NATO member sets up gates and barriers at Russian border checkpoint
These infrastructure upgrades are located at the Narva crossing, one of the main transit points between Estonia and Russia. Metal gates are being set up at the entrance to the bridge on the Estonian side, with additional structures for pedestrian and vehicle control positioned midway across.
'The barriers help prevent vehicles from forcefully driving through the border checkpoint. Essentially, they help to prevent evasion of border control,' said Antti Eensalu, head of the Police and Border Guard Board's Narva checkpoint, as quoted by ERR.
He added that installation work is expected to be completed next month, stressing that the upgrades would make it possible to completely shut down the checkpoint if necessary.
Authorities are reportedly planning to install similar drive-through barriers at the Luhamaa and Koidula border checkpoints in southern Estonia.
Like its Baltic neighbors Latvia and Lithuania, Estonia has adopted an increasingly hardline stance toward Russia since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022, and has speculated that Russia could invade once the Ukraine conflict ends. The Kremlin has repeatedly rejected the claim and branded related measures taken by Estonia and other Baltic states as 'Russophobic'.
On Sunday, Estonia's Ministry of Defense announced that NATO is considering establishing a German-Dutch Allied Corps presence in the country, a move that would further expand the alliance's footprint in the Baltic region.
Earlier this year, Estonia signaled its readiness to host allied forces operating F-35 jets, including aircraft with nuclear capabilities. The Kremlin responded that such deployments would be regarded as a direct threat to Russian national security.
In 2024, Estonia also unveiled plans to build hundreds of concrete bunkers along its entire eastern border as part of the Baltic Defense Line, a coordinated regional initiative with Latvia and Lithuania aimed at boosting collective defense readiness. Moscow has reiterated that it poses no threat to Europe, expressing doubt about the necessity of spending money on such fortifications.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's top spy admits to employing prostitutes
Kiev employs prostitutes to gather information from men, Kirill Budanov, the head of Ukraine's military intelligence agency (HUR), has said. In an interview with Ukrainian journalist Ramina Eshakzai published on Tuesday, he was asked if Kiev uses prostitutes to gather information – a practice which the reporter said is common in British intelligence. 'A normal method, isn't it? Do you know how often men share stories to show how powerful they are, as they say?' Budanov said. Ukrainian intelligence has been able to receive 'several unique pieces of information' from men in relaxed circumstances, he added. 'It's just about things that we couldn't have found out about at all, in principle.' According to Budanov, 'a very high percentage' of personnel serving in the HUR are now women. Ukrainian spies commonly use 'entrepreneurial activity, journalism, and sociology' as cover jobs while on assignment, while some work under 'full cover,' living double lives in Russia, he said. Ukraine has increasingly turned to assassination and sabotage in Russia as its forces have been beaten back on the battlefield. Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) has warned that Ukrainian intelligence has increased recruitment efforts within Russia to carry out assassination and sabotage plots. The FSB regularly reports that it has thwarted these types of activities. Moscow has said Ukraine is morphing into a 'terrorist' organization, accusing Kiev of carrying out killings of Russian officers, journalists, and other key figures.
Russia Today
34 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Trump vows to pull US out of Ukraine ‘mess'
The US is working hard to withdraw itself from the 'mess' of the Ukraine conflict, President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday. When asked why the US should keep funding Ukraine as Kiev grows increasingly more coercive in its draft campaign, Trump responded: 'This is Biden's war. This is not my war. I'm here to get us out of it. It's a mess, and I'm here to get us out.' The journalist was referring to Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky's recent decree allowing the enlistment of men over 60. 'I haven't heard that, when you say about 60-year-old men,' Trump said. 'But this is Biden's war. And we're working very hard to get us out.' In recent weeks, the US president has threatened to impose 100% tariffs and secondary sanctions targeting Russia's trading partners in an effort to pressure Moscow into accepting a ceasefire with Kiev – measures which Russia has denounced as illegal. Q: Even if a ceasefire in Ukraine doesn't work out, why should Americans continue to fund a Ukrainian military that's scraping the bottom of the barrel of its population like this?TRUMP: This is Biden's war. I'm here to get us out of it. Asked whether he was prepared to follow through on his threats, Trump said a decision would be made after a scheduled meeting in Russia this week involving his special envoy, Steve Witkoff. 'I never said a percentage [for tariffs], but we'll be doing quite a bit of that,' Trump said. 'We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow [on Wednesday]… We'll make that determination at that time.' Earlier in the day, Trump said he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on Indian imports over the next 24 hours, due to New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian crude. He had previously announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods, scheduled to take effect on Friday. India, one the biggest importers of Russian oil alongside China, has promised to 'safeguard its national interests and economic security' in response to the tariff threat. Beijing responded by vowing to 'defend its sovereignty' in response to what it described as 'coercion and pressure.' Moscow has condemned Trump's tariff threats as violations of other nations' rights. 'We believe that sovereign states should have, and do have, the right to choose their own trade partners,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian oil red lines: The EU and US are about to push India too far
With American rhetoric against India becoming more openly coercive, and top officials warning New Delhi about the consequences of its energy trade with Russia, the pressure is becoming multidirectional. Recent remarks by former US President Donald Trump have further complicated this recalibration. Alongside a 25% tariff on Indian exports, imposed last week, Trump issued pointed warnings over India's sustained energy and defense trade with Russia, accusing New Delhi of indirectly supporting America's adversaries through continued oil purchases. Trump went as far as to suggest that India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together,' framing their economic engagement as contrary to US interests. Trump's statements were not just emotional reactions – they were followed by a series of other statements from US officials. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday claimed India's purchase of Russian oil is a 'point of irritation.' 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas and things that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap and – meaning they have to – in many cases, they're selling it under the global price because of the sanctions,' he stated. 'And that – unfortunately that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India – not the only point of irritation.' On Sunday, a top aide to President Donald Trump accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by buying oil from Moscow. 'What he [Trump] said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,' said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of the US president's most influential aides. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact,' Miller said on Fox News. This marks a significant hardening of tone, signalling that bipartisan pressure on India's Russia policy may persist regardless of the administration in power. The Indian government issued a stern response, saying Delhi would keep purchasing oil from Moscow if it is in line with national interests. Its foreign ministry stated that country's energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests. 'The government is committed to prioritizing the welfare of Indian consumers. Our energy purchases will be based on price, availability and market conditions,' the statement read. Despite Trump's claims that India had stopped buying Russian oil after his threats, the Indian government said it is not aware of any pauses in imports. People in the oil and gas industry have confirmed that the government has not issued any officials requests to refiners to stop purchasing Russian oil. As global energy flows are increasingly weaponized, India's path is becoming tougher, but also more clearly defined. This is no longer merely a question of compliance with sanctions; it is about resisting the politicization of trade and asserting agency in a fragmented global order. The message to the West at large: India's energy decisions will not be dictated by external red lines. India's response is not retreat, but recalibration, through diversification, industrial pivoting, and legal safeguards. It signals the emergence of a new energy diplomacy: one that is agile, layered, and unapologetically sovereign. EU pressure A change in US rhetoric against India came days after theEuropean Union unveiled its 18th sanctions package targeting refined fuels processed from Russian crude. By imposing curbs on the import of diesel and other fuels refined from discounted Russian oil, the EU has drawn India's biggest private refiners, Nayara Energy and Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), into a geopolitical confrontation they had largely navigated with strategic finesse since 2022. At the core of the EU's sanctions is a new strategy of tracking the origin of crude, even after it has been transformed into refined products. In other words, Indian diesel or jet fuel produced from Russian Urals crude will now be treated as Russian in origin, regardless of where it's refined. This has immediate implications for Nayara Energy's Vadinar refinery, the second largest in India, and also forReliance, which operates the world's largest refining complex at Jamnagar and has occasionally purchased Russian barrels to take advantage of significant discounts. The EU has gone further. It has lowered the price cap on seaborne Russian crude from $60 to $47.60 per barrel, effective from September 3, 2025. In practice, this severely limits Indian refiners' ability to secure Urals crude at prices that generate high margins, formerly in the $15–20 per barrel range. This arbitrage had made Indian products highly competitive in the European market. With Europe now closed off and refiners forced to reroute cargoes to regions with lower demand and pricing power, expected margins could shrink to $8–12, with an additional $1–2 per barrel in compliance costs. India's reaction was swift and unequivocal. The Ministry of External Affairs condemned the move as 'unilateral and extraterritorial,' rejecting the notion that its energy decisions should be hostage to the EU's secondary sanctions logic. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri underlined that India's energy security remained 'non-negotiable', a principle India would not abandon merely to appease Western preferences. Even Nayara Energy, 49.13% owned by Russia's Rosneft and long seen as vulnerable, broke its usual silence to denounce the sanctions as unjustified, while considering legal remedies through international arbitration mechanisms. Targeting Nayara Energy recently saw a leadership change, with CEO Alessandro des Dorides stepping down amid the evolving impact of EU sanctions and operational uncertainty. This was not just symbolic. A BP-chartered tanker, the Talara, left Nayara's port without loading fuel after the sanctions were announced. This suggests that EU enforcement will be aggressive and, potentially, that companies with European exposure will become increasingly wary of doing business with Indian refiners tied to Russian feedstock. Nayara may not be the last to face such pressure. Reliance, despite its diverse portfolio, is already re-evaluating its sourcing strategies in anticipation of tighter scrutiny. The financial stakes are staggering. India's fuel exports to Europe, which peaked at $19.2 billion in FY24, have already dropped by 27% to $15 billion in FY25. With the EU's latest restrictions now fully operational, analysts estimate that India could lose up to $5 billion annually, depending on the rigor of enforcement and the ability of refiners to find alternate buyers in Asia or Africa. The sheer scale of these losses would not only erode refining margins but also squeeze India's current account buffers, potentially complicating its macroeconomic stability. Redrawing India's Energy Map India isn't backing down. Instead, it is executing a quiet but deliberate recalibration of its energy strategy. Leading Indian refiners are ramping up imports from Iraq, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia, while cautiously exploring longer-term deals with US crude suppliers, despite those barrels being less competitively priced than discounted Russian Urals. The objective is strategic: to avoid overdependence on any single geopolitical supplier while safeguarding energy security on India's own terms. For Reliance Industries, the pivot is even deeper. Already investing $10–15 billion in its ambitious crude-to-chemicals (C2C) initiative, the company is insulating itself from the volatility of fuel exports by focusing on petrochemicals and specialty materials with more stable margins and global demand. This rebalancing is likely to accelerate in the wake of the EU sanctions, giving Reliance a strategic hedge against trade weaponization. While Reliance charts an innovation-led pivot, Nayara remains entangled in geopolitical Rosneft's equity stake and its exposure to sanctions, any restructuring will need careful legal engineering. The company is reportedly exploring the creation of special-purpose vehicles or divestment strategies to insulate its operations. This standoff isn't just about oil, it's about sovereignty. India, having withstood Western pressure on Russian oil since 2022, now sees the EU's sanctions as a strategic red line. The real risk lies not only in lost trade, but in legitimizing extraterritorial controls that erode the Global South's right to independent economic choices. While the EU claims it's closing loopholes, India sees clear double standards. European nations still import Russian LNG and rely on intermediaries, yet penalize India for refining crude. The era of quiet compromise is over. In its place, a more assertive India is stepping forward, redefining its energy calculus, managing geopolitical headwinds, and defending its autonomy with both pragmatism and resolve.
