France condemns civilian abuses in Syria's Sweida conflict
The foreign ministry demanded an end to clashes and urged all parties to respect ceasefire agreements.
Syrian government forces entered Sweida, a predominantly Druze city, to enforce a truce after clashes between Bedouin tribes and local Druze communities left over 100 dead.
Witnesses, however, accused government troops of joining Bedouin fighters in attacks on Druze civilians.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported 21 Druze civilians killed in summary executions by pro-government forces.
France reiterated support for Syria's transitional authorities and regional leaders in restoring dialogue for lasting peace.
French President Emmanuel Macron previously urged Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa to safeguard minorities, following violence against Alawite and Druze communities.
The EU recently lifted economic sanctions on Syria but imposed penalties on militia groups linked to attacks on minorities. – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Gaza civil defence reports 39 killed near aid centres in Israeli fire
GAZA CITY: Gaza's civil defence agency reported on Saturday that Israeli fire killed 39 people and wounded over 100 near two aid centres in southern Gaza. The deaths occurred near Khan Yunis and Rafah, with witnesses describing chaotic scenes as civilians sought food amid gunfire. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal attributed the fatalities to 'Israeli gunfire.' One witness, Abdul Aziz Abed, 37, told AFP he and his relatives went to Al-Tina in Khan Yunis before dawn but only encountered bullets instead of food. Three other witnesses also accused Israeli troops of opening fire. The Israeli military responded by stating it had identified 'suspects' approaching troops in Rafah, posing a threat. Soldiers fired warning shots after calls to turn back were ignored, the military said, adding the incident was under review. The GHF, now the main aid distributor in Gaza, denied reports of deaths near its sites, urging people not to gather overnight. Meanwhile, an Israeli strike on a house near Nuseirat in central Gaza killed 12, according to the civil defence. The war, triggered by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, has left Gaza in dire humanitarian conditions, with severe malnutrition and aid blockades worsening the crisis. The UNRWA said it had enough food stockpiled for three months but faced delivery restrictions. Hamas demands unrestricted aid flow and an Israeli withdrawal in ceasefire talks. - AFP
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Syrians protest Sweida killings in London and Paris
LONDON: Dozens of Syrians from minority communities gathered in London and Paris on Saturday, calling for urgent measures to safeguard the Druze population in Sweida, where escalating sectarian violence has left hundreds dead. In central London, approximately 80 protesters chanted slogans such as 'God protect Druze' and 'Stop supporting Jolani,' referencing Syrian interim leader Ahmed al-Sharaa's former nom de guerre. Demonstrators held signs demanding an end to the bloodshed in Sweida and urging the opening of a humanitarian corridor via Jordan. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, over 900 people have been killed in the Druze-majority province since Sunday. The clashes involve Druze communities and Sunni Bedouin tribes, with involvement from the Islamist-led government, Israel, and armed factions from other Syrian regions. Protest organiser Emad al Eismy described the atrocities in Sweida as ongoing. 'Shootings, beheadings, raping, killing children, (torching) shops, homes. It's a barbarian movement going on in Sweida,' he said outside BBC headquarters. Despite a ceasefire brokered by the US to prevent further Israeli intervention, AFP correspondents reported continued clashes in Sweida. The Observatory noted that armed volunteers, backed by the government, had been deployed. Druze fighters claimed most reinforcements for the Bedouin were Islamists. Maan Radwan, a protester with family in Sweida, tearfully recounted relatives killed in a guesthouse massacre. He criticised British Foreign Secretary David Lammy for meeting al-Sharaa earlier this month. William Salha, another demonstrator, accused the Syrian government of complicity, calling the violence 'like ethnic cleansing.' A London teenager shared that multiple family members had been shot dead, with news reaching him through an aunt. In Paris, Aida Haladi mourned her brother, killed while fetching medication. 'Where is France?' she demanded, condemning Syria's interim president and France's leader Emmanuel Macron for hosting him in May. Eva Radwan, protesting near the Eiffel Tower, displayed photos of her slain cousin and nephews. She urged Jordan to open its border for aid. The Observatory reported at least 940 deaths, including 326 Druze fighters and 262 civilians, 165 of whom were executed. - AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Editorial: Seoul's mixed messages on Pyongyang will only sow confusion
South Korean and North Korean guard posts are seen on either side of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) in Paju between the two counntries. — AFP THE notion of a country's main enemy – or ' jujeok ' in Korean – is not just symbolic rhetoric. It is the fulcrum around which national defence policy, military readiness and diplomatic posture revolve. Yet the Lee Jae Myung administration's incoming ministers are offering strikingly divergent views on North Korea's status. In a region where miscalculation can lead to catastrophe, the lack of clarity is not a luxury South Korea can afford. During confirmation hearings this week, the country's Unification Minister nominee Chung Dong-young described North Korea not as an enemy but as a 'threat.' Labour Minister nominee Kim Young-hoon echoed that assessment, distancing himself from the 'main enemy' label. By contrast, Defence Minister nominee Ahn Gyu-back offered a resolute view, stating that the North Korean regime and military are indeed South Korea's principal adversary. This inconsistency is not merely semantic. The designation of North Korea as South Korea's main enemy first appeared in the 1995 Defence White Paper under President Kim Young-sam, following the North's threats to turn Seoul into a 'sea of fire.' While subsequent governments shifted between hard-line and conciliatory stances, most notably under Roh Moo-hyun and Moon Jae-in, the Yoon Suk Yeol administration reinstated the enemy designation in 2022. Now, Seoul risks retreating from this stance just as Pyongyang has explicitly emphasised its own hostility. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un last year formally declared the South a 'primary foe,' rejecting unification and dismantling the inter-Korean reconciliation framework. Since then, the North has accelerated weapons development, severed communication channels and deepened military ties with Russia. To overlook these developments or downplay their implications is to misread the strategic environment. Chung's statements suggest the new administration may be preparing a significant policy pivot. He proposed suspending joint military drills with the United States as a confidence-building measure, citing the 2018 model. He also raised the idea of renaming the Unification Ministry to the Ministry of the Korean Peninsula, a move he claims would signal flexibility. Yet such proposals, absent careful coordination or broad consensus, could project confusion rather than pragmatism. Strategic ambiguity has long characterised inter-Korean policy, but frequent shifts weaken credibility. South Korea's defence posture cannot oscillate with each political transition. Doing so emboldens adversaries and complicates coordination with allies, particularly Washington. North Korea has repeatedly exploited policy vacillations, alternating between provocation and dialogue to gain time for weapons advancement. Calls to revive the 2018 military accord – annulled by the North and later suspended by Seoul – underscore this risk. South Korea honoured the agreement despite repeated violations by the North, including missile launches, GPS jamming and trash balloon campaigns. Restoring such an accord without preconditions could repeat a pattern of unreciprocated concessions. What is missing from the current debate is a sober reflection on the record of past engagement. Chung attributes the sinking of the ROKS Cheonan in 2010 and Yeonpyeongdo shelling to the Lee Myung-bak administration's hawkish posture, yet similar provocations occurred under liberal governments. North Korea has pursued escalation to secure leverage regardless of the South's tone. This is not to dismiss the value of diplomacy. Efforts to reduce tensions must continue, but only with a clear-eyed understanding of the other side's intentions. Engagement should be mutual, measured and anchored in deterrence. One-sided overtures, whether symbolic or substantive, can be as risky as belligerence. If the Lee government intends to revise its stance toward Pyongyang, it must do so with unity, transparency and strategic rationale. Fragmented messaging – especially on foundational concepts like the main enemy – undermines trust both at home and among allies. In a geopolitical landscape marked by intensifying tensions, Seoul cannot afford ambiguity in its security doctrine. — The Korea Herald/Asia News Network
