It will be an ‘insult' if Fianna Fáil don't enter presidential race, says Mary Hanafin
should run a candidate in the
presidential election
, and it will be 'an insult' to the office if the party does not enter the race, former Fianna Fáil minister for education Mary Hanafin has declared.
'I firmly believe that the largest party of the country, which is the largest at local level, largest at national level, should be running,' said Hanafin, who has made clear her desire to be the party's candidate.
Speaking at the Patrick MacGill Summer School in Glenties, Co Donegal, Ms Hanafin said: 'First of all, I think it's an insult to the office of president if you're willing to run for everything but you won't run for the office of president.
'Secondly, I think you have an obligation to give the people of Ireland a choice. Because it is the politicians who give you that choice,' said Hanafin, who has yet to receive public support from senior Fianna Fáil figures.
READ MORE
Saying that the theme of her campaign, if nominated, will be resilience, she said: 'I think my life experience is such that a word that actually has come up an awful lot here tonight is something that I would bring as my platform, which is resilience.
'I think I have been lucky enough, despite all of the knocks that we all experience, to bounce back each time,' said Ms Hanafin, who emphasised the 30 years of experience she has had as TD, minister, councillor.
People in
Northern Ireland
should not be allowed to vote in presidential elections, she said: 'Not yet, and not in isolation. I think there's not enough understanding between communities within Northern Ireland and North-South.'
Pointing to controversies during last week's Orange Order bonfires, including
the burning of effigies
, she said: 'There's still a journey to go before we get any kind of real understanding and real political understanding.'
The Government's
Shared Island
programme, which bids to improve North-South co-operation, should be progressed 'to break down the boundaries', she told the Patrick MacGill Summer School.
Saying that President Michael D Higgins is 'loved' by the public, Ms Hanafin said: 'The Irish people of all ages love their president, love their president, and that starts because they voted for their president.
'There is that sense of ownership. Even younger people under the age of 35 who could never get to be president until they're 35, just look at the way they love Michael D, particularly, and they respond to him,' she said.
Continuing, she said: 'He pushed the boundaries in talking about world problems, but he didn't go beyond it. He didn't go beyond his constitutional role, and I think that the next president, or any president, should not start where he has finished.
'You bring it back to the start again and push your own boundaries. Because times change, issues change, problems change. The debate that you want to generate, the campaign that you're quietly launching can be done within that Constitution.'
However, the next occupant of the Áras should not conflict with the Taoiseach and the Government: 'I think there is a wisdom in not overstepping the independence because you do not want to have a Taoiseach and a president in conflict about where a country stands.'
Meanwhile, Seán Gallagher, who twice ran for the presidency, said his legacy will be that no other presidential candidate will be treated by RTÉ in the way that he was treated in 2011, when his campaign was derailed in the final stages by a false tweet.
Ruling himself out of the race
, he said his life had moved on, but he expressed concern at the reluctance of so many to come forward because they feared they would be 'annihilated' in a campaign that has become bruising in recent years.
Mr Gallagher declared, to applause, that: 'The thing that frustrates me is negativity. I hate negativity because I want to say to people, 'Stop running down our country. Let's talk about the good things.'
'Let's stop being victims in our own lives. What can we do with our own careers, our own families, our own communities, our own country? Why are we afraid? Because we're inhibited by this Irish psyche that says, 'Don't get notions. Don't get above your station.'
'I say to hell with that. Get above your station. Be the best that you can be,' he said, 'there is a mentality in Ireland, and it is to take us down, to take each other down rather than build each other up.'
The next president should take the lead in selling Ireland abroad, said Mr Gallagher: 'We could have a president on the stage attracting foreign direct investment into Ireland.'
Equally, the winner of the election later this year could lead Ireland's effort to attract tourists and students to come to Ireland, 'or tapping into the 40 million Americans and the global diaspora'.
Pointing to his experience of watching
Mary McAleese
in Shanghai, he said: 'The power when the president walks into a room of business leaders in China is beyond anything that you would experience here because we are so close to the president.'
Referring to his first run in 2011, Mr Gallagher said: 'It's not lost on me that ... 14 years later one of the greatest challenges the country has is from a president who is an entrepreneur, a TV personality and in real estate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Almost €100bn expected to be invested in Ireland's infrastructure over next five years
Almost €100 billion is expected to be earmarked for investment in infrastructure between now and 2030 under plans being finalised by Government. Senior Coalition figures met on Saturday as work continues on the revised National Development Plan (NDP) which is due to be unveiled on Tuesday. The Irish Times understands that as much as €30 billion in extra funding is set to be added to the NDP. That is up from a previously mooted sum of around €20 billion – bringing the overall sums to be spent over the next five and a half years to almost €100 billion. The Government's coffers have been boosted by the proceeds of the Apple tax case and sale of AIB shares . READ MORE The plans are being billed within the Coalition as one of the largest ever capital expansion programmes in the history of the State. The goal is to transform capital infrastructure over the next decade with housing, water, energy and transport all being prioritised for investment. There will be a significant focus on scaling up housing delivery by providing big 'once in a generation' capital funding into Úisce Éireann , ESB and EirGrid. The key utilities' difficulties in delivering services to new housing developments has been identified as a significant barrier to scaling up housing. A source said: 'This will be critical investment in key infrastructure to drive growth for the future'. [ We need to face up to the fact that not all middle-earners are squeezed Opens in new window ] Tuesday's publication is expected to set out departmental capital ceilings to 2030 and overall capital investment to 2035. Deliberations for finalising the NDP are to continue on Monday in advance of a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers is expected to tell Cabinet colleagues that there is profound uncertainty around global trade and the threat of tariffs by US president Donald Trump poses significant risk to Ireland's economy. He will say the best way to way to safeguard the economy and to protect growth, jobs and living standards is to address the country's infrastructure deficits through focused investment in the key growth enabling sectors of the economy. Ministers will also be briefed on work being progressed to reform the country's delivery systems so that project life cycles can be reduced and better value for money can be achieved. Ministers will outline the specific programmes and investment they will prioritise as part of Budget 2026 in October.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
We need to face up to the fact that not all middle-earners are squeezed
While we have all been focusing endlessly on the latest Truth Social post from Donald Trump, the Coalition has been having backroom rows about its budget plans . Serious ones. A key document which sets the framework for the budget – the Summer Economic Statement – will be published next Tuesday. And alongside it will be the Government 's updated investment spending plans in the revised National Development Plan (NDP) . The game, in other words, is on. When you see the Independents who support the Government being filmed for the RTÉ News going to talk to senior ministers, you realise there is some good news coming and kudos to be sought for a new road or rail upgrade. But there will be tough calls, too. And it is no exaggeration to say that Tuesday will be a key moment for the Government as it signals a change of budgetary direction. The Coalition is going to go all in on State investment – energy, water and housing in particular. The catch is that to afford this, it is going to have to keep much tighter control on day-to-day spending and also end the once-off giveaways which have been a feature of the last few budgets. It will sell the message of restraint now allowing for investment for the future. Bread tomorrow is never an easy strategy to sell to voters – but that is what the Coalition is going to try to do. There will still be some extra cash in the budget for State services and welfare and – probably – a modest tax package. Talk of a 'tough budget' is nonsense – look at France where spending cuts, tax hikes and cutting two bank holidays were put on the table this week. But Irish voters have become accustomed to their budget day goodies – and there is going to be one heck of a political row when the penny drops that they are not going to feature this October. READ MORE Given the risks ahead and the State's reliance on tax payments from a few multinationals, the brakes do need to be put on. Spending has soared and Departmental targets set in the budget are regularly exceeded. Central Bank researchers estimated in June that permanent Government spending has risen by a hefty 37 per cent since 2021. Had the 'rule' to limit State spending growth to 5 per cent been adhered to, the increase would have been 16 per cent. There has simply been little culture of spending control and reinstating it is not going to be easy at a time when demands on public services are growing. Meanwhile, 'once-off payments' – repeated so often now that the term is an offence to the English language – have a serious budget price, costing more than €2 billion in the last package, which was a reduction on earlier years. The most expensive elements have been the universal payments to all households in areas like energy credits in the annual cost-of-living packages. Budget ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers have been saying there will be no cost-of-living package this year ; for now, at least, it seems that the rest of the Cabinet are signed up to this. Ministers will spot the political dangers. Households have started to get used to the annual boost and will feel a bit less well-off. The Opposition will scream. But continuing to throw out the universal once-off payments would be a poor use of money, benefiting many for whom the cash is nice, but not necessary. Better to use what funds are available to build up permanent supports and improved services, focused on those who need them. The cost of living is high , for sure, but it is a farce to portray all households as 'hard-pressed', or everyone in the middle ground as 'squeezed'. Effective policy should help those who genuinely are – like many younger families – through better services in areas like childcare and health, rather than repeating the annual cash giveaways. [ Government 'feckless' with public money, Social Democrats claim in budget row Opens in new window ] Meanwhile, with the sums tightening considerably , the Coalition's 'solemn promise' – as Simon Harris put it – to cut the hospitality VAT rate back to 9 per cent is looking like a 'repent at leisure' moment. Even if this is restricted just to food businesses, it will cost €550 million a year. When other demands are being turned down and 'restraint' is the message , this is not going to be an easy sell for the Coalition. The all-in bet on State investment is driven by a view in Cabinet that housing, water and energy provision have all reached a crisis point – an argument being hammered home to them by big investors. Tariffs and Trump are the most discussed threat to future investment – and do indeed pose fundamental questions. But if Ireland does not put forward a plan to develop infrastructure, then investment is going to drift away, whatever happens in the White House. [ Focus in Budget 2026 has to be on transforming infrastructure, Martin says Opens in new window ] This will be mightily expensive. As well as controlling spending elsewhere, the Government will have to run down its annual budget surplus – and there are some risks here. However, it is still legally obliged – barring a downturn – to keep putting cash away in two funds designed to support future spending and investment. As well as finding the cash, the Coalition has to show it can actually deliver big projects – and more housing – an area where the previous administration performed poorly. And it needs to heed the warnings from the Central Bank and the Fiscal Council that if the State keeps pumping out cash across the board, then it will just add fuel to an economy already at full capacity, making it even harder to deliver on the infrastructure programme. Having had a stumbling and slow start, the Government is about to roll the dice for the rest of its term. Its more serious players will know that threats from across the Atlantic could damage the favourable economic position and budget outlook, and might require mid-flight adjustments in these plans. There will be some reassurance that there is €30 billion in cash and liquid assets down the back of the State couch, but also a realisation that if the trends change fundamentally this only goes so far. But sitting and doing nothing does not look like a clever strategy. Investment is the right direction for the Government to take. It will all come down to delivery. And to a bit of luck that Trump's policies, while inevitably damaging, do not upend things completely.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
As abortions triple, when will we admit that reluctant repealers were profoundly wrong?
Strange, isn't it, how often this pattern repeats? We are assured in stentorian tones that not only is something never going to happen, but it is scaremongering and manipulative even to suggest that it will. Then we are told that it has happened, and furthermore, it is unequivocally a good thing. Before the repeal of the Eighth Amendment, we were assured that all that would happen was that a similar number to the 2,879 women who travelled to England and Wales in 2018 would no longer have to do so. Then-tánaiste Simon Coveney believed the argument, though he said 'removing the equal right to life of the unborn from our Constitution [was] not something I easily or immediately supported'. In an oped, he said any woman choosing abortion after a three-day waiting period and other safeguards 'is very likely to have travelled to the UK or accessed a pill online in the absence of such a system being available in Ireland'. He and other reluctant repealers were promised that numbers of abortions would not rise rapidly and inexorably. The latest abortion figures show 10,852 abortions in Ireland in 2024 . There were 54,062 live births in 2024 . For every five babies born alive, one was aborted. READ MORE Is there no number of abortions that would be unacceptable? If one in two pregnancies was ending in abortion, would that be too many? UK Department of Health figures show the number of women giving Irish addresses for abortions halved between 2001 and 2018, with a 5 per cent drop from 2017. Numbers were dropping before Repeal, in other words. Even allowing for the tiny number in 2018 of Irish-based women having abortions in the Netherlands and those using illegal abortion pills, the rise in numbers of abortions is shocking. Some 55,000 of them have taken place in Ireland since Repeal. The reality is that restrictions on abortion reduce abortion numbers. US advocacy group Secular Pro-life has a useful summary of the evidence. Many studies claiming restrictive abortion laws don't lower rates overlook socio-economic factors. Most countries with strict laws have low economic development, and poorer nations tend to have higher abortion rates. This important confounding factor is often ignored. As a relatively wealthy liberal democracy that banned abortion, our abortion rates were much lower. Abortion numbers can triple, and still Ireland refuses to acknowledge that the reluctant repealers were wrong, wrong, wrong. The Eighth was saving lives in the thousands. We collect statistics on where abortions happen in Ireland and under what part of the legislation, and virtually nothing else. We seem to have zero interest in the reasons why women have abortions – whether it is poverty, lack of support, or housing. Is that because we don't want to look too closely at anything that might undermine the idea that abortion is just another healthcare procedure? At some level, people know well that abortion is unlike any healthcare procedure. English singer Lily Allen recently sang a flippant parody of My Way about not knowing exactly how many abortions she had. It was probably five. Many pro-choice people were shocked. The comments on the BBC video of the podcast she hosts with Miquita Oliver, who has also had 'about five' abortions, showed the conflict people felt. Some pro-choice people felt that by saying the only justification needed for abortion is 'I don't want a f**king baby', she had handed ammunition to the anti-abortion advocates. [ Breda O'Brien: Ableist legislation shows lives of those with Down syndrome are less valuable Opens in new window ] Others disagreed, with comments such as: 'It's important to support any abortions for any reason. If you start putting restrictions on who can have them, how many they're allowed, and how they must act when they've had them ... well, you're not pro-choice.' I am not interested in dumping on Allen or Oliver. Allen has spoken about losing her virginity at 12, about a 19-year-old friend of her father's who bought her drinks and 'had sex with me' when she was 14, and about living through her teens to her 30s in a haze of drugs, alcohol and mental ill-health. (By the way, we have no idea how many women are coerced into abortion, even though domestic violence campaigners tell us it happens in Ireland, including one under 18-year-old who was locked in a room and forced to take abortion pills.) Allen and Oliver are not alone in joking about abortion. Irish comedian Katie Boyle has a comedy show about her experience of having an abortion aged 34 in the US, which caused the presenters of the Morning Show on Ireland AM to laugh. Nonetheless, most people still react with shock when abortion is treated as contraception – or a joke. It reminds me of debating in the past with people who were adamantly pro-choice, who visibly flinched when the number of babies with Down syndrome who are aborted was mentioned . Their humanitarian, pro-disability rights instincts conflicted with their other deeply held beliefs about the right to choose to end early human lives. The problem is that while bans and restrictions on abortion did decrease rates, those of us who consider ourselves pro-life depended on the legal ban while underestimating how the culture was changing. To keep abortion figures low in a well-off democracy, we needed to persuade people to build a woman-friendly society where pitting women's rights against the next generation's right to life became an unthinkable and completely outdated dilemma. The failure to do so really is no laughing matter.
