European airport passenger traffic tops pre-Covid level
Passenger traffic reached 2.5 billion in 2024, up 7.4 percent from the previous year, according to provisional figures from Airports Council International (ACI) Europe.
That total was 1.8 percent above 2019 levels, said the trade group, which represents more than 600 airports in 55 countries from western Europe to Israel and Central Asia.
Growth was mostly driven by international passenger traffic, which rose 8.8 percent, while the number of domestic travellers was up 2.5 percent from the previous year and remained below pre-pandemic levels.
"Europe's airports welcomed an additional 200 million passengers last year, with many surpassing their previous historic records," said ACI Europe director general Olivier Jankovec.
"This was achieved despite much inflated air fares, continued supply pressures, mostly tepid economic growth and geopolitical tensions," he added.
He noted, however, that nearly half of Europe's airports remained below their pre-Covid traffic levels in 2024.
"We are now in a multi-speed European airport market where competitive pressures just keep rising," Jankovic said.
The association is forecasting a four-percent rise in passenger traffic this year, he said, but warned that it would have to keep it "under review, considering the overwhelming global political and economic uncertainties".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Norway
6 days ago
- Local Norway
Norway government agrees tax for areas hit by overtourism
The deal was struck after a group of mayors from the Lofoten islands travelled to Oslo on Monday to lobby the government and parliament after the parliament's business committee opted to limit the long-discussed tourist tax to visiting cruise ships. The three parties have a majority in the parliament, meaning the new tax was certain to be voted on when it comes before this parliament on Wednesday June 4th. "We have agreed on an effective model on visiting fees for areas with particular challenges, like the Tromsø region and the Lofoten Islands," the Centre Party MP Erling Sande, who leads the business committee, told the TV2 broadcaster . The tax will be levied on accommodation and cruise ships, but not on caravans, motorhomes, recreational boats or camping. Municipalities will be eligible to levy the tax if they can document "real pressure on infrastructure". Sande said the details over what would count as "real pressure" still needed to be finalised. "There are a handful of areas in our country. We see it in the Tromsø region, we see it in Lofoten, and there are some other places around the country where there is a particularly high load." The government's original plan for a 3 percent tax on accommodation was dropped by the committee last Wednesday at the last minute, with the committee instead opting to limit the tax to cruise ships. The government had already reduced the proposed rate for the accommodation sector from 5 to 3 percent this spring, bringing it in line with taxes in many European cities, but had left out cruise and campervan tourists. READ MORE: Everything you need to know about Norway's planned tourist tax Advertisement Municipalities were then, as now, granted discretion over whether to implement the tax, but the focus of the tax still drew anger from some business groups for missing its intended targets. Six mayors from Lofoten travelled to Oslo on Monday to try to revive the tourist tax on accommodation, as they did not believe that a cruise tax would be enough to solve the problems with overtourism in their communities.
Local Norway
28-05-2025
- Local Norway
'Disaster for customers': EU's plan to cut flight compensation provokes anger
Representatives for the bloc's 27 countries are to discuss the idea , which proponents say will result in fewer flight cancellations, on Wednesday in Brussels. Carriers currently must pay air travellers in Europe up to €600 ($682) for delays of more than three hours, or if a flight is cancelled less than 14 days before departure. Supporters see the rules dating back to 2004 as an example of the European Union's prowess in defending consumer rights. But airlines say they face a hefty bill, which "perversely" often leads them to cancel flights rather than run them with a long delay -- with the knock-on effect on flight schedules. "Extending the so-called delay thresholds will give airlines more time to move planes and crews across Europe to save flight schedules," said Airlines for Europe (A4E), an industry group. Poland, which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency, has picked up plans for reform that have languished since a 2013 commission proposal failed to bear fruit. Advertisement Warsaw initially mooted upping the maximum non-sanctioned delay to five hours, according to several people familiar with the discussion. But some member states, including Germany, oppose the idea and negotiations are ongoing to find a compromise, several European diplomats told AFP. "Long flight delays are a real nuisance. They ruin the start of well-deserved holidays. They disrupt important plans. They cost valuable lifetime," said Stefanie Hubig, Germany's consumer rights minister. Berlin could not agree to any changes "unilaterally aligned" with airlines' interests "just before the holiday season," she added. More flights, less money Upping the threshold to five-hours could save almost 50 percent of flights that are currently cancelled, according to A4E, which represents Air France-KLM, Lufthansa and other companies accounting for more than 80 percent of European air traffic. It would also strip about 75 percent of passengers of the right to compensation, said Europe's BEUC umbrella consumer rights group. Advertisement "This is an unacceptable step back from the current level of protection," it said in a joint statement with consumer associations. Delays and cancellations could cost airlines up to €8.1 billion this year, according to the European Commission. Yet, agencies that help passengers get money in exchange for a fee note that of the millions of passengers eligible for compensation, only a fraction each year file a claim. "For European customers this is a disastrous change," Tomasz Pawliszyn, the head of one such firm, Airhelp, told AFP of the planned reform. Since the three-hours threshold has been adopted in other jurisdictions, such as Canada, Turkey and Britain, the changes would generate "confusion" and potentially lead to some European carriers being allowed longer delays than their non-European rivals on some of the same routes, he added. ' Blackmail ' The proposed change is part of a broader package of reforms. This includes some clearly passenger-friendly moves, such as barring airlines from charging for hand-luggage of a standard size and weight. It has nevertheless enraged some European lawmakers, as the Polish presidency of the European Council is seeking to push it through with a rarely-used expedited procedure that limits parliament's say. "The first word that comes to my mind about the council behaviour is blackmail," Andrey Novakov, a lawmaker with the centre-right EPP and the parliament's rapporteur on the issue told AFP. "Everyone who is not a pilot here in the parliament will need some time to digest" the reform and come up with suggestions that "could serve both passengers and airlines". "This is not happening when you have a time pressure," he said.
Local Norway
27-05-2025
- Local Norway
Why Temu orders to Norway look set to become more expensive
Mounting pressure from Norwegian authorities, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and potential new duties on parcel distributors could soon make ordering from Temu more expensive for Norwegian consumers. The shopping platform's appeal lies in its low prices and vast selection, but recent investigations have cast a shadow over its operations. A joint Nordic inspection of products ordered from Temu and similar platforms revealed that 7 out of 10 items contained hazardous substances , including materials banned under Norwegian and EU law. This discovery prompted Norwegian Climate and Environment Minister Andreas Bjelland Eriksen to summon parcel distributors for a high-level meeting on Monday. Their (declared) task? To determine how Norway can better regulate the flow of online imports from platforms like Temu and protect consumers from unsafe goods. READ MORE: Why Norway will hit you with a customs fee for small online purchases from abroad Stricter controls Following the meeting, Minister Eriksen emphasised a collective recognition that "more control is needed," the business newspaper e24 reported. In the short term, the government wants to ramp up customs checks on incoming packages to detect violations of environmental and safety regulations. While this won't cover all 31,000 Temu packages entering Norway daily, the goal is to create a credible threat of enforcement – building the case for distributors to cut ties with non-compliant sellers. Eriksen clarified that the government is prepared to act unilaterally if distributors fail to take responsibility. This could include assigning new legal duties to distributors , such as requiring them to conduct due diligence on platform partners or reject deliveries that don't meet Norwegian standards. Advertisement Why consumers might pay more While consumer protection is the focus of the government's efforts, these additional controls are unlikely to come free – and the cost could land on Norwegian consumers. Distributors such as Posten and Bring are generally not permitted to open individual packages. However, if they're mandated to support customs with expanded control zones, staff training, and technological upgrades to track regulatory compliance, these changes will require significant investment. Similarly, if new legislation places liability or enforcement obligations on these companies, they'll need to develop internal compliance systems – costs that might, at least in part, be passed on through increased service fees or higher delivery charges. For platforms like Temu, additional pressure from Norwegian or European regulations may compel them to alter sourcing practices, submit to external audits, or cut off certain suppliers altogether. That may reduce the availability of ultra-cheap goods, especially those that violate safety standards. And in logistics, time is money - additional inspections and customs holds could delay delivery times, leading distributors to raise prices or prioritise more expensive service tiers. READ ALSO: What are the rules for posting and receiving items in Norway Advertisement A long-term shift on the horizon Another potential source of price inflation is Norway's push for more substantial alignment with EU regulatory frameworks on e-commerce and consumer protection. Both Climate Minister Eriksen and Children and Family Minister Lene Vågslid have voiced support for more integrated European systems that ensure consistent safety data across borders. If they materialise, such systems could lead to the adoption of stricter EU and EEA-wide compliance requirements for non-EEA platforms like Temu. While this would potentially standardise enforcement, it could also increase the regulatory burden on foreign sellers and their logistics partners – raising the costs of doing business in Norway. A price worth paying? This rising tide of accountability may soon make Temu's orders to Norway cost more. And as distributors and platforms absorb these new responsibilities, the end customer will likely see the difference in their final bill. Yet, don't expect consumers to take to the streets - numerous Norwegians might consider it a price worth paying in the broader context of consumer safety.
