Israeli Cabinet May Order Complete Gaza Takeover
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leaning towards an expanded offensive and taking control of the entire enclave after 22 months of war against militant group Hamas, Israeli Channel 12 reported.
A senior Israeli source told Reuters on Monday that more force was an option following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas.
Seizing the entire territory would reverse a 2005 decision by Israel to pull settlers and military out of Gaza while retaining control over its borders - a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there.
It was unclear, however, whether a potential full takeover of Gaza would entail a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing hostages.
Israel's coalition government is regarded as one of the most right-wing in its history, with the cabinet including parties that seek to annex both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland.
The country's military has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel trying to fully occupy Gaza and establish military rule there, which would require it to take over long-term governance.
The military has also struggled with manpower issues as the war has dragged on, with reservists being repeatedly called up and putting a strain on capabilities.
The conflict was triggered by a Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, when gunmen stormed the border from Gaza, killing more than 1,200 people and seizing around 250 hostages according to Israeli tallies.
Israel's military campaign has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 60,000 people according to Palestinian health authorities. It has forced nearly all of Gaza's over 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine.
That has caused widespread international anger and prompted several European countries to say they would recognise a Palestinian state next month if there was no ceasefire.
Inside Gaza on Tuesday, Israeli gunfire and strikes killed at least 13 Palestinians, local health authorities said, including five people in a tent in Khan Younis and three aid seekers near Rafah in the south.
Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza earlier on Tuesday but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive.
Palestinians living in the last fifth of the territory where Israel has not yet taken military control via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave said any new move to occupy the area would be catastrophic.
"If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea? This will be like a death sentence to the entire population," said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant, who asked not to be named in full.
A Palestinian official close to the talks and mediation said Israeli threats could be a way to pressure Hamas to make concessions at the negotiation table.
"It will only complicate the negotiation further, at the end, the resistance factions will not accept less than an end to the war, and a full withdrawal from Gaza," he told Reuters, asking not to be named.
Israel said it would allow merchants to import goods. A source in Gaza told Reuters some trucks had already entered carrying chocolates and biscuits for a merchant.
It is hoped that essential items such as children's milk, fresh meat and fruits, sugar, and rice could be allowed in, which would alleviate scarcity and drive down prices of what is available in the markets.
U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said last week he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza.
But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the offensive and annexing parts of Gaza.
The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel.
The Israeli military was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
US lawmaker Darrell Issa in Beirut, promises 'solution regarding Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon'
BEIRUT — During a visit to Beirut and a meeting with President Joseph Aoun, U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa promised that the United States would find a "solution" to the ongoing Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory in southern Lebanon. "The Lebanese government wants to strengthen stability and we support its efforts in this direction," Issa is cited as saying, according to a statement released by the Lebanese presidency. "Israel must understand that Lebanon is experiencing a new beginning and we will make sure to find a solution regarding the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon." Cabinet met on Tuesday afternoon to continue discussions on Hezbollah's disarmament and specifically the U.S. proposal for how to do so. As the ministers' meeting was adjourned, it was announced that they had approved "the objectives set out" by the American plan. Despite a cease-fire concluded on Nov. 27, 2024 between Israel and Hezbollah after more than a year of conflict, the Israeli army continues to occupy positions in Labbouneh/Alma al-Shaab, near the coastline (Sour district); Jabal Blat, near Ramieh (Bint Jbeil district); Jal al-Deir, south of Aitaroun (Bint Jbeil district); the Markaba-Houla road (Marjayoun district); Hamames Hill, near Khiam (Marjayoun district). Issa, a Republican member of Congress of Lebanese origin, said that the "Lebanese decision must be in the hands of the people," stressing the need "for legitimate institutions to lead Lebanon." "We support them, just as we reaffirm our support for the Lebanese Army," he said. Issa's Lebanese visit comes two weeks after that of U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, during which he admitted that no one could force Israel to do anything, that there were no guarantees, and that the Lebanese state had to take on the issue of Hezbollah's arms to ensure its monopoly.
L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
What does the US proposal for Hezbollah's disarmament look like?
BEIRUT — During its second meeting convened these week to discuss a state monopoly on arms, Cabinet saw all of its Shiite ministers walk out following a refusal to discuss a plan drawn up by the United States that lays out a "roadmap" for how Lebanon should go about disarming Hezbollah, a group that was once one of the most powerful non-state actors in the world. The U.S. proposal sets the end of the year as a deadline for Hezbollah's disarmament, a timeline that Cabinet adopted during Tuesday's meeting. Instead of adopting the American plan directly, which was delivered to Lebanon through U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's ministers assigned responsibility for drawing up a roadmap to the Lebanese Army, which it has been tasked to submit by the end of August. Hezbollah and its allies accused the government of "bowing to foreign pressure" and categorically refused to discuss disarmament so long as Israeli attacks against Lebanon and its occupation of several areas of the South was ongoing. Cabinet was set to discuss the U.S. proposal during Thursday's meeting, which was adjourned shortly after the walkout. According to copy of the Cabinet agenda reviewed by Reuters, the U.S. plan, drawn up by the U.S. State Department, sets out the most detailed steps yet for disarming Hezbollah. It aims to "extend and stabilize" a cease-fire agreement brokered in November, that, while ending an all-out war, has not prevented Israel from continuing its attacks against the country. "The urgency of this proposal is underscored by the increasing number of complaints regarding Israeli violations of the current cease-fire, including airstrikes and cross-border operations, which risk triggering a collapse of the fragile status quo," it said. Here is an outline of the U.S. proposal that brought Thursday's Cabinet meeting to a halt: Phase 1: The Lebanese government issues a decree within 15 days committing to Hezbollah's full disarmament by Dec. 31, 2025. In this phase, Israel would also cease ground, air and sea military operations. Phase 2: Lebanon begins implementing the disarmament plan within 60 days, with the government approving "a detailed [Lebanese Army] deployment plan to support the plan to bring all arms under the authority of the state." This plan will specify disarmament targets. Israel begins withdrawing from positions it holds in southern Lebanon and Lebanese prisoners held by Israel would be released in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Phase 3: Within 90 days, Israel will withdraw from the final two of the five points it holds, and funding will be secured to initiate rubble removal in Lebanon and infrastructure rehabilitation in preparation for reconstruction. Phase 4: Within 120 days, Hezbollah's remaining heavy weapons must be dismantled, including missiles and drones. The United States, Saudi Arabia, France, Qatar and other friendly states will organize an economic conference to support the Lebanese economy and reconstruction and to "implement President Trump's vision for the return of Lebanon as a prosperous and viable country."
L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Hezbollah calls on government to 'correct its course' on disarmament
BEIRUT — Hezbollah has called on the government to "correct its course" as Cabinet meets for a second time this week to discuss a state monopoly on arms that centers around Hezbollah's disarmament, for which U.S. envoy Tom Barrack submitted a proposed "roadmap" drawn up by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Meeting under the chairmanship of its leader, Mohammad Raad, Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc issued a statement denouncing U.S. policy and protesting against what it said was the government's "yielding to foreign pressures" and disregarding the interests of Lebanon and national unity. "When Prime Minister Nawaf Salam adopts the American envoy's roadmap, he is going against all the commitments he made in his ministerial statement, as well as those in the president's inauguration speech." Cabinet concluded its Tuesday meeting on the topic having decided to task the Lebanese Army with drawing up a plan for the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon by the end of the year, which it should present to Cabinet by the end of August. Two ministers associated with the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, Rakan Nassereddine and Tamara al-Zein, walked out in protest, and Minister Fady Makki made his reservations known. Hezbollah responded the next day, saying it was not concerned by the government's decision. Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc described the government and its leader's adoption of the U.S. roadmap as a "suspicious and unreasonable haste," considering that it "disregards respect for the national pact and the principles of the Taif Agreement, which enshrines Lebanon's right to self-defense." "Desperate attempts to target the weapons of 'the Resistance' are a free gift to the Israeli enemy and would strip Lebanon of one of its main assets against blind Zionist violence," the statement added. The bloc called on the government to "correct course by reversing its decision." Kabalan: Stability or a powder keg? For his part, Jaafarite Mufti Ahmad Kabalan, a Shiite cleric close to Hezbollah, issued a short statement ahead of Thursday's Cabinet meeting, warning that it might "put the country on the path toward stability and respecting national interests, or it may inflame the heart of its people, disregarding their sovereign interests." "No one has an excuse, silence is a grave crime, and everyone is concerned with protecting the country's higher political and sovereign interests," the sheikh said. "There can be no neutrality in such an existential cause. Any constitutional coup or reckless national gamble will put the country at the center of an ordeal that could be the worst."
