Ohio University closing diversity offices, women and pride centers
In a message to students, Ohio University President Lori Gonzalez said the university is closing its diversity offices as required by Senate Bill 1, which will go into effect in late June. Gonzalez said OHIO is eliminating all of its Diversity and Inclusion staff positions, and impacted staff have the opportunity to apply for other positions within the university or receive separation benefits. See previous coverage of Senate Bill 1 in the video player above.
'I hope you will all join me in recognizing and celebrating the lasting impact that the Division of Diversity and Inclusion – as well as all the staff members who have dedicated their time and talent to diversity and inclusion work at OHIO – will forever have on our University, on the students we serve, and on each of us,' Gonzalez said. 'We must work collectively to preserve the legacy of their work and carry it forever forward.'
The university is not removing any scholarships, as it already examined its diverse scholarships last year and ensured all were within compliance. The identity-relevant Templeton, Urban, Appalachian and Margaret Boyd Scholars programs are now moving to the Honors Tutorial College. Ohio University's LINKS program — a first year support program for students of cultural, social and location-based diverse backgrounds — will move to University College.
The Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine's Office of Inclusion will also be retired, with the college's Office of Student Affairs taking on additional responsibilities. The Office of Accessibility Services, Veterans and Military Students Service Center and Office of Civil Rights Compliance will not be affected.
Gonzalez said the university will need input from students, faculty and staff who are passionate about inclusion and belonging as they go forward. She said the university hopes to build new support systems for students that are compliant with the law and still make students feel welcome.
'I want to be clear that the task ahead for all of us is not to look for ways to recreate the same approaches under a different name,' Gonzalez said. 'Rather, the charge is to invent something new that meets the moment and delivers results for our students.'
The change is required under Senate Bill 1, which bars public universities from having any diversity, equity or inclusion programs on campus.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Thousands of National Guard troops in D.C. Is this the America we want?
There aren't many songs that drip with the dread Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young injected into 'Ohio.' Even today, the anthem's opening guitar riff is ominous, its whisper of cymbals is wounding, and the second guitar growls with anguish before the first lyric. Then Neil Young sings, 'Tin soldiers and Nixon coming. 'We're finally on our own. 'This summer I hear the drumming. 'Four dead in Ohio.' Now, 55 years later, we know what can go so wrong when the National Guard errs. We either remember the events of May 4, 1970, or we read in history books about how the Ohio National Guard shot and killed four unarmed students and wounded nine others at Kent State University that day. Now, 55 years later, governors in Ohio, South Carolina and four other states so far have said they'll send National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., at the direction of President Donald Trump to combat crime in the capital the administration considers out-of-control even if that's up for debate. As in any city, the perception of danger in the nation's capital varies depending on where you rest your head at night and what you're doing. There are surely areas that are not as safe as others. There are surely concerns that need to be addressed. The question is: Should they be addressed by the National Guard troops of South Carolina, especially during hurricane season? Gov. Henry McMaster announced his authorization of the deployment of 200 S.C. National Guardsmen 'to support President Trump in his mission to restore law and order to our nation's capital' on Saturday. He noted two details that directly and wisely addressed potential criticism. McMaster said the feds would pay for this deployment under a government code section called Title 32, which is good news for state taxpayers if not Americans in general. And as Hurricane Erin spun off our coastline, McMaster also said, 'Our National Guard will work to assist President Trump's mission, and should a hurricane or natural disaster threaten our state, they can and will be immediately recalled home to respond.' That would be essential. A day later, Christale Spain, the chairwoman of the state Democratic Party, called the governor's deployment 'reckless' and didn't stop there. 'The gall of Henry to think so little of our friends, neighbors and loved ones as to send our heroes away during the very time they are most needed here at home is a disgusting act of betrayal,' she said. 'Our men and women in uniform aren't political pawns. They deserve respect, and their first duty is to protect South Carolina families, not to serve as props for a political stunt hundreds of miles away.' Luckily, Hurricane Erin wasn't expected to make landfall along our coast as it heads north. But this week, lifeguards in Hilton Head were advising people not to be more than ankle-deep in the ocean because of rip currents, and evacuations were being ordered not too far away in North Carolina's Outer Banks. Of course, the issue has become divisive with Republicans urging Trump on and Democrats calling Trump's federal takeover of police in the nation's capital political theater. The arriving troops hail from the red states of West Virginia, South Carolina, Ohio, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee. In all, six GOP governors have pledged a total of 1,145 to 1,245 troops to work alongside another 800 Trump controls in D.C. That's 2,000 soldiers suddenly on patrol in the streets of the nation's capital. Others governors have declined the administration's request to send troops. Vermont Republican Gov. Phil Scott said no because he, in the words of his chief of staff, 'does not view the enforcement of domestic law as a proper use of the National Guard.' Maryland Democratic Gov. Wes Moore said no because to him the mobilization 'lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous.' On Aug. 14, the Army said the National Guard's initial mission in D.C. was 'to provide a visible presence in key public areas, serving as a visible crime deterrent' and that 'they will not arrest, search or direct law enforcement' but will 'have the authority to detain people temporarily. The Army said weapons would be 'available if needed' but remain in the armory. On Aug. 16, a White House spokesman framed the mission at least a little differently, saying the National Guard troops 'may be armed' but would not be making arrests 'at this time.' As we all know, missions change. This week, The Washington Post interviewed locals in D.C. about the boosted military presence and surveyed residents to find eight in 10 oppose the federal patrols on the streets. 'Absolutely unnecessary,' one said. 'Totally being done to distract attention from the Epstein files.' 'I don't feel safe with the possibility of untrained FBI agents and military personnel who are untrained to do police services patrolling our streets,' another said. 'We don't need the National Guard who I can't imagine what they're going to do because we all know they're not trained for this sort of thing, whereas the Metropolitan police are.' The criticism isn't affecting the Trump administration's approach. The other day, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, 'President Trump will not be deterred by soft on crime Democrats and media activists who refuse to acknowledge this rampant violence on our streets. He is going to make our nation's capital the most beautiful and safe city on Earth.' McMaster sent 200 of South Carolina's about 11,000 total troops. West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said 300-400 troops would 'restore cleanliness and safety to Washington, D.C.' Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said 150 would 'carry out presence patrols and serve as added security.' Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said 135 would help 'return safety and sanity.' Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves said 200 would do 'an excellent job enhancing public safety and supporting law enforcement.' A spokesperson for Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee said 160 would 'assist with monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities, and traffic control.' Governors have long deployed National Guards troops in and out of their states, such as at the southern U.S. border, to assist presidents requesting aid. The reality is presidents can seek to deploy the Guard as they want, and often do. Of note, of course, is that President Trump did not call the National Guard to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, the day more than 140 police officers were assaulted during a crime against the U.S. Capitol building and the very idea of democracy. But the South Carolina National Guard helped keep the peace during Democratic President Joe Biden's 2021 inauguration and during Trump's this year, so we also know what it looks like when the National Guard handles its duties well. It can be of service in large missions with lots of agencies, helping Americans in and out of their respective states in times of emergency or need. In January 2025, the outgoing U.S. attorney for the district, Matthew M. Graves, issued a news release proclaiming total violent crime in D.C. was the lowest it had been in over 30 years. 'A central component of this strategy has been targeting those crews who have preyed upon certain neighborhoods in our community, often operating drug trafficking networks in these neighborhoods,' the release said. 'These proactive investigations and prosecutions have yielded immediate reductions in violence that have had lasting impact.' It's that last part that matters most to people living in those neighborhoods: Lasting impact. But now the Trump administration has called the accuracy of those statistics into question and the district's new U.S. attorney, Jeanine Pirro, has now launched an investigation into them. As recently as April, Pirro's predecessor, interim U.S. attorney Ed Martin Jr. cited them to credit Trump with a year-to-date drop in D.C.'s violent crime of 25%. Here's the thing: While everyone is seeing what they want to see in D.C. crime numbers, no one is seeing the details. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the White House is sharing information daily on how many arrests have been made in the nation's capital, but it is keeping details secret about each arrest that typically are released in D.C. and nationwide following an arrest for any crime. This is the most troubling aspect of the federal intervention and it should be troubling to everyone regardless of political affiliation. 'The lack of specificity creates circumstances in which it is hard to say who is being arrested and who's arresting them,' The Washington Post reported. 'Meanwhile, Trump continues to tout the progress of the operation — progress that, without publicly available arrest data, is difficult to measure.' While the White House releases a tally of arrests each day, it is not sharing anything resembling a standard public incident report that includes the location, date and description of the offense. That is unacceptable, and Americans in South Carolina and every other state should be outraged. How long will this last? It's unclear. By law, the president can intervene in D.C. via his 30-day emergency declaration, but a longer military presence in the nation's capital would require an act of Congress, which seems unlikely. This is not an America any of us recognize or many of us want. No one should simply accept this at face value without asking questions. The big questions now are where is the National Guard being deployed, what are the details of this crackdown on crime, how long will it last and what happens when the troops leave? There are other questions, of course: Are armed troops patrolling the streets of Washington, D.C. a new reality? Will arrests continue to be made without any clear understanding of the process? It's impossible to know now whether this show of force will have a lasting impact on crime, but it's easy to be appalled at the optics and aghast at the secrecy. This is not four dead in Ohio, but it sure feels like the slow death of open government. Matthew T. Hall is McClatchy's South Carolina opinion editor. Email him at mhall@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Columbus-area Rep. Allison Russo to run for Ohio secretary of state in 2026
A top Democratic lawmaker will run for secretary of state in 2026. Rep. Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, announced her campaign Aug. 21, weeks after she stepped down from her position as House minority leader. Ohio's current secretary of state, Republican Frank LaRose, is term limited next year and running for state auditor. Russo told the statehouse bureau that she wants to restore public trust in elections and depoliticize the secretary of state's office. "I think there's a lot of justified distrust in many of these offices, especially the secretary of state, because time and time again this office has tried to manipulate voters," Russo said. "It starts there with taking the partisanship out of it, not putting thumbs on the scale." Russo is the second Democrat to announce a bid for secretary of state, setting up a primary if both candidates remain in the race. Cincinnati doctor Bryan Hambley launched his campaign in January and has the backing of Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, according to his website. Hambley welcomed Russo to the race, saying democracy thrives on a 'competition of ideas.' 'My fellow Ohioans have told me, loud and clear, that Ohio needs new voices in state government and a less partisan secretary of state,' he said in a statement. 'This is why I am running: to make our elections fair and ensure Ohioans can hold politicians accountable.' Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague, who is term limited in his current role, is running on the Republican side. "They are playing musical chairs because they've been blocked out of running for governor, which is what most of them wanted to do," Russo said of Ohio's GOP officials. "Regardless of who my opponent is, I'm in this to restore transparency and integrity back to the secretary of state's office." Russo was first elected to the Ohio House in 2018 − flipping what used to be a Republican seat − and served as minority leader for more than three years. She worked in health care policy before launching her career in public office. What does Ohio secretary of state do? The secretary of state wears multiple hats, chief among them being the role of Ohio's top election official. That person also sits on the Ohio Redistricting Commission and chairs the Ohio Ballot Board, which approves the ballot language for statewide issues. Russo credited LaRose for his focus on cybersecurity, but she contends he mismanaged the office in other ways. During his tenure, LaRose has faced criticism for voter purges and approving ballot language that differed substantially from the proposed amendments. LaRose is also a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump, who recently floated plans to crack down on mail-in voting and voting machines, Reuters reported. LaRose repeatedly says Ohio elections, which allow absentee voting by mail, are effective and secure. "Many of the actions that we see coming from the president of the United States have been to prevent people from voting, period, and to rig elections," Russo said. "I think Ohioans have seen the damage that gets done when elections are rigged." State government reporter Haley BeMiller can be reached at hbemiller@ or @haleybemiller on X. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Allison Russo launches campaign for Ohio secretary of state in 2026
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio State's President Carter said he invited Gorden Gee back to be his 'wingman'
When it became known that two-time former Ohio State President E. Gordon Gee was returning this fall, the question arose as to what brought him back to Columbus. Ohio State President Ted Carter made it clear — he wanted Gee on campus. Carter discussed Gee's return, political headwinds and more with Dispatch higher education reporter Sheridan Hendrix at a Columbus Metropolitan Club forum on Aug. 20 at the National Veterans Memorial and Museum in downtown Columbus. "He's gonna be something of an adjunct professor, but also, as Gordon and I agreed to, he's gonna be Ted Carter's wingman," Carter said to laughter from the crowd. "So, we're looking forward to having him." Ohio State announced on Aug. 19 that Gee would be making his return in a one-year consulting role, mainly working with the leaders of the new Salmon P. Chase Center, the John Glenn College of Public Affairs and Moritz College of Law. Per his contract, Gee will work directly with Chase Center Director Lee Strang to hire faculty and spread awareness about the "intellectual diversity center" across campus and beyond. During the forum, Carter shared that he's known Gee since his time in the U.S. Naval Academy, and the former Ohio State president served as a mentor to Carter throughout his tenure at the University of Nebraska during the COVID-19 pandemic. Carter said he had seen similarities between his and Gee's work as university leaders, and when he heard Gee was retiring, Carter picked up the phone. He clarified that Gee will serve in an adjunct professor-like role, adding that Gee was recruited by many other institutions, including "that school up north." "As I knew he was getting retired and seeing some of the legacy that he left here as a two-time president, I saw a lot of what I was trying to do in developing these standards of excellence here at Ohio State," Carter said. "He's 81 years old, and he's still got it." A "turbulent" time in higher education, and what Ohio State is doing to remain stable Carter said that while most Big Ten universities have stopped hiring and frozen budgets, Ohio State couldn't be more different. While acknowledging that Ohio State has lost tens of millions of dollars in research grants and is in a legal fight to earn some of that money back, Carter said the university received $1.6 billion in research funding for fiscal year 2024 and is already on track to exceed that amount this year. Carter added that the university is preparing to make investments in multiple academic programs, already having done so in nursing and veterinary medicine. He said Ohio State will increase the number of spots in its veterinary medicine program from 165 to 200 and attempt to double the number of graduates produced through its nursing program. It is in this spirit that Carter said while other universities are playing defense instead of offense, Ohio State is playing both. For Carter, it was clear that there was work to do regarding the higher education landscape even before the series of state and federal policy changes that went into effect following the election of President Donald Trump. He recalled a 2015 Gallup poll that showed only 57% of Americans surveyed had a high level of confidence in higher education. Then, in 2023, another Gallup poll was released and that 57% had dropped to 36%. This summer, the poll was conducted again, revealing what Carter said was an 11% increase in the American public's confidence in higher education. According to Gallup, the poll actually showed a 6% increase from 2023. Either way, Carter wasn't afraid to teasingly chalk it up to the Buckeyes. "Who's going to take credit for that?" he said. "I know the answer: Ohio State." How the passage of state Senate Bill 1 may change Ohio State When asked what on-campus changes students should expect this academic year as a result of Ohio Senate Bill 1's passing, Carter mentioned one specific program: Buckeye Commons. Through collaboration with faculty and student leadership, Carter said the university will launch Buckeye Commons as a replacement for the Center for Belonging and Social Change, which was shut down in February. The office will be a space for students to gather and seek help with various issues — namely mental health resources or finding an internship — much like the center originally did, Carter said. "Everything that could be associated with helping our students be successful is now what we built out of Buckeye Commons," Carter said. "That's the approach we're taking to make sure that we not only can attract and retain the best that we have, but that every single student who comes on our campus now has the opportunity to be successful." Reporter Emma Wozniak can be reached at ewozniak@ or @emma_wozniak_ on X, formerly known as Twitter. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Ohio State President Ted Carter talks Gee, SB 1 at CMC public forum Solve the daily Crossword
