Dublin-based social media body to cover Instagram
The Appeals Centre Europe, a Dublin-based social media appeals body, has announced that it has expanded its scope and is now hearing cases relating to Instagram.
This is in addition to its previous remit, which covered Facebook, TikTok and YouTube.
The centre opened in November 2024 and began issuing decisions in late January.
It hears disputes from people and organisations in Ireland and across the European Union about decisions by social media platforms relating to issues such as the removal of content.
In March, the centre said it had received more than 1,500 disputes from people across the EU looking to challenge the decisions of platforms.
The issues were most likely to be about potential violations of platforms' rules on adult nudity, followed by bullying and harassment, and restricted goods and services, which govern how users can mention products like drugs and alcohol.
The decisions are non-binding but the Appeals Centre said Meta has already started implementing its findings, adding that it will release more information about this in its first transparency report which will be published by the middle of the year.
The Appeals Centre has been certified by the media regulator Coimisiún na Meán as an out-of-court dispute settlement (ODS) body under the EU's set of online safety rules, the Digital Services Act (DSA).
The start-up funding for the Appeals Centre has been provided through a one-time grant from the Meta Oversight Board Trust but the centre has insisted that it will be independent of Meta.
Once it is up and running, the new Appeals Centre will be funded through fees charged to social media companies for each case.
In the future, users who raise a dispute will be asked to pay what is described as a 'nominal fee' of €5, which is refunded if the centre finds in their favour.
The Appeals Centre said it will operate as an independent regulatory body that will provide an alternative to often costly and time-consuming legal routes to redress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
40 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Institutional investment in Irish property down 80%, Central Bank says
Institutional investment in residential real estate in Ireland fell by 80 per cent in 2023 and 2024, according to the Central Bank . 'Inward capital flows and equity financing for new residential development have fallen markedly,' the bank's director of financial stability Mark Cassidy said at the launch of the regulator's latest Financial Stability Review. Changes to the global financial system from higher interest rates and increased uncertainty were of particular concern to the residential rental sector here, he said. Mr Cassidy noted that inward investment in residential real estate in Ireland averaged €450 million a year in 2023 and 2024 compared to an average of €2.5 billion in 2021 and 2022. READ MORE 'The availability of this type of equity financing is particularly important for meeting supply targets for residential property over the medium term,' Mr Cassidy said. Changes announced this week to the State's system of rent controls were primarily designed to attract foreign capital. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 The Government's new plan will permit landlords to reset rents at market rates when tenancies end instead of being tied into 2 per cent increases under the former Rent Pressure Zone (RPZ) rules. Asked for his view on the changes, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf said the regulator had not had the time yet to adequately assess the changes. 'But we do know – from international experience – rent controls have an impact on housing supply,' he said. In its review, the Central Bank warned rising geopolitical tensions, shifts in global trade policy, and higher economic uncertainty have increased risks to the Irish financial system. 'As a small open economy, with a high reliance on foreign direct investment from the United States, Ireland is particularly exposed to recent trade tensions and external macro-financial developments,' Mr Makhlouf said. 'In the short run, the main channel through which these developments are likely to affect the domestic economy is uncertainty as well as a reduction in external demand,' he said. Mr Makhlouf noted there had already been some softening in consumer sentiment while 'industry engagement points to cautiousness among companies, at least for now, in terms of new investments'. Any reduction in activity by US-owned multinationals, particularly 'in economically concentrated and trade sensitive sectors' such as pharmaceuticals and ICT, could affect employment, tax revenue and investment here, the governor said.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Against EU market rules to refuse Israel bond sales, says Makhlouf
The governor of the Central Bank will tell politicians that it cannot refuse to facilitate the sale of Israel war bonds as doing so would break EU capital markets rules. Gabriel Makhlouf is due to outline the position to the Oireachtas Committee on Finance and Public Expenditure this afternoon. In a written opening statement to the committee, which has been seen by RTÉ News, Mr Makhlouf is expected to say the Central Bank is "absolutely appalled" by what is happening in Gaza. However, he will say that "we are required to perform" certain actions under EU rules, and that "we are established by law, we are empowered by law, and we must always act within and in line with the law". Specifically, Mr Makhlouf will say that "one of the powers assigned to us is to perform the functions of a competent authority under the European Prospectus Regulation" and that "this means we must approve a prospectus once certain conditions are met". He will say that: "We are required to approve a prospectus where it meets the standards of completeness, consistency and comprehensibility under the legislation. "Our legal obligations are clear and we do not need guidance to follow them. "For the avoidance of doubt the Central Bank does not issue, sell, trade or list these bonds. And in the case of Israeli sovereign bonds, we do not authorise or supervise them and they are not listed on a stock exchange we regulate. "Under the Prospectus Regulation, it is up to the third-country sovereign to choose one EU member state to apply to for approval of its prospectus. "The competent authority of the chosen member state is then obliged to discharge the relevant duties within the Prospectus Regulation. In effect the Central Bank is carrying out a role mandated by EU law." Mr Makhlouf is also expected to say that while sanctions against Israel have been discussed in the Dáil, "the Central Bank has no mandate to impose sanctions on any state or person for breaches or alleged breaches of international law". He will say: "Unlike the EU sanctions against Russia after its invasion of Ukraine, the EU has not, at this time, adopted sanctions against the state of Israel. "The Central Bank would of course implement any sanctions adopted by the EU that are applicable to the Central Bank's functions, as we have with Russia." The Central Bank's meeting with the committee is taking place on the same day as the Dail votes again on whether to ban the facilitation of Israeli war bonds in Ireland. The cross-party motion was tabled during the Social Democrats speaking time this morning, with a Government counter-motion outlining the actions the Coalition has taken so far due to be voted on tonight. During this morning's debate, Social Democrats deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan said "genocide, let's be clear, is taking place with the sale of Israeli war bonds" and that the Central Bank should "stop facilitating these bonds". He was supported by a number of party colleagues, including Gary Gannon, who said he believes the Government's view is that "genocide is happening but Ireland must do nothing to affect GDP". Sinead Gibney said whatever the rules may be "we have to try" as it could create a "domino effect" among other countries. Sinn Féin Spokesperson on Finance Pearse Doherty described the Government's position as "shameful", alongside party colleague Sean Crowe, who responded to recent Coalition comments that Ireland's position is leading to tangible results. "Gaza is flattened to the ground, people are starving, and you say you're getting tangible results?," he said. "Ireland cannot be a conduit for blood money." Labour TD Ged Nash said regardless of EU rules Ireland should not facilitate Israeli war bonds and should instead "challenge the state of Israel to take us to the international courts", a view repeated by Solidarity-People Before Profit TD Ruth Coppinger and Independent TD Catherine Connolly who said Government is engaged in "cognitive dissonance". Responding to the Opposition's remarks, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said there were "far more issues we agree on than do not agree on", before saying if he "refrained from charges of naivety" against some opposition TDs, then he would like them to "refrain from charges or complicity or collaboration" against Government. Minister Donohoe said Government is in his view working "relentlessly" to "build a diplomatic coalition" on the issue, and outlined a number of measures the coalition has taken so far. Responding to the key point being discussed, he said: "I want to again set the record straight, the Central Bank does not oversee the sale of Israeli war bonds" and that the opposition motion "wouldn't be consistent with EU law, it would undermine our obligations with the EU". That view was also outlined by a number of Government TDs, including Fianna Fáil TDs Paul McAuliffe and Robert Troy. Independent TD Barry Heneghan, one of a number of Independent TDs who are supporting Government, voted against the coalition on a similar motion last month. During the Dáil debate, he said the world is witnessing "one of the darkest moments in modern history" in Gaza. He said when a person living in his constituency, who is from Gaza and whose relatives are still there, asked him what Ireland is doing to end the violence, "I couldn't look him in the eye and say I was doing all I can". "We've all seen the images. Gazan children are being starved to death, in full view ... It's not about a technicality, it's about us doing the right thing," Mr Heneghan said.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says US will get magnets and rare earth minerals in China trade deal
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will get magnets and rare earth minerals from China under a new trade deal and that tariffs on Chinese goods will go to 55%. In return, Mr Trump said the US will provide China 'what was agreed to', including allowing Chinese students to attend American colleges and universities. Several global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labour through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from the far-western Xinjiang region of China, an international rights group said on Wednesday. The report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labour practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities. Hotan, in western China's Xinjiang region (Andy Wong/AP) The report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labour transfer programmes,' in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a long-standing campaign of assimilation and mass detention. Commercial paints, thermos cups and components for the aerospace, auto and defence industries are among products sold internationally that can trace their supply chains to minerals from Xinjiang, the report said. It said that companies must review their supply chains. 'Mineral mining and processing in (Xinjiang) rely in part on the state's forced labour programmes for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report said. The report came as China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, said that they have agreed on a framework to get their trade negotiations back on track after a series of disputes that threatened to derail them. The two sides on Tuesday wrapped up two days of talks in London that appeared to focus on finding a way to resolve disputes over mineral and technology exports that had shaken a fragile truce on trade reached in Geneva last month. Asked about the report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that 'no-one has ever been forcibly transferred in China's Xinjiang under work programmes'. 'The so-called allegation of forced labour in China's Xinjiang region is nothing but a lie concocted by certain anti-China forces. We urge the relevant organisation to stop interfering in China's internal affairs and undermining Xinjiang's prosperity and stability under the guise of human rights,' ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said. The named companies did not immediately comment on the report. A UN report from 2022 found China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where more than one million Uyghurs are estimated to have been arbitrarily detained as part of measures that the Chinese government said were intended to target terrorism and separatism. The Chinese government has rejected the UN claims and defended its actions in Xinjiang as fighting terror and ensuring stability. In 2021, then-US president Joe Biden signed a law to block imports from the Xinjiang region unless businesses can prove the items were made without forced labour. The law initially targeted solar products, tomatoes, cotton and apparel, but the US government recently added new sectors for enforcement, including aluminium and seafood. Many of China's major minerals corporations have invested in the exploration and mining of lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, in Xinjiang, Global Rights Compliance said. Xinjiang is also China's top source of beryllium, a mineral used for aerospace, defence and telecommunications, its report said. A recent report by the International Energy Agency said that the world's sources of critical minerals are increasingly concentrated in a few countries, notably China, which is also a leading refining and processing base for lithium, cobalt, graphite and other minerals.
