
EU countries begin political battle over €2 trillion budget
Von der Leyen's plan, unveiled on Wenesday after weeks of mounting speculation, will require unanimity from the 27 member states. The president of the European Commission called it the "most ambitious" budget ever presented.
"No country is ready to accept the budget as it is today," said Marie Bjerre, Denmark's minister, at the end of the meeting. As the rotating presidency of the EU Council, Denmark will steer the debate until the end of the year.
"This is a long discussion we will have, and obviously, there are different views on how to structure the budget, and it will also be difficult. But Europe needs a budget," she said.
Long-standing tensions between fiscally conservative countries such as Austria, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands, and more indebted southern nations, like Spain and France, resurfaced on Friday, offering a preview of the squabble to come.
Finland's Minister for European Affairs, Joakim Strand, argued the budget level — which has increased from 1.13% of the EU's GNI to 1.26% — was "too high" and must be slashed. The Commission says the figure is 1.15% after subtracting 0.11% from the €168 billion needed to repay the COVID-era debt between 2028 and 2034.
Austria's Claudia Plakolm, whose country joined the Frugal Four in the 2020 talks, said the proposed budget was "very, very far" from a position she could endorse.
"We called for the careful and wise use of Europeans' tax money, and this draft is neither more careful nor wise," she said. "We find the volume of the EU budget excessive."
Her Polish counterpart, Adam Szlapka, praised von der Leyen's proposal for its ambition and scope, but cautioned: "We still need some discussion about it, especially in terms of cohesion and common agricultural policy."
Agricultural subsidies and cohesion funds — aimed at narrowing the socio-economic gap between the richest and poorest regions — have been merged into a larger pot, with important changes in how they are managed and distributed, as Euronews reported.
Spain's Fernando Sampedro voiced a discordant note, saying the €2 trillion size "does not measure up to the challenges" facing the bloc.
'We appreciate that security and defence are treated as a European public good that requires a strong response from the Union, but this should not be at the expense of other European public goods such as the triple green, digital and social transition, cohesion policy and other important areas of the budget that will require attention,' Sampedro said.
The long-term budget — formally known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) — is funded through two main channels: national contributions from member states, which cover the bulk, and so-called own resources, which are EU-wide taxes.
In her proposal, von der Leyen has suggested boosting the existing pool of own resources with three new taxes on electronic waste (e-waste), tobacco products and companies with an annual turnover above €100 million, together with the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Carbon Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
In total, Brussels expects to raise about €58.5 billion every year through old and new own resources, which would be enough to cover the COVID-era repayments without asking member states for extra cash or sacrificing strategic programmes.
Governments have traditionally opposed boosting the Commission's ability to collect revenue independently, however, and von der Leyen's last proposal to modernise the EU's own resources is still on the table and in limbo.
Nordic countries like Sweden and Finland have already voiced their opposition to new taxes, while Germany has firmly rejected the idea of issuing new common debt.
"We do not see the need for new own resources or new common borrowing. There is no such thing as a free lunch," said Jessica Rosencrantz, Sweden's representative.
"In a time where national budgets are under great economic pressure, the answer can't be more money and a bigger budget. It has to be about responsible handling of limited resources, about making priorities and tough calls," she added.
But the French Minister for European Affairs disagreed and called the introduction of new own resources a condition "sine qua non" for supporting strategic priorities.
At the end of the meeting, Piotr Serafin, the European Commissioner for Budget, defended the proposal against the first chorus of criticism.
"We understand it is not the time to call for higher contributions from the member states to the European budget," Serafin said in response to a question from Euronews.
"That is the only way to square the circle of being more effective, more ambitious with respect to financing new priorities is therefore an ambitious own resources package."
Serafin acknowledged the concerns among ministers but noted the discussions were still in "very early stages" and required "a lot" of technical work before developing at the political level of ministers and, ultimately, leaders.
"Europe is in a crucial time, and it seemed to me that we are all very well aware of that," said Denmark's Marie Bjerre, speaking next to Serafin.
"The state of play for Europe is different. We need a stronger Europe. We need to be more ambitious, and I think that is something we can agree on."
The Danish presidency intends to finalise a "nego-box" by the end of the year, laying out the core principles on which the negotiations will follow over the next two years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US
"Trump always chickens out." The phrase, coined by a columnist at the Financial Times, has been circulating widely in recent weeks. The idea that the US president speaks loudly but does not always follow through on his threats has fueled complacency among stock markets regarding the risks his trade war poses to the global economy. However, accusations of cowardice may not apply to Donald Trump alone. The European Union's hesitance in the face of Trump's maneuvering has also raised questions about whether the 27 member states can truly engage in the kind of power struggle that is now essential. While Brussels believed it was on track to minimize the tariffs on European exports to the United States, Trump dashed the EU's hopes by announcing on July 12 that he would unilaterally impose a 30% tax starting August 1. Is this a final bluff to extract further concessions, or a definitive move that could deal a severe blow to European growth? In any case, as the American president ramps up the pressure, the EU continues to waver, trying to salvage what it still can. European leaders have responded with lackluster retaliatory measures that have done little to deter Trump, who seems indifferent to the economic consequences of his actions. This game of high-stakes bluffing is likely to benefit the party setting the rules, to the detriment of those who are forced to adapt, always a step behind and uncertain of the game's true objective. Setting ambitious goals The confrontation appears to be based on a misunderstanding. The EU seeks to negotiate in good faith, aiming for fair trade based on the principle of comparative advantage between countries. But the US president has little interest in this quest for a mutually beneficial, purely commercial agreement. His ambitions go further. He aims to undermine Europe by any means, because he despises everything it stands for: supranationalism, multilateralism, progressivism and the primacy of law. Yet the EU has no reason to apologize for what it represents, nor to make concessions on its tax policy or the regulatory framework it has established for digital services. In this final stretch of negotiations, Europe must give the talks a political dimension, moving beyond the technical aspects that have dominated the debate so far. The EU should clearly set out its red lines and aim high. Settling for a compromise as unfavorable as the one the United Kingdom accepted in May would be unacceptable. If the 27 member states, as the US's top trading partner, fail to demonstrate that they carry more weight than a single country, it would send a disastrous message about the purpose of the European project. The EU's strategy of absorbing American provocations without actually implementing the retaliatory measures at its disposal has shown its limitations. The "proportionate, robust, and well-calibrated" reprisals promoted by the 27 member states do not measure up to what is a clear act of aggression, one whose aim goes beyond simply rebalancing the US trade deficit – its goal is to subordinate Europe. If Europe were to "chicken out," the consequences would not be purely economic.


Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Is von der Leyen ready for bruising budget battles?
It was a lacklustre victory for Ursula von der Leyen in the European Parliament. Many of those who supported her in the no-confidence vote did so without enthusiasm and to avoid a crisis. The Commission president's challenge now is to advance her agenda with a fragile majority and against an energized opposition. And with bruising battles ahead over the next long-term budget and a looming trade war with the US the pressure is only mounting. Can von der Leyen deliver? Questions for our guests this week: Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Irish member of the European Parliament for the Renew Europe Group, Philipp Lausberg, senior analyst at the European Policy Centre and Klaus Welle, chairman of the Academic Council at the Wilfried Martens Centre. On the surface, it was a good day for Ursula von der Leyen. A solid majority of members of the European Parliament expressed their trust in her. To achieve this result, however, the German Christian Democrat had to expend considerable political capital to buy concessions from the Socialists and Democrats to keep them on board. It worked this time, but her center-left allies made it clear that, from now on, they expect her to stick to agreed policies, for example on climate. A policy that has put von der Leyen increasingly at odds with her own EPP led by her nemesis Manfred Weber. Brussels watchers predict lively discussions on the fate of the 2040 emission targets as well as laborious budget negotiations in the months to come. The question is: how messy will it get? The second topic: The surge in migration flows from Libya that Greece is currently experiencing could easily evolve into the EU's crisis of the summer. Last week, on the island of Crete alone, almost 500 migrants arrived per day. Athens announced stricter measures, suspending asylum requests for three months. The government's goal is to discourage people in Libya from beginning the dangerous journey across the sea. But for that you need the cooperation of the Libyans. That's what an EU delegation was trying to accomplish when they were kicked out of the country by a local warlord over protocol issues. That begs the question: how serious a partner is Libya for Europe and how to deal with a failed state? Finally, the panel discussed the relationship between the EU and China that caught in a cycle of disgruntlement - and it doesn't appear to be getting any better. Restricted market access, trade imbalances or China's support of Russia in its war against Ukraine: pick your favorite dispute. That's the backdrop against the upcoming EU-China summit in Beijing next week. But as Donald Trump's shadow is looming large, some suggest Brussels should work toward a reset of relations with the Chinese. Initially, the summit was planned to run for two days in Brussels, now it's only one day in Beijing. Xi Jinping refused to come to Brussels and he will most likely not participate in the summit. Also, no joint statement is planned. What needs to be done to overcome years of frustration and scepticism?


Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
42 million EU workers can't afford holiday: Which countries are worst?
In 2023, 15% of employed people in the EU were unable to afford a one-week holiday away from home. While this percentage might not appear very high at first glance, it represents around 42 million workers. In each of the EU's "Big Four" economies (Germany, France, Spain and Italy), over 5 million workers were unable to afford a week-long holiday according to Eurostat data published by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC). 'Taking a break with family or friends is important for our physical and mental health, and it is a basic part of the European social contract,' said ETUC General Secretary Esther Lynch, criticising the situation. Holiday poverty among workers continues to rise Holiday poverty among workers is on the rise across the EU, marking the third consecutive annual increase. In 2022, 40.5 million employed people reported being unable to afford a one-week holiday away from home. That number rose to 41.5 million in 2023—an increase of over one million workers in just a year. The share of affected workers grew from 14% to 15%. 'The findings are the result of an increasingly unequal economy, in which workers are forced to give up their holidays due to rising costs for accommodation, transport and food, combined with declining purchasing power and speculation', the ETUC stated. East-West gap in holiday affordability for workers The data reveals a strong disparity in holiday affordability across the EU, particularly between Eastern/Southern Europe and Western/Northern Europe. Romania tops the list, with 32% of workers unable to afford a one-week holiday. Close behind are Hungary (26%), Bulgaria (24%), Portugal and Cyprus (both 23%), and Slovakia (22%). The Nordic countries—Finland, Sweden and Denmark—along with the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Slovenia, report the lowest levels of holiday poverty, ranging between 5% and 7%. Czechia, Austria, and Belgium reported holiday poverty rates at or below 10%. Despite their economic weight, even the EU's largest economies report concerning levels of holiday poverty. Among the EU's Big Four, Spain (18%) and Italy (17%) exceed the EU average of 15%. France (12%) and Germany (11%) fall below the average, but both still remain above 10%. EU's Big Four: Over 5 million workers in each country can't afford a holiday Absolute figures speak louder than percentages. Over 5 million workers in each of the EU's Big Four were unable to afford a holiday in 2023. In Italy, the number stood at 6.2 million, followed by 5.8 million in Germany, 5.6 million in Spain, and 5.1 million in France. Over 3.5 million workers in Romania and Poland also couldn't afford a holiday. This figure was more than 1.5 million in Hungary and Portugal. In Austria and the Netherlands, over 550,000 workers couldn't afford even a one-week holiday despite being employed or having a business. 'After working hard all year, it is the least working people should be able to expect to afford and should not be allowed to become a luxury for the few,' Lynch said. 'However, these figures show that Europe has a quality jobs emergency and that our social contract is continuing to crumble as the result of growing economic inequality.' Is holiday poverty linked to income? There is a moderately strong negative correlation between the share of workers who cannot afford a one-week holiday away from home and annual net earnings. This means that as net earnings increase, the proportion of workers unable to afford such a holiday tends to decrease. However, since the correlation is moderate, it also indicates that in some countries, this relationship is not strong or does not follow the overall trend as closely. For example, Ireland (€43,897) had one of the highest annual net earnings in the EU in 2023, yet holiday poverty remains comparatively high. In contrast, Slovenia has a low level of holiday poverty among workers, even though the incomes are similar to countries where more people struggle to afford a holiday. Strong correlation between workers and general population By comparing workers (aged 15-64) and the general population aged 16 and over, Euronews Business found a strong correlation: the higher the rate of workers who cannot afford a holiday, the higher it tends to be in the overall population. In 2023, among the general population, the share of people unable to afford a one-week holiday ranged from 11% in Luxembourg to 60% in Romania, while the EU average stood at 29%. This suggests that the rate among the general population is nearly double that of workers. Experts speaking to Euronews Business had noted that differences between countries are largely tied to the strength of their economies. The level of disposable income plays a key role, as it directly affects people's ability to spend on holidays—particularly when looking at figures for the general population. The ETUC calls on national governments to fully implement the Minimum Wage Directive and urges the European Commission to ensure that the Quality Job Package due this year includes legislation to rebalance the economy—making respect for collective bargaining a condition for access to public contracts.