
‘It's not realistic': New England food banks struggle to keep up with demand after federal government cuts $1 billion in funding
:
Advertisement
The uncertainty comes at a time of increasing food insecurity in New England, with many hunger relief organizations struggling to meet soaring demand. In Massachusetts, about
Vince Hall, the chief government relations officer at Feeding America, said USDA officials told the organization that $500 million provided last year to support The Emergency Food Assistance Program was terminated. That's in addition to the
About $3.3 million worth of food provided through the emergency food program scheduled to be delivered to Massachusetts food banks was canceled, the Greater Boston Food Bank told the Globe Thursday. Nearly $2.3 million worth, or about 105,000 cases, was slated for the Greater Boston Food Bank, the region's largest hunger-relief organization.
Democratic Whip Katherine Clark condemned the cuts in a statement Thursday.
'Amid skyrocketing grocery prices, Republicans just stole more than $3 million in emergency food assistance from families across the Commonwealth — including 90,000 cartons of eggs. Nationally, they've robbed hungry families of more than $500 million in groceries," she said.
Heather Paquette, the president of Good Shepherd Food Bank in Maine, said the organization was notified earlier this month that it would be losing out on $1.2 million in funding it expected to get over the next three years to help it purchase food from local farmers. Fifty percent of emergency food assistance deliveries the charity was scheduled to receive in the next several months have also been canceled, Paquette said.
Advertisement
'We are already really running to meet the increasing need in the state of Maine with the stable sources of funding that we have been able to depend on for decades,' she said. 'An adjustment of that sort to the [food] we're moving through the state of Maine has significant negative impact on our ability to do our work.'
Though some charities are hoping to recoup costs via private donors or state funding, the unexpected changes are likely to cause shortages in distribution, especially in the next few months.
'Because this is so sudden, we were really not planning for this, so we have to accommodate in the short term,' said Elsy Cipriani, executive director of the New Hampshire Food Bank.
The organization learned two weeks ago that the close to $1 million it was set to receive over the next three years through the emergency food assistance program was canceled and is trying to minimize the impact of the cut on partner agencies.
'But again, maybe we have to make some internal adjustments in terms of the number of staff members that are working in that program,' Cipriani said, referring to the
Jason Jakubowski, the president and CEO of Connecticut Foodshare, said a delivery of 34 trucks was canceled and cost the organization about $1.75 million to replace, he said. Connecticut Foodshare also learned that it would lose $1 million in funds from the LFPA earlier this month.
Advertisement
'This has been a real gut punch for a number of different constituencies over the last couple of weeks. We're nervous, and so are our local pantries,' he said.
Andrew Schiff, the CEO of Rhode Island Community Food Bank, said the organization ordered 24 truckloads of food with the money provided to the state through the increased TEFAP funding. As of Thursday, they had received 10 truckloads. Fourteen truckloads, amounting to about 500,000 pounds of food, are in limbo.c
'Now, at least the stories we're hearing, we're expecting it to be canceled,' Schiff said.
Without federal assistance, food banks are unlikely to be able to keep up their current scale of operations.
'It's unrealistic to think that there is a way that we'll be able to accomplish the goals that every food bank in the nation has without the ability to rely on USDA funding,' Paquette said. The Good Shepherd Food Bank serves about
Jakubowski said the $2.75 million that was cut from Connecticut Foodshare would amount to close to five and a half million meals. The organization is hoping the state government will help it recover some of the cost, but Jakubowski is worried the recent cuts are just the 'tip of the iceberg.'
'My biggest fear is that we're entering an era in which more people are hungry, but we have less food to provide them,' he said. 'That's the nightmare scenario for us and for our local pantries.'
Advertisement
Paquette said that for Good Shepherd, the 50 percent reduction in funding is 'unrealistic' to recover.
'We will do everything we can to close that gap,' said. 'But it's not realistic. We could have used an additional 10 percent versus the reduction of 50 percent, given the increased need we have in our state.'
Emily Spatz can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas House passes GOP redistricting plan after weeks-long standoff
The Texas House of Representatives gave final passage on Wednesday to House Bill 4, a controversial Republican-backed proposal to redraw the state's congressional maps and potentially add up to five new GOP-leaning districts. Entering Wednesday, the bill needed to pass two votes in the House to advance to the Senate. Each vote passed 88-52. Before the final vote, lawmakers debated a series of amendments offered by Democrats, all of which were rejected by the Republican majority. The bill was the sole item on the agenda for the day's floor session, which began at 10 a.m. The Texas Senate, which approved a similar version of the redistricting legislation earlier this week, is scheduled to take up the House-passed bill when it convenes this Thursday at 7 p.m. If the Senate approves the House version without changes, the legislation could be sent to Gov. Greg Abbott by the end of the week. If not, the two chambers will need to reconcile differences in a conference committee. The vote came after a dramatic standoff earlier this month, when Democratic lawmakers fled the state to break quorum and block action on the redistricting bill. Their absence stalled the Legislature and effectively ended the first special session, delaying the measure for two weeks. Gov. Greg Abbott called a second special session hours after the first adjourned, and Democrats returned to the House chamber on Monday, allowing the legislation to move forward. That evening, HB 4 passed out of the House redistricting committee on a 12-8 party-line vote. To prevent another walkout, House Speaker Dustin Burrows imposed a rule requiring Democratic members to be escorted by Department of Public Safety officers if they wished to leave the Capitol. While most Democrats complied, Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth refused. She was temporarily locked in the House chamber and was later allowed to go to her Capitol office. On Monday, Collier filed a petition in state court alleging she was under "illegal restraint by the government." The court has not yet ruled on the matter. On Tuesday, several other Democrats joined Collier in protest, tearing up their signed escort agreements and spending the night in the Capitol. With the passage of HB 4, Republican leaders dropped the escort requirement. The redistricting plan is expected to give Republicans a significant advantage in the 2026 midterm elections, potentially flipping up to five congressional seats.


New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani doubles down on pro-prostitution policies as he praises ex-NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's decriminalization focus
Mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani has doubled down on his pro-prostitution policies. After being hounded by rival campaigns about his stance on decriminalizing sex work as a Queens assemblymember, Mamdani said Wednesday that he wants to mirror the policies of his favorite ex-mayor: Bill de Blasio. 'What I want to do is look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue,' Mamdani, the Democratic nominee, said when pressed on the issue during an unrelated public event on the Upper East Side. 5 NYC Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has doubled down on his position on pro-prostitution policies. Matthew McDermott 'I found that it created far more safety than what the current administration has done,' he told reporters, in a ding at Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for re-election as an independent in November. De Blasio, at the tail end of his administration in 2020, proposed a series of reforms to decriminalize prostitution in an attempt to shift focus on the arrests of traffickers, rather than sex workers. Opponents of decriminalizing sex work, such as the National Organization of Women, however, argue it could actually lead to spikes in sex trafficking, as well as a decrease in quality of life for New Yorkers due to open-air brothels. De Blasio's admin pushed the use of 'community-centered services' for sex workers, rather than arrests, and services supporting victims of trafficking. 5 Mamdani told reporters he wants his policies to reflect those of ex-mayor Bill de Blasio. Paul Martinka 5 At a public event taking place in the Upper East Side, the mayoral frontrunner said he wants to 'look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue.' Matthew McDermott But it's not clear how much of these policies ended up being implemented. Current City Hall representatives didn't respond to a request for comment about the Adams admin's implementation or rollback of the de-Blasio era proposals. But Mamdani, a proud Democratic Socialists of America member, took the opportunity to swipe at Adams' record on the issue. 5 During the de Blasio era, his administration sought to use 'community-centered services' for sex workers, rather than arresting individuals. William Farrington 5 Mamdani took a shot at Mayor Eric Adams at the public event, saying his administration has led 'New Yorkers facing the same problems that they did a year prior.' Matthew McDermott 'So I have said time and again, my focus is on the outcomes of public safety,' he claimed. 'And what we have seen from this current administration is a theater, one that repeats itself every so often and leaves New Yorkers facing the same problems that they did a year prior.' A representative for Adams' campaign did not respond to a request for comment. The Manhattan District attorney's Office announced that it would no longer prosecute prostitution cases in April 2021.


NBC News
22 minutes ago
- NBC News
What's next in the battle over redistricting as the Texas House passes new GOP maps
The Republican-controlled state House in Texas has passed new congressional maps that aim to pad the party's majority in Washington by as much as five seats in the midterm elections, a move that comes as battles over redistricting spread across the country. With Texas set to fully enact its new plan as soon as this week, urged on by President Donald Trump, California Democrats are moving quickly to implement a plan carving up their state's maps in retaliation. Meanwhile, top Republicans in states like Indiana, Missouri and Florida continue to talk about tweaking their maps to create more Republican-controlled congressional seats in the 2026 elections. Ohio's redraw, which it must do under state law, could benefit the GOP, too. Governors in Democratic-controlled states are weighing a response too, but in many cases, they're restrained by procedural hurdles or by other practical limitations — some have already stretched their own gerrymandered maps as far as they could go — that could make a tit-for-tat more difficult. It's all expected to come to a head in a matter of weeks, against the backdrop of a race for the congressional majority in Washington that sits on a knife's edge. The final outcome in Texas Lawmakers in the GOP-controlled Texas House passed their map Wednesday, days after Democrats returned from a two-week "quorum break" in which they fled the state to hold up the bill. But they could only delay, not derail, the new Republican maps, which convert three deep-blue districts into deep-red ones and tilt two Democratic-held South Texas districts slightly further toward the GOP, too. State Rep. Todd Hunter, a Republican who represents Corpus Christi and co-sponsored the new map, kicked off the day with some straight talk. 'The underlying goal is this plan is straightforward: Improve Republican political performance,' he told his colleagues, adding that the crux of the changes to the maps center on five districts that 'now trend Republican in political performance.' 'While there's no guarantee of an electorate success, Republicans will now have an opportunity to potentially win those districts,' he added. After a handful of lawmakers remained in the chamber overnight to protest House leadership for requiring Democrats agree to police escorts to ensure they don't attempt to skip town again, Democrats took to the floor to criticize their Republican colleagues over the maps. They questioned whether their Republican colleagues were truly not factoring in the racial compositions of districts, as they claimed, warning Democrats will have "their day in federal court." They also hit out at their scheduling in the special legislative session, which put redistricting on the calendar ahead of voting on relief for the victims of the July floods in the Hill Country. 'This is Donald Trump's map. It clearly and deliberately manufactures five more Republican seats in Congress because Trump himself knows the voters are rejecting his agenda and instead of respecting that rejection, he's changing the rules," said state Rep. John Bucy III of Austin, a Democrat. "Instead of listening to the people he's trying to silence them, and Texas Republicans have been more than willing to help.' California Democrats move to retaliate California's legislature saw an hours-long hearing Tuesday as Democrats there speed toward passing legislation that will call for a fall special election putting redistricting on the ballot. Voters will decide whether to override the state's independent redistricting commission and approve temporary, Democratic-drawn maps for the rest of the decade. Those maps are the political inverse of the ones in Texas — endangering a handful of incumbent Republicans and putting Democrats in position to net up to five seats from California's new map, according to estimates from the University of Virginia's Center for Politics. The hearing turned contentious amid interruptions and partisan clashes between lawmakers. Republicans repeatedly accused Democrats of wasting state resources — a statewide special election would cost significant funds — and for bucking the agreement that empowered the state's independent redistricting panel in the first place. 'California should lead the way — when other states decide to do something else, we shouldn't react to them, we should prove by example that we can do this better. That we create the foundations for the rest of the nation,' said state Assemblyman David Tangipa, a Republican from the Fresno area, said. Steve Bennett, a Democratic state legislator from Ventura, lashed out at Texas Republicans' mid-decade redistricting by comparing it to power grabs by 'autocrats' like Russian President Vladimir Putin. "We prefer the agreement we all had to play by the old rules," he said. "But when autocrats change the rules and the norms that we are using to decide who has power, we can either fight back or we can potentially permanently lose the ability ever to fight back again." Democrats need to get the maps passed through the legislature soon in order to bring the question to the voters this fall, if they want to enact the maps in time for the 2026 midterms. Republicans are seeking to delay that, with a group of lawmakers suing this week, arguing that Democrats haven't given the public the required time to review legislation before voting. Other states weigh jumping into the fray While the spotlight remains on California and Texas, redistricting remains a live ball in other states. Ohio must redraw its lines by law, since the state legislature approved its 2021 map without Democratic support. The timing could work out well for Republicans, who control the legislature there and could stand to gain depending on how the maps are drawn. Two of Ohio's three Democratic House members won re-election last cycle by less than 3 percentage points. In Indiana, the state's Republican members of Congress have in recent days announced their support for a redraw there, where the party already controls seven of the nine congressional seats. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, a Republican, hasn't said whether he plans to call for a special session of the legislature. But Vice President JD Vance traveled to Indiana earlier this month to meet with the governor as the redistricting debate swirled. In Missouri, Republicans have been cajoling Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special legislative session for redistricting there, where the GOP controls six of the eight congressional seats. In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said this week that people can 'anticipate' a mid-decade redraw because there has been a 'sea change in demography' since the 2020 census. Outside of California, where their efforts are subject to approval from voters, Democrats face a smattering of other challenges if they want to redraw maps in other states. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has been vocally supportive of the Texas House Democrats' attempts to delay the redistricting process in their home state, hasn't ruled out a redistricting push in his backyard. But Democrats already hold 14 of the state's 17 congressional districts there. New York Democrats are also interested in redrawing the lines there, but they face logistical hurdles to change the state constitution, which would likely mean no changes until 2028 at the earliest.