logo
'Thriving' Māori economies revealed in new report

'Thriving' Māori economies revealed in new report

RNZ News4 days ago
Māwhera Pā is divided into five 'whare'
Photo:
Supplied / Atawhai Creative
The Māori economy is "thriving", recent statistics have revealed, but a new report shows Māori businesses do not always measure their success monetarily.
According to
the prior
Te Ōhanga Māori 2023
report, Māori entities grew from contributing $17 billion to New Zealand's GDP in 2018 to $32 billion in 2023, turning a 6.5 percent contribution to GDP into 8.9 percent.
The Māori economy asset base has grown from $69 billion in 2018 to $126 billion in 2023 - an increase of 83 percent.
Released on Wednesday, the
Amplifying Māori approaches: The transformative potential of Māori economies
report from lead author Matthew Scobie (Kāi Tahu) and co-author Tayla Forward (Ngāpuhi), suggests Māori economies revolved around "taonga with labour organised through mahi and reciprocal exchanges based on utu", or repayment.
Forward, a researcher in economics and political economy based in Tāmaki Makaurau, said the Māori economy was "big, thriving and active".
"But what that captures is sort of different. Are we thinking about Māori businesses that are operating in the usual dominant economic system, or are we talking about something that takes place according to Māori logic?
"Considering there's parts of the economy that are taking place on a different logic in the dominant system, that's the Māori economy that we're most interested in unleashing, that's the part that is an expression of mana motuhake Māori."
Tayla Forward said the case studies form an important part of the new report and they are all defying the dominant system to pursue pakihi Māori (Māori businesses)
Photo:
supplied
There was not much that separated the Māori economy from the contemporary setting; it was just an umbrella-term used for authorities, businesses, and employers who self-identified as Māori.
But it was more than that. While an economy revolved around the production and consumption of goods and services and the supply of money, Māori businesses often built off tikanga, or Māori lore, to help their communities - such as iwi and hapū, and beyond.
"We talk a lot in this report about the ways that those pursuing pakihi Māori (Māori business) have to take on these hybrid strategies to strategically navigate the dominant system," Forward said.
"Instead of just aiming to increase our share in the dominant system, we take up a demand to change the shape of the dominant system, and those things that currently sit beneath the surface of the dominant system can be unleashed."
There were four case studies prominent in the report - each an example of "Māori logic" combined with old and new ways of business, providing perspectives on housing, food sovereignty, trading and iwi authority, respectively.
"They strike up against the system, they strike up against pūtea, and the need to sort of go between worlds all the time."
A case study by Danielle Webb focused on Kelly Francis' Whenua Warrior charitable trust.
In 2017, Francis left her corporate job to grow an edible garden accessible to every New Zealander and feed the community.
The not-for-profit organisation used hua parakore (kaupapa Māori framework) and matauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) for mahinga kai, community engagement, environmental conservation and preservation.
Within two days of Francis' first project under Whenua Warrior, 132 gardens cropped up across South Auckland.
Building a garden at the back of a home in Manurewa, South Auckland in NOV 2022 - as a part of the #projectSouthSide600
Photo:
Facebook/Whenua Warrior
"The world is our oyster anyway, so we can do what we should be able to do," Forward said.
The report stated Francis viewed waged labour as something that can potentially rob people of time that could be spent nurturing te taiao (the natural world), fundamental to food sovereignty.
"We should be able to have particularly Māori responses to decisions about what we're creating together and how we resource each other and the things that we create together, and if that keeps having to be mediated by pūtea, that's not in our control," Forward said.
"We have to make all these strategic allowances to navigate towards whatever ends we're trying to pursue with our economic activity. If we want to have this very whenua-oriented and whakapapa-oriented economic ends being served by our economic practices, then we need to engage with the system that generates the constraints."
The report broke the Māori economy into subsections - economies of mana, tribal economies, and diverse and community economies.
"These have created necessary interventions to assert Māori perspectives as valid to national and international audiences," the report said.
In simple terms, economic decisions were influenced by "mana-enhancing" interactions between people and the environment.
Furthermore, there were two sides to this conversation.
How did Māori organise their economies, and what framings of the economy did not align with Māori values?
It stemmed from the perspective of measuring wealth by how much passes through one person's hands, rather than how much accumulated, and it allocated resources and undertook activities to generate adequate profits, Forward said.
"It doesn't have to be profit-maximising, but you know, you need profits in order to survive otherwise you'll fall apart."
History was deeply rooted in this topic and specific to iwi and hapū organisations.
"Tribal economies move from how things were organised to the institutions that enable or constrain these ways of organising today," the report said.
"This includes not just direct breaches of Te Tiriti, or the failure to honour purchase deeds, but the systematic exclusion of Māori from decision-making around how the economy is designed."
An example of a tribal economy was Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, which was established under the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998 and the Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Act 1996.
"Collective settlement assets are managed by Ngāi Tahu Holdings, separately from the bodies that spend and distribute the income earned from those assets, The Office," the lead author wrote.
A Ngāi Tahu forestry block.
Photo:
Ngai Tahu
The Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement of $170 million had grown into net assets valued at NZ$1.66 billion. Assets included businesses like Queenstown's Shotover Jet and Fiordland's Hollyford Wilderness Experience.
"Typically, any surplus generated by activities from settlement resources is appropriated by the Ngāi Tahu Charitable Trust and distributed to the wider iwi. But these resources only exist because of the intergenerational struggle for the Ngāi Tahu claim and are intended for future generations."
In 2024, each of the 18 papatipu rūnanga (authoritative tribal council of a specific tribal area) in Te Wai Pounamu received $574,334 with a total direct distribution since settlement of $17.2 million.
Today, the wealthiest iwi contributed to improving the wellbeing of 80,000 tribal members.
Diverse and community economies used economic activities, both paid and unpaid, beyond formal market transactions. They included gifting, sharing, volunteering, and caring as legitimate economic actions.
Although some challenges had been identified - such as resourcing rangatiratanga, financialisation, no time for kaitiakitanga (guardianship), and balancing obligations.
The report also stated it also required pushing beyond limited Crown recognition, and exploring diverse forms of labour, enterprise, transactions, property and finance to achieve diverse and community economies.
Forward explained it in terms of the "Matike Mai sphere" - the sphere of influence.
"Of course [Māori] are a firm, at large, and empower the rangatiratanga sphere, but I think we see in our in our case studies what the kāwanatanga is doing does strike us, though we resist and though we're in defiance of their idea that they have a sole claim to authority sometimes.
"We have to navigate strategically and that's what we take up - a new strategic navigation in which the kāwanatanga diverts us and say no more. That there are things that we can do in the relational sphere between those two spheres to demand a different shape rather than just a greater share."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IKEA cagey about opening date for first NZ store this year
IKEA cagey about opening date for first NZ store this year

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

IKEA cagey about opening date for first NZ store this year

IKEA's new store at Sylvia Park is taking shape. Photo: Supplied Global furniture giant IKEA is due to open its first New Zealand store in Auckland some time this year, but has not yet told Auckland Council when. IKEA said it was still on track to open at Sylvia Park and had so far employed 85 of the 500 staff it needed. Within at least two months of opening, IKEA has to provide the council with an opening date and managment plan, but a council spokesperson confirmed it was still waiting to receive this information. The consent conditions for the big box retailer required it to submit an plan that detailed how it would manage the anticipated crowds expected to drive there. "No less than two months prior to the scheduled opening date of the Ikea store, the consent holder must prepare and submit a store opening management plan to Auckland Council for written certification," the consent decision stated. "The purpose of the plan is to set out the measures to be adopted to manage effects on the transportation network during the first three months following the opening of the store." IKEA has yet to announce its opening day, but indicated it would be in time for Christmas . The council indicated that, before an official store opening, it wanted Ikea to open online to manage anticipated demand and have a soft opening to test traffic management. It advised IKEA to avoid opening on public holidays, Fridays, weekends, Black Friday or Boxing Day. The council asked Ikea to provide details about "incentives to travel to the site by transport modes other than private vehicle, such as bus, train and active modes", as well as "comprehensive information provided to the public on travel routes to and from the store". Ikea must provide at least 54 bicycle parks and 543 carparks, and submit a travel plan to the council that shows how it would encourage employees and customers to use public transport, walk or cycle to the store. Construction began on the 34,000 square metre store in 2023 and the iconic blue building is taking shape at Sylvia Park . The ground level will be a carpark, with the store spread across two floors, including its Swedish restaurant that will sell meatballs and hotdogs. The retailer is still recruiting for its anticipated. IKEA people and culture manager Lauren Clegg said 15,000 people had applied for advertised roles by the end of May. She said 85 people had been employed so far and more roles would be advertised this month, attracting thousands of applicants. "There does seem to be a lot of people that are between jobs at the moment or struggling to get into work," she said. "I think we're in a really tough time in New Zealand, with the market at the moment, and that's probably contributing to some of our numbers." Clegg said the IKEA opening had caused excitement. "We're definitely on track to open late 2025, but the exact opening date is very under wraps for now." IKEA would continue to release and advertise for roles until November. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

'Announcement of an announcement': Govt accused of recycling projects in $6b infrastructure push
'Announcement of an announcement': Govt accused of recycling projects in $6b infrastructure push

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

'Announcement of an announcement': Govt accused of recycling projects in $6b infrastructure push

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. File photo. Photo: AFP / NurPhoto /Jakub Porzycki The opposition has dismissed the government's infrastructure announcement as a public relations stunt, while Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says the projects will create thousands of jobs and improve the nation's productivity. On Sunday, Luxon joined Minister for Economic Growth Nicola Willis and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop at Drury near Auckland's southern border, where the population was forecast to swell over the next few decades, to launch an infrastructure update showing $6 billion of government-funded construction due to get underway before the end of the year. The projects included the construction of a new acute mental health unit at Hutt Valley Hospital, seismic strengthening of the Parliamentary Library, and long-awaited upgrades to SH76 Brougham St in Christchurch. Bishop said there were almost $4b of roading projects in the list of work getting underway, including the Ōtaki to north of Levin expressway, the Melling interchange, the Waihoehoe Road upgrade, and the new Ōmanawa bridge on SH29. The projects would create thousands of jobs and lift productivity by getting people and freight to their destinations quickly and safely, Bishop said. But Green Party infrastructure spokesperson Julie Anne Genter said spending billions of dollars on roading projects would not solve the country's productivity crisis. Green Party infrastructure spokesperson Julie Anne Genter. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver "They're trying to distract from the fact their actions cancelling heaps of projects has led to a crisis in the construction industry here in Aotearoa, where last month almost a third of business liquidations were construction companies. "The coalition government has cancelled far more projects than any other government that I'm aware of. They cancelled the ferries, they've cancelled lots of public house builds, and other decisions they've made to cut public spending have led to a longer and deeper recession. "This is really a government trying to govern with PR stunts and slogans, and no real commitment to solving the challenges we're facing." A majority of New Zealanders wanted to take action on climate change, so getting off fossil fuels and onto more sustainable transport was a win-win that would do more for productivity, she said. Willis said the projects due to get underway included new roads, hospitals, schools, high-tech laboratories and other government buildings. "That means spades in the ground, jobs throughout the country and a stronger economy." Improving New Zealand's infrastructure was critical to growing the economy and helping with the cost of living, Willis said. Luxon said the government was "on the side of the Kiwis who need roads to get to their jobs at the crack of dawn, deliver essential goods like food and get their kids to school." He said the government would partner with the private sector "where it made sense". "We're obviously are doing a huge amount of investment ourselves as government, but it's a combination of both of those things." Labour's infrastructure spokesperson Kieran McAnulty characterised the announcement as nothing more than a distraction. "Just this morning... the Associate Housing Minister [Tama Potaka] finally admitted the government's policies have contributed to an unprecedented rise in homelessness and the best distraction they can come up with is an announcement of an announcement - I think that speaks volumes," McAnulty said. Labour's infrastructure spokesperson Kieran McAnulty. Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker "There's nothing new in today's announcement. People knew that was happening, and some of it was actually started under the previous government. What the infrastructure sector actually want is certainty ... because we've already lost 15,000 workers in construction, many of them have gone to Australia, and every week we've got civil construction firms going under because of the lack of work. "Today's re-announcement isn't going to help any of those people. "It would have been preferable for the government to announce new work, or bring projects and maintenance work forward to give firms confidence and certainty, so they can either keep their workers or attract them back." References to private investment and collaboration rang hollow, McAnulty said. "We've been hearing the government talking about public-private partnerships since the day they came in - we still haven't seen any of them signed or underway. I'd like to see the government actually come up with something tangible." "Announcing things and making a big deal about things that they already had been announced or underway under the previous government is not going to give people the certainty they want," he said. Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett welcomed the announcement, which he said came at a time when the industry was "bleeding capability". Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett. Photo: RNZ/ Tom Kitchin An Infrastructure New Zealand survey found 65 percent of firms had reduced staff over the past twelve months, and nearly half had lost workers to overseas markets. "New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit, and we need our skilled workforce here to close it." He said the country has a "perennial problem" with start-stops when it comes to building infrastructure, and he wanted to see a more "bipartisan approach". Leggett acknowledged the projects announced were not new, but said the industry association's focus was on the increase in projects underway by December this year, compared to last year. "And we're hopeful that in December of 2026, there'll be even more work. "We've got very skilled, professional people in different parts across the infrastructure industry that are keen to get their teeth into those projects announced today, some of them, of course, have been paused or cancelled previously. But the point is they're going to be in the market quickly." He wanted to see more work on smoothing out the infrastructure pipeline. "What we need to do is get agreed on what the pipeline looks like and never have the kind of stops we've seen in the last decade or so that pause or cancel projects. "Our economy needs this stimulus, and it needs these projects so people can get health and education results and be able to move around on transport projects that actually get built rather than just get argued over." The full list of projects due to get underway this year includes: The government said there was also a small number of "significant projects" which could not be named for "a range of commercial reasons", but were included in the $6b total. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Will Working for Families changes leave people worse off?
Will Working for Families changes leave people worse off?

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Will Working for Families changes leave people worse off?

Fleur Howard, chief executive of FinCap, says some families could be left without enough money week to week. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King An organisation representing financial mentors around the country is worried that proposed changes to the Working for Families scheme could leave some families worse off. As part of the Budget, the government said it would look at options to help avoid the issue of Working for Families debt. In the 2022 year, only 24 percent of households receiving weekly or fortnightly Working for Families payments and who were squared up by IRD at the end of the tax year had received the right amount of money. People who earned more than expected can end up with an overpayment debt that that they struggle to pay back . There is almost $300 million owed in Working for Families debt . A discussion document, on which submissions were sought, said the government's current thinking was that a quarterly assessment of Working for Families eligibility could strike the right balance between responsiveness, certainty and recipient effort. This would adjust what people were paid much more frequently. But Fleur Howard, chief executive of FinCap, said in a submission in response that she was worried that some families could be left without enough money. A shorter quarterly assessment period would be an improvement, she said, but it needed to be refined. "Aspects of the proposed design appear to suit some whānau situations better than others. We are concerned that in its current state, this design would have a disproportionally negative impact on those who are already experiencing financial instability due to more fluctuations in payment amount." She said FinCap's internal data showed most financial mentor clients had a weekly budget deficit even after they had received help. "More often than not, this deficit is due to whānau trying to pay for essentials, and commonly going into debt to do so. "This, among other markers, points to the fact that government support is not currently adequate to cover living expenses. We have concerns that some of the proposed changes would exacerbate income inadequacy in certain scenarios, particularly for whānau who need that money week to week." She said an example used in the discussion document, outlining a situation where a woman on the sole parent benefit went into additional work for a short period of time, highlighted a potentially unacceptable outcome. In that case, the woman's Working for Families credits would be reduced by $130 a week for the quarter after her temporary work, even though she was no longer in work, because the calculation was based on the higher income from the previous quarter. "We can see that the 'lagged income' mechanism makes sense from the perspective of achieving accuracy, however the potential for a decreased payment below what a whānau is entitled to poses real risk for wellbeing and social participation. "There is also a real concern over the dynamic whereby a quarterly period of higher income followed by a quarterly period of low income would see increased hardship within the low-income period, due to those payments reflecting the past higher income. "While this could be squared up during the end of year process, our data tells us that most whānau living week to week need that money as part of their weekly payments." Howard said mentors were also concerned something similar could happen if someone lost a job and went on the benefit, because their reduced income would not show up in the Working for Families calculation for another quarter. "Whānau need every cent they are entitled to in a timely manner when events such as job loss occur." A solution could be for the quarterly assessment period to look forward, rather than backwards, she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store