here is a look at other important grocery store decisions: Proteins Swapping one serving of chicken per day for beef cuts a diet's emissions nearly in half. Ruminant animals such as cows, sheep and goats are the top drivers of emissions. Those animals "are associated not only with nitrous oxide emissions, but they're also related to direct methane emissions because they burp them up while they digest food,' said Marco Springmann, professorial research fellow in climate change, food systems and health at University College London. Springmann said processed animal products have a higher impact on the planet, too: 'You need 10 times the amount of milk to make one unit of cheese.' So — and this is true of most food groups — the less processed the food, the smaller the environmental impact. Plant-based proteins like legumes, beans and nuts all boast a much lower climate impact. Grains The standout here is rice, and not in a good way. ' Rice uses a ton of water. It uses gobs of fertilizer. There's flooded rice paddy fields, and that water actually breeds all kinds of bacteria, and those bacteria produce methane gas,' said eco-dietitian nutritionist Mary Purdy. Purdy said the most planet-friendly alternative is just eating a bunch of different grains. 'The wheat, corn and soy world is very, very familiar to us because we've been seeing it. It's been heavily marketed. When was the last time you saw a commercial for millet or buckwheat?" she asked. Diverse diets, Purdy said, incentivize biodiverse agriculture, which is more resilient to erratic weather — a hallmark of climate change — and makes healthier soil. Fruits and vegetables When it comes to produce, minimizing impact is less about choosing between foods and more about buying based on the way that food was grown. Conventionally grown produce 'very likely is using pesticides, fertilizer, and maybe more water because the soil isn't healthy,' said Purdy. Purdy said organic labels, such as Regenerative Organic Certified, indicate those foods had a smaller climate impact when they were grown. The tradeoff is that organic food has a lower yield, so it requires more land use and is often more expensive. Local and 'in season' foods also have a smaller climate impact, but not just for one of the reasons you may be thinking of: emissions from international shipping. Every day, thousands of large ships transport goods, including produce, around the world, and the fuel they use is heavily polluting. However, "it's mostly those local emissions on trucks that are actually impactful, not the international shipping emissions," Springmann said. Also, food grown nearby tends to be grown in a way that fits with the local climate and is less harmful to the environment. "We're not trying to grow oranges in some place in a greenhouse,' Purdy said. Butter and oil Plants win out over animals, again. Vegetable oils are less impactful than butter or lard. Springmann also said tropical oils are healthiest in moderation, such as those from coconuts or palms, because they have a higher fat content. Plus, palm oil is associated with deforestation. As for nut butters, almonds might be a great option for limiting carbon emissions, but they require a lot of water. One study out of Tulane University found that a serving of peanuts has an emissions footprint similar to almonds but 30% less impact on water use. Don't waste food Throwing less food away might sound obvious, but roughly a third of food grown in the U.S. is wasted. Meal planning, freezing leftovers and checking the fridge before heading to the grocery store all help cut waste. 'The climate impact, the embedded water use, all of the labor and different aspects that went into producing that food, that all gets wasted if we don't eat it,' Blackstone said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The real-life Day After Tomorrow: Scientists reveal exactly how COLD Britain will get if the Gulf Stream collapses - with some areas plunging to -30°C
The UK could be plunged into a deep freeze with temperatures dropping as low as -30°C if climate change triggers a Gulf Stream collapse, experts have warned. For years, scientists have sounded the alarm over the potential effects of global warming, from increased droughts to catastrophic floods. But one scenario bears a stark resemblance to the film The Day After Tomorrow, in which parts of Britain could experience temperatures more common in northern Canada. Researchers examined how Europe's climate could be affected if the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) were to substantially weaken in conjunction with 2°C of global warming. Their analysis revealed that temperatures could plunge to -30°C in Scotland, while Edinburgh would spend nearly half of the year with a minimum temperature of below 0°C. London, meanwhile, would experience cold extremes of -19°C and record over two months' worth of additional days with sub-zero temperatures compared to the late 19th century. Expanding sea ice could cover parts of the British Isles, and there would also be increased winter storms, they warned. The AMOC is the large-scale ocean circulation in the Atlantic Ocean that plays a crucial role in regulating both the global and European climate by redistributing heat through the ocean. There is growing concern that the AMOC, of which the Gulf Stream is a part, may weaken or collapse under future climate change due to an influx of freshwater. In the new study, researchers used a complex climate model to simulate a range of scenarios in which the circulation system substantially weakens by more than 80 per cent, while also including the effects of global warming. They warned urgent action must be taken in an attempt to avoid these 'dangerous tipping points'. 'The relatively mild climate for a city such as Edinburgh would see drastic changes,' Michiel Baatsen, co-author of the study, said. 'For example, it would experience 164 days with minimum temperatures below zero, that's almost 50 per cent of the year, and an increase of 133 days compared to the pre-industrial climate. 'The Scandinavian climate would become much colder under such a scenario, with even Norway's typically mild west coast potentially experiencing extremes below -40°C — a drop of 25 degrees compared to the pre-industrial climate.' The researchers explained that summer temperatures are not significantly affected by a weaker Atlantic Ocean circulation, although some places would see a slight increase in warm extremes or summer temperatures. As a result, the contrast between summer and winter becomes greater, with much colder winters. There was an unusually cold winter recorded in Europe 15 years ago. Pictured, a driver tries to dig a car out from under the snow in Allendale, Northumberland, January 5, 2010 What is the AMOC? The Gulf Stream is a small part of a much wider system of currents, officially called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation or AMOC. Described as 'the conveyor belt of the ocean', it transports warm water near the ocean's surface northwards - from the tropics to the northern hemisphere. When the warm water reaches the North Atlantic (Europe and the UK, and the US east coast), it releases the heat and then freezes. As this ice forms, salt is left behind in the ocean water. Due to the large amount of salt in the water, it becomes denser, sinks, and is carried southwards – back towards the tropics – in the depths below. Eventually, the water gets pulled back up towards the surface and warms up in a process called upwelling, completing the cycle. Scientists think AMOC brings enough warmth to the northern hemisphere that without it, large parts of Europe could enter a deep freeze. Beyond temperature effects, previous studies show that a weaker circulation system would also lead to less precipitation in Europe, along with faster sea-level rise in the Atlantic Ocean. 'Continued greenhouse gas emissions put us on a path to further extreme climate impacts, leading to more heatwaves, droughts, and other extreme weather events,' René van Westen, lead author of the study, said. 'The longer we keep burning fossil fuels, the worse these will get. At the same time, every fraction of a degree of global warming brings us closer to the collapse of the AMOC. 'Our new study shows that this would take Europe to the other extreme - a freezing cold future.' 'Policymakers must take heed - urgent and drastic cuts to greenhouse gas emissions are the only way to mitigate the most catastrophic impacts of the climate crisis and prevent the devastating consequences of an AMOC collapse on society.' Commenting on the study Gareth Redmond-King, Head of International Programme at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: 'A collapse of the AMOC, a critical ocean current, would tip the UK's current temperate climate into something like the cold of northern Canada, seriously reducing the land suitable for growing crops, and putting our food security in serious danger. 'Cutting emissions to net zero is the only solution we have to averting the most dangerous impacts of climate change. Dr Bablu Sinha, Leader of Climate and Uncertainty, Marine Systems Modelling (MSM), National Oceanography Centre, said the results are 'physically plausible' and in line with previous modelling studies. Professor Jon Robson, Research Fellow at the National Centre for Atmospheric Science at the University of Reading, added: 'A collapse in the strength of the AMOC would have serious implications, including for people living in Europe. 'This research adds to a growing worry that a collapse in the strength of the AMOC could mean sharp drops in European winter temperatures and increases in winter storminess across Northern Europe, even in a globally warming climate.' However some experts urged a sense of caution. Dr Alejandra Sanchez-Franks, Senior Research Scientist at the National Oceanography Centre, said: 'While these modelling studies are of great value to our community, it is important to be aware that our observational ocean records have not yet captured a tipping point, so the results of this study and their immediate impact on the real world must be interpreted with caution.' The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, was carried out by researchers from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and Utrecht University.
