Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez are engaged; celebrating 9 years together with a heartfelt announcement
Their engagement was joyfully revealed by Georgina on social media, capturing global attention and delighting fans. Together, they share two children, including their youngest daughter Bella, born in 2022. Georgina, known for her Netflix reality show I Am Georgina, has become a prominent public figure alongside Ronaldo's legendary football career. This milestone marks a new chapter in their journey, highlighting their enduring love and family bond amid the spotlight of fame and professional success.
How Cristiano Ronaldo met Georgina Rodriguez: A nine-year love story
Cristiano Ronaldo first crossed paths with Georgina Rodriguez in Spain, nine years ago. At the time, Ronaldo was playing as a captain for Real Madrid in La Liga, establishing himself as one of the top footballers globally. Their meeting took place in a Gucci store in Madrid, marking the beginning of a relationship that has lasted nearly a decade.
Since then, Ronaldo and Georgina have been inseparable, building a strong partnership that balances personal life and global fame.
Their enduring relationship is a testament to mutual support and love amidst the pressures of professional sports and public scrutiny.
Georgina Rodriguez announces engagement on social media with heartfelt message
On August 12, 2025, Georgina Rodriguez announced their engagement on social media with a heartfelt message in Spanish: 'Sí, quiero. En esta y en todas mis vidas,' which translates to 'Yes, I do. In this life and all my lives.' The post included a photo showcasing her engagement ring, sparking a wave of excitement across Ronaldo's fanbase and the global media.
While Ronaldo himself has not yet commented publicly on the engagement, the couple's gesture on social media reflects their deep commitment and love.
Inside Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodriguez's family journey and parenting
Cristiano Ronaldo is a proud father of five children, two of whom he shares with Georgina Rodriguez. Their youngest daughter, Bella Esmeralda, was born in April 2022. Tragically, this joyful event was accompanied by the loss of their stillborn baby boy, a deeply emotional experience for the couple.
Their family life is a blend of joy, resilience, and privacy, as they raise their children while managing careers in the public eye. Georgina's role as a mother and partner has been highlighted in her own Netflix reality series, I Am Georgina, which offers an intimate glimpse into their world. Beyond being Ronaldo's partner, Georgina Rodriguez has carved her own identity as a public figure. At 31 years old, she stars in the Netflix reality show I Am Georgina, which follows her life, career, and relationship with Ronaldo.
In the show, Georgina addressed engagement rumors, revealing how her friends often joked about their wedding plans, especially after the release of Jennifer Lopez's song 'The Ring'. Despite this, she noted that the decision to marry was ultimately not in her hands alone, hinting at the complexities of their relationship dynamic.
Cristiano Ronaldo's career shift and life after European football
At 40, Cristiano Ronaldo remains one of football's most iconic players. A five-time Ballon d'Or winner, he ended his European club career in 2022 by mutually terminating his contract with Manchester United. Since then, Ronaldo has been playing for Saudi Pro League side Al Nassr, marking a new chapter in his professional journey.
Known as the most followed person on Instagram globally, Ronaldo's influence extends far beyond the pitch. His engagement to Georgina adds a personal milestone to his illustrious career and public life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
'Saare Jahan Se Accha' review: Netflix spy series is a missed opportunity
Saare Jahan Se Accha spends most of its time listing differences between India and Pakistan. But Netflix's new spy series can't help draw attention to a common heritage: language. Characters switch naturally between Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi and English, as so many did in undivided Punjab. The Punjabi in particular—spoken by Pakistani and Indian characters—is mellifluous, flowing off the tongues of the actors, not the same intonations you'd hear in a modern Hindi film. It reminded me of Song of Lahore (2015), Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy's musical documentary, with the Punjabi session players hitting the consonants in trumpeter Wynton Marsalis' name: 'Vin-ttun'. The show, created by Gaurav Shukla, opens with conspiracy theory (the CIA blowing up a plane with Indian nuclear physicist Homi Bhabha on board) and boilerplate spy drama truths (we operate in the shadows, our families don't know what we do). Both are delivered in a flat voiceover by Pratik Gandhi, who plays intelligence agent Vishnu Shankar. After the formation of RAW in 1968, its head, R.N. Kao (Rajat Kapoor), sends Vishnu on a top-secret mission: relocate to Islamabad and sabotage Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme. Vishnu's primary asset there is Sukhbir (Suhail Nayyar), alias Rafiq, an Indian posing as a Pakistani stockbroker. Rafiq, a capable but reluctant spy, helps corrupt lieutenant colonel Rizwan (Kapil Radha) with his investments, and is wooing his sister, Naseem (Diksha Juneja). Vishnu, tailed and intimidated by local agents despite ostensibly being a diplomat, carefully pulls strings too. He pushes Naushad (Anup Soni), a Pakistan army brigadier whom they've been blackmailing, and tries to win over Fatima (Kritika Kamra), an anti-bomb journalist who happens to be nuclear engineer Munir Khan's niece. Seemingly ahead at every step is Murtaza Malik (Sunny Hinduja)—'Pakistan's most capable officer', in the words of President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. From the moment he's introduced, the show has a problem. Murtaza is simply more interesting than Vishnu. Hinduja plays him with a mixture of sardonic reserve and restless intelligence. It lends a tension to every scene he's in, even when the situation doesn't warrant it—we can't tell how closely he's reading into his close friend Naushad's behaviour, and it keeps us on edge. He's as formidable a spy as Vishnu, but happier in the spotlight, wittier and more commanding. Vishnu, on the other hand, never feel right at the centre of the show. Gandhi is a deft actor who was working steadily in the theatre and Gujarati cinema before Scam 1992 thrust him into lead roles in Hindi films. In Saare Jahan Se Accha, you can feel the tension between a character actor who'd relish the challenge of making a drab agent interesting and a star who's supposed to carry the production. Vishnu is a cypher, as spies must often be, but Gandhi can't find a way to make this shadowy figure compelling. He keeps losing scenes—to the confident Hinduja, to Tilottama Shome, rather wasted here as his confused, neglected wife, and to Nayyar, whose Sukhbir turns out to be the sad heart of the series. I couldn't help but imagine a richer, more complex show built around Sukhbir: a fascinating figure, resourceful, lonely, an Indian pretending to be Pakistani, a Sikh posing as Muslim, blackmailed by his country, with genuine attachments to the people he's spying on. There are recent shows that have gone all-out with period recreation (Jubilee) and those that managed it with a few smart touches (Rocket Boys). Saare Jahan Se Acha tries the latter, but, apart from a sequence at a screening of cult horror film Zinda Laash, the research and detailing are inadequate. The clothes, the hair, the speech, the cultural markers—little of it suggests a convincing 1970s Pakistan. 'Tumhare takes kya hain?' is something you wouldn't hear today, let alone 50 years ago. Rajat Kapoor may be styled to look like Alec Guinness' Smiley, but Saare Jahan Se Acha doesn't want to be John le Carré. In its better moments, it has some of the enjoyable pulpiness of the Yash Raj spy films. One of its episodes revolves around the capture of a minor antagonist named Bilal (Rajesh Khera), an arms dealer in London with a weakness for women. The multiple subplots—the race to extract information from Bilal, the kidnapping of his son back in Pakistan, Murtaza getting increasingly suspicious—are woven together nicely by editor Aarif Shaikh and Sumit Purohit, who directs all the episodes. I also appreciate that the Indian agents, till then less cutthroat than their Pakistani counterparts, are shown using torture, not on a particularly bad person, but one they need information from quickly. This and a messy kill in the previous episode go some way to dispelling the notion of a 'right' side. There are only six episodes, each between 30-45 minutes—a fairly slim offering. Surprisingly, there's no real attempt to tease a second season. Vishnu and Kao spend all season insisting India isn't working on a nuclear bomb (it's described as a 'moral line', one that a nation like Pakistan would cross but we wouldn't). The truth is, India's nuclear weapons programme was very much in swing by then, culminating in the Pokhran-I tests. I thought the show might be saving this as the A-plot for Season Two, but was less certain once the 1974 tests were mentioned at the end of the last episode. Espionage is a saturated genre in India right now, and Saare Jahan Se Accha doesn't do enough to stand out. If it does return, I hope it's at least with a more stirring, less shaken protagonist.
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From Nevermore to Forevermore: How Edgar Allan Poe's rival tried and failed to bury his legacy
On Netflix's Wednesday, the fictional Nevermore Academy stands beneath the brooding gaze of an Edgar Allan Poe statue, its raven-topped pedestal a shrine to the macabre. For millions of viewers, it is a clever ode to the master of Gothic fiction. Off the page, the macabre clung to him, even in death. When Poe collapsed on the streets of Baltimore in October 1849, delirious and dressed in another man's clothes, he left behind unfinished stories, poems, and an unsatiated nemesis. Within hours of Poe's burial, the rival struck. On October 9, 1849, The New York Tribune published an obituary under the pseudonym 'Ludwig' that began: 'Edgar Allan Poe is dead. He died in Baltimore the day before yesterday. This announcement will startle many, but few will be grieved by it.' The author, as the public soon learned, was Rufus Wilmot Griswold — minor poet, major anthologist, and Poe's self-appointed literary executor. This act of posthumous literary vendetta went on to outlive both men. Griswold's eulogy would become one of the most infamous posthumous betrayals in American letters, launching a character assassination so complete that even today, Poe's reputation still bears the scars. Their relationship began almost amicably in 1841. Poe, then a rising critic with a caustic pen and an appetite for literary skirmishes, initially gave Griswold guarded praise. In his 'Autography' series, Poe called Griswold 'not only a polished prose-writer, but a poet of no ordinary powers.' That early warmth faded quickly. Griswold, a failed Baptist minister and career anthologist, considered himself the cultural gatekeeper of American poetry. When he began assembling his anthology, The Poets and Poetry of America in 1842, Poe sent him poems and names of promising writers. But Griswold's selection was, to Poe's eye, a betrayal of taste. 'It is a most outrageous humbug, and I sincerely wish you would 'use it up',' Poe fumed in a letter to JE Snodgrass. Later, Griswold paid Poe his 'usual fee' to review the anthology. The result was a mix of reluctant praise and veiled disdain: 'We disagree then, with Mr Griswold in many of his critical estimates… he has scarcely made us amends by introducing some one or two dozen whom we should have treated with contempt.' Griswold published the review to avoid appearing petty. 'I am rather pleased that it is to appear, lest Poe should think I had prevented its publication,' he admitted in a letter. What began as literary rivalry soon calcified into personal loathing. In private, Poe dismissed Griswold as a pompous fraud, telling Lowell, 'He certainly lacks independence, or judgment, or both.' Griswold, in turn, bragged about puffing books 'without any regard to their quality,' and was, in turn, described by publisher John Sartain as 'a notorious blackmailer.' In 1843, Poe toured the lecture circuit criticising The Poets and Poetry of America, reserving 'witheringly severe' jabs for Griswold. That same year, the Saturday Museum published a scathing anonymous review, penned by Poe's friend Henry Hirst, that called Griswold a 'toady' and predicted 'he will sink into oblivion, without leaving a landmark to tell that he once existed.' Griswold, perhaps rightly, suspected Poe's involvement. Still, their enmity was not without its brief armistice. In early 1845, Griswold solicited Poe's work for a new anthology, writing, 'Although I have some cause of personal quarrel with you… I retain, therefore, the early formed and well founded favorable opinions of your works.' Poe, ever in need of money, softened: 'Your letter occasioned me first pain and then pleasure: — pain because it gave me to see that I had lost…an honorable friend: — pleasure, because I saw in it a hope of reconciliation.' That fragile peace did not last. By the time Poe died in mysterious circumstances in Baltimore in 1849, Griswold was lying in wait. Claiming (falsely) that Poe had named him literary executor, Griswold obtained Poe's manuscripts from his grieving mother-in-law, Maria Clemm, under the pretense of raising money for her. Instead, Griswold published a three-volume edition of Poe's works, reserving the most vicious blow for the final pages. In his Memoir of the Author, appended to Volume III, Griswold created the ultimate hatchet job. He depicted Poe as a depraved drunkard, expelled from university, dishonorably discharged from the military, and given to wild rages and blackmail. He even forged letters to support his claims. It was extremely damaging. Griswold's portrait was seen as the gospel truth. For decades, Griswold's version of Poe, which painted him as a mad genius, melancholic drunk, and literary pariah, was uncritically accepted. Poe's friends tried to fight back. Sarah Helen Whitman, Poe's former fiancée, publicly accused Griswold of falsehoods. The myth stuck. By the time John Henry Ingram published his rebuttal biography in 1875, Poe had been dead for 26 years. Griswold, too, was gone. He died in 1857 of tuberculosis, perhaps never fully aware of how his scheme would backfire. Ingram, with help from Whitman and others, painstakingly dismantled the Griswold narrative, revealing the forgeries, restoring context, and re-centering Poe as a misunderstood but deeply gifted artist. The war over Poe's image continued and still does. Why did Griswold go so far? Some point to jealousy. Others suggest a shared affection for the poet Frances Sargent Osgood, whose flirtation with Poe scandalised literary circles. Some scholars speculate Griswold suffered from undiagnosed mental illness. Whatever the cause, Griswold's actions remain among the most infamous acts of posthumous literary sabotage in history. However, ironically, it was Griswold's slander that helped immortalise Poe. Without The Memoir, Poe might have remained a literary footnote: a minor critic and a strange poet. Instead, he became myth, remembered as the tormented genius, the madman of melancholy, the raven-haunted soul. Griswold intended to bury Poe but in doing so he made him eternal. While Griswold may have triumphed briefly, Poe got the last word.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Vince McMahon's reaction to Hulk Hogan's WWE RAW return draws mixed reactions from fans
Image via WWE The legendary wrestling star, Hulk Hogan , left the world for the heavenly abode on July 24, 2025. He passed away due to a cardiac arrest in front of his family and loved ones in Clearwater, Florida. Before this unfortunate situation, the WWE Universe saw Hulk Hogan one last time on WWE TV on the debut episode of RAW on Netflix, where he was heavily booed. Months later, former Chairman Vince McMahon gave his honest take on the same, which drew reactions from the audience. Vince McMahon was not happy about fans booing Hulk Hogan in his last televised WWE appearance In an appearance of TMZ's new documentary, 'The Real Hulk Hogan', Vince McMahon was asked about his reaction to fans booing Hulk Hogan on the debut episode of RAW on Netflix. McMahon revealed that he was very angry and believed that Hogan deserved to be treated well that night for his immense contributions to the world of professional wrestling. He said, "I was angry because we've known each other for a lifetime, professionally and personally. And setting up, so to speak, this larger than life superhero, you don't just let him walk out there. He deserved something very, very special. More than anyone, they owe him. It's just like, okay, here comes Hulk Hogan. I got angry because that's not the way I would have done it and he deserved much more." Hulk Hogan getting loud boos was primarily due to the multiple controversies he had been involved in during his lifetime. This included a leaked s*x tape scandal, making racist comments, lawsuits, and other issues. While the fans did what they wanted that night, a lot of reactions after his death saw many of them being apologetic about their actions. Fans reacted to Vince McMahon's statement about Hulk Hogan's last WWE appearance After Vince McMahon's comments became public, wrestling fans took to social media to express their reactions. Some fans believed that McMahon would have countered by piping in cheers, as he did during his time as WWE's head honcho. Another section of fans agreed with Vince McMahon that Hulk Hogan deserved to be treated better for being a pioneer of the wrestling business. However, there was still a notorious section of wrestling fans who stood firm that Hogan got what he deserved in his appearance on the debut edition of Monday Night RAW on Netflix, showering negative comments. Regardless of McMahon's statement getting such a mixed response, there is no doubt that he was a huge supporter of Hulk Hogan throughout his lifetime. Despite the perception about The Hulkster, he will go down in history as one of the greatest WWE superstars of all time and no one would be able to take that away from him. Also read: WWE legend Hulk Hogan's infamous s*x tape partner spotted in rare sighting after his death Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
