What Republicans Have Said About the Epstein Controversy
A memo released by the Department of Justice and FBI that denies the existence of an Epstein 'client list' and states that he died by suicide, aiming to put to bed conspiracies surrounding the disgraced financier harbored by those on the right, has sparked widespread outcry from President Donald Trump's MAGA base.
'I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is,' Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews on Tuesday, speaking of public interest in Epstein. 'The credible information's been given.'
Amid the blowback, Trump allies from House Speaker Mike Johnson to right-wing activist Laura Loomer have broken with the Administration over its handling of the issue, while some other conservatives have voiced support—or sought to avoid the controversy.
Prominent voices on the right clash with the Trump Administration
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, an outspoken MAGA voice in Congress, told CNN that the Trump Administration's mishandling of files related to Epstein's case, which Trump pledged to release during his 2024 campaign, is 'just a red line that it crosses for many people.'
'This is something that's been talked about by many people serving in the Administration, myself and many others on the right and the left of there needing to be transparency of the rich and powerful elites,' she added. Conspiracy theories about Epstein's case were previously promoted by multiple high-ranking members of the Administration, including Vice President J.D. Vance and FBI Director Kash Patel. Over the weekend, however, Patel said in a post on X that 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been.'
Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told NBC News that he understands the public intrigue surrounding Epstein, 'who he trafficked those women to and why they weren't prosecuted.'
'I think the Justice Department is going to have to go back to the drawing board in answering those questions,' he said.
Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told The Hill he 'would just like the files to be turned over.'
Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, another outspoken MAGA lawmaker, on Tuesday called for the appointment of a special counsel in the matter, floating former Rep. Matt Gaetz for the role. 'We deserve the truth about the Epstein Files,' she wrote in a post on X. 'I'm ready for a Special Counsel to handle this.'
Right-wing media commentators have also contributed to the blowback. 'The fact that the U.S. government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, 'Case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist,' was too much for me,' right-wing commentator and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in a speech at Turning Point USA Student Action Summit on Friday.
Far-right activist and Trump ally Laura Loomer warned that the 'lack of transparency' would cost Republicans House and Senate seats in a post on X. In an interview with Politico, Loomer called for a special counsel to 'independently investigate the handling of the Epstein files.'
Attorney General Pam Bondi has faced particular ire. Bondi in February stated that Epstein's alleged 'client list' was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' The same month, the Justice Department released a cache of files related to Epstein's case that were heavily redacted and mostly consisted of information that had previously been made public despite Bondi's promises that the documents would include flight logs and the names of people involved, leaving many underwhelmed.
Following the release of the memo last week, Bondi said that she had been referring to the case file on Epstein in the February interview as opposed to a 'client list.'
Trump defended Bondi, writing in a Truth Social post earlier this week that the Attorney General 'is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' But others on the right have voiced a much more critical sentiment.
After initially saying he trusted the Administration to make the 'right decision,' House Speaker Mike Johnson urged Bondi to 'come forward and explain' what happened with the Epstein 'client list' in an interview with youtuber Benny Johnson. 'I'm for transparency,' the House lawmaker said. 'It's a very delicate subject but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Still, he opposed Democratic efforts to release files related to Epstein.
"I'm sure it's a relief for Pam Bondi to hear the president is still in her corner. Unfortunately, huge swaths of the party are not,' conservative commentator Megyn Kelly wrote on X. 'She repeatedly misled on Epstein. Then didn't have the courage to explain herself. Suddenly, she's camera shy & no Qs allowed. Good luck!"
Carlson blamed Bondi for the backlash facing the Trump Administration in an NBC News interview published earlier this week.
Saying he now thinks the Justice Department doesn't have 'much relevant information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes,' Carlson told the outlet, 'Rather than just admit that, Pam Bondi made a bunch of ludicrous claims on cable news shows that she couldn't back up, and this current outrage is the result.'
Inside the department, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who previously promoted conspiracy theories about a government coverup related to Epstein's case, has reportedly had a falling out with Bondi over the issue and threatened to quit.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who has clashed with Trump on issues from Iran to the President's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' on Tuesday announced he was launching an effort to force a vote on the release of files related to Epstein's case alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California with a procedural tool known as a discharge petition.
'We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes,' Massie said in a statement, adding, 'If your Representative won't sign the discharge petition, ask why.'
Some GOP members of Congress voice support—or dodge the issue
Still, some Republican lawmakers, including Chuck Grassley of Iowa, have made public statements in support of Administration officials or are backing off from making any strong comments about the issue at all. Grassley said that based on what he knows he does believe Bondi provided enough information about Epstein, though he told The Hill that he 'always urge[s] the greatest of transparency.'
Sen. Jim Jordan of Ohio, a strong Trump ally, told NBC News he trusted the President and his team. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Sen. John Cornyn echoed the sentiment by deferring to Trump on the matter.
Rep. Darrell Issa of California spoke more strongly in support of Trump, saying that much of what his base believes about the case simply isn't true.
'I trust the people who reported it to us and who looked at them,' Issa said.
As a number of Republican lawmakers have looked to avoid the controversy, Democratic lawmakers have sought to take advantage of it by forcing their GOP colleagues to show their cards.
Rep. Khanna introduced an amendment to a cryptocurrency bill that would have required Bondi to release the Epstein files. 'This is a question of whose side are you on?' Khanna said on the House floor on Monday.
Most of the Republicans on the House Rules Committee—Reps. Virginia Foxx, Michelle Fischbach, Erin Houchin, Nicholas Langworthy, Austin Scott, Morgan Griffith, and Brian Jack—voted to block the amendment. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina was the sole Republican on the panel to vote to advance it for the consideration of the full House. Rep. Chip Roy did not vote.
Langworthy defended his vote by saying that Democrats politicized the amendment. 'He voted no because it was a pointless political gimmick, not a path to justice,' a spokesperson from Langworthy's office told ABC News 10.
'I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it,' said Foxx, who chairs the committee.
A similar move by Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland last week won more Republican support, however. Van Hollen introduced an amendment to a funding bill before the Senate Appropriations Committee that would force the Justice Department to retain Epstein files, and provide a report to Congress on the history of the case. The committee approved it unanimously with bipartisan support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC Mayor Eric Adams: ‘I have not asked' for Trump's help getting re-elected and president hasn't offered
President Trump has yet to make overtures to assist Mayor Adams' re-election bid — and Hizzoner isn't counting on it. Trump recently hailed Adams' re-election bid and many of the commander-in-chief's supporters continue to pressure Republican Curtis Sliwa to drop out of the race and prevent a victory by 'communist lunatic' Zohran Mamdani. But Adams told The Post 'I have not asked him for [an endorsement or help], and he has not interfered with this race at all.' 5 Mayor Eric Adams says President Donald Trump has yet to make overtures to assist his re-election bid – and he's not counting on it. J.C. Rice Adams faces an serious uphill battle to get re-elected — with a series of recent polls having him in a distant third or fourth place, more than 20 points behind Democratic nominee and frontrunner Mamdani. Adams, however, expressed confidence he'll pull off an upset win in November, even if Sliwa and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo — a registered Democrat like Adams also running as an independent — remain in the race. 'I got to win the race based on what I do best, and that's campaign,' said Adams during an interview Thursday on the backyard porch of Gracie Mansion. The trio are jockeying for the votes of moderate Dems and Republicans, as well as the largest swath of the independent voters. Cuomo and Adams have repeatedly called for each other to drop out of the race, claiming only they can stave off the young far-left socialist from being handed the keys to New York City. Adams, who has repeatedly cozied up to the president, skirted questions about whether he'd even want a Trump endorsement considering Dems outnumber Republicans 6-1 in the city. 5 Trump has declined to comment who he will support NYC mayor, instead telling reporters earlier this week, 'I don't want to say.' AFP via Getty Images However, he wondered out loud why Cuomo didn't get the same criticism he received from lefty critics after Trump on Tuesday said the ex-governor should stay in the race because he 'has a shot' to beat Mamdani and prevent a 'communist' from running NYC. Trump declined to say who he would support, instead telling reporters on the White House lawn, 'I don't want to say.' Adams also skirted questions on whether he'd accept the Republican line if it became available. For that scenario to play out, Sliwa, 71, under state election law, would either first have to accept a federal appointment or die. There's also some precedent for him to be removed from the ballot if he moves out of Gotham and alerts election officials he can't serve as mayor. Adams would then need the backing of at least three of the five Republican county chairs to replace Sliwa on the Republican line. 5 Socialist Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani is frontrunner to become NYC's next mayor. Paul Martinka Sliwa, however, insists he remains all in on his mayoral bid — even though he's not expecting a Trump endorsement based on past bad blood between the two. Although Trump has yet to reach out to Adams, he has repeatedly blasted Mamdani after the socialist's stunning upset in New York's Democratic mayoral primary last month. 'Democrats have crossed the line by elevating a 100% Communist Lunatic,' Trump railed in a Truth Social post on June 25. Adams has repeatedly come under fire from his party's far-left faction for having a good working relationship with the Republican president. 5 Ex-Mayor Bill de Blasio said Adams should avoid a Trump endorsement if he wants to be re-elected. William Farrington Some pols and political pundits say Adams could see a significant bump in support from Trump-loving Republicans and moderate Democrats if the president offered the mayor his support. 'Moderates Democrats might have a problem with Trump, but they're more likely to have a bigger problem with Mamdani,' said Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime Democratic consultant. 'They might look at Adams and say he's a [retired NYPD] cop and understands all our problems.' Yet Adams should expect little support from New Yorkers who voted for Mamdani in the Democratic primary — especially if Trump endorses him, Sheinkopf added. Far-left ex-NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio agreed, adding a potential endorsement from Trump would all but doom Adams' re-election campaign. De Blasio told The Post his advice for any candidate in the left-leaning Metropolis — including Adams — is 'you're going to lose more than you gain' with a Trump endorsement, considering only 30% of NYC voters supported Trump in last year's presidential election. 5 Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo — a registered Democrat like Adams — also is running for mayor as an independent. John Angelillo/UPI/Shutterstock 'It's simply bad math: Two-thirds of New Yorkers would react badly to someone they saw affiliated with Trump . . . so you lose a bunch of Democrats,' said de Blasio, an avid supporter of the 33-year-old Mamdani. 'It's not 2001 where a Democratic Michael Bloomberg took on the Republican [mayoral] line sort of in a fusion way like we used to have where a moderate Republican could be acceptable to a certain number of Democrats,' he said. 'This is a whole different reality because of Trumpism. People have just hardened on their positions, so I don't see how it adds up.'
Time Magazine
18 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Roadblocks Cuomo Faces in NYC Mayoral Race, Per the Experts
Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to re-enter the race for New York City Mayor after his decisive defeat in the Democratic primary in June has prompted plenty of discussion. Cuomo, who conceded the race to progressive newcomer Zohran Mamdani of the Democratic Party, announced his return via a video statement on July 14, during which he shared he will now run as an Independent. 'I am in it to win it,' Cuomo said. 'Only 13% of New Yorkers voted in the June primary. The general election is in November, and I am in it to win it. My opponent, Mr. Mamdani, offers slick slogans, but no real solutions.' Mamdani responded to Cuomo's video by commenting directly underneath it with a link to donate money to his own campaign. As of Saturday morning, Mamdani's X response has over 180,000 likes, while Cuomo's original post has just 5.5k. Experts have queried if Cuomo has learned from the mistakes of his Democratic primary campaign and whether he can overcome the roadblocks facing him in order to stand a solid chance in the November election. If Cuomo is to have a fighting chance, Boris Heersink, a political science professor at Fordham University, says he'll have to find a new narrative for his campaign, decide the key issues upon which he wants to build his platform, and somehow fight back against the campaigns of Mamdani, Republican Curtis Sliwa, and current Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an Independent. It's a delicate balancing act. 'It's actually going to be a pretty tough thing for him to figure out how to present an aggressive Cuomo, that's also a gentler Cuomo, and a more policy-focused Cuomo, all in one package,' says Heersink. Furthermore, some of the high-profile billionaires who previously showed support to Cuomo have since decided to back current Mayor Adams in the general election, including hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman. Now, Cuomo will need to garner new support. Here is what experts say Cuomo's major roadblocks will be as he attempts to run a successful mayoral campaign. Campaigning amid the backdrop of previous sexual harassment allegations Cuomo re-entering this race comes four years after he resigned as Governor of New York after a report from the state Attorney General accused Cuomo of sexually harassing at least 11 women, most of whom had worked for him. The allegations ranged from groping and kissing to remarks about the women's appearances and sex lives. Cuomo denied the allegations. He then went on to acknowledge that he "acted in a way that made people feel uncomfortable." He said it was "unintentional" and that he "truly and deeply apologised" over it. "I feel awful about it and, frankly, I am embarrassed by it," he said in a video statement, before doubling down on his statement that he "never touched anyone inappropriately." On Friday, July 19, the state of New York agreed to pay $450,000 to settle a lawsuit from Brittany Commisso, an ex-aide of Cuomo's who alleged he had sexually harassed and groped her while he was in office. In a statement, Commisso's lawyers referred to the settlement as 'a complete vindication of her claims' and said that Commisso is "glad to be able to move forward with her life." In response, lawyers for Cuomo said: 'The settlement is not a vindication, it is capitulation to avoid the truth," and once again referred to the allegations as "false." Heersink says that Cuomo has not addressed the allegations in his newly-relaunched mayoral campaign. "It's clearly not going to go away. If he's actually going to be actively out there campaigning, it's actually going to come up quite a lot in setups that he can't control,' Heersink says. 'It's a reason for a lot of people to never vote for Cuomo, [and] there's a decent number of people that I think are at least uncomfortable with it.' Cuomo has also come under fire over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic during his time as New York Governor and the testimony he gave in regards to the high number of deaths reported in nursing homes during that time. Cuomo can't have tunnel vision. He must not only defeat Mamdani, but Adams and Sliwa too If Cuomo, Adams, and Sliwa split the non-Mamdani vote, Mamdani will 'certainly' win, Heersink says, arguing that Cuomo needs to convince all those who say they are supporting Adams or Sliwa 'to transfer their support to him, so that he can prevent Mamdani from winning the election.' In order to do that, Heersink says Cuomo will need to posit Mamdani as a 'real threat,' but this could admittedly descend into a 'negative' campaign, something he may be keen to avoid. In an interview with the New York Magazine, published earlier this week, Cuomo appeared to be on board, at least partly, with a renewed approach, admitting that this time around he needs to be 'aggressive across the board.' For Laura Tamman, a professor of political science at Pace University, the issue is that Mamdani has often done better with someone to villainize against. So Cuomo's efforts on that front could end up backfiring. 'Cuomo is a good person for Mamdani to excite people against,' she says. 'It's helpful for fundraising. It's helpful for galvanizing volunteers.' (Cuomo's Super Pac battled hard against Mamdani in the primary, yet he didn't defeat him.) Tamman echoes Heersink's argument that Cuomo will need to consolidate all of the non-Democrat voters, as well as a 'healthy number' of people who are registered as Democrats, in order to claim victory in November. It's because of this that Brian Arbour, associate professor of political science at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, argues that partisanship will be Cuomo's enemy. 'It's a partisan election, and you somehow have to get Democrats not to vote for the Democrat,' he says. Cuomo can't undervalue the importance of likeability Cuomo does not have the 'winner vibe' around him right now, experts tell TIME, so he will need to find a 'positive reason' for people to rally behind him, rather than just a 'negative reason' to not vote for the other candidates. Cuomo, in his latest campaign video and interviews, is seemingly trying to come across as more approachable, experts argue, with Heersink saying it perhaps shows that he has 'learned something' from the Democratic primary upset. 'The approach that he [Cuomo] took in the Democratic primary was, essentially, 'I'm gonna win this thing so I don't actually have to talk to you,'' says Heersink. 'In the primary, he barely campaigned—he was a candidate, but most of the actual campaigning on his behalf was being done by his Super PAC.' Cuomo could be seen shaking the hands of New Yorkers on the street, visiting subway stations, and engaging in more community-driven activities as he announced his re-entry to the race. But Camille Rivera, a political campaign strategist at New Deals Strategies, remains unconvinced this approach will resonate with voters after the primary. She argues that 'not being available for people or press doesn't work in New York City' and that it could feel 'disingenuous' and 'offensive to voters' to start now. Finding an issue to galvanize voters around Mamdani's success, in part, stems from his centering of the issue of affordability, and the popularity of his calls to 'freeze the rent,' make buses free, and provide free childcare in the city. Heersink says that Cuomo will need to find an equally compelling issue of his own to galvanize voters around. 'I think if you were to ask people what are the policies that Cuomo ran on in the Democratic primary, they would have a tough time summarizing that,' he says. 'To be fair, I think that's a criticism you can make of lots of candidates in the Democratic primary.' Yet, Mamdani differentiated himself in this sense, making sure that his policies stood out. When discussing his re-entry to the race, Cuomo told New York Magazine that combatting crime will be a core focus of his platform. 'We either stop the crime, stop the exodus, or we pivot now and start to bring the city back,' he said. 'But I believe it's A or B. You continue the decline and we have real trouble. Or we take a different path to start to make some changes. And I think Mamdani takes us in exactly the wrong direction.' Yet, with Adams in the race, Arbour says that it will be harder for Cuomo to "differentiate himself on this issue,' as it's a core principle of Adams' platform, too. "It's certainly the issue that Adams wants to talk about [also], and it fits with his background,' Arbour says, highlighting Adams' focus on combatting crime since his election in 2021.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buried in Trump's beautiful bill is a new $250 fee on travelers to the U.S. Estimates project it could cut the federal deficit by nearly $30 billion
A provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act states all visitors who need nonimmigrant visas to enter the U.S.—tourists, business travelers and international students, to name a few—must pay a 'visa integrity fee,' currently priced at $250. Travelers who comply with their visa conditions will be eligible for reimbursement. The provision is estimated to bring in $28.9 billion over the next decade. Visitors to the United States will need to pay a new fee to enter the country, according to the Trump administration's recently enacted bill. A provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act states all visitors who need nonimmigrant visas to enter the U.S.—tourists, business travelers and international students, to name a few—must pay a 'visa integrity fee,' currently priced at $250. The fee cannot be waived or reduced, but travelers are able to get their fees reimbursed, the provision states. All told, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the new fee could cut the federal deficit by $28.9 billion over the next ten years. During the same period, the CBO expects the Department of the State to issue about 120 million nonimmigrant visas. In 2023 alone, more than 10.4 million nonimmigrants were issued visas, according to DOS data. CBO expects a 'small number' of people will seek reimbursement, as many nonimmigrant visas are valid for several years. CBO also expects the Department of State would need several years to implement a process for providing reimbursements. Still, the fee could generate billions, the agency estimates. The fee is set at $250 during the U.S. fiscal year 2025, which ends Sept. 30, and must be paid when the visa is issued, according to the provision. The secretary of Homeland Security can set the current fee higher, the provision states. During each subsequent fiscal year, the fee will be adjusted for inflation. Those eligible for reimbursement are visa holders who comply with conditions of the visa, which include not accepting unauthorized employment or not overstaying their visa validity date by more than five days, according to the provision. Senior Equity Analyst at CFRA Research Ana Garcia told Fortune in an email she expects the 'vast majority' of affected travelers to be eligible for reimbursement, as historical U.S. Congressional Research Service data indicates that only 1% to 2% of nonimmigrant visitors overstayed their visas between 2016 and 2022. 'The fee's design as a refundable security deposit, contingent upon visa compliance, should mitigate concerns among legitimate travelers.' Garcia wrote. Reimbursements will be made after the travel visa expires, the provision said. Any fees not reimbursed will be deposited into America's Checkbook, or the General Fund of the Government. What's unclear is the effective date of the 'visa integrity fee.' Steven A. Brown, a partner at the Houston-based immigration law firm Reddy Neumann Brown PC, wrote in a post on his firm's website the fee's 'specific start dates have not yet been confirmed.' Brown points out that the fee is an add-on to others already required by U.S. travelers. 'For example, an H-1B worker already paying a $205 application fee may now expect to pay a total of $455 once this fee is in place,' Brown wrote. Most travelers are also required to pay a fee that comes with submitting a Form 1-94 arrival and departure record. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act increased this charge from $6 to $24. CFRA's Garcia expects demand to be unmoved by the fee, considering 'higher-income' consumers comprise the majority of international leisure and business travelers to the U.S. 'For affluent travelers, the additional $250 represents a manageable increment relative to overall trip costs,' Garcia wrote. 'The fee structure appears strategically designed to enhance compliance rather than broadly restrict travel.' This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword
