AIADMK led the way on caste census. History should remember that: E Palaniswami
This moment did not emerge overnight. The call for a caste-based census, now accepted at the national level, has its roots in the firm ideological soil of Tamil Nadu's social justice movement. And in that journey, it was the AIADMK, under the visionary leadership of Puratchi Thalaivi Amma J. Jayalalithaa, that laid the foundation for genuine representational equity.
In the intricate fabric of Indian democracy, few questions strike at the heart of equality and representation like that of caste. The recent announcement by the Union government to conduct a comprehensive caste census is a landmark moment—one that promises to reshape the contours of social justice policy in India. As the Leader of the Opposition in Tamil Nadu, I welcome this move with conviction and pride, for it affirms a demand the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam first articulated with clarity and foresight.
Tamil Nadu has long stood as a beacon of affirmative action, with its unique 69 per cent reservation policy. That achievement was not accidental but was made possible by AIADMK's political resolve and constitutional acumen. When the Supreme Court's Indra Sawhney (Mandal) judgment in 1992 imposed a 50 per cent cap on reservations, the very framework of Tamil Nadu's policy was threatened. But Amma Jayalalithaa rose to the challenge. In 1993, she convened a special assembly session, passed a unanimous resolution, and led an all-party delegation to Delhi. Her persistent persuasion ensured the Tamil Nadu Reservation Act was placed in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution, protecting it from judicial review. That was not just governance; it was transformative leadership.
Also read: Dear Shekhar Gupta, don't fear caste census. Let it prove private sector has no caste inequality
Duplicitous claims of DMK
Our 2021 demand for a caste census was not political posturing. It was a reflection of AIADMK's long-standing understanding of Tamil Nadu's evolving social realities. We recognised the urgent need to reassess the representation and well-being of Backward Classes (BC), Most Backward Classes (MBC), Scheduled Castes (SC), and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in education, employment, and welfare.
This demand, when initially raised, was met with silence from the ruling DMK. But the party now conveniently claims to be a torchbearer of this cause. It was only in late 2023 that the DMK Chief Minister wrote to the Prime Minister, echoing what we had already taken to the people. Thanks to the Union government's announcement, it has finally become a part of the national agenda and exposed the duplicitous stand of DMK on representative caste census.
Even today, the DMK's steps appear more opportunistic than pioneering. Their one-man commission on caste enumeration, announced with fanfare, has yielded little clarity or direction. Unlike the AIADMK, which took bold, constitutionally binding action, the DMK has often been content with symbolic gestures.
Our record speaks for itself
The historical trajectory of reservation is inseparable from AIADMK's legacy:
In the 1980s, MG Ramachandran, AIADMK's founder, raised BC reservations to 50 per cent, bringing the total quota to 68 per cent.
By 1990, the quota stood at 69 per cent. But when the courts cast doubt on its legality, it was Madam Jayalalithaa who protected it through constitutional means.
Also read: Blow to Yogi, Fadnavis, Gadkari—caste census will change criteria for PM Modi's successor
Issue finally gets its due
Today, Tamil Nadu remains the only state with such a robust reservation policy, safeguarded by constitutional protection—because AIADMK did not waver in the face of opposition.
With the Union government now committing to conduct a caste census, AIADMK welcomes this historic and courageous decision. We believe this data will not only help tailor welfare policies to contemporary needs but will also allow for more accurate and fair distribution of resources and representation. It is heartening to see this issue receiving national attention, and we commend our allies at the Centre for recognising its importance.
This census will gather detailed demographic data on caste distribution, education levels, employment patterns, and socio-economic status across the country. Its findings could reframe how reservations are allocated, how social schemes are targeted, and how the state and Centre together approach the long project of inclusive development.
Also read: BJP's caste census move is reformist. Congress is clinging to religion-based reservation
Electoral calculation vs. moral clarity
One must ask, why did the DMK hesitate for so long? The answer lies in their electoral arithmetic. A full and transparent caste census could disrupt the fragile caste alliances that the DMK has carefully built over decades. The AIADMK, by contrast, has always believed that uncomfortable truths are better than convenient fictions. For us, justice must be grounded in facts—and for it we stand unwavered.
The DMK's sudden support for a caste census appears less an act of ideological commitment and more of political compulsion. Their delays and diversions on this issue contrast sharply with the AIADMK's clarity and consistency.
A caste census is not a panacea, but it is an essential tool. If we are to build an India that truly represents all its people, we must start by knowing who those people are, where they stand, and how far they still must go. Tamil Nadu must once again lead by example.
Edappadi K. Palaniswami is former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, the general Secretary of the AIADMK, and Leader of Opposition, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. His X handle is @EPSTamilNadu. Views are personal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump doubles tariffs on India to 50%, but offers 21 days window for negotiations
Ramping up pressure on India before US negotiators are expected to reach India on August 25, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday doubled the tariffs on India to 50 per cent, but there is a 21-day window before the additional tariff of 25 per cent comes into effect, offering India a window to strike a trade deal. A White House statement said that the US will impose 'additional 25 percent ad valorem duty' above the 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs announced on August 1 to 'deal with the national emergency stemming from Russia's actions in Ukraine'. This tariff is deemed necessary and appropriate due to India's 'direct or indirect import of Russian Federation oil', which the President judges will more effectively address the national emergency, the executive order said. The additional tariffs dramatically raises pressure on India as most of its competitors such as Vietnam, Bangladesh and now China are not at lower tariffs. However, exporters said that US tariffs related uncertainty is already disrupting trade and that Indian exporters have grown wary of exporting to the US. About half of India's total exports of $80 billion are, however, in the exemption list that include products such as pharma and electronics goods. While the fresh order takes the total US tariffs to its highest on any country globally, it also offers a fresh window for discussion. The Indian Express had reported on Saturday that key economic ministries have been asked for inputs to sweeten the US trade deal stuck on India's resistance to US demand for access in the Indian agri market. 'This 25 percent ad valorem duty will be effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time 21 days after the date of the order. There are exceptions for goods that were loaded onto a vessel and in transit before this effective date and are entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on September 17, 2025,' the order read. NEW: President Donald J. Trump just signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25% tariff on India in response to its continued purchase of Russian oil. Here is the text of the Order: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the… — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 6, 2025 While New Delhi has called the targeting of India over the purchase of Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable' and vowed to take 'all necessary measures' to safeguard its 'national interests and economic security', Indian exporters are in a fix, scrambling to retain access to the US — their most valuable export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of India's total outbound shipments. Incidentally, China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India (just under 2 million a day) and Turkey. The US had agreed to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent from 145 per cent in May. The executive order does not make a mention of China, but instead stipulates a mechanism wherein the US Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with other senior officials, 'will monitor if any other country (beyond India) is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil and recommend further action'. Indian officials have indicated that the US is unwilling to negotiate sectoral tariffs — such as those on steel and automobiles — which have already impacted nearly $5 billion worth of Indian exports. Evan A. Feigenbaum, Vice President for Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said on Monday that US-India relations may now become a political football, especially in New Delhi. He warned that the core understandings that enabled closer ties may be at serious risk, as New Delhi had largely assumed Washington would take political risks to strengthen the relationship — something Trump has not done and clearly will not do. Feigenbaum added that the split in relations is further underscored by Trump's effusive praise for Islamabad and recent engagement with Pakistan's army and government — developments that raise obvious concerns in New Delhi. 'The United States was roiled by India's ties to Iran, Myanmar, and later Russia. Trump and his administration are now moving to sanction and tariff India over its oil trade with Russia. This significantly shifts the bar for bilateral relations,' he said. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court bans hand-pulled rickshaws in Matheran
The Supreme Court on Wednesday banned hand-pulled rickshaws in the ecologically sensitive Matheran near Mumbai, a destination which draws tourists in large numbers, saying that the practice 'is against the basic concept of human dignity' and needs to be done away with completely. A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justices Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria said that those plying it are not doing so by choice but because they have no other source of livelihood. 'Permitting such an inhuman practice, which hits at the basic concept of human dignity in a country like India, which is a developing country, belittles the constitutional promise of social and economic justice,' the court added. The bench pointed out that the SC had in the case People of India for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, given an expanded meaning to Article 23, holding that it was intended to abolish every form of forced labour and said that even if remuneration is paid, labour supplied by a person will be hit by Article 23 if it is forced labour. It referred to the SC's 1980 ruling in the case Azad Rickshaw Pullers Union (Regd.) vs State Of Punjab & Others which dealt with the rehabilitation of cycle rickshaw pullers in Punjab. The bench said it was then held that the practice of allowing cycle-pulled rickshaws was inconsistent with the preambular promise of social justice. The bench said, 'it is really unfortunate that after 45 years of the observations made by this Court in the case of Azad Rickshaw Pullers Union, the inhuman practice of a human being pulling another human being is still prevalent in the town of Matheran.' It said that allowing manual rickshaws today would be a betrayal of the promise of social and economic justice that the people of India promised to themselves. 'The question that we ask ourselves is as to whether this practice is alive to the Constitutional promise of social and economic equality and social and economic justice. The answer, unfortunately, will have to be in the negative. To continue such human practice even after 78 years of tecountry getting freedom and after 75 years of the Constitution being enacted and promising social and economic Justice to its citizens, however, would be betraying the promise given by the people of India given to themselves,' the order said. The SC added, 'we therefore find that the practise of permitting hand-pulled rickshaws needs to be stopped forthwith.' It directed the 'state to stop the practice of hand-pulled rickshaws in a phased manner within a period of 6 months from today'. The bench said the question would then arise as to what will happen to those dependent on it for their livelihood. It said that the answer lies in switching to environmentally friendly e-rickshaws. The Court asked the Maharashtra government to roll out a rehabilitation scheme for the rickshaw pullers of Matheran saying 'the state… has also a duty under the directive principles to ensure that social and economic justice is done to the citizens…'. The bench said that the non-availability of funds 'cannot be an excuse for non-implementation of the…scheme' and added, 'we earnestly hope that the state would tender necessary assistance in stopping such an inhumane practice.' The court asked the state to adopt the model followed in Kewadia of Gujarat, where the state purchases e-rickshaws and gives them to genuine rickshaw pullers on hire. It asked the Matheran monitoring committee, headed by the Collector, to identify genuine rickshaw pullers who need to be rehabilitated and said the committee will decide the number of e-rickshaws needed after taking into account ground realities. It permitted the state government to lay paver blocks from Dasturi Naka (bus station) up to the Shivaji Statue in Matheran and said that no paver blocks are to be laid on the internal road and the trading routes. The court also directed that any concrete blocks already laid should be replaced by paver blocks.
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
DMK should ignore opposition to separate law against honour-based crimes from caste outfits: Thirumavalavan
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi founder Thol. Thirumavalavan, on Wednesday, said the DMK government should ignore the opposition of the caste outfits in the issue of enacting a separate law against honour-based crimes and pave way for a 'democratic revolution'. Mr Thirumavalavan met with Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, along with CPI and CPI (M) state secretaries, R. Mutharasan and P. Shanmugam, on Wednesday. On the other hand, the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee observed a day's fast led by its SC wing leader, M.P. Ranjan Kumar, inside the Sathyamurthy Bhavan. Mr. Thirumavalavan pointed out the Hindu Marriage (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1967, which legalised self-respect marriages, and the implementation of Mandal Commission's recommendations, providing 27% to backward classes in government jobs and in education, also faced stiff opposition from upper castes and dominant castes. 'These were accepted by the larger society over time. The separate law is not a law in favour of scheduled castes. Honour-based crimes are national phenomena – such crimes are happening across communities and States and even within SCs and OBCs. Even recently, an OBC boy attacked another OBC boy for speaking to a girl from his own caste. It is a law against regressiveness and backwardness. CM Stalin should ignore the opposition of caste outfits as the democratic forces within these communities would welcome it,' he told The Hindu. He explained to Mr Stalin about the need for a separate law to tackle such crimes and give it a special focus just as we have separate laws for crimes against women, Scheduled Castes and so on. 'We have given him several references that reiterate why such a law is needed as recommended by National Commission of Women, Law Commission of India, Supreme Court's directives in Shakti Vahini vs Union Of India case and bills introduced as private member bills in Parliament and also a Bill introduced by CPI-M MLA A. Soundarrajan in 2015 in Tamil Nadu Assembly. Even Rajasthan has introduced a separate law against it. We take pride in calling Tamil Nadu a land of social justice and we talk about Dravidian model. He listened to us patiently. He didn't give us any assurance but we hope CM Stalin would enact a separate law. It is needed today,' he said.
