Thaksin reveals backstory of leaked audio clip
The discussion focused on various pressing issues, including the leaked audio clip of a June 15 call between Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen and Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra.
The incident could significantly affect the standing of Paetongtarn, who is Thaksin's daughter.
Thaksin referred to the secret recording of their private phone conversation and its subsequent public release by Hun Sen on his Facebook page on June 18.
'The situation started when my daughter mentioned that she planned to speak with Hun Sen through Khliang Huot (a close aide of Hun Sen who also acted as an interpreter) and arrange a call with him,' Thaksin shared.
'She invited Defence Minister Phumtham (Wechayachai), Foreign Minister Maris (Sangiampongsa) and Secretary to the Prime Minister, Dr Prommin Lertsuridej, to join her, as she wasn't going alone. They waited for three hours, but Hun Sen said he was asleep and even sent a photo to prove it.
'I told my daughter to return, and everyone disbanded. But later, Hun Sen personally called my daughter's phone. That was really painful. Originally, we had intended to resolve matters through dialogue,' he said.
Reflecting on the deteriorating relationship, Thaksin said: 'When things end, they end. I questioned what went wrong.
'I reviewed everything from Thursday night to Friday morning, and Nation TV reported on troop movements along the border.
'I was furious. I called Huot and asked, 'Are we about to go to war?' I demanded they pull back the troops and settle things through the JBC (Joint Boundary Committee) mechanism.
'Even though Cambodian troops were withdrawn on Sunday, by Monday, we closed the border, which angered him (Hun Sen),' he said.
'When Paetongtarn later posted that his actions were unprofessional, Hun Sen became angry. But I want to emphasise that we have not yet reached the point of declaring war, as we can still resolve this through the JBC talks.
'Today, I don't know what to say any more. I only sent one message to Hun Sen: 'What you are doing today is damaging both sides. We were once very close, but I never expected it to turn out like this.'' — The Nation/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Cambodia marks UNESCO recognition of Khmer Rouge sites as places of 'peace and reflection'
PHNOM PENH (Reuters) -Cambodia held ceremonies across the country on Sunday to celebrate UNESCO's recognition of three former Khmer Rouge sites as World Heritage, honouring their transformation from centres of repression to places of peace and reflection. The Tuol Sleng prison and Choeung Ek killing fields in Phnom Penh, and M-13 prison in Kampong Chhnang province were inscribed as "Cambodian Memorial Sites: From centres of repression to places of peace and reflection" during a UNESCO meeting in Paris on Friday. "This is a model for the world, showing the long struggle of Cambodia, reconciliation, the spirit of national unity, finding justice for the victims and building peace," said interim Culture Minister Hab Touch. The Khmer Rouge sites mark Cambodia's fifth World Heritage listing, and is the country's first modern-era nomination and among the first globally tied to recent conflict. The sites are a stark reminder of the atrocities committed under Pol Pot's regime from 1975 to 1979, during which an estimated 1.7 million to 2.2 million people died, many from starvation, torture, or execution. The Tuol Sleng prison, which held approximately 15,000 prisoners, is now a genocide museum. (Reporting by Chantha Lach; Editing by Michael Perry)
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cambodia marks Unesco recognition of Khmer Rouge sites as places of 'peace and reflection'
PHNOM PENH: Cambodia held ceremonies across the country on Sunday to celebrate Unesco's recognition of three former Khmer Rouge sites as World Heritage, honouring their transformation from centres of repression to places of peace and reflection. The Tuol Sleng prison and Choeung Ek killing fields in Phnom Penh, and M-13 prison in Kampong Chhnang province were inscribed as "Cambodian Memorial Sites: From centres of repression to places of peace and reflection" during a Unesco meeting in Paris on Friday. "This is a model for the world, showing the long struggle of Cambodia, reconciliation, the spirit of national unity, finding justice for the victims and building peace," said interim Culture Minister Hab Touch. The Khmer Rouge sites mark Cambodia's fifth World Heritage listing, and is the country's first modern-era nomination and among the first globally tied to recent conflict. The sites are a stark reminder of the atrocities committed under Pol Pot's regime from 1975 to 1979, during which an estimated 1.7 million to 2.2 million people died, many from starvation, torture, or execution. The Tuol Sleng prison, which held approximately 15,000 prisoners, is now a genocide museum.
BusinessToday
6 hours ago
- BusinessToday
The Power Lies With Us
By Tengku Aliaa Syairah Tengku Sallehuddin Those from the older generation around me said people mostly got their news from newspapers and TV back then. But now that we live in a digital world, information comes from many sources like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and online news sites. This change makes it easier to get information, but it should also make us ask an important question: Who really decides what we see? Big tech companies like Google, Meta (Facebook and Instagram), and TikTok control a lot of what shows up on our screens. They use algorithms, computer programmes that pick content based on what we like or interact with. These algorithms don't check if something is true or false. Instead, they try to keep us online longer so the companies can make more money from ads. Because of this, fake news or dramatic posts often spread faster than real information. This is a big problem for journalism. Before, journalists were the main people who shared news. They would check facts and report on important issues. But today, many people read the news through social media, not newspapers. This change has caused thousands of local newspapers to shut down. In some countries, like Malaysia, access to certain news websites has also been limited by the government, often for 'security' reasons. Another issue is the lack of clear rules on social media. Traditional news had editors and guidelines. If something was wrong, people could complain or ask for corrections. But on social media, companies can remove posts or block users without giving reasons. For example, in 2022, several journalists were banned from Twitter (now called X) during Elon Musk's takeover. This shows how a private company can easily silence people it disagrees with. Even though there are problems, digital media also gives people new ways to speak up. Social media has helped many movements grow by letting regular people share their stories. A good example is the Arab Spring, where people used Facebook and Twitter to organise protests for freedom. Also, some online news platforms like Malaysiakini in Malaysia have survived by getting support from readers, not just advertising. There are also new tools to help fight fake news. Some organisations now use artificial intelligence to check if photos or videos are real. In Europe, a new law called the Digital Services Act now asks tech companies to be more honest about how they choose what content to show or remove. One of the best ways to fix this problem is through media literacy. People need to learn how to spot fake news, check sources, and think critically. In Finland, students learn these skills in school, and it has helped reduce the number of young people who believe false information online. So, what can we do? We don't need to stop using media, but we must use it wisely. Governments should create fair rules to protect free speech and stop the spread of lies. Tech companies should be more open about how their systems work. And most importantly, we as users must be more careful about what we read, watch, and share online. In conclusion, the media can be used for both good and bad. Yes, it can connect people and share knowledge, but it can also spread lies and create division. The future of media depends on how we choose to use it and who we allow to control it. The author is an undergraduate student of Universiti Malaya Related
