
Post-Budget Speech To Auckland Business Chamber
It's a pleasure to be invited here today by the Auckland Chamber for my first post-Budget speech.
The Chamber is the peak body for the Auckland business sector, where so many of our country's businesses are based.
Our Government backs business-friendly policies because, ultimately, business success underpins our success as a nation.
I am going to talk to you today about the Budget's business growth measures.
Thriving businesses deliver the growth, jobs and incomes that New Zealanders need to get ahead.
One of those thriving businesses is hosting us right here.
If you'll pardon the pun, I reckon that Recorp is the can manufacturing company with the can-do attitude.
I admire the scale of your ambition to eliminate the use of single use plastic bottles in New Zealand by 2030.
My congratulations to you Bruce Parton and your team, and also to Rob Fyfe whose vision and commitment helped get this company up and running.
One of Recorp's critical points of difference is the quality of its manufacturing equipment.
You invested heavily at the outset in the technology that enables you to accurately tailor orders to match customer requirements, regardless of size.
You have set an example for other new Kiwi businesses. Many are following it, but it's a challenge for others.
We know that capital investment is a key to business success. So often, it's the piece that gives companies the edge over competitors at home and overseas.
One of the things I hear from business leaders is the difficulty many Kiwi businesses face raising capital to invest in the equipment and other assets they need to succeed.
Lack of good quality capital has become a barrier to growth.
This Government has acted to lower that barrier.
The Investment Boost tax incentive announced in the Budget gives businesses an adrenalin boost to invest in the new productive assets they need to succeed.
I'm really proud that we've managed to incorporate this exciting new initiative in the Budget.
I expect almost all of you will have heard something about Investment Boost in recent days.
You may even have heard our critics say in the media that it won't make much difference.
Well, our MPs have been out since the Budget was delivered and what they've heard is that Investment Boost will be a game-changer for many Kiwi businesses.
Like the manufacturer now planning a $70 million capital expansion over the next two years to install a fully automated plant.
Like the chicken farmer now planning to raise his investment in upgrades and new assets from $12 million to $18 million over the next 12 months. He said this was the 'best news for our sector in a long time'.
Like the caterer with a new kitchen to fit out, who says they will be 'thousands and thousands better off'.
Like Robbie Smith, owner of Stevenson and Taylor, the large Hawke's Bay agricultural machinery business. He has already seen a jump in sales since the announcement, with one customer purchasing two tractors. He said: 'This initiative is great news for local businesses.'
Like Pic's Peanut Butter Chief Executive Aimee McCammon, who thinks Investment Boost will be 'super helpful' for the many small to medium-sized businesses like hers that are running on old kit.
Or like Chartered Accountants New Zealand country head Peter Vial who says the announcement was more generous than expected and will significantly increase productivity and growth
He says: 'New Zealand's poor productivity is not due to poor work ethic or laziness, but rather a lack of capital investment in equipment, machinery and technology. The Investment Boost tax incentive strikes at the heart of this.'
I couldn't agree more.
Then there's the semi-retired accountant who was inundated with calls on the Friday morning after the Budget from clients looking to take advantage of Investment Boost.
He said: 'It is a long time since I have seen a reaction like this to the Budget.'
I'm going to talk more about Investment Boost soon – how it works, with some examples of the savings it offers.
But I'd like to start by putting a bit of context around the Budget, and why we've taken the approach we have.
The Budget is a responsible Budget for uncertain times.
I've been calling it the no-BS Budget.
We've levelled with Kiwis about the challenges we face as a nation.
No rainbows or unicorns. No lolly scrambles. Just straight talk, and responsible actions.
We inherited a country with its bank account run down and the credit card maxed out.
Thanks to the previous Government's refusal to turn off the spending tap after Covid, public debt ballooned from just 18.6 per cent of GDP in 2019 to 41.7 per cent in 2024, just five years later.
We've slipped back to the bad old days of the eighties and nineties, when debt servicing was among the biggest government spending items.
Today, about one dollar in every 15 of the Government's operating spending goes to paying the interest bill on our borrowings.
Our political opponents say that's all good. Other countries have higher debt, so we can just borrow and spend more to get ourselves out of trouble.
That kind of talk ignores the reality that New Zealand's economy is different to many of those other more highly indebted economies.
We are small, isolated and heavily reliant on overseas trade. We have very limited ability to influence the global financial and trading conditions that affect our livelihood.
This audience needs no reminding of how unstable and unpredictable the world trading environment is right now.
Further, we are a country that's vulnerable to sudden, costly shocks.
One day another big earthquake, cyclone, pandemic or biosecurity breach is going to hit us. Recovering from events like those is even harder if there's nothing left in the kitty to pay for it.
The good news is that the economic recovery is under way.
Inflation is down and is forecast to stay within the 1 to 3 per cent target band.
Interest rates are down, and forecast to fall further.
The Budget forecasts GDP to rise to healthy rates of around 3 per cent in each of the next two years.
Wages are forecast to grow faster than the inflation rate, making wage earners better off, on average, in real terms.
The Budget also forecasts that 240,000 more people will be in work over the forecast period to mid-2029.
Many New Zealanders may not be feeling better off now, but over time they will – provided we stay the course.
The recovery remains fragile. Global uncertainty has caused Treasury to peg back its forecasts, especially in the near term.
The recovery isn't in danger, but it is likely to be slower than previously forecast.
As a government, we're talking straight with New Zealanders about the way ahead.
About getting public debt under control and nurturing the economic recovery now under way.
About carefully managing the public purse. Making sure we're using taxpayer dollars to pay for the must-haves, rather than the nice to haves.
About doing nothing to put the economic recovery at risk - because a growing economy is the route to higher living standards for everyone.
But we're also clear that the no-BS Budget doesn't mean penny-pinching across the board.
We get that New Zealanders are struggling with the cost of living. The Budget responds with some carefully targeted help, including rates relief for more SuperGold Card holders, 12-month prescriptions to save the cost of repeats, better targeting Working for Families to low and middle-income earners, and continuing funding for food banks.
We're also investing more in health, education, law and order and other frontline public services.
We've done that while also finding room to invest in business success.
The Budget demonstrates that we truly can walk and chew gum at the same time.
It's about hope grounded in reality.
That we can continue to invest in the things that matter, while staying on a debt reduction and economic growth track.
That we can reduce government spending as a share of the economy and return the government's books to balance.
We've done it despite reducing our operating allowance from $2.4 billion to $1.3 billion a year.
That's the lowest allowance in a decade. The adjustment was made to keep government spending on a tight track, recognising changing forecasts due to the uncertain economic conditions.
Despite the smaller discretionary kitty, we've still been able to deliver $5 billion in new spending and $1.7 billion for the Investment Boost tax incentive that I talked about earlier.
That's because most of the spending increase is funded by savings.
We've been able to find $5.3 billion in savings through reprioritising and cost reductions across government.
Half the savings come from changes to the pay equity regime.
To be clear, I am absolutely committed to pay equity. But we have to be sure that future settlements stick to fixing pay discrepancies between occupations that are based only on sex-based discrimination, and not for other reasons.
Otherwise, pay equity negotiations simply become a surrogate for a normal wage bargaining round.
Even our political opponents are starting to realise that the previous pay equity regime was simply out of control. The scale of settlements coming at us would have limited our ability to invest in health, education and the other public services that the women – and men – of New Zealand rely on.
We've also put another $1.8 billion towards investment in health and education infrastructure like hospitals and schools.
And we're putting $1.7 billion into what I believe is the single most important policy in this year's Budget – the Investment Boost tax incentive that I talked about earlier.
Investment Boost is available right now to every business represented in this room.
Businesses large and small – manufacturers like Recorp, farmers, tradies, whoever.
It's for all those businesses that are keeping their heads above water but need a bit of help to get beyond that, by getting their hands on the productive assets they need to grow.
Assets like machinery, tools, equipment, technology, vehicles and industrial buildings.
Investment Boost applies to new assets purchased by New Zealand businesses. It can also apply to second-hand assets imported from overseas.
It excludes land, residential buildings, and assets already in use in New Zealand.
There's no cap on the value of new investments. All businesses, regardless of size, are eligible.
It allows you to immediately deduct 20 per cent of the cost of a new asset from your taxable income, on top of depreciation.
That means a much lower tax bill in the year of purchase. The remaining book value is depreciated at normal rates.
Since a dollar now is more valuable than a dollar in future, the cashflow from investments is more attractive and the after-tax returns are better.
It means that more investment opportunities stack up financially, so more investments will be made.
Let's look at an example.
A manufacturer – let's call it Green Kiwi – wants to invest in a new environmental test chamber, at a cost of $200,000.
Before Investment Boost, the company could claim an annual depreciation deduction of 10.5 per cent. That would reduce Green Kiwi's taxable income by $21,000 a year over its useful life.
With Investment Boost, it can now also claim 20 per cent of the value of the asset – that's $40,000 - in the year of purchase, as well as the standard depreciation on the remaining 80 per cent of its value
Together, these deductions reduce the company's taxable income in that year by $56,800.
This translates to an additional $10,000 off the company's tax bill that year.
That's $10,000 more that Green Kiwi has to reinvest in the assets it needs to grow.
Another example. Farmer Brown gets a woolshed built for $150,000. The extra deductions he gets under Investment Boost mean his tax bill will be $8,274 less than it would otherwise have been, meaning more to invest in shearing equipment in his new shed.
And another one. Pam the plumber buys a ute for $60,000. Investment Boost gives her $2906 more than she would otherwise have had to buy new tools.
Over the next 20 years, Investment Boost is expected to lift New Zealand's capital stock by 1.6 per cent, leading to wages rising by 1.5 per cent and GDP by 1 per cent.
These are estimates, not precise values. But officials estimate that roughly half those benefits will be achieved in the first five years.
The Government did consider reducing the company tax rate as an alternative to Investment Boost. But dollar for dollar, Investment Boost raises investment more than a company tax rate reduction as it only applies to new investments, not those made in the past.
The other advantage of Investment Boost is that the benefits are expected to flow to workers.
Inland Revenue's Regulatory Impact Statement states that 'the majority of the increase in national income from Investment Boost would flow to workers. This increase would come from a combination of higher wages and higher employment. We therefore expect that the benefits of Investment Boost will be spread broadly across a wide range of New Zealanders.'
There you have it. Ultimately, all workers benefit from Investment Boost.
There's a number of other business growth initiatives in this Budget.
We're setting up a new agency, Invest New Zealand, to attract global capital, business and talent to this country. An experienced advisory group chaired by Rob Morrison, has been appointed to support its establishment.
We're changing our thin capitalisation tax rules to encourage foreign investment in our infrastructure. We're consulting now on the details of that.
We're allowing employee share schemes to defer their tax liability, to help start-ups and unlisted companies to compete for and retain talent.
We're re-prioritising our science and technology funding towards growth-promoting investment in areas like gene technology. We want our researchers to focus on real-world problems and innovations that can be commercialised.
And we're supporting our highly successful film and television sector by increasing the screen production rebate to just over a billion dollars across this year and the next four years.
We don't subsidise business as a rule, but when it comes to the screen industry, a rebate is the price of entry to the game.
Over the last decade overseas production companies have invested $7.5 billion in New Zealand. We simply wouldn't get that kind of investment in future without continuing the rebate.
We're also replacing the much-maligned Resource Management Act to unlock investment and growth across the country. You'll be hearing more about that in the months ahead.
No doubt you have heard about the changes to KiwiSaver, which the media has focused pretty heavily on.
Essentially, we are raising the default employee and matching employer contribution rate from 3 to 4 per cent over the next three years. To ensure the scheme's sustainability, we are also reducing the government contribution by half, to just over $260 a year.
We're also extending the government contribution to 16- and 17-year-olds, to foster the savings habit, but removing it altogether for people earning more than $180,000 a year, because they don't need it.
I acknowledge that change impacts on employers. But to allow time to adjust, we are phasing it in over the next three years, and we are not making the new rate compulsory – employees can choose to opt back down to a three per cent contribution if they wish.
The changes are designed to lift our retirement savings rates which, frankly, are too low, especially when compared with other countries like Australia.
Higher retirement savings deliver big benefits for individuals and for the country. Our financial institutions have a larger pool of capital to invest back in the economy, and the pressure on Government to financially support retired New Zealanders is eased.
To finish, I want to touch on where this Budget takes us.
Our decisions mean we are on track to bend the debt curve downwards without applying a blowtorch to public services.
We are taking a deliberate, medium-term approach to fiscal consolidation.
This is far from austerity, as some commentators have claimed. In fact, it is what you do to avoid austerity.
There's no doubt that balancing the books is challenging.
Some would do it with higher taxes; we are doing it by controlling growth in spending.
We're saying to New Zealanders: we're about no BS, just straight talk about the choices we face as a country.
Thank you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
‘How do I not get rage-baited?' Meet the under-25s vying for council seats
They're young, full of ambition and just want to make sure their mates stop leaving the country. The competitive world of local politics, where greying heads and people named John dominate, is not a domain younger New Zealanders have traditionally gravitated towards. While this is changing – the number of under-40s voted in at the last last local elections in 2022 had doubled since 2016 – the median age was still 55, and only around 6% of members were aged 18-30. Looking to further increase that percentage when the country heads to the polls in October, these young candidates are hoping another youthquake could be possible in local government. Born on a leap day in the year 2000, 25-year-old Wellingtonian Sam O'Brien may have only had six real birthdays, but he reckons he's got enough life experience to represent the Motukairangi/Eastern Ward on Wellington City Council. Running on the Labour ticket, O'Brien is the second-youngest candidate in his race after the Act Local-backed 21-year-old Luke Kuggeleijn. Though their political stances are poles apart, they're both driven by the same motivation: to prove the youth voice can speak for all New Zealanders. It's a rainy day in Kuggeleijn's home suburb of Lyall Bay – Motukairangi/Eastern Ward stretches eastwards from Roseneath, Kilbirnie, Hataitai and Lyall Bay to cover the Miramar Peninsula that juts out into the mouth of Wellington Harbour – when we meet for a coffee at Maranui Cafe, just a stone's throw from the Surf Life Saving Club where he works. A postgraduate medical technology student and athlete, Kuggeleijn told The Spinoff he decided to throw his hat in the ring after seeing the party he voted for at the last election move into the world of local government – he figured the support that Act could offer would make it easier for a first-time candidate at his age to 'have the confidence to stand'. Also, it's pretty handy to have some mentors around who can answer the hard questions, like 'how do I not get rage-baited?' Running in a Green/Labour stronghold city, Kuggeleijn reckons his chances of winning one of the three ward councillor spots are slim (and the Eastern Ward race in particular is pretty stacked, with mayoral candidates Alex Baker, Rob Goulden and Karl Tiefenbacher also running), but he says it's still worth it if it encourages other young people to get into local politics. 'Usually, [young people] only see older people on council, and they think it's shit – you know, what's the point [of caring?],' Kuggeleijn says. 'We have a 45% voter turnout [in Wellington], and they're mostly older property owners and people who are already interested in politics.' Kuggeleijn says he feels 'fairly aligned' with Act's principles and 'commonsense mindset' on council spending, a position also informed by the experiences of his parents, two local business owners dealing with the rising cost of rates. As a councillor, Kuggeleijn says he'd be focused on 'ending wasteful spending and focusing on core services'. There are times when Kuggeleijn feels slightly out of step with his more progressive peers, but he's a firm believer that 'in a democracy, you've got to give people a choice, even if it's a minority view'. 'I think the best course of action you should take if you're elected is that [you see yourself] as a public servant, so you have to serve. People should make decisions that are not based on ideology or political favour – you're supposed to make decisions based on what the people want,' Kuggeleijn says. In Hataitai, Sam O'Brien's vision for the Eastern Ward looks vastly different. Over a coffee and toastie from Coolsville Cafe, just up the road from his flat, the regional council environment policy adviser (who's been endorsed by outgoing Eastern Ward councillor Teri O'Neill, herself elected to council at age 21), reckons he's been to far too many leaving parties for his mates who are heading overseas for better opportunities. Encouraging development and demand in the Eastern Ward will be key to curbing the 'general down-buzz' permeating the air in the capital, he says, and to turn off the tap on the brain drain. Alexandra born-and-raised O'Brien is running for council in the city he moved to post-university because he believes the council could be more proactive at listening to the concerns of younger Wellingtonians. The Eastern Ward in particular has seen very little growth in terms of population, O'Brien says, and as a councillor he would push to enable housing intensification and greater density. Ignoring these issues will 'affect young people more than anyone else' in the long run, he says. Having affected mobility due to hip and knee replacements as a child, O'Brien is also pushing for a more accessible capital by way of supporting more pedestrian-friendly urban spaces and improving the public transport system in the city. And should he make it onto the council table, O'Brien hopes older Wellingtonians will be able to see themselves and their interests reflected in his work. 'What benefits young people benefits everyone, and I don't want to come across a candidate that only cares about young people,' he says. 'A lot of older voters that are on fixed incomes are really struggling, and you can see the similarities between them and students.' 'I'll sacrifice myself, I guess' Further north in Auckland, 21-year-old Caitlin Wilson is running for the Waitematā Local Board with City Vision, the Labour-Greens-independent local government coalition in the supercity. She's also seen too many of her mates headed to Australia for work opportunities, and as a former co-convenor for the Young Greens, Wilson had tried last year to put together a campaign to 'push the vote out for our younger audiences', but struggled to find any young candidates keen to stand in 2025 – until she realised she should just do it, deciding, 'I'll sacrifice myself, I guess.' 'There's no pathway, which is why a lot of young people say, 'I don't know where to start',' Wilson says. 'You feel like you have to fit a certain mould, talk a certain way, look a certain way … But I definitely think I'm learning that people should respect me for who I am, regardless of how I dress and speak.' Wilson says local government isn't designed to engage young people – too few councillors are showing up in youth-focused spaces, and holding local board meetings at the 'retiree time' of 1pm can be a barrier to accessibility. 'Young people, and myself included, have in the past thought, 'they don't care about us, they don't care about our opinions, so why should we be engaged?'' Wilson says. Her own interest in politics happened by accident – she was 15, there was a global pandemic going on, and Green MP (now co-leader) Chlöe Swarbrick was on Facebook Live talking about the cannabis referendum. It was the first time Wilson had seen a politician 'speaking in a language I could understand'. She hopes that standing for council and replicating some of Swarbrick's 2020 campaigning by hitting the universities and letterboxes can also help the youth vote grow. 'My whole thing has just always been to bring people into politics, people who've never felt welcomed or that they needed a certain level of knowledge to enter this space,' Wilson says. 'It's not just young people – I feel I can represent disengaged communities in general, families and people who don't have the time and luxury to be in the know with local government.' Young enough to know when to quit Rohan O'Neill-Stevens was only 19 when they were first elected to Nelson City Council in 2019, and had just turned 22 when they became the city's deputy mayor, after putting their name forward for the top job. Now 25 and having spent a quarter of their life in local government, O'Neill-Stevens reckons it's the right time to give someone else a chance to bring their ideas to the council table. 'I promised myself when I was first elected that I'd ask myself every single day, 'Is this where I'm most effective and most able to drive change?'' O'Neill-Stevens tells The Spinoff. 'I can step away with confidence that I'm making space for someone else to have those opportunities to shape the future, and that I'll be able to find new ways to do the same.' Their experience in council has shown them that younger elected members tend to face more scrutiny than their older counterparts – it wasn't uncommon to field 'way more technical questions' to prove that they were on par with older councillors. 'There was definitely that period of being sized up,' O'Neill-Stevens says. 'It's so hard to know what my experience would have been like if I wasn't young. But also, I'm a male-presenting white person, so those layers of perception are different in terms of what it takes to earn respect, and to have your voice be treated as one of authority.' To the next generation of young councillors, O'Neill-Stevens says the 'service to the kaupapa' has to be the driving force behind a campaign, and to 'approach every conversation with the expectation that you'll learn something'. Being able to create meaningful dialogue with community members, even those who might never vote for you, is still 'an innate source of information' for what's going on in your area. That attitude to conversation even works with fellow candidates. 'So many people will tell you exactly what their debates are before you go in, even if they are completely opposed to you,' O'Neill-Stevens says. 'Use that to your advantage, get them talking. Let them spill their secrets.'


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ debt nears $1 trillion as growth moderates, savings fall
At the current rate of growth, we'll hit that landmark inside the next three years. The rate of growth has moderated in the past two years as the Government has sought to curb borrowing, and the housing market, which accounts for the largest chunk of our debt, has been flat. Businesses have also been hunkering down, afraid to invest and expand, and farmers are getting good returns but using them to address high debt levels. But while the rate at which we're borrowing has eased, so too has the rate at which we are saving and growing wealth. The easiest path out of debt is wealth creation, shrinking our net debt and our debt-to-GDP ratio. So going backwards on that front is a cause for concern. The big, ugly numbers In the year to May 31, we hit a total of $872.6 billion in gross debt. That figure is up from $827.3b last year, a rise of 5.4%. It represents an average of $163,717 in raw debt for every Kiwi in the country. The rate of growth is relatively subdued by the standards of previous years. In the first New Zealand Herald Nation of Debt feature, in 2016, the total gross debt figure was $492.5b. We have seen total debt rise 77% since then. That represents an average annual increase of 6.65%. Given we are still coming down from a period of high interest rates, it was not surprising that borrowing growth was subdued, said Reserve Bank adviser for financial stability assessment and strategy, Charles Lilly. 'We're still in a relatively contractionary phase,' he said. 'We want to see stability. We don't want credit debt off the scale and people taking too much risk.' On the downside, a lack of borrowing growth was more of an issue with the financial system if the banks were not willing to lend, he said. 'I think banks are still willing to lend; it's mainly from the demand side, they just don't have customers coming through the door.' Crown debt also continues to rise, despite the Government's efforts to curb spending. Core Crown borrowing (the baseline we've used since 2016) was $238.8b in the year to May 31, 2025. That's up from $215b in the year to May 30, 2024 – an increase of 11%. It follows an increase of 11% for the previous year. While the coalition Government hasn't been able to stop Crown debt rising in double digits, it has at least reduced the annual rate of increase. It was 27% and 17% respectively in the years to May 2022 and May 2023. Crown debt is always a hot political topic. Wellington business editor Jenée Tibshraeny will take a deep dive into the state of the Government books tomorrow in part two of this series. The other side of the ledger Of course, the nominal figures still look scary. So does your mortgage if you don't weigh it against the value of your house. It is important to compare the gross debt figure to our saving rates and assets to add more context. Unfortunately, the latest Stats NZ figures (for the year to March) showed New Zealanders' household net wealth has fallen. Household net worth, the value of all assets owned by households less the value of their liabilities, fell $25.4b to $2.42 trillion in the March 2025 quarter. That is still almost three times the total gross debt figure. But in the year ended March 2025, household net worth fell $23.1b (0.9%), after a rise of $61.2b (2.5%) in the year ended March 2024. We're currently headed in the wrong direction. Most of that fall will be related to house prices, although some of it can be attributed to lower savings rates. Stats NZ's household saving data shows how much households are saving out of their current income (ie current income less current consumption). The data shows savings fell $392 million to minus $1.6b in the March 2025 quarter. Sector by sector Housing It should come as no surprise that the nation's mortgage debt accounts for the bulk of what we owe. Housing debt shot up during the big housing booms in the middle of the last decade and again during the first blush of Covid as stimulus money and low interest rates bolstered property prices. In the year to May 2016, the annual rate of increase for total housing debt was 9.2%, in 2021 it was 11.5%. If we look back further, it topped 16% in 2004. So this year's increase of 4.7% looks modest in comparison. It represents a slight increase on the even more modest 3.3% rise in the year to May 2024. That lift in mortgage debt may reflect the slight uptick in prices late last year and early this year (albeit something of a false start for those waiting on a full-blown housing market recovery). But the level of borrowing has also been lifted by record numbers of first-home buyers coming into the market, and fewer investors, said the RBNZ's Lilly. The former typically need to borrow more from the bank than the latter. If the housing market picks up later this year, as many pundits expect, then we'll likely see the rate of increase in mortgage borrowing follow, he says. Mortgage debt, most of which we owe to Australian banks, is a feature of the New Zealand economy that tends to worry international credit agencies more than our Crown debt. It has been a concern for the Reserve Bank in the past. 'In the current environment, subdued is definitely the theme,' Lilly said. Business Business borrowing barely lifted in the past year – and that is not good news for the economy. At $136.5b in the year to May 31, it was up just 0.6%. Businesses typically borrow to invest in new equipment that will improve productivity or to expand, taking on staff, to grab more market share. None of that stuff has been a feature of the past year. In fact, the opposite has been the case. Many businesses are struggling to survive. Those that desperately need cash to stay in business aren't going to get it from a bank. The struggle for many retail businesses is also highlighted in the relatively anaemic growth in personal consumer lending. At $14.5b, it is up 1.1% in the year to May 31. NZ Herald retail reporter Tom Raynel will take a closer look at the consumer borrowing trends later this week as part of the Nation of Debt series. For larger businesses, issues such as global uncertainty and tariffs would be limiting the appetite to borrow and take risks, Lilly said. It was also the case that the commercial property sector remained very weak, he said. Agriculture Unlike the struggling urban business sector, farmers have been benefiting from strong international export prices in the past year. Numerous commentators have suggested increased spending in the agricultural sector should buoy the regional economies and eventually flow through to the cities. The borrowing data for the past year offers some clues as to why that may take longer than many expect. Total agricultural debt is down 1% for the year to May 31, to $62.8b. Farmers appeared to be using their increased earnings to pay down debt in the first instance, Lilly said. This wasn't a bad thing; it is only a few years ago that the Reserve Bank was highlighting dairy debt as a significant risk to New Zealand's financial stability, he said. By the numbers That big, ugly number in our graphic is New Zealand's total gross debt. It combines the latest Reserve Bank figures for private debt with Treasury numbers for Crown debt and Local Government Funding Agency data on council debt, and IRD's data on student loans. The Reserve Bank figures include housing debt, consumer debt, business debt and agricultural debt to June 30. These are updated monthly by the central bank as part of its brief to monitor and maintain financial stability. The Crown debt figure is taken from the Treasury's Interim Financial Statements (11 months to May 31) and is the figure for core Crown borrowings. This is different from the net core Crown debt figure often used by politicians when discussing debt-to-GDP ratios. We use this (on Treasury's advice) as it is a gross debt figure but excludes debt held by state-owned enterprises, which would have been covered in the Reserve Bank statistics. The debt figure supplied by the Local Government Funding Agency is gross debt for the year to June 30, 2024. It captures all core council activities (Watercare, Auckland Transport, etc) but excludes some commercial activities (eg Christchurch City Council's Orion lines company, Port of Lyttelton, Christchurch Airport) as these would also be included in RBNZ data. Student loan debt is from the IRD statistics to March 2025. COMING UP IN THIS SERIES Tomorrow: Gov't debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Wednesday: Consumer debt: What are Kiwis borrowing for? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Liam Dann is Business Editor at Large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, as well as presenting and producing videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Do those who manage rugby want to see a crowd? I have listened to RNZ with growing concern
What is wrong with the people responsible for such genuinely awful planning? Had they started the early fixture a bit later and ensured a wait between games of, say, just 15 minutes before a 4.35pm kickoff for the NPC game, the crowd of probably 12,000 or so people would likely have stayed and enjoyed both games. The vast majority of the significant crowd immediately left at the first game's final whistle and the remaining crowd by the time of the next kickoff, as seen on TV, was the proverbial 'two men and a dog'! This was the first time we had attended at Eden Park for many years. We won't be back. In retrospect, it was 'the smart move' to leave as soon as the schools game ended as, when I gave up in disgust and turned the telly off, Taranaki were giving Auckland a good old-fashioned thrashing. Roger Hawkins, Herne Bay. Covid inquiry I am wondering why the citizenry of New Zealand are surprised when some politicians will not attend the Royal Commission on the Covid response. We elect our leaders to act on our behalf. Normally, everything is transparent and follows due process. A pandemic is an interruption to the normal business of a country; it requires instant, sometimes repugnant outcomes for the people and makes the deliverer of the message very unpopular. Being told to isolate and how and when we may leave our homes is anathema to New Zealanders but in the instance of a pandemic of the severity of Covid, it was necessary. Decision-makers did do what they thought right at that time, with what expert information and scientific knowledge was available to them. Why is the 'rightness or wrongness' of those decisions now being queried? It was over and above the parameters of normal governance. It was a pandemic! Life-threatening. A once-in-a-lifetime event. Yes, money was spent. How much and for how long was those leaders' decision to make. It is not now the privilege of today's political cohort to question the minutiae of detail of the whys and wherefores. New Zealand did not have coffins lining the streets. Perhaps our island nation was saved by the unpopular isolation tactics returning citizens endured but they can be proud they contributed to the safety of all. Do not turn this to a dollar mentality when measuring outcomes. A democratic society pays what is necessary to house and feed its criminals; provides succour to the needy, cares for the elderly – why pillory the decision-makers for money spent saving the nation in the time of a pandemic? Robyn Tubb, Millwater. RNZ's decline As a former senior NZBC announcer, I've listened to RNZ National's decline with growing concern. Richard Sutherland's recent criticism (Media Insider, August 16) confirms what many listeners know: standards have slipped dramatically. Today's RNZ presenters gabble through scripts, mangle pronunciations ('flowan' for 'flown,' 'pardy' for 'party'), and rush through te reo Māori with obvious discomfort. This undermines both our official language's mana and RNZ's credibility as New Zealand's public broadcaster. The problem runs deeper than technical issues. RNZ has drifted toward commercial radio tactics. There is much gabbling and puerile banter, chasing ratings rather than serving its unique public mission. But public radio shouldn't sound like The Rock or ZM, it should offer something better. Excellence means clear, accurate presentation with proper pronunciation of both English and te reo Māori. It means substance over filler, cultural competence and an authentically New Zealand voice that maintains professional standards without stuffiness. The solution isn't complicated: establish clear broadcasting standards, provide ongoing professional development and create a culture valuing craft over ratings. Experienced broadcasters should mentor newcomers, passing on both technical skills and understanding of public radio's role. RNZ National should be the best of New Zealand broadcasting; thoughtful, substantial and respectful of audience intelligence. The talent exists; what's needed is leadership willing to set and maintain standards. Our public broadcaster should make us proud, not require excuses. James Gregory, Parnell.