Russia advances to Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region amid row over dead soldiers
Amid talk of peace, the war is stepping up with Russian forces grabbing more territory in Ukraine and Kyiv unfurling high-profile drone and sabotage attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet and, according to Moscow, on railways.
Russia, which controls a little under one-fifth of Ukrainian territory, has taken more than 190 square km (73 square miles) of the Sumy region of eastern Ukraine in less than a month, according to pro-Ukrainian open source maps.
Now, according to the Russian defence ministry, units of the 90th Tank Division of the Central Grouping of Russian forces have reached the western frontier of Ukraine's Donetsk region and are attacking the adjacent Dnipropetrovsk region.
"The enemy does not abandon its intentions to enter the Dnipropetrovsk region," Ukraine's Southern Defence Forces said on Telegram. "Our soldiers are courageously and professionally holding their section of the front, disrupting the occupier's plans. This work does not stop for a minute."
Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, said the Dnipropetrovsk offensive showed that if Ukraine did not want to accept the reality of Russia's territorial gains in peace talks then Moscow's forces would advance further.
The pro-Ukrainian Deep State map showed Russian forces very close to the Dnipropetrovsk region, which had a population of more than 3 million before the war, and advancing on the city of Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region from several directions.
A Ukrainian military spokesman, Dmytro Zaporozhets, said that Russian forces were trying to "build a bridgehead for an attack" on Kostyantynivka, an important logistical hub for the Ukrainian army.
Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of delaying the swap of prisoners of war and return of the bodies of 12,000 dead soldiers, though Ukraine denied those claims.
Russia said on Sunday it was moving bodies towards the border and television showed refrigerated trucks containing the bodies of Ukrainian soldiers on the road in the Bryansk region.
Ukraine accused Russia of playing propaganda games and said that the exchange of prisoners of war and the bodies of fallen soldiers was scheduled for next week. Russia said Ukraine was playing politics with the dead.
US President Donald Trump, who says he wants an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War Two, on Thursday likened it to a fight between young children and indicated that he might have to simply let the conflict play out.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace, after accusing them of ordering a bombing in Bryansk, western Russia, that killed seven people and injured 115 a day before talks in Turkey.
Ukraine, which has not commented on the attack on a Bryansk bridge, has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously seeking peace, citing as evidence Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire.
Russia is demanding international recognition of Crimea, a peninsula annexed from Ukraine by Russia in 2014, and four other regions of Ukraine that Moscow has claimed as its own territory. Ukraine would have to withdraw its forces from all of them.
Russia controlled 113,273 square km, or 18.8 per cent of Ukrainian territory as of June 7, according to the Deep State map. That is an area bigger than the US state of Virginia.
The areas under Russian control include Crimea, more than 99 per cent of the Luhansk region, over 70 per cent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, all in the east or southeast, and fragments of the Kharkiv and Sumy regions in the northeast.
Putin told Trump on Wednesday that he would have to respond to Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's bomber fleet and the bombings of the railways.
Russia also hit the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv on Friday evening and overnight with drones, missiles and guided bombs, killing at least four people and injuring more than 60, including a baby, local officials said on Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
How To Take Forward The Latest Improvement In India-China Bilateral Relations?
By Nitya Chakraborty India-China political relations have started improving giving all the indications that the leaderships of the two countries with the largest population in the world, are ready for building stable relationship after an uneasy period of five years since the Galwan killings on the border in 2020 in which 20 Indian soldiers lost their lives. The process of healing began from last year itself but the course has intensified since US President Donald Trump started his tariff war and imposed 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the USA and announced additional tariff of 25 per cent as a penalty for buying Russian oil to be effective from August 27 this year. The initial 25 per cent tariff has already taken effect. President Trump's personal relations with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi worsened since the ceasefire of the four day India Pakistan war announced on May 10 at 5 PM. Trump claimed credit for compelling both the warring governments to opt for the ceasefire which Modi consistently opposed. The India-US political relations got a further jolt with the sudden improvement in Pak-US relations. Trump hosted lunch in his Oval office for the Pak General Asim Munir who during his stay in USA threatened of a nuclear strike against India. It was in this deteriorating state of India-US relationship, Chinese foreign minister paid a three day visit from August 18 to 20 and met Prime Minister Narendra Modi as also external affairs minister Dr. S Jaishankar and the National Security Adviser Ajit Modi told the Chinese foreign minister that the stable, predictable and constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global prosperity. PM is visiting Tianjin in China to attend the summit of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to be hosted by the Chinese President Xi Jinping on August 31 and September 1 next. Indian Prime Minister will have bilateral talks with both President XI Jinping as also the Russian President Vladimir Putin who will be attending. The question is what is the basic imperative of the Prime Minister's sudden hobnobbing with both China and Russia just after getting the snub from President Trump on both political and trade tariff issues? Is it a jerk reaction to the US attitude to India or it is a part of a deliberate calibrated strategy to build India's strategic autonomy to look after India's national interests without being dependent on any of the big three powers USA, China and Russia. This issue is of crucial importance as Indian PM will be attending Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit this month where he will discuss India's global strategy with both President Xi and President Putin. This will be followed by the US dominated QUAD meet in India hosted by Narendra Modi by the end of this year. The QUAD schedule is still on. It has not been postponed. In 2026, Prime Minister will host the BRICS summit in India. President XI and even President Putin might be attending. In any case, President Putin is scheduled to arrive in India by year end as a part of his bilateral visit. As regards China, the official Chinese view regarding India-China relations has undergone changes in the last one year and more so in the last two months in the context of the deterioration of India-US relations. The Chinese commentators have taken note of the recent moves by both sides in normalizing relations. For instance both governments are expediting visa facilitation; talks on resuming direct flights are reportedly underway; the two sides are discussing resuming border trade of domestic goods. Further multiple friction points along the Line of Actual Control have seen disengagement with reinforced buffer arrangements; and both the Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) and the Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question have become regularized. Together, these steps show that both countries are prioritizing stability and embracing a practical approach of 'managing differences while expanding common ground.' According to Global Times, the official English daily of the Chinese Government, several factors explain why relations are improving now. First, profound shifts in the international landscape have heightened the shared desire for multipolarity and strategic autonomy, particularly regarding BRICS cooperation. With supply chains being reconfigured and geopolitical flashpoints multiplying, major Asian economies are seeking to reduce bloc-based risks and preserve policy flexibility. Second, structural complementarities and mutual security concerns create intrinsic momentum. As two large economies with complementary markets, China and India have significant opportunities to collaborate in manufacturing ecosystems, the digital economy, green transition, public health and poverty reduction. Third, regional and multilateral platforms provide responsibility and traction. Frameworks such as BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the G20 enable the two countries to coordinate on development priorities. Practical collaboration amplifies the voice of the Global South and prevents differences from diluting broader cooperation. As the Chinese official media sees it, a stable border is foundational for regional development; any escalation raises costs and constrains cooperation. Wang Yi's visit for boundary talks to India at this juncture carries substantive weight. The boundary question is central to the relationship and underpins further progress. This comment was made by GT on August 19 issue the day the Chinese foreign minister met the Indian PM Narendra Modi. Together, China and India account for roughly 2.8 billion people. Expanding cooperation in lower-sensitivity areas of supply chains, cross-border e-commerce, healthcare, clean energy and connectivity can boost jobs and investment while enhancing regional supply-chain resilience and efficiency. In the fields of technological and green transition synergy, complementarities in digital infrastructure, renewables, energy storage and electric mobility offer practical avenues for aligning projects. Chinese government wants to channelize more investments in India. New Delhi is careful about the sectors where national security is involved. But in the latest economic survey, the finance ministry has favored increased investments from China. Both governments can discuss the sectors and clear concerns about national security. Once the process starts and other areas open up, there will be more trust between the two governments and the delicate border disputes can be tackled more effectively for arriving at an understanding. The Chinese official media also underlines that, the gradual improvement of bilateral relations is conducive to increasing mutual trust. From a broader perspective, the bilateral relations have to be seen as a part of a long term strategy by India. Only then the border issues can be solved amicably. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to give a relook at the contours of Indian foreign policy and reset the priorities on the basis of strategic autonomy and multipolarity. India will be able to talk to all three big powers USA, China and Russia with strength and conviction. Just as India should not be a part of Trump's global strategy,, similarly, India can't align with China and Russia in their respective strategies to further their national interests. India is the country with the largest population in the world and it will soon become the fourth largest economy globally. This nation of 1.44 billion with more than 5000 years of rich civilization behind it has the capacity to move on its own with flexibility to deal with all including the big powers. It is to be seen whether Narendra Modi imparts a dynamic shift in his foreign policy in that direction or goes back to his old ways after a small gap due to some political compulsions. .Indian Prime Minister is on test. (IPA Service)
Middle East Eye
7 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Targeted for Gaza protests: The Palestinian still in US custody
Of all the high-profile, pro-Palestine, non-US citizen arrests linked to campus protests made by the Trump administration's immigration authorities earlier this year, Leqaa Kordia is the only one still languishing in a detention centre in Alvaredo, Texas. On Monday, the 32-year-old's lawyers filed an updated petition in her federal lawsuit seeking her immediate release from the Prairieland Detention Facility based on new evidence unearthed last month in a separate case. The case in question is American Association of University Professors (AAUP) v. Rubio, which sought to challenge Secretary of State Marco Rubio's policy of what the plaintiffs describe as a "policy of ideological deportation". It was during the AAUP v. Rubio trial that government officials revealed they leaned on the pro-Israel doxxing site Canary Mission to target particular students for immigration detention. "The evidence shows that the administration's policy of targeting, investigating, surveilling, arresting, confining and seeking the deportation of noncitizens who have expressed support for Palestinians extends to anyone involved in protests on or near campuses, irrespective of affiliation with a campus or immigration status," a statement from Kordia's legal representatives at the Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP), Muslim Advocates (MA), and the CLEAR Project at the City University of New York (CUNY) said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This new evidence makes clear that Ms Kordia's targeting is part and parcel of the same, suppressive policy the administration has weaponised against so many others, including Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi, whose release federal courts have compelled under the First Amendment," the statement continued. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attempted to strip Khalil, Ozturk and Mahdawi of their legal status in the US at the time they were taken away by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents (ICE). For Kordia, the DHS maintains that she was already out of status at the time she was arrested in New Jersey, and issued a statement on 14 March insisting she was "overstaying her expired F-1 student visa", which was terminated on 26 January 2022 for "lack of attendance". US federal judge grants bail to Turkish national Rumeysa Ozturk Read More » The DHS also cited Kordia's arrest by the New York Police Department in April 2024 during a protest against Israel's war on Gaza, organised by Columbia University students. The police, however, had arrested several students at the time, and Kordia was eventually let go after charges against her were dropped. "It is true that at that time she did not have lawful status," Amal Thabateh, a staff attorney at CLEAR who is working on Kordia's case, told Middle East Eye. She thought she was close to becoming a lawful permanent resident because her US citizen family had filed for such a status on her behalf, Thabateh explained. But upon receiving "faulty advice" from a mentor, Kordia voluntarily signed a termination notice, withdrawing from the F-1 visa program, leaving her out of status entirely. "We all know based on how other cases have gone, and just routinely [that] this happens all the time where people have losses in status," Thabateh told MEE. "They're in transition periods... and that's quickly solved and fixed." 'Forgotten prisoner' But that wasn't the case in what is now the era of enforcement under US President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown targeting pro-Palestine voices. "The ways in which the government has criminalised the visa overstay is just another attempt to target Palestinian rights activists," Thabateh said. "The question is not whether overstaying a visa is criminal or a violation, but instead it's whether the ways in which Leqaa has been punished and targeted, whether that is a justification for very innocently following false advice about her immigration status." Kordia arrived in the US from the occupied West Bank in 2016 on a Palestinian Authority passport, was initially a visitor before adjusting her status to a student as she began learning English. Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil files $20m claim against Trump administration Read More » She has lost 200 extended family members to Israel's genocide in Gaza. Thabateh told MEE that Kordia voluntarily went to meet with immigration agents to find out what was happening after learning that people who knew her were being questioned about her life, and that agents had also approached her home. It was during that meeting in Newark, New Jersey, that she was served with a notice to appear in court, and then taken away overnight to the Texas facility. Kordia has frequently described poor and discriminatory treatment at the Prairieland Detention Facility to her legal team, but they say that she's persevering. "I think that her spirits are strong, but the conditions she's enduring are not easy," Golnaz Fakhimi, the legal director at Muslim Advocates, told MEE. Authorities interfered with her ability to observe Ramadan and did not provide accommodations so she could carry out her five daily prayers as a Muslim, Kordia had told renowned Muslim scholar and civil rights activist Omar Suleiman, who was granted a visit with her in May. He had called her "the forgotten prisoner" in an op-ed published earlier this year. "In litigation, the government has taken the position that that her confinement is based on having overstayed a visa, [but] the authority that the government has asserted... is a discretionary authority," Fakhimi said. "She is not someone who, by law, has to be confined." "The underlying policy of the administration to target non-citizens - according to the government's own officials who testified - really zeroed in on association with viewpoints supportive of Palestine," she added. "I think it's pretty clear what there is to see when you read between the lines. They're confining her because they have marching orders to do that pursuant to an umbrella-level policy." On 27 June, US Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford recommended to the federal judge in the case filed against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem - Kordia v. Noem - that Kordia should be released, given the main threat present is one to her own liberty. She remains in custody after a government appeal.
Dubai Eye
10 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Putin, Modi to meet in Delhi by end of year, Russian embassy official says
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet in New Delhi by the end of year, but no dates have been finalised yet, a Russian embassy official in India said on Wednesday. Russia will continue supplying oil to India, Roman Babushkin, the charge d'affaires at the Russian embassy in India, told reporters at a press briefing. Russia has a "very, very special mechanism" to continue oil supplies to India, adding that India's crude oil imports from Russia will remain at the same level. The US is set to impose an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports on August 28, citing their imports of Russian oil, which expanded after Western nations sanction Russian supply after its invasion of Ukraine. However, the US has stopped short of imposing similar tariffs on China over its purchases of Russian oil. Last month, the European Union sanctioned Russian-backed Indian refinery Nayara Energy, leading the refiner to cut back processing and companies to curtail their trading with them. Trade between Indian and Russia was expected to grow 10 per cent annually, Evgeniy Griva, Deputy Trade Representative of Russia to India said at the briefing.
