logo
Blackwood councillors 'excluded' from meeting with minister

Blackwood councillors 'excluded' from meeting with minister

I have asked Ruth Jones, MP for Newport West and Islwyn, if she would be kind enough to contact the minister, as I wrote on June 14 and received no response. If an invite had been received, these could have been asked verbally.
The questions are:
1 - I certainly welcome the fact to fund local government to deliver the Connect to Work, and I would be most grateful for a little more information about funding, partnership working with DWP, Housing, Communities and councils to make this a success.
2 - I assume there will be joint action plans between local and central government, so the best can be achieved for all residents.
3 - How will other departments feed into this process, please like Education and Health to ensure we are all joined up?
4 - Do you envisage there will be a different formula used for urban and rural communities, and how will the Senedd be involved, please?
5 - I have long been a supporter of Youth Hubs as a previous peer mentor trying to get clients back to work in South Powys. We involved the voluntary organisations in confidence building and positive outcomes and objectives which many clients appreciated.
6 - The European Social Fund was a lifeline then for many.
7 - Will a plan be developed with private sector organisations and employer engagement plans please?
8 - You will be aware of the Senedd Elections next year, so will these plans be in place prior so we can move forward together, and how will councils be involved please, as we are at the forefront of our communities, and will the scheme differ from England please?
Always a pleasure to work in partnership
Cllr Kevin Etheridge.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Nimby' attacks alienate rural voters, Labour MPs warn Keir Starmer
‘Nimby' attacks alienate rural voters, Labour MPs warn Keir Starmer

Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Times

‘Nimby' attacks alienate rural voters, Labour MPs warn Keir Starmer

Sir Keir Starmer is being warned by Labour MPs to tone down the government's attack on 'nimbys' amid fears it is alienating voters in rural constituencies that the party won for the first time in 2024. The prime minister was told the phrase was divisive and risked a further drop in the 'goodwill' shown by rural voters that handed Labour a historic election win last year. The Rural Research Group, which represents 26 MPs from countryside constituencies, said it was wrong to label people 'nimbys'. The acronym stands for 'not in my back yard' and has been adopted frequently by Starmer to characterise those he has said are standing in the way of Labour's growth plans by blocking new housing and infrastructure. But the group said there was a tendency in Westminster to 'focus on dividing lines' that 'often pit rural against urban, and nimbys against yimbys ['yes in my back yard']' — with the former 'seen as people living in rural or semi-rural communities'. They conducted polling that found 56 per cent rural of rural voters did not see themselves as nimbys, compared with 16 who did. 'For development to succeed in rural areas, it must respect and reflect the deep connection to land, nature and local identity,' the MPs said. • Pro-growth Labour MPs dismayed at concession to green 'nimbys' Jenny Riddell-Carpenter, who chairs the group and won the seat of Suffolk Coastal for Labour for the first time in 2024 from the former deputy prime minister Thérèse Coffey, said that calling people nimbys was 'toxic'. She told The Times: 'We need to put the term 'nimbyism' to bed. It excludes a whole set of voters from a conversation about what local growth and local opportunity means for them, in their area. 'Shouting people down and calling them nimbys won't win support for local growth. 'But if we capture what matters locally, build in for nature, and make growth inclusive for our rural areas — we can succeed where the previous government failed.' Starmer has repeatedly attacked 'nimbys' in a bid to demonstrate the government's commitment to boosting growth through housebuilding and new infrastructure projects. Since becoming prime minister, he has vowed to 'take on the nimbys', branding them 'blockers' who want to 'frustrate growth' and are part of 'the alliance of naysayers'. The group's intervention will be seen as evidence of growing concern among rural MPs about Labour's poll ratings, particularly given the hit to farmers from Rachel Reeves's changes to inheritance tax in her budget. • James Rebanks: 'The farming crisis? It's much bigger than inheritance tax' The emergence of more 'research group' caucuses in parliament also mirrors how Conservative factions sought to wield their power under previous administrations and demonstrates the restlessness felt by some Labour MPs. Starmer was told to show more recognition of rural identity, which the rural group said had 'for too long been misunderstood and overlooked by policymakers'. They said housebuilding was still important, with 80 per cent of those surveyed saying they were concerned younger people will not be able to buy their own home. Most — 65 per cent — were happy for development to proceed, so long as it was done thoughtfully and with consideration for local identity and needs. However, the group said that rural areas 'often have higher housing targets than their urban neighbours' and are bearing the brunt of big energy projects and grid upgrades as part of the government's drive towards net zero. 'For many rural voters, this is something that they are increasingly aware of, as they witness new infrastructure and developments appearing in their locality,' the MPs said in their report, Understanding Rural Britain. • Why Labour is failing to build the homes Britain needs Their polling showed rural voters prioritised spending on the NHS above all else (59 per cent), followed by agriculture and the rural economy (51 per cent), education (48 per cent) and tackling crime (44 per cent). The most popular spending cuts were foreign aid (53 per cent) and welfare (44 per cent).Given the potential threat posed by Reform UK, the group also highlighted widespread disillusionment with the established political parties. Almost two thirds of rural voters — 65 per cent — said they have little trust in politicians, according to the poll. The MPs said: 'This should serve as a clear warning sign to all parties: disillusionment in rural Britain runs deep, and restoring trust will require more than promises — it must be backed by visible, long-term local action rooted in authenticity.' A Labour source defended the party's record, saying: 'We are proud of our ambition to create a fairer Britain.' They said that working families were yet to 'feel that sense of fairness' and that all people 'deserve a secure place to call home for them and their loved ones'. The source added Labour would 'unashamedly deliver on that promise', as well as its commitment to build 1.5 million new homes during the parliament with adequate infrastructure and healthcare for new residents.

Elite liberal Yimbys are killing off the family home
Elite liberal Yimbys are killing off the family home

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Elite liberal Yimbys are killing off the family home

The Yimbys believe that the only real solution is to roll back regulations further and introduce new housing laws designed to increase urban density. Much of this is based on often exaggerated climate concerns about 'sprawl'. Remarkably they have gained the support of the libertarian Right. One might think such people would embrace the notion of promoting a class of small property owners, but it seems that juicing the profits of large corporations is a higher priority. The problem here, for Yimbys on the Right and Left, lies in the small matter of market preferences: most people don't want to live in the inner-city high rise apartments beloved by planners and Yimbys, but in a house with a garden of their own. Indeed, generally high-end dense housing has a relatively small market. Condos and apartments may thrill Yimby imaginations – the public, not so much. Surveys, such as one in 2019 by political scientist Jessica Trounstine, have found that the preference for lower-density, safe areas with good schools is 'ubiquitous'. Three out of four Californians, according to a poll by former Obama campaign pollster David Binder, opposed legislation that banned zoning which only permitted single family homes. This mismatch between what is being built and what most people want can be seen in the huge oversupply of apartments, not just in the US but in Canada's big cities too, causing prices for such properties to drop over the past two years. Yet despite all the evidence, Yimbys show little or no interest in the predominant dreams of their own citizens. Worse, their ideas are helping to inform the agenda of the so-called 'Abundance Democrats', a fashionable new movement which seeks to make peace between the Left, prosperity and growth, inspired by a book by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. Even the Yimbys' more moderate ideas as laid out in the book – also called Abundance – largely ignore the suburbs and exurbs, where most Americans live, and stay clear of ownership. As attorney Jennifer Hernandez suggests, there is an 'ugly elitist underbelly' to Abundance, reflecting the values of hipster professionals while eschewing 'even a passing wave to those who choose not to live in city centres, who want to be able to buy a detached, single family home, and who don't want to share a wall, sound, ride or odours with their neighbours…' The obvious and likely failure of Yimby policies might well empower far more radical approaches to housing, which seem more interested in turning cities into a souped up version of greater Moscow. The Mamdani approach of public housing and rent control may come to be seen by progressives as the best alternative – however disastrous public housing has been in cities across the United States. Given the utter failure of mainstream Yimbyism, the progressive embrace of a more socialist approach seems inevitable. Well-heeled Yimbys, and their corporate backers, are unlikely to enjoy the results.

Guernsey politicians to decide fate of plans for new roads
Guernsey politicians to decide fate of plans for new roads

BBC News

time4 hours ago

  • BBC News

Guernsey politicians to decide fate of plans for new roads

The fate of new roads in northern Guernsey will soon be decided by States will host an open planning meeting "in due course" to consider 19 representations for new routes in St Sampson.A total of 64% of the proposed new housing planned across the island for the period 2025 to 2030 are set to be built in the north, according to St Sampson Douzainier Karl said they would consider the representations before preparing a final report and recommendations. Building up to 190 homes has been suggested for the Saltpans site off Route Militaire, which is one of four in the area set aside for housing plans include roads, pavements, cycle lanes and bus stops at the area which previously had plans for the building of a data States property unit said the cost for the outline planning application is being included in a larger piece of work which had cost about £118,000 to in the north of Guernsey previously raised concerns about the lack of infrastructure ahead of new building projects, saying too many have been planned for their Guille said: "There is some logic to building in the north because that's where the infrastructure is and that's where the amenities are."But we're talking at the moment about up to 1,300 new properties in the longer-term just in the area of the Braye du Val."That's an awful lot."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store