‘A real coup': NATO must learn from Ukraine strategic strike on Russia
Ukraine resistance to Russia's invasion was providing lessons to NATO.
NATO countries are under pressure to increase in their defence spending.
Over 70% of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones.
Ukraine's 'creativity', including its massive 'Spider's web' drone attack deep inside Russia, holds profound lessons for Western militaries, the top NATO commander overseeing battlefield innovation told AFP.
'What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse - and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago,' French Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview.
'Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity.'
Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed.
'It was a real coup.'
'We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning,' the navy commander said.
'We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated.'
Faced with the Russian threat, NATO this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow.
But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping NATO and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years.
Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly.
Pierre Vandier
The admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said NATO needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack.
'When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter,' he said.
'That's what should prevent war - making the adversary think: 'Tomorrow morning, I won't win.''
NATO countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month. That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware.
Daniel Carde/Anadolu via Getty Images
But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems?
'No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment,' Vandier said.
'However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it.'
Officials say that over 70% of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones. But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent.
'Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10m-long drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools,' Vandier said.
'If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs.'
Jose Colon/Anadolu via Getty Images
The admiral, who works out of NATO's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was 'integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine'.
NATO and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its neighbour.
Artificial Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield.
'All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities,' Vandier said.
'It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155mm shell.'
Viacheslav Madiievskyi/Ukrinform/NurPhoto via Getty Images
This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which NATO aims to expand by at least 30% over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros.
Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was 'substantial' it was 'fully realistic'.
'Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump says U.S. trade "deal with China is done," after tariff talks yield "framework deal"
London — President Trump declared on Wednesday morning that a U.S. trade "deal with China is done." The U.S. leader offered a few key details of a "framework deal" reached between senior U.S. and Chinese trade representatives in London on Tuesday, but he acknowledged that both he and Chinese President Xi Jinping were both yet to formally sign off on the agreement. The U.S. and Chinese trade teams wrapped up two days of marathon negotiations in London close to midnight on Tuesday, with the sides saying they had agreed on a new "framework deal" to ease the trade war between the world's two largest economies. The tension had only increased in recent weeks, despite an agreement reached in Geneva during a first round of talks in May to put the steepest retaliatory tariffs on hold. Those record-high tariffs are due to kick back in on July 9, unless the agreement struck in London is in fact formalized by Trump and Xi. In month since the Geneva talks, Beijing had cut its exports of critical rare earth elements to the U.S. by half compared to the previous year, and the Trump administration said it would "aggressively revoke" the visas of Chinese students in the U.S. who were found to be linked to the Chinese Communist party. While the announcement by Mr. Trump's top negotiators on Tuesday evening of an agreed framework was thin on details, the president said in a post on his own Truth Social media platform Wednesday morning that it was "done, subject to final approval with president Xi and me." He said the deal would see China maintain its current 10% tariffs on goods imported from the U.S., while the U.S. would keep 55% tariffs on Chinese imports. There was no immediate confirmation from China's government of any terms agreed to in the framework, or whether President Xi intended to sign off on the deal. In Geneva, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to put their unprecedented tariffs of more than 100% on each other's imports on hold for 90 days. That brought U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports down to their current level of 30% after they briefly soared to around 145%. Chinese tariffs currently stand at 10%, after hitting 125% before the Geneva round of talks. Speaking Tuesday, Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang, who took part in the talks in London, confirmed the agreement on a framework, "in principle." On Wednesday, China's state-run media said the delegations had "made new progress," but offered no details. "The framework deal puts meat on the bones of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs," U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters after the talks in London, which spanned six hours on Monday and then more than 12 hours into the evening on Tuesday. Lutnick said part of the objective of this week's second round of meetings was just to get "the negativity out" of the bilateral relationship, which had festered since the Geneva talks. "Now we can go forward to try to do positive trade, growing trade," he said. The U.S. wants China to resume and increase shipments of rare earths. The materials are vital to industries ranging from weapons and aerospace to electric vehicles and small consumer goods. On Wednesday, in his all-capital-letter social media post, Mr. Trump said under the agreement reached in London, "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities." "Relationship is excellent!" added Mr. Trump. "At stake is the release of rare earths exports to U.S. manufacturers — stockpiles are dwindling fast — in exchange for aerospace parts and semiconductor programming technology to China," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told investors in a report. "A 'fail' would raise the risk of auto and aircraft production grinding to a halt as soon as next month. If that happens, economic growth will be severely dented for an unknown term."
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NATO summit statement omits Ukraine's entry bid, $40 billion pledge, Bloomberg reports
A one-page draft of a joint declaration for the upcoming NATO summit omits Ukraine's membership aspirations and last year's pledge of over $40 billion in support, Bloomberg reported on June 11 after reviewing the draft. This news signals that, for the first time since 2022, Russia's war against Ukraine will not be the chief focus of the annual NATO meeting, which is taking place on June 24-25 in The Hague. The unusually brief document recognizes Russia as a threat to NATO but not as an aggressor in Ukraine. It also does not mention China, Bloomberg reported. The communique of the 2024 summit in Washington named Beijing as a "decisive enabler" of Russia's war against Ukraine. Last year's gathering also included a declaration that Ukraine's path to NATO is "irreversible" and promised more than $40 billion in additional military aid. This year, the document will solely focus on defense spending, as U.S. President Donald Trump pushes NATO partners to hike the military expenditure benchmark from 2% to 5% of GDP. The final version of the statement can still change, Bloomberg reported. The brevity of the communique and the summit itself, as well as the decreased focus on Ukraine, stems from the effort to avoid conflict between Trump and European allies. In a sharp break from former U.S. President Joe Biden, the Trump administration has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine and signaled its intent to reduce assistance for Kyiv in the next year's budget. The U.S. president initially vowed to broker a peace deal between Kyiv and Moscow but became increasingly less engaged in the process as the negotiations stalled and Russia only intensified its attacks against Ukraine. According to Bloomberg, NATO allies will pledge to allocate at least 3.5% of GDP to defense needs and 1.5% to protecting infrastructure and civil preparedness by 2032. Member states will also consider counting their contributions to Ukraine as part of the new defense spending targets, the news outlet reported. The summit was preceded by rumors that President Volodymyr Zelensky would not be invited to participate for the first time due to U.S. opposition. Later, the speculations were dispelled after the Dutch media reported that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had invited the Ukrainian leader to attend. Read also: As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Trump says U.S.-China trade deal "is done," after tariff talks yield "framework deal"
London — President Trump declared on Wednesday morning that a U.S. trade "deal with China is done." The American leader offered a few key details of the agreement reached between senior U.S. and Chinese trade representatives in London on Tuesday, but he acknowledged that both he and Chinese President Xi Jinping were both yet to formally sign off on the agreement. The U.S. and Chinese trade teams wrapped up two days of marathon negotiations in London close to midnight on Tuesday, with the sides saying they had agreed on a new "framework deal" to ease the trade war between the world's two largest economies. The tension had only increased in recent weeks, despite an agreement reached in Geneva during a first round of talks in May to put the steepest retaliatory tariffs on hold. In the intervening month, Beijing had cut its exports of critical rare earth elements to the U.S. by half compared to the previous year, and the Trump administration said it would "aggressively revoke" the visas of Chinese students in the U.S. who were found to be linked to the Chinese Communist party. While the announcement by Mr. Trump's top negotiators on Tuesday evening of an agreed framework was thin on detail, he said in a post on his own Truth Social media platform Wednesday morning that it was "done, subject to final approval with president Xi and me." He said the deal would see China maintain its current 10% tariffs on goods imported from the U.S., while the U.S. would keep 55% tariffs on Chinese imports. There was no immediate confirmation from China's government of any terms agreed to in the framework, or whether President Xi intended to sign off on the deal. "The framework deal puts meat on the bones of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs," U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters after the talks in London, which spanned six hours on Monday and then more than 12 hours into the evening on Tuesday. China and the U.S. had broadly agreed in Geneva to pause crippling tariffs on each other for 90 days, through July 9. Lutnick said part of the objective of this week's second round of meetings was just to get "the negativity out" of the bilateral relationship, which had festered since then. "Now we can go forward to try to do positive trade, growing trade," he said. The U.S. wants China to resume and increase shipments of rare earths. The materials are vital to industries ranging from weapons and aerospace to electric vehicles and small consumer goods. On Wednesday, in his all-capital-letter social media post, Mr. Trump said under the agreement reached in London, "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities." "Relationship is excellent!" added Mr. Trump. "At stake is the release of rare earths exports to U.S. manufacturers — stockpiles are dwindling fast — in exchange for aerospace parts and semiconductor programming technology to China," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told investors in a report. "A 'fail' would raise the risk of auto and aircraft production grinding to a halt as soon as next month. If that happens, economic growth will be severely dented for an unknown term." This breaking news story will be updated.
