Asian stocks, bonds climb as trade-truce rally holds
Stock Rally
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Asian equities followed Wall Street higher in a sign the stock market rally has further to run. Treasuries advanced on Thursday as traders priced in two Federal Reserve rate cuts this year.Shares in South Korea and Australia climbed early Friday, while Japan's were mixed. US futures inched higher after the S&P 500 rose 0.4% Thursday. Canada's stock benchmark hit a record with an eight-day rally.Caution still lurked in the background after a furious rally spurred worries about an overheated market, with the pendulum swinging in favor of defensive dividend-payers that had underperformed in the past month. Meta Platforms Inc. paced losses in big tech on a news report it was delaying the rollout of a flagship AI model. In late hours, Applied Materials Inc. gave a tepid forecast. And Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s quarterly revenue grew a disappointing 7%, reflecting pressure on Chinese consumers.Treasuries were steady in Asian trading on Friday after a Thursday rally as prices paid to US producers unexpectedly declined by the most in five years suggesting companies are absorbing some of the hit from higher tariffs. Australian and New Zealand yields fell.Separate US economic data showed growth in retail sales decelerated. Factory production declined for the first time in six months while New York state manufacturing contracted again. And confidence among homebuilders slumped.'If you are in the stagflation camp, these data aren't confirming your thesis,' said Jamie Cox at Harris Financial Group. 'While growth is slowing, disinflation remains intact.'The bond rally on Thursday sent yields down 10 basis points or more for debt maturing in two to 10 years. Longer-dated bonds were earlier whipsawed by large trades that briefly pushed the 30-year yield to nearly 5%. A dollar gauge lost 0.2% Thursday and was flat early Friday.'Bad news is good news for the bond market' as Thursday's data — including producer prices and retail sales — pointed to a weaker economy, said Zachary Griffiths, head of investment-grade and macroeconomic strategy at CreditSights Inc.In Asia, US President Donald Trump said India had made an offer to drop tariffs on US goods, as the Asian nation negotiates a deal to avert higher import taxes. India was one of the first countries to begin trade negotiations with the US following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the White House in February.Elsewhere, Japan's economy shrank for the first time in a year, illustrating its vulnerability even before sustaining the impact of Trump's tariff measures. The yen gained 0.2% on Friday to trade around 145 per dollar.Other data set for release in the region includes gross-domestic product for Malaysia and Hong Kong, inflation expectations for New Zealand and international reserves for Thailand. Bank of Japan official Toyoaki Nakamura will speak later in the day.Stocks are now trading like last month's rout never happened. The S&P 500 is about 4% away from an all-time high, while the Nasdaq 100 swung from a bear market back into a bull market. The advance is building as economic tensions between the US and China ease and the White House appears to be softening its approach to trade negotiations.'I don't want to get too excited, but we may actually be able to focus on company fundamentals for a while this summer,' said Lamar Villere, portfolio manager at Villere & Co. 'If you'd told me a month ago that stocks would be up year-to-date when my kids finished their exams, I'd have called you a liar.'Still, there's little clarity over how the existing levies might impact the US economy or the trajectory the global trade war will take in coming months.Fed Governor Michael Barr said the economy is on solid ground, but warned tariff-related supply-chain disruptions could lead to lower growth and higher inflation.Recession remains a possibility as tariff fallout continues to buffet global economies, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon.'Hopefully we'll avoid it, but I wouldn't take it off the table at this point,' Dimon said in a Bloomberg Television interview Thursday at JPMorgan's annual Global Markets Conference in Paris. 'If there is a recession, I don't know how big it would be or how long it would last.'Wells Fargo Investment Institute sees economic growth, clarity around Trump's tariffs and continued earnings growth driving further stock-market gains through the rest of this year and next.In commodities, oil rebounded on Friday after slumping in its previous session as President Donald Trump said the US and Iran are getting closer to a deal regarding Tehran's nuclear program. Gold was little changed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Who is Stephen Miran? Trump's new pick for Fed governor
US President Donald Trump has appointed Dr. Stephen Miran, the current Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, to a vacant seat on the Federal Reserve Board, calling the Harvard-trained economist's expertise 'unparalleled' and his service 'outstanding.'In a statement posted on Truth Social, Trump said: 'It is my great honor to announce that I have chosen Dr. Stephen Miran He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term, and his expertise in the World of Economics is unparalleled — He will do an outstanding job.'advertisementMiran will serve on the Fed board through January 31, 2026, as the administration continues to look for a permanent nominee. Trump praised Miran's credentials, noting his Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard and longstanding service in his economic team.'Stephen has a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, and served with distinction in my First Administration,' Trump said, adding, 'He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term.'John Velis, member of BNY Mellon Markets' global strategy team said "A bit of surprise to nominate Miran – he wasn't mentioned as a likely candidate by markets, although he is likely to be a reliable dove, given his current political position (as Chair of CEA) and his public comments to added by stating that the appointment is temporary. "This is a recess appointment, so it does not need Senate confirmation. As far as I understand about recess appointments, they remain valid until the next session of the Senate is complete."This still doesn't remove the current chatter about Christoher Waller being named Fed Chair to replace Powell." He the Senate confirms Miran, his presence at the Federal Reserve would likely add support for lowering interest rates. At the Fed's July meeting, officials voted to keep borrowing costs unchanged for the fifth straight time, though the decision saw rare dissent from multiple governors, a first in over 30 the Senate acts quickly enough to seat Miran before the Fed's next policy meeting on September 16–17 remains Gardner, who serves as the chief Washington policy strategist at Stifel, told CNN. 'The confirmation process is going to take a couple of weeks, maybe as much as two months,'WHO IS STEPHEN MIRAN?Stephen Miran, a prominent figure in conservative economic policy, is poised to shape key financial strategies under Trump's second term as chair of the Council of Economic Advisors. Previously, he served in the Treasury Department under Secretary Steven Mnuchin, where he was instrumental in designing the Paycheck Protection Program during the 2020 COVID-19 background includes roles as senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital Management and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. He has been a vocal critic of the Federal Reserve's pandemic-era stimulus policies and authored the controversial 'Mar-A-Lago Accord,' which advocates dollar devaluation to address the US current account staunch supporter of reciprocal tariffs and pro-crypto initiatives, Miran's views closely mirror Trump's economic platform. His potential impact on the Federal Reserve could influence not only interest rate policy but also broader financial regulation.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump blasts jobs report as ‘Rigged' — Nobel economist Paul Krugman fires back with brutal dig
Synopsis Paul Krugman slams Trump after President Donald Trump called the July 2025 jobs report rigged and fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump claimed the weak job numbers were politically manipulated, sparking outrage from economists. Krugman fired back, saying, 'every accusation is a confession,' warning that dismissing data undermines democracy. Experts explained job data revisions are routine, not rigged. This political clash over economic facts is fueling deep concerns about transparency and trust. Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, is calling out President Donald Trump after the release of the July 2025 jobs report, which showed much weaker job growth than expected. Trump didn't just criticize the numbers—he went a step further by firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) chief and calling the report 'rigged.' Paul Krugman slams Trump over 'rigged' jobs report claim as economists warn of deeper crisis- In a fiery response that's stirring headlines across the political and economic world, Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, has lashed out at President Donald Trump for claiming that the latest U.S. jobs report is 'rigged.' The report, which showed far weaker-than-expected job growth in July 2025, has sparked a wave of controversy after Trump accused federal officials of manipulating economic data against him — a move Krugman and other economists are calling dangerous, dishonest, and deeply destabilizing. The controversy began with the July 2025 U.S. jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The report showed that only 73,000 jobs were added in July, falling far short of Wall Street expectations. More alarmingly, the government revised previous months' job gains down significantly—by a total of 258,000 jobs across May and June. This sharp downward revision has raised concerns that the American economy is slowing more rapidly than previously thought. It also sent shockwaves through financial markets, reignited fears of a possible recession, and put the Federal Reserve in a tricky position regarding potential interest rate cuts. President Donald Trump, who is seeking re-election this fall, did not hold back in his reaction. Within hours of the BLS release, Trump publicly called the numbers 'rigged,' 'a scam,' and fired the Bureau's Commissioner, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who was originally appointed under President Biden. Trump accused McEntarfer and the agency of political manipulation, claiming the negative jobs report was deliberately skewed to damage his administration's record on the economy. He went as far as calling the data a 'deep state lie' intended to fuel voter distrust just before the election. This isn't the first time Trump has attacked federal institutions, but this move has sparked widespread criticism from economists, policymakers, and media outlets across the spectrum. Leading the intellectual pushback is Paul Krugman, a longtime Trump critic and respected economist. Writing in response to Trump's accusations, Krugman stated that 'every accusation is a confession,' suggesting that Trump often blames others for the very things he's guilty of doing. Krugman accused Trump of embracing a 'paranoid style of politics' that undermines trust in core democratic institutions like the BLS. He stressed that data revisions are normal, especially during periods of economic volatility, and that Trump's response only highlights his discomfort with reality. In Krugman's words, the danger isn't just in Trump's rhetoric — it's in what he's willing to dismantle to protect his image. 'When leaders start dismissing facts as lies and firing neutral officials, democracy suffers,' he warned. Stripping away the noise, here's a clearer picture of what the latest labor market data actually shows: July 2025 : 73,000 jobs added (vs. 180,000 expected) : 73,000 jobs added (vs. 180,000 expected) May & June revisions : Total jobs cut by 258,000 : Total jobs cut by 258,000 Unemployment rate : Slight uptick to 4.1% : Slight uptick to 4.1% Wage growth: Still steady at 3.7% year-over-year This data reflects a slowing but stable economy, not a collapse—and certainly not a government-led data conspiracy. Most independent economists agree that the labor market is adjusting as expected after years of aggressive post-pandemic growth and inflation-fighting monetary policy. Several independent economists have stepped forward to clarify what's really happening with the job numbers. According to Jeffrey Roach, Chief Economist at LPL Financial, 'downward revisions are common when the economy begins to slow down. Employers typically report data late or revise their numbers as trends shift.' Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group added that the weak jobs data and revisions could nudge the Federal Reserve to consider rate cuts to keep the economy from tipping into recession. While the headlines were shocking, most experts agree that the changes reflect real-time corrections — not conspiracy. In fact, experts pointed out that job market reports often undergo revisions for accuracy, and this cycle is no different from previous economic slowdowns. Despite the political drama, economists say there is real concern beneath the headlines. A consistent theme across recent data points to a gradual slowdown in job growth, falling from the robust pace seen earlier in the year. While 73,000 new jobs in July may still reflect expansion, it's far from the 200,000+ averages seen in the first quarter. Coupled with the large downward revisions to prior months, experts believe the economy may be entering a cooling phase, likely influenced by: High interest rates by the Federal Reserve Slower consumer spending Reduced business hiring amid political uncertainty These shifts don't signal a recession yet, but they do suggest that America's post-COVID boom is tapering it's not unusual for presidents to spin economic data in their favor, Trump's decision to fire the head of the BLS has drawn sharp criticism from economists, political analysts, and even former government officials. Many see it as a direct threat to the independence of federal institutions responsible for delivering unbiased, factual information to the public. Critics argue that politicizing trusted data not only damages credibility but also sets a dangerous precedent, where economic reports could be shaped by political agendas rather than truth. This move has raised serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the future of data integrity in American governance. Q: Why did Paul Krugman criticize Donald Trump over the jobs report? A: He said Trump's 'rigged' claim was dishonest and dangerous to democracy. Q: What did Donald Trump do after the July 2025 jobs report? A: He fired the BLS chief and claimed the data was fake.
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
China's Envoy Hits Out At Trump's Tariffs On India, Says ‘Give The Bully An Inch…'
New Delhi: Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong has criticised U.S. President Donald Trump's escalating tariff policies, including the recent imposition of 50% duties on Indian exports. His reaction came through a post on X, where he referenced an old proverb in pointed context. 'Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile,' Xu wrote, attaching a quote from recent discussions between China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Celso Amorim, chief advisor to Brazil's President Lula da Silva. The quote read, 'Using tariffs as a weapon to suppress other countries violates the UN Charter, undermines WTO rules and is both unpopular and unsustainable.' Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile. — Xu Feihong (@China_Amb_India) August 7, 2025 India had initially been in line to finalise a trade agreement with Trump's administration. Negotiators from both sides held five rounds of discussions. However, the process stalled due to disagreements. India was unwilling to open up its large farm and dairy markets. Talks also broke down over New Delhi's decision to continue importing oil from Russia. The Chinese ambassador's criticism comes at a moment when the U.S. president is considering further economic penalties. Trump warned that countries buying Russian oil may face additional tariffs. He made this remark during a recent press conference at the White House. 'It may happen, I don't know, I can't tell you yet. We did it with India and we are doing it probably with a couple of others. One of them could be China,' Trump said in response to a question about new trade restrictions. At present, India, China and Turkey remain the top three buyers of Russian crude. Trump has said new 'secondary tariffs' may be applied if the war in Ukraine does not end by Friday. Earlier this year, tensions rose between Washington and Beijing over trade measures. The United States had increased tariffs on several Chinese goods, reaching as high as 145 per cent. In response, China raised its tariffs but stopped at 125 per cent. Officials in Beijing explained that any further increase would lack economic sense. 'Even if the U.S. further raises tariffs to even higher levels, it would be economically meaningless and would ultimately become a laughingstock in the history of global economics,' a Chinese trade spokesperson had said at the time. Despite the current standoff, Trump has announced intentions to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year. According to the White House, the meeting aims to build the foundation for a new trade agreement between the world's two largest economies.
