Bargain Hunt star leaves guest 'gobsmacked' as item sells for 'incredible' price
Bargain Hunt expert Irita Marriott had a guest in tears after their item was auctioned off for a staggering price
Bargain Hunt: Moment winning team is announced despite losses
Bargain Hunt star Irita Marriott left a guest "gobsmacked" as their item sold for an "incredible" price.
The BBC antiques expert was presenting her Discovery+ series, The Derbyshire Auction House, when she stumbled upon a heartfelt story with guest Helen and her son Ben.
While searching their home for hidden gems, Helen brought forward a set of family photos which held original signed shots from acclaimed photographers that dated back to 1975.
They included works from Graham Smith and Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen, whose works are now displayed in the Tate Gallery and the Victoria and Albert Museum, reports the Express.
Bargain Hunt star Irita Marriott had one show guest in tears
(Image: BBC )
In a heartbreaking twist, it was revealed that the photographs were being auctioned to fund the care of Helen's husband, Alan.
Article continues below
Alan was suffering from dementia at the time and needed full-time care, though he sadly died before the episode went to air, with the money being used to pay for his funeral.
The cherished pictures once adorned the hallway of their home, thanks to Alan's former role in promoting cinema and photography.
The photographs were sold individually, with one estimated at £80 to £120. This quickly sparked a fierce bidding war, with the picture ultimately fetching a staggering £12,000.
The mum and son duo were in tears on the Derbyshire Auction House
(Image: Discovery+ )
After learning the price that the photograph had sold for, Helen was moved to tears.
Following the auction, Irita reflected on the difficult situation, noting: "It can't be easy for them. These items are things that they've lived with all their lives.
Article continues below
"Now that Alan's gone into care, it's probably going to be really sad to see them go."
Helen's son, Ben, also expressed his shock at the auction outcome, remarking, "I was absolutely gobsmacked at the values people were willing to bid for what we thought were just nice pictures... that we saw on the wall every day. Absolutely brilliant."
The Derbyshire Auction House is streaming on Discovery+
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BBC director-general Tim Davie is on 'last strike' after series of scandals - but corporation wants to save him
BBC director-general Tim Davie is on his 'last strike' after a series of scandals has plunged the BBC into chaos but the Corporation is determined to save him, sources have claimed. The Corporation is facing serious questions after it came under attack on three fronts this week. And while there is widespread feeling Davie is one scandal away from losing his high-profile role, a former executive told The Sunday Times that the BBC has deployed 'Operation Save Tim'. On Monday, the BBC was forced to admit that its documentary about children in Gaza had breached editorial guidelines by failing to disclose that the narrator was the son of a senior Hamas official. Hours later, a damning probe into Gregg Wallace 's behaviour on MasterChef was published, with 45 out of 83 complaints, including one count of 'unwanted physical contact', upheld. The report also upheld two out of 10 complaints - relating to swearing and racist language - made into other individuals, who were not identified. That was until the BBC was thrown into another crisis when Wallace's co-host John Torode publicly declared that he was the individual who had used racist language. Torode, 59, was sacked on Tuesday in a move he claims the BBC had not made him aware of. He said he was 'seeing and reading' he had been dropped from the show and had 'no recollection' of making a racist comment. In the following days, it was reported that he had used the N-word at a filming wrap part in 2019 while singing along to Gold Digger by Kanye West. But the investigation is understood to have upheld a separate complaint made the year prior when he used the same racist word on the MasterChef set. A BBC News report claims the racial slur was directed towards a MasterChef staff member. The Gaza documentary and MasterChef scandals add to a tumultuous period for the BBC, who also came under fire for their handling of the live streaming of Bob Vylan's Glastonbury set last month. The band sparked a backlash after leading chants of 'death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces] during a live broadcast on the BBC. The BBC also said it will no longer broadcast live performances deemed 'high risk' – as Bob Vylan had been assessed – and its director of music, Lorna Clarke, also reportedly stepped back from her day-to-day duties. The corporation issued an apology after the Bob Vylan set at Glastonbury, saying: 'We deeply regret that such offensive and deplorable behaviour appeared on the BBC and want to apologise to our viewers and listeners and in particular the Jewish community. 'We are also unequivocal that there can be no place for antisemitism at, or on, the BBC. After Glastonbury, which Davie attended, culture secretary Lisa Nandy told parliament there was a 'problem of leadership' at the BBC. But BBC chair Samir Shah has doubled down on his support for the director-general, insisting Davie 'has shown strength, confidence and decisive leadership in a very challenging environment'. Another insider claimed his position with some board members was 'more precarious than people realise' after the Glastonbury scandal, but this was disputed by a source close to the board who insisted they were backing him. While the scandals alone would not be enough to see Davie sacked, the revolving door of scandals has raised huge questions about the management of the BBC. It also comes at a time when Davie's salary jumped £20,000 to £547,000, while Deborah Turness, the BBC News chief executive, saw hers rise £17,000 to £431,000. Since Davie became director-general in September 2020, the BBC has shelled out almost £10million addressing scandals. Almost half of that - £4.5million - comes from the fallout from the Martin Bashir 1995 Panorama interview with Princess Diana. Although the original controversy came before Davie took on his role, the sum includes £539,000 of legal fees in fighting journalist Andy Webb's internal emails about the scandal. Another £3.3million was spent on an external investigation into its handling of complaints about Radio 1 presenter Tim Westwood. Allegations against Westwood were first made public in 2022 when several women accused him of sexual misconduct. He has strongly denied all allegations. A review, which was carried out by barrister Gemma White KC and included contributions from more than 120 people, found people were 'concerned that they would not be believed or might be blamed' for his alleged behaviour because he was so 'popular'. The BBC also faced a £1.3million bill from the Huw Edwards scandal, although the report's findings have never been published. The review into the Gaza documentary, carried out by the director of editorial complaints Peter Johnston, cost £98,500. The Sunday Times reports that there is widespread feeling at the BBC and the wider media that Davie cannot afford another crisis, but his allies remain supportive and warn 'nobody should underestimate his strong survival instincts'.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shark diver busts Jaws myths and shares her top tip to avoid a similar attack
When Andriana Fragola slips into the ocean, she's not just diving into saltwater. She's entering the habitat of some of the world's most feared and misunderstood creatures - sharks. Fragola, a 31-year-old marine biologist, conservationist, and shark diver known to her online followers as Andriana Marine, has built a life around challenging the myths that have haunted our cultural consciousness since 1975 - the year Jaws hit theaters and turned the great white shark into a cinematic supervillain. Now, with Shark Week 2025 kicking off July 20 on Discovery and Max and coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Jaws, Fragola says it's more important than ever to set the record straight. 'Jaws, specifically, has done quite a lot of damage for sharks and just the image of sharks,' Fragola said. 'It's something that people are already nervous about - being in the ocean or being in that environment - and then it just amplifies it by making it this shark that's specifically hunting people. And that is not the case at all.' However, she does admit to one or two terrifying encounters, including a dive in Hawaii where she was almost savaged by a Tiger shark. Daily Mail caught up with Fragola to distinguish fact from fiction and get her top tips for avoiding a similar fate. The truth behind the terror Fragola grew up in Miami, where a childhood love of the ocean led her to snorkeling, scuba diving, and eventually a master's degree studying sharks at the University of Miami. Today, she leads shark diving tours, creates educational content for social media, and works with conservation-focused dive operators around the globe - including her latest project in the Maldives, helping design a new tiger shark free diving program. Still, she's no stranger to skepticism. 'People really don't understand that if that were the case, there would be people every single time you go to the beach - there would be someone there, you know, multiple people getting injured or attacked because they're in the water all the time,' she said. 'In reality, out of the global population, there's only about 10 human fatalities in the entire world' due to shark interactions each year. 'In comparison to how many sharks are killed by people, that's actually over 100 million sharks killed by people every single year.' 'If you compare the number between 10 and 100 million, it's pretty jarring.' Could Jaws actually happen? Not according to Fragola. 'I think it's pretty off-base with sharks,' she said. 'Sharks are attracted to splashing because when something's injured or dying at the surface, it's usually splashing or thrashing around.' But the image of a relentless man-eating predator? Pure Hollywood. 'In an extremely small chance that could happen, but it's so, so unlikely and so uncommon that a shark would continue to try to attack a person. So I would say it's pretty off-base.' Even Shark Week, she says, sometimes gets it wrong. 'I think the current image of sharks in pop culture and media and movies still has that really negative image,' she said. 'Unfortunately, a lot of times movies are still bringing up the drama... Even a series like Shark Week, they do often still dramatize the most crazy thing with sharks or the most intense moment of their behavior.' 'That's maybe like five percent of what they do in a day. It's really, really different from what's actually happening and the way that sharks are actually behaving every single day.' Beauty and power, side by side Despite spending thousands of hours in the water with sharks, Fragola says she's never been bitten. That doesn't mean every dive is peaceful. 'I have definitely had encounters where the sharks have been either really competitive - whether that's because there's baitball and they're feeding, or a situation where they're just being competitive with each other,' she said. 'Sometimes that can get really heated and escalated.' But those moments are the exception, not the rule - and they're part of what makes sharks so remarkable. 'Specifically with the tigers that I work with in Hawaii, there'll be moments where the same shark is extremely intense - and she's tried to bite me before,' Fragola said. 'But it's really displaced aggression when it comes to the other sharks in the area, and she's just frustrated.' 'An hour later, it's just completely beautiful - super soft-touching, when I have to push her away - very curious. Seeing the same power in the one shark, where it's super incredibly peaceful, and then completely strength in the other side of it - I think is really beautiful.' What to do if you see a shark It's the summer beachgoer's worst-case scenario: spotting a fin near the shore. But Fragola says the solution is simpler - and calmer - than most would expect. 'The best thing to do is just to remain calm,' she said. 'If you do want to get out of the water, just slowly kind of back out of it - that way you can keep an eye on the shark while getting out.' 'Any type of screaming and splashing, they can feel the vibrations of all of that, and it's definitely going to make them more interested in pursuing you or just checking you out.' 'Honestly, standing still is probably the best thing.' If you're in the water and a shark is curious, eye contact is key. 'You want to look like a predator,' she said. 'You're going to stand your ground and show the animal that you see it - show the shark that you see it - by making eye contact and continuing to look around, just in case there's any other sharks in the area.' 'And then if the shark ever continued to approach you... you could push down on the top of the head and push it away from you. That's like last-case scenario.' Changing minds and facing critics Through her videos, Fragola documents not just the beauty of sharks, but the transformational experience of diving with them - especially for first-timers. 'I've been able to have people in the water and see sharks, and see the reaction they have when they're getting on the boat and they're terrified and nervous,' she said. 'And then the reaction afterwards, when they have a little bit more understanding of the behavior and how different it is from the perception that they had.' Still, not everyone is supportive. Some critics accuse her of interfering with nature - especially when she redirects a shark with her hand. 'It's when people say not to touch them, and it's like - the shark is approaching and I have to redirect in the sense for safety. I can't just let the shark run into my chest,' she said. 'If I didn't touch the shark to move it away from me, there's a potential it could bump into me or even bite me - and then that is going to create a whole negative slew of videos and things that people would share about someone getting hit by a shark. And that's the opposite of what I would ever want to happen.' Fragola also believes gender plays a role in the backlash. 'I get more negative comments because of being a woman,' she said. 'I'll see a post that's really similar that a man posts, and then a post I post... they could be very similar in content, and then the comments and reaction are completely different.' The real threat While fear of sharks still dominates headlines, Fragola says the real threat is going largely unnoticed - and it's on our plates. 'A lot of sharks are caught as bycatch from fisheries, and unfortunately they don't - a lot of times they don't even use the sharks,' she explained. 'They're just thrown back in the ocean.' 'And most of the time, because there's so much gear to bring in, the sharks that were caught usually are dead.' Her advice? 'Probably the number one way you can help sharks is honestly not eating seafood at all,' Fragola said. 'But if you're going to eat seafood, just really minimize it, or try to get it from a fisherman that's local and you have a more direct source. If you don't know where it's coming from, it's better not to eat it.' 'Even though it's not a shark fishery, when they're setting out big long-line fishery or gill net fishery, they're setting out all of this gear... and unfortunately, it's so much gear that it catches a lot - dolphins and turtles and other sea birds, sea lions, things like that.' 'So if you want to help the ocean in general - that's my number one thing.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Again and again, we are shocked by the treatment of learning-disabled people. Yet we never learn from the past
BBC Radio 4 has just aired a short series about the writer Virginia Woolf, to celebrate the centenary of her novel Mrs Dalloway. According to the publicity blurb, the aim of Three Transformations of Virginia Woolf was to explore what she 'has to say to us today', and how she 'captured and critiqued a modern world that was transforming around her, treated mental health as a human experience rather than a medical condition, and challenged gender norms'. Because the three episodes immediately followed the Today programme, I distractedly caught two minutes of the first, before flinching, and turning it off. The reason? Only a few days before, I had read a diary entry Woolf wrote in 1915, presented alongside the acknowledgment that she was 'suffering deep trauma at the time', but still so shocking that it made me catch my breath. It was a recollection of encountering a group of learning-disabled people, who were probably residents of a famous institution called Normansfield hospital. 'We met and had to pass a long line of imbeciles,' Woolf wrote. 'The first was a very tall man, just queer enough to look at twice, but no more; the second shuffled, and looked aside; and then one realised that everyone in that long line was a miserable ineffective shuffling idiotic creature … It was perfectly horrible. They should certainly be killed.' That passage arrives a third of the way through a brilliant new book titled Beautiful Lives, straplined How We Got Learning Disabilities So Wrong. Written by the playwright and drama director Stephen Unwin, its story goes from the Greeks and Romans to the 21st century. Much of it is a history of the misunderstanding, hatred and appalling mistreatment experienced by endless millions of people. But partly because Unwin has a learning-disabled son – 28-year-old Joey, who he says has 'challenged everything I was brought up to believe in and turned it on its head' – it is also a very topical demand for all of us 'to celebrate the fact that such people exist and have so much to offer'. A sign of the ignorance Unwin spends some of the book railing against is the fact that this superbly original work, published in early June, has not been reviewed in a single mainstream publication. In the context of the attitudes he writes about, that is probably not much of a surprise – but there again, the book is so timely that its passing-over still feels shocking. After all, it follows the same unquestionable logic as all those high-profile discussions and debates about institutional racism and empire, and demands a very similar process of reckoning. On this subject, there is a mountain of questions to ask. Some are about language that still endures: 'imbeciles', 'morons', 'cretins', 'idiots'. How many of us know about the first official Asylum for Idiots – later the Royal Earlswood Institution for Mental Defectives – founded in Surrey in 1847, and infamous for what Unwin describes as 'widespread cruelty … and soaring mortality rates'? However much young people study history, do their syllabuses ever cover the Mental Deficiency Act of 1913, which formalised the idea that people categorised as 'idiots' and 'imbeciles' (and all disabled children and young people) should be institutionalised, let alone the fact that it granted local councils powers to remove such people from their families by force? Why is the US's record on institutional cruelty and cod-psychology even worse than the UK's? There is another part of the same story, centred on a slew of 20th-century politicians and cultural figures who believed that learning-disabled people – and disabled people in general – were not just pitiful and wretched, but a threat to humanity's future, an idea expressed in the absurd non-science of eugenics. They included that towering brute Winston Churchill, DH Lawrence (who had visions of herding disabled people into 'a lethal chamber as big as the Crystal Palace'), and lots of people thought of as progressives: Bertrand Russell, HG Wells, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, the one-time Labour party chair Harold Laski, and the trailblazing intellectuals Sidney and Beatrice Webb. Their credo of pure and strong genes may have been discredited by the defeat of the Nazis, but we should not kid ourselves that everyday manifestations of loathing and condescension that underlay those ideas do not linger on. Ours is the age of such scandals as the one that erupted in 2011 at Winterbourne View, the 'assessment and treatment unit' in Gloucestershire, where people with learning disabilities were left out in freezing weather, had mouthwash poured into their eyes and were given cold showers as a punishment. The year 2013 saw the death in an NHS unit of Connor Sparrowhawk, the autistic and learning-disabled young man whose life was dramatised by Unwin in a profoundly political play titled Laughing Boy, based on a brilliantly powerful book written by Sparrowhawk's mother, Sara Ryan. As well as its principal character's life and death, it highlighted the fact that the health trust that ran the unit in question was eventually found to have not properly investigated the 'unexpected' deaths of more than 1,000 people with learning disabilities or mental-health issues. Right now, about 2,000 learning-disabled and autistic people are locked away in completely inappropriate and often inhumane facilities, usually under the terms of mental health legislation. Only 5% of learning-disabled people are reckoned to have a job. Six out of 10 currently die before the age of 65, compared with one out of 10 for people from the general population. But this is also a time of growing learning-disabled self-advocacy, which will hopefully begin to make change unavoidable. One small example: at this year's Glastonbury, I chaired a discussion about the cuts to disability benefits threatened by the political heirs of Laski and the Webbs. The speakers onstage included Ady Roy, a learning-disabled activist who is involved in My Life My Choice, a brilliant organisation that aims at a world 'where people with a learning disability are treated without prejudice and are able to have choice and control over their own lives'. He was inspirational, but it would be good to arrive at a point where what he did was completely unremarkable. It may sound a little melodramatic, but it is also true: such people, and allies like Unwin, are at the cutting-edge of human liberation. Far too many others may not have the same grim ideas as Woolf, Lawrence, Keynes and all the rest, but their unawareness and neglect sit somewhere on the same awful continuum. That only highlights an obvious political fact that all of us ought to appreciate as a matter of instinct: that the present and future will only be different if we finally understand the past. John Harris is a Guardian columnist
