logo
Video: Cruise guest falls over side of infinity pool while reaching for sunglasses

Video: Cruise guest falls over side of infinity pool while reaching for sunglasses

USA Today6 days ago
A Royal Caribbean International cruise passenger went over the side of an onboard infinity pool.
Video footage shared on social media appears to show the guest leaning over the pool's railing in the Icon of the Seas ship's adults-only Hideaway area on Deck 15. A clip posted on Instagram by the "Only in Florida" account on July 27 appears to show the guest's legs rise up before they flip over the edge.
"A guest accidentally fell onto the pool gutter after reaching over to retrieve their sunglasses," Royal Caribbean Group, the cruise line's parent company, told USA TODAY in an emailed statement. "Our crew immediately attended to the guest and fortunately the guest did not experience any injuries."
The company did not share any details about the guest's identity.
The incident took place during Icon's current cruise, which departed on July 26. The round-trip sailing from Miami includes stops in Mexico, Honduras and the Bahamas, according to CruiseMapper.
The incident is not the only one aboard Icon in recent weeks. A crew member was pronounced dead after allegedly jumping overboard after stabbing a fellow employee earlier this month. The victim was in stable condition as of July 25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Miss United States accuses Rep. Cory Mills of threatening to leak intimate images
Miss United States accuses Rep. Cory Mills of threatening to leak intimate images

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Miss United States accuses Rep. Cory Mills of threatening to leak intimate images

The reigning Miss United States alleges Rep. Cory Mills threatened to release private images of her, documents show. Lindsey Langston, 25, filed the report against Mills, 45, with the Columbia County Sheriff's Office on July 14. In the report, Langston detailed her relationship with Mills, claiming it began in November 2021 and ended in February 2025. She alleged that Mills threatened to expose nude images and videos of her following their breakup. Langston alleges that Mills contacted her multiple times, threatening to release intimate images and videos, and provided text and Instagram messages as evidence to the Sheriff's Office. According to the report, Langston's relationship with Mills began when he was still technically married, though he claimed he was separated from his wife. The document shows that she moved to New Smyrna Beach to live with him but returned to Lake City, Florida, after their breakup. According to the report, the alleged threats reportedly began after Langston confronted Mills about a news report of him being involved in a physical altercation with another woman in Washington D.C. According to the report, Mills denied the romantic involvement, but Langston found social media posts suggesting otherwise. Langston, who is also a Republican State Committeewoman, alleged that Mills threatened to harm any men she intended to date post-breakup. According to the report, she sought legal counsel and was advised to document the threats with law enforcement. Mills released the following statement to Channel 9: Channel 9 has reached out to Langston's attorney for comment. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live. Solve the daily Crossword

'Entire attack livestreamed on Facebook': Oct 7. victim relatives file lawsuit against Meta
'Entire attack livestreamed on Facebook': Oct 7. victim relatives file lawsuit against Meta

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Entire attack livestreamed on Facebook': Oct 7. victim relatives file lawsuit against Meta

Relatives of October 7 victims are suing Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads, for livestreams of Hamas's massacre, broadcasting footage of their relatives' murder. A motion for certification of a class action lawsuit for more than NIS four billion ($1.15 b.) was filed on Monday by October 7 victims, their families, and users on Facebook and Instagram against corporate parent giant Meta. The motion charged that the mammoth social media companies had played a part in the atrocities that took place on that Saturday, and effectively violated the privacy rights of users by bombarding them with sensitive content. This, the motion argues, is inseparable from the broader attack. 'The horrific images of terror and pain are forever ingrained in the minds of these families as the last moments their loved ones had on earth,' reads the motion, adding that this atrocity balloons every day as long as the footage remains publicly accessible. Filed in the Tel Aviv District Court, the motion for certification filed by the representatives of the victims and families will need to be reviewed by the court to test its suitability for class action. The court will assess the strength of the case arguments: to show that a group was clearly affected, as well as proof of damages, among other conditions. If the court grants the motion, the case will then proceed as a class action, and the court will eventually rule. The motion was signed by the Idan family from Kibbutz Nahal Oz. Maayan, 18, was killed by terrorists on October 7 after being held hostage in her own home for hours. Relatives viewed the horror of the October 7 massacre through happenstance social media scrolling 'Her horrific murder and the entire attack was livestreamed on Facebook for the whole world to see,' reads the motion, adding that the family knew of what had happened to Maayan through a happenstance scroll on Facebook. Also signed onto the motion is Stav Arava, who found out, through the Facebook app, that his family living in Nahal Oz was being held hostage, and that his brother Tomer was forced at gunpoint – and while being broadcast live – to convince his neighbors to open their doors to the terrorists waiting outside. Tomer was killed by terrorists on October 7. Another signatory is Mor Bayder, who learned of the murder of her grandmother, Bracha Levinson, after terrorists filmed the murder act and then posted it to her Facebook page. 'My grandmother, a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz all her life, was murdered yesterday in a brutal murder by a terrorist in her home... A terrorist came home to her, killed her, took her phone, filmed the horror, and published it on Facebook. This is how we found out,' Bayder wrote at the time. Also signed on is the mother of a female hostage, who learned of her daughter's fate on Instagram – while the entire event was being broadcast live – as well as a mother and her 14-year-old daughter, who were shocked and traumatized by the footage that greeted them on Facebook on that Saturday morning. Many of the livestreams of the horrific acts of torture and murder remained live and available for viewing for several hours, with no outside intervention. The motion argues that these public digital spaces purport to be safe for widespread public consumption, but that proved false on October 7. Meta issue response to lawsuit According to Calcalist, Meta stated in response, 'Our hearts go out to the families affected by Hamas terrorism. Our policy designates Hamas as a proscribed organization, and we remove content that supports or glorifies Hamas or the October 7 terrorist attack.' CyberWell, an independent nonprofit focused on combating online antisemtism and Holocaust denial on social media, released a statement on the lawsuit. "The case represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation about the responsibilities of social media platforms in moderating content that incites terror and violence," the NGO stated. "What should have been a turning point, a moment to prioritize user safety over platform engagement, was tragically missed. As was the opportunity to re-examine laws and for platforms to invest in robust security measures to prevent similar events in the future," they added. "In the nearly two years since, social media has hosted echo chambers normalizing pro-terror and violent content, left unchecked by the very generative AI tools capable of effective, large-scale content moderation," they continued. "This landmark case raises urgent questions, not only about platform liability when social media and digital services become weapons in the hands of terrorists, but also about the new reach of terrorism in the digital universe," they commented.

Elina Svitolina ripped bettors for crossing line after Naomi Osaka loss
Elina Svitolina ripped bettors for crossing line after Naomi Osaka loss

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Elina Svitolina ripped bettors for crossing line after Naomi Osaka loss

In case it wasn't already clear, bets you make on any sporting event are your responsibility and YOUR responsibility alone. An athlete is not obligated to follow through and will not tailor their performance based on whatever transaction a complete stranger agreed to behind the scenes (not to mention the ethical and legal concerns). And the moment you start venting out your frustrations to an athlete who "let you down," you've lost the plot entirely. That seems to be what's happened with Elina Svitolina. After losing to Naomi Osaka in the National Bank Open quarterfinals on Tuesday, the No. 13-ranked tennis player in the world took to her Instagram story to share screenshots of a handful of "shameful" messages from bettors filled with vitriol and anger over her failure at the hands of Osaka. Svitolina included messages that invoked death threats. Some mocked Svitolina's Ukrainian heritage amid the country's ongoing war with Russia. Others made racist comments about her husband, Gaël Monfils, a Black fellow professional tennis player. For obvious sensitivity reasons, I will not link out any of the images here. You can find them in Svitolina's story if you're so inclined. To say the least, this is not OK. Not at all. 'To all the bettors: I'm a mom before I'm an athlete,' Svitolina wrote in her Instagram story. 'The way you talk to women – to mothers – is SHAMEFUL. If your moms saw your messages, they'd be disgusted.' Friends, please remember what I'm about to say. Just because you lost a bet over a sports outcome does not mean you get to start harassing the person you think cost you money. Athletes are still, and stay with me here, human beings who deserve common decency like any of us. They're not props. The only person who costs you money in these kinds of situations is you. The betting buck starts and stops with you. Always.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store