&w=3840&q=100)
US labels 'The Resistance Front' behind Pahalgam attack as terrorist group
The announcement was made on Thursday (local time) by the US Department of State. In an official statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the move reflects Washington's resolve to enforce President Donald Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack.
Rubio stressed that TRF acts as a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba and claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack. 'This action underscores our commitment to counter terrorism and hold accountable those who target civilians,' he said.
According to the US State Department, TRF has carried out multiple attacks against Indian security forces in recent years, including the most recent one in 2024. The terror outfit's designation as an FTO and SDGT—under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act and Executive Order 13224—allows for stronger legal measures against the group and its affiliates.
The State Department has also reviewed and confirmed that Lashkar-e-Taiba will continue to remain listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO).
US reiterates commitment to global counterterrorism
The State Department further emphasised that the Trump administration remains committed to protecting US and allied interests by cracking down on extremist organisations worldwide.
'These actions reflect the Trump administration's commitment to protecting national security, countering terrorism, and upholding President Trump's call for justice after the Pahalgam attack,' the statement noted.
Jaishankar welcomes US move on TRF designation
India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar welcomed the US decision and expressed his appreciation in a post on X.
'Thank you Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the US State Department for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation,' he wrote.
He added that the group had claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack and reiterated India's policy of zero tolerance for terrorism.
The Indian Embassy in Washington also issued a statement on X, thanking the US government and reiterating India's stance against terrorism.
'Another demonstration of strong India-USA counter-terrorism cooperation. Appreciate the Department of State for listing The Resistance Front (TRF) as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist. TRF is a proxy of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and claimed responsibility for the April 22 terror attack on civilians in Pahalgam. ZERO TOLERANCE for terrorism!' it said.
Pahalgam attack and India's retaliatory response
The Pahalgam attack, which took place in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22, resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, sparking outrage across India. Though TRF initially claimed responsibility for the attack, it later retracted the statement amid mounting tensions between India and Pakistan.
In response, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting nine terror infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
Later in May, India escalated its diplomatic efforts, dispatching seven multi-party delegations to 33 global capitals, including Washington, to increase international pressure on Pakistan and expose its continued support for cross-border terrorism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Jaishankar recalls UPSC journey, says interview was on the day Emergency was revoked
S Jaishankar on Sunday reminisced about his UPSC journey, stating that his interview for the exam, in Delhi, took place the same day the Emergency was lifted — March 21, 1977. "(1977) Election results were coming from the previous day... The sense of the defeat of the Emergency rule was coming into understanding. In a way, that is what got me through the interview," said Jaishankar. The 21-month Emergency was imposed on June 25, 1975 and lifted on March 21, 1977. Jaishankar shared his experience while addressing a gathering of the fresh batch of entrants to the civil services, terming the coveted UPSC exam akin to an 'Agni Pariksha' (trial by fire). The EAM, who is now 70-years -old, said his 22-year-old self had returned from the interview with two key takeaways – the significance of communication under pressure and that important people may be living in a "bubble". 'My interview was on March 21, 1977. That was the day the Emergency was revoked. Revoked! So, I go in for an interview at Shahjahan Road... First person that morning,' recalled the EAM. Jaishankar said, in the interview, he was asked about the 1977 elections — India's fist after the Emergency. Citing his association with JNU as a student and his subject of political science, the EAM reminisced, "I was lucky." "We had taken part in the 1977 election campaign. We had all gone there and worked for the defeat of the Emergency," Jaishankar said. So, in response, "I forgot I was in an interview", and at that moment, "my communication skills somehow came together," he added. And, the second thing he said, he learned that day, of this "Lutyens' bubble". "These people were really shocked, they could not believe that this election result had happened, whereas for us, the ordinary students, we could see that there was a wave against the Emergency," the EAM recalled of the interview experience. Describing the challenge of explaining that shift to people 'connected and sympathetic to the government,' without offending them – Jaishankar noted – was a test in diplomacy, long before he officially became a diplomat. Nearly a month ago, the Modi government marked the 50th anniversary of the imposition of the Emergency by the then prime minister Indira Gandhi, with events held across the country to recall what its leaders called a "dark chapter" in Indian democracy. The Janata Party, a coalition of opposition leaders, emerged victorious in the 1977 elections, handing a defeat to Indira Gandhi, and Morarji Desai became the prime minister.
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
After challenging US' F-35 fighters with Rafael jets, France is now planning to compete with..., Trump should be worried because...
France's SAMPT NG missile system Bad news for US's Donald Trump: For several decades, the United States of America has dominated the global market for missile defense systems with its defence production and innovation capabilities. The defence equipment of USA including the Patriot Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) system are widely deployed by NATO allies and strategic partners across the world due to their defence capabilities. However, there is an European country which has started to compete with US's defence capabilities. At first, it challenged US' F-35 fighters aircrafts with Rafael jets and now, it is planning to challenge the Patriot Surface-to-Air Missile with its SAMP/T NG missile system. Why should Donald Trump be worried? In the latest development, France has entered the global race to dominate air defense technology by unveiling its advanced SAMP/T NG missile system. Seen as a direct challenge to the American Patriot system, much like the earlier F-35 fighter jet vs Rafale jet debate in the fighter jet segment, the missile is seen as the biggest challenges for US led by President Donald Trump. Why is France's SAMP/T NG missile system dangerous? The SAMP/T NG missile of France has been developed by Thales and MBDA in collaboration with Italy. Designed to intercept ballistic missiles, drones, the fighter jets has been developed with greater accuracy and speed. With longer range, faster deployment, and modern radar tech, it could attract NATO countries looking for alternatives amid rising global tensions. US plans to supply Patriot missiles to Ukraine Meanwhile, in a significant test for the US Patriot air defence missiles, US President Donald Trump has said that the United States will send the missiles to Ukraine to help bolster the country's defences against Russian attacks. Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on Sunday (local time), US President Trump explained that the European Union would purchase the missiles from the United States and then deliver them to Ukraine. (With inputs from agencies)
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Russian oil major condemns EU sanctions on Indian refinery, calls it a threat to the country's economy
New Delhi: Moscow-headquarteredRosneft Oil Company on Sunday described the European Union's (EU) latest sanction on Nayara Energy's 20-million tonne refinery in Vadinar, Gujarat as 'unjustified and illegal'. 'The Nayara Energy refinery is a strategically important asset for the Indian energy industry, providing a stable supply of petroleum products to the country's domestic market,' the Russian state-owned energy major said in a statement on Sunday. 'The imposition of sanctions against the refinery directly threatens India's energy security and will have a negative impact on its economy.' Rosneft also said that Nayara Energy–in which it holds 49% stake–will take steps to protect the interests of its shareholders and consumers. 'We are counting on the fact that Nayara Energy will take measures to protect the legitimate interests of its shareholders and consumers, which will be supported by the governments of Russia and India,' it said. Rosneft emphasized that it is not a controlling shareholder of Nayara Energy–the company's share in the authorized capital of the enterprise is less than 50%. The enterprise is managed by an independent board of directors, it said. On Friday, in an attempt to target Russia's ability to raise revenues from its oil and energy sector as it wages war with Ukraine, the EU unveiled sanctions on Nayara's Vadinar refinery and also lowered the price cap on Russian oil by 15% to $47.6 per barrel from $60. Among other steps, it also imposed sanctions on more 'shadow fleet ships', which are largely used for moving crude oil from Russia. Rosneft's statement on Sunday further said that the EU's grounds for imposing sanctions are completely far-fetched and false in content. Nayara Energy is an Indian legal entity whose economic activity is aimed at the development of its asset. The entity is taxed entirely in India, it said, while adding that Nayara Energy shareholders have never received dividend payments and the accumulated profits have been used exclusively for the development of the refinery and petrochemicals and the company's retail network in India. The statement added that these sanctions are examples of extraterritorial implementation of politically motivated restrictions that blatantly violate international law and infringe on the economic interests of a sovereign state. To be sure, Nayara has the largest private sector retail fuel network of the country with about 6,500 fuel bunks, out of the total of about 90,000 petrol pumps in India–a market dominated by state-owned oil and gas companies. The statement further said such actions of the EU demonstrate complete disregard not only for international law, but also for the sovereignty of third countries. 'Rosneft views these sanctions as part of the EU's destructive policy aimed at destabilizing global energy markets. The restrictions on Nayara Energy are yet another example of the EU's use of unfair competition practices,' said the Russian energy major. The statement by the Council of European Union had also said on Friday: 'The bloc will ban the import of 'refined petroleum products made from Russian crude oil and coming from any third country – with the exception of Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States – thereby preventing Russia's crude oil from reaching the EU market through the back door'. Following the EU's move, Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson of the ministry of external affairs, said in a statement late on Friday night that India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. 'We are a responsible actor and remain fully committed to our legal obligations,' he said. The MEA spokesperson said that the government of India considers the provision of energy security a responsibility of paramount importance to meet the basic needs of its citizens. "We would stress that there should be no double standards, especially when it comes to energy trade," Jaiswal added.
