Korea may ease age ban on US beef as tariff deadline nears
Amid stalled trade talks with the US over 25 percent tariffs set to take effect Aug. 1, Korea appears increasingly willing to relent on the non-tariff barrier.
'We're under heavy pressure to scrap the age limit on US beef, and it's becoming harder to hold the line,' a government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Last week, US President Donald Trump sent a tariff-focused letter to Korea, addressed to President Lee Jae Myung, calling the duties necessary 'to correct the many years of Korea's Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers,' and pressing for meaningful progress on trade grievances.
The beef age rule is among key non-tariff barriers the US has pushed to eliminate, alongside restrictions on rice imports and high-resolution mapping data exports. Washington has characterized the restriction as an outdated trade barrier that places unnecessary costs and burdens on American exporters.
Korea and the US agreed to limit imports in 2008, only allowing beef from cattle under 30 months old, in an effort to ease public fears over bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease.
Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo, who traveled to Washington on July 5 for six days of tariff talks, signaled that agricultural concessions could be on the table, saying Korea had entered 'a period of decisions and strategic choices.'
'There are areas we must protect,' Yeo said at a press conference Monday, 'but also areas where we can be flexible.' He emphasized that agricultural issues require strategic judgment, adding, 'We must protect sensitive sectors, but also take into account the broader framework of the negotiations.'
Even so, US beef remains a fraught issue, with domestic farmers warning of market disruption.
The Hanwoo Association, a nonprofit representing Korea's beef industry, lashed out at the government over its potential easing of the ban, calling it a betrayal of local cattle farmers.
'While other industries have grown on the back of sacrifices from the agricultural sector, farming and livestock have continued to decline," the association said in a statement Tuesday. 'Among them, the hanwoo industry has suffered the most, but what has the government done so far?'
The group noted that Korea imported 221,629 tons of US beef last year, nearly half of the country's total beef imports of 461,027 tons. 'With tariffs set to fall to zero next year, American beef will become even more price-competitive and capture a larger share of the market," they argued.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Renowned human rights lawyer urges Korea to adopt forced labor import ban
No company is free from forced labor in global supply chain, stresses Vandenberg, founder of Human Trafficking Legal Center American human rights lawyer Martina Vandenberg has called on South Korea, an important economy in the global supply chain, to enact an import ban on goods made with forced labor during her recent visit to Seoul, saying such a measure would benefit not only exploited workers abroad but Korean workers as well. "Forced labor is ubiquitous, and it is so frequently found in global supply chains" said Vandenberg, president of Washington-based Human Trafficking Legal Center, in an interview with The Korea Herald. It is 'a feature, not a bug' in the global economic system, and 'it's systematic.' She visited Seoul earlier this month to speak at a forum on the forced labor issue, co-hosted by the National Assembly Labor Forum, the National Human Rights Commission and the Korean Bar Association. The Human Trafficking Legal Center, founded by Vandenberg, is a nonprofit that trains pro bono lawyers to seek restitution for human trafficking victims. She has trained more than 4,000 pro bono attorneys. 'At this point in the global economy, if you want a job and you're coming from a poor country, you have to buy that job,' she said. 'You pay recruitment fees, fees for medical tests, fees to travel. And when workers arrive at the job site, they discover they're not being paid the rate they were promised. Their debt back home keeps growing. They may be victims of deception, violence or even sexual violence.' "When so many workers across the globe are experiencing forced labor, we have to ask how the system is so broken," she added. She explained that many firms build layers of subcontractors — "subcontractors, and subcontractors and subcontractors" — to distance themselves from legal responsibility. 'They're trying to avoid liability, both criminal and civil.' But the real pressure, she emphasized, comes from the top. 'It's the companies in developed economies putting enormous pressure on supply chains to lower prices.' 'No company is free from this,' Vandenberg said. 'American companies are not free from this. South Korean companies are not free from this.' US import ban model To address the issue, the United States has enforced Section 307 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits the import of goods made with forced labor. Although the law has existed since 1930, it became enforceable only after loopholes were closed in 2016. 'This enforceability has had an enormous impact,' she said. 'Before, companies operated with total impunity. No one would prosecute them. No one would stop them. But now they realize someone is watching. Someone is investigating. And if their supply chain is tainted with forced labor, they may not be able to sell their goods in the US, the EU, Canada or Mexico.' Vandenberg said, 'We hope someday they won't be able to bring their goods into South Korea — when South Korea has an import ban.' 'South Korea is a very important economy, a key player in the global economy,' she added. According to a 2023 report by international human rights group Walk Free, South Korea imports up to $20 billion worth of goods each year that are at risk of being linked to forced labor. Many of these products originate from regions where Uyghur workers and others are forced into labor in the lowest tiers of global supply chains. While Korea has not yet proposed such a bill, The Korea Herald has learned that Rep. Kim Tae-seon of the ruling Democratic Party is preparing to introduce legislation following a series of public discussions. Import bans, she noted, do more than protect workers abroad. 'They also protect workers at home. There's no way a Korean or American worker can compete with someone earning almost nothing. A US steelworker, who testified in a hearing before the Senate Finance Committee several years ago, said 'There's no way I can compete with someone held in slavery.' So US and South Korean workers can't compete when other workers aren't being paid." Vandenberg suggested that import bans can be incorporated into bilateral trade agreements. Canada and Mexico, for example, adopted import bans as part of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, negotiated under the Trump administration in 2020. 'It's a very good way for countries to negotiate with the US — agree to adopt import bans and reach mutually beneficial trade deals,' she said. Korean sea salt under scrutiny The US has already taken action against a Korean company. In April, US Customs and Border Protection issued a withhold release order against products from Taepyung Salt Farm, one of Korea's largest sea salt producers, citing evidence of forced labor. The action followed a 2022 petition from Korean civic groups urging a ban on Korean sea salt allegedly produced under forced labor conditions. According to Vandenberg, the action against the Korean company is highly unusual. 'It's one of only three issued this year -- alongside actions against frankincense from Somaliland and seafood from a Chinese fishing vessel, Zhen Fa 7, which had Indonesian fishers onboard.' 'We don't believe any withhold release order should be modified or revoked until there is proof that workers have been compensated and that conditions have changed,' she said. 'The whole point is not just to block goods — but to change the reality for workers on the ground.' She added, 'There's still a long way to go. It will take attention and effort from the company and Korean authorities before any modification or revocation would be justified.' shinjh@
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares end lower on retail selling amid tariff worries
Seoul shares closed lower Friday as investors remained cautious over US President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat. The Korean won fell against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index fell 4.22 points, or 0.13 percent, to close at 3,188.07. The main index rose 0.39 percent for the week. Trade volume was moderate at 389.98 million shares worth 11.84 trillion won ($8.5 billion). Decliners outnumbered gainers 589 to 303. The KOSPI reversed earlier gains after opening higher, tracking overnight gains on Wall Street. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.52 percent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite climbed 0.75 percent. Individuals sold a net 340.72 billion won worth of stocks, offsetting stock purchases by institutions and foreigners of 61.85 billion won and 187.72 billion won, respectively. Trump recently notified key US trading partners of new tariff rates set to take effect Aug. 1 unless they offer sweetened terms in ongoing negotiations. Investors are awaiting second-quarter earnings results from major companies in the coming weeks for clues on the market's direction, while keeping an eye on further developments in US trade policy, analysts said. In Seoul, large-cap stocks were mixed. Leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai fell 2.18 percent to 134,800 won, and state-run utility firm Korea Electric Power Corp. declined 0.68 percent to 36,250 won. National flag carrier Korean Air dropped 0.95 percent to 25,950 won, and No. 1 shipping firm HMM shed 0.99 percent to 25,000 won. Among gainers, top carmaker Hyundai Motor rose 0.24 percent to 210,500 won and market behemoth Samsung Electronics climbed 0.6 percent to 67,100 won. Leading steelmaker Posco Holdings gained 1.14 percent to 311,000 won, and leading battery firm LG Energy Solution rose 1.74 percent to 322,500 won. The local currency was quoted at 1,393.00 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., down 0.4 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Korea may be able to reduce tariffs to 15 to 18% with the right deal: former US trade official
'Trump has put trade in the middle of determining and evaluating what a relationship is with every country' Korea may face US tariffs of between 15 to 18 percent as the country scrambles to cut a better deal with Washington, a former US trade official said Friday 'I see countries such as Korea, I see Japan in the same bucket. ... as being able to get out from under the highest tariffs that have been threatened but (only) with some kind of deal,' Michael Beeman, former assistant US trade representative for Japan, Korea and APEC, said in a video podcast released by the Korea Economic Institute of Korea. Beeman, whose US trade official tenure lasted January 2017-2023 during Trump's first term, believes that Korea may be able to reduce the tariffs to the "15 to 18 percent (range)" if negotiations lead to a deal that the Oval Office deems successful. "That is still a major tariff on a lot of exports … So some of the auto, steel and other tariffs, I think Korea may be able to moderate some of those terms, but there's still going to be really large tariffs.' US President Donald Trump sent a publicly disclosed letter to Korean President Lee Jae Myung on July 7, stating that the US will impose "only" 25 percent tariffs on all Korean products imported into the US starting Aug. 1. He warned that the US would increase the tariff rate further if Korea decides to raise tariffs on US imports. Asked about the possible threat of increased tariffs, Beeman acknowledged 'the style of (President Trump) and the style of the Oval Office ... it is kind of chaotic compared to most US administrations," adding he believes "that chaos and unpredictability is part of the plan.' 'That is part of the style that the (Trump administration) dabbled with a little bit during the first term that has come roaring back, and it's all about keeping the business environment uncertain.' Since the presidential election in early June, the Lee administration has made an all-out push in tariff negotiations with the US, holding a series of high-level and working-level meetings with American counterparts over the past month. Beeman cited Korea's auto sector — which has seen a steady decline in US-bound exports since Trump's 25 percent tariff on all vehicle imports took effect on April 1 — as an example of how countries might be able to negotiate or moderate certain aspects of US tariffs and gain export advantages. 'Korea might get some consideration based on the number of cars the US is shipping to Korea, which is ... not much compared to what goes the other direction, in exchange for lower tariffs for that amount of exports and not for the full amount of Korea's exports,' he said. '(President Trump) has put trade in the middle of determining and evaluating what a relationship is with every country, ... it's seen as a package in many ways. So I think it really will depend on what this package looks like and the degree to which ... Korea feels it will resonate with the president as a country that's willing to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the US.'
