Construction costs rise as tariff clock ticks
Dive Brief:
Construction input prices ticked up 0.2% in June, driven by increases in key materials such as copper and fabricated structural metal products, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Producer Price Index data.
Input costs now sit 2.1% higher overall and 2.5% higher for nonresidential construction compared to a year ago, according to the report. Through the first half of 2025, nonresidential prices climbed at a 6% annualized rate.
The June data predates the steepest tariffs set to take effect Aug. 1, leaving contractors bracing for more volatility as additional duties loom.
Dive Insight:
Contractors absorbed another round of steady cost increases in June, even before the most aggressive tariffs take hold later this summer, according to the Associated General Contractors of America.
Aluminum mill shapes climbed 6.3% over the past year, steel mill products rose 5.1% and lumber and wood products increased 4.8%, according to the report. More extreme increases hit certain structural steel components, including a 22.5% spike in fabricated metal for bridges and 8.3% for bar joists and rebar.
'The fact that construction materials prices are rising even before the steepest proposed tariffs have taken effect doesn't bode well for what will happen in August if the promised new tariffs are implemented,' said Ken Simonson, AGC chief economist. 'Rising construction costs and economic uncertainty are already causing some owners to put projects on hold, which will only get worse if costs jump again.'
The Trump administration raised steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% last month and plans to impose a similar 50% duty on copper on Aug. 1. Broader import restrictions also still remain under consideration.
At the same time, inflation appears once again to be gaining momentum. Core good prices, excluding automobiles, increased at their fastest pace since late 2021 in the June Consumer Price Index report, signaling additional risk for contractors on the horizon, said Anirban Basu, ABC chief economist.
'Nonresidential input price escalation has accelerated in 2025," said Basu. 'While it is unclear how and when trade policy will affect construction materials prices, the impact was evident in June's CPI release.'
Nevertheless, Basu said many contractors remain upbeat about their margins. That outlook may reflect federal tax changes under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which made 100% bonus depreciation permanent and helped offset some pressure from rising input costs.
'Economic uncertainty remains extraordinarily elevated,' said Basu. 'What is all but certain is that the Federal Reserve will not be cutting interest rates at its July meeting. Despite higher-for-longer interest rates and rising input prices, contractors remain relatively optimistic.'
Still, AGC officials warn confidence may erode if tariff-driven increases persist. If costs spike too sharply, more developers may choose to delay or cancel projects outright, according to the report.
'The construction industry is poised to benefit from greater tax certainty as well as the administration's efforts to streamline permitting and reduce needless regulatory burdens,' said AGC CEO Jeffrey Shoaf in the release. 'Finding a way to provide greater certainty on materials prices is the best way to make sure the new tax and regulatory approach have the best possible impact on economic activity.'
Recommended Reading
Construction costs jump at a 6% annualized rate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
11 hours ago
- Business Insider
U.S. introduces $250 visa integrity fee, raising barriers for African applicants
Visiting the United States is about to become significantly more expensive for African travellers, following a new policy that introduces a hefty $250 'visa integrity fee' for most nonimmigrant visa applicants. The United States introduces a $250 'visa integrity fee' for nonimmigrant visa applicants from African nations, significantly increasing visa costs. The fee, enacted under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, is non-waivable and in addition to existing visa-related fees. Critics argue the new policy creates financial barriers and may discourage travel to the U.S., especially for students, tourists, and business visitors from Africa. This fee is an inside part of the recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted by U.S. lawmakers on July 4, 2025, and is expected to take effect later this year. According to immigration legal firm Envoy Global, the new fee will apply to any foreign national issued a nonimmigrant visa, particularly from an African country, whether as a student, tourist, temporary worker or business visitor. The $250 "visa integrity fee" is non-waivable and non-reducible, and will be charged in addition to existing visa-related fees, including machine-readable visa (MRV) application fees, anti-fraud fees, and reciprocity fees. This means a single visa application for a Nigerian, Ghanaian, or Kenyan citizen could now cost as much as $500, excluding documentation and travel expenses. What this means for African tourists, students' applications African students applying for F-1 and F-2 visas, exchange visitors on J-1 and J-2 visas, and professionals applying for H1-B and H-4 temporary work visas will all be subject to the new levy, likewise African tourists visiting family or attending events in the U.S. will bear the increased cost. Notably, citizens from 42 countries, mostly in Europe, Canada, Bermuda, and a few Asian and Gulf nations, are exempt under the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. These travellers won't be affected if visiting for under 90 days. In contrast, African nations are entirely excluded from the program, perpetuating the continent's disadvantage in terms of access and mobility. As the U.S. prepares to host major global events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, experts warn that the recent visa fee hike could significantly reduce international attendance, particularly from countries in Africa, South America, Asia, and the Middle East. These countries already face long waiting periods and high visa denial rates, which could worsen with the added financial burden. Although the U.S. claims the funds from the fee will go into the Treasury's general fund, there's no indication that the money will be reinvested in improving consular services or reducing processing delays, a longstanding challenge for African applicants. Even while there are claims that the fee is refundable, there are no guarantees or clear mechanisms for reimbursement. Geoff Freeman, President and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, has strongly criticized the new rule, calling it "a self-inflicted wound." He emphasized the psychology behind the hike, stating that, 'These fees are not reinvested in improving the travel experience and do nothing but discourage visitation at a time when foreign travellers are already concerned about the welcome experience and high prices' For many Africans, including students seeking education, entrepreneurs pursuing U.S. business opportunities, families reuniting, or tourists exploring cultural exchange, the new fee presents both a financial barrier and a symbolic message. As global discussions on travel equity and visa reform continue, the U.S. appears to be moving in the opposite direction, erecting higher walls when the world is calling for more bridges.
CNBC
16 hours ago
- CNBC
An early lesson from this earnings season: Don't judge the quarter too quickly
The one-two punch of strong earnings and tame inflation helped propel the S & P 500 to a positive week — despite the latest tariff news on Friday putting a slight damper on the action. The broad index added 0.59% for the week led by technology, utilities and industrials, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq outperformed, jumping 1.51%. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average finished the week slightly in negative territory, down 0.07%, after falling 142 points Friday on a report that President Donald Trump was pushing for between 15% to 20% tariffs in any deal with the European Union. The main economic event of the week came Tuesday, with the release of the June consumer price index. The headline CPI reading tracked in line with expectations, rising 2.7% year over year. However, the core index, which strips out food and energy due to their higher levels of volatility, came in slightly below expectations at 2.9% versus 3.0% expected. It wasn't a perfect report, though. Importantly, the shelter cost index was up 3.8% year over year. While lower than what we saw in the 12-month period ending May 2025 and trending the right way, it's still above the overall rate of inflation. For that reason, it's problematic as the Federal Reserve looks to thread the needle between maintaining price stability — which requires higher rates to address issues like the rise in shelter costs — and keeping unemployment low. Fortunately, for the time being, labor market dynamics are on the Fed's side, with the unemployment rate coming at 4.1%, as of June, and initial jobless claims now falling for five straight weeks. As a result, the market, according to the CME FedWatch Tool , continues to believe the Fed will keep its benchmark lending rate steady at its late July meeting, though the base case remains that we will likely see two cuts by year-end. More good news on inflation arrived Wednesday when the June producer price index came in a bit below expectations on both the headline and core readings. Known as the PPI, the gauge tracks wholesale inflation and is seen as a leading indicator for the CPI given it provides insights into what producers of goods are paying for their inputs. If their costs are going up, that will ultimately feed into what we all see in stores. It's too early to make a final judgement on how much tariffs are trickling into consumer prices, even though the overall impact so far appears to be subdued. Beneath the surface of the CPI report, some tariff-sensitive goods categories, such as household furnishings and supplies, increased at rates above the headline level. At the same time, within the PPI report, we saw a 0.1% decline in final demand services that was more than offset by a 0.3% increase in final demand goods. Putting it all together, the tariff impact thus far has proven very manageable — for now. It's possible the impact grows over time. As a result, while we continue to think rates should ultimately come down, we don't think Fed Chair Jerome Powell would be wrong to keep rates where they are for now as we wait for another month of data to roll in. Other positive economic updates this week included a better-than-expected read on June industrial production and capacity utilization; lower-than-expected initial jobless claims for the week ending June 12; strong June retail sales, and slight beat on June housing starts. Earnings was the other big story of the week, and the results were overall supportive of the idea that companies are deftly navigating the tricky economic moment. As for Club earnings, we had some hits and misses, though no real thesis-changing events. On Tuesday morning, we were wrong in thinking Wells Fargo could increase its net interest income outlook. No denying it. However, the reason we aren't changing our view is because we like why we were wrong. Rather than focus on the net interest part of its business — which is highly dependent on interest rates and therefore more out of management's control — the team is pushing deeper into the fee-based side of the operation, which tends to be more predictable. After falling around 5.5% on the report Tuesday, shares of Wells Fargo gained 2.3% over the final three days of the week, which was nice to see after the initial market reaction. BlackRock also got clobbered when it released second-quarter results Tuesday, sinking 5.9%. While the asset management giant did miss on revenues, we argued the sellers were short-sighted and failed to appreciate things such as the strong organic growth in fee revenue. They also weren't considering the transformative acquisition of private credit manager HPS acquisition, which wasn't in the Q2 results because it didn't close until July 1. That deal stands to provide a significant boost to the business going forward. Indeed, our more optimistic read on BlackRock's report proved to be correct. The stock quickly bounced back, touching a fresh all-time intraday high Friday before closing modestly lower in the session. Our final financial of the week to report, Goldman Sachs produced very strong results. Despite a tepid stock reaction, investors shouldn't ignore the combination of excellent execution, high levels of excess capital, and an improving IPO and M & A environment in the back half of the year. As we work our way into 2026, those three factors support a higher stock price. Goldman sits about 2% off its all-time closing high of nearly $724 a share on July 3. Abbott Labs rounded out the week Thursday, reporting a top and bottom line beat with strong organic growth versus the prior year. However, shares took an 8.5% dive as management failed to increase its outlook for full year earnings, guided below expectations for current earnings, and shaved its outlook for full-year organic sales growth. It wasn't the kind of print we've come to expect from Abbott. However, we appreciate CEO Robert Ford coming on "Mad Money" to provide a closer look at the quarter and the path ahead. It bolstered our conviction to stick with the name. We're hardly alone on Wall Street, with many analysts coming out in defense of the stock Friday. In fact, analysts at Jefferies actually took the pullback as an opportunity to upgrade shares to a buy rating. Abbott shares added 2.6% Friday, clawing back a few of the bucks lost in Thursday's sell-off. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long WFC, GS, BLK and ABT. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs and Interest Rates Squeeze Construction Budgets
The Construction MMI (Monthly Metals Index) traded flat month-over-month, with no noteworthy price movement in either direction. Meanwhile, the U.S. construction industry is bracing for fallout from a new round of tariffs on key building materials. Industry groups warn that these tariffs, alongside persistently high interest rates, threaten to squeeze project budgets. Surging Costs for Steel, Aluminum and Other Metals As metal prices remain somewhat volatile, contractors nationwide report mounting cost pressures. Now that President Trump has announced more duties, including a 50% tariff on all copper imports, further cost spikes appear imminent. Ken Simonson, chief economist of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC), cautioned, 'It is likely that contractors will be hit with substantial additional price increases shortly, unless the tariffs are postponed or rolled back.' Such material inflation could strain profit margins across the construction industry. Many U.S. builders operate on thin margins (often <5%), so a jump of 5–7% in overall project costs can damage profitability. Industry estimates forecast that the 2025 tariffs could drive steel prices up by ~8.2% and aluminum by ~5.7%. As a result, total construction costs would rise 5–7%. Recent Producer Price Index data confirmed that essential products like structural steel beams, rebar and aluminum components are all more expensive. In fact, prices for aluminum mill shapes were nearly 10% higher this January than a year prior, while copper/brass mill forms surged over 12% year-on-year. Tariffs and Interest Rates Not only are material costs facing potential price spikes, but builders are also contending with a challenging financing environment. The Federal Reserve's 2022–2023 interest rate hikes took benchmark rates from near-zero to over 5%, the highest in decades. Although the Fed eased slightly with a few rate cuts in late 2024, bringing its key rate to about 4.25–4.50%, borrowing costs remain elevated. This means that commercial construction loans and mortgages are carrying 6–7% interest rates, roughly double the lows seen a few years ago. These higher rates have made it pricier for developers to finance new projects, adding another layer of cost on top of expensive materials. The Construction Industry Could See Good News Soon Fortunately, there is hope on the horizon. Cooling inflation earlier this spring prompted optimism that the Fed might cut rates later in 2025, potentially spurring construction activity. 'Due to a cooler-than-expected inflation reading in May, the chances of an interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve in 2025 have improved,' noted Anirban Basu, chief economist of Associated Builders and Contractors. Lower interest rates would reduce financing costs and could help offset the impacts of tariffs by boosting construction industry project demand. However, the latest data complicates that outlook. Inflation ticked up to 2.7% in June (a four-month high) as consumer prices began to reflect the new tariffs. Analysts warn that full tariff pass-through hasn't even hit yet, meaning inflation could rise further in the coming months. If tariffs keep price levels elevated, the Fed may delay rate cuts to avoid fueling more inflation, leaving builders stuck with high borrowing costs for longer. For procurement executives navigating these cross-currents, knowledge is power. MetalMiner's weekly newsletter provides timely market insights on metal price drivers and macroeconomic news, enabling teams to adjust their sourcing strategies in real-time. Sign up here. In the coming months, construction industry executives will be keeping a close eye on Washington and the Federal Reserve. For now, tariff policies remain fluid. For instance, a proposed extra 25% tariff on copper and lumber has been floated, but not yet enacted. Any such move could further jolt material markets and hit home builders (many of whom rely on Canadian lumber and Mexican gypsum) especially hard. On the monetary front, the consensus is that the Fed will hold rates steady for now. If inflation stabilizes later this year, a gentle rate cut or two is possible by late 2025. But until there's clarity, caution will rule. 'Our view is that continued investment into construction will remain cautious, for now,' said Michael O'Reilly of construction consultancy RLB. He went on to note that uncertainty around tariffs and policy changes is keeping developers in 'wait-and-see mode.' Ultimately, the combination of tariff-driven cost inflation and high interest rates is creating a careful balancing act for U.S. construction firms. As a result, industry leaders are focusing on cost control, strategic sourcing and contractual protections to weather the storm. Many are also leveraging data and forecasts to make smarter buying decisions. For example, some MetalMiner subscribers use customized price forecasting on MetalMiner Select to time their metal purchases and negotiate better with suppliers. By blending such tactics with prudent project planning, construction companies can strive to preserve their margins and keep projects on track. By Metal Miner More Top Reads From this article on
