Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters target Stockton Mine
By
Sharon Davis
and
Ellen Curnow*
Protesters used the aerial ropeway cables as a zip line to access a coal bucket high off the ground.
Photo:
Supplied
Climate activists have climbed into a coal bucket on the rope way at Stockton Mine again to protest Bathurst Resources Ltd's fast-track application to extend its mining operations across the Buller plateaux to Denniston.
Yesterday afternoon, two Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters clipped themselves to the ropeway cable and used it like a zipline to access a coal bucket in a remote area high off the ground.
This follows a larger protest at Stockton and Denniston in April which ended with at least nine people charged with wilful trespass.
Protester Rachel Andrews, from Palmerston North, was among those charged with trespass on 21 April.
Speaking to The News from a coal bucket this morning she said they had a good supply of water and food and planned to disrupt the transport of coal from Stockton Mine for as long as possible.
Their goal was to have Bathurst withdraw its fast-track application to mine 20 million tonnes of coal on the Denniston Plateau.
While there are only two protesters in the coal bucket, she said they were supported by a huge group of people who were against the mine and the fast-track process.
"There is huge opposition to this mine, even on the West Coast," she said.
Andrews said there were several reasons she was personally motivated to participate. One was the legacy she would leave for future generations.
She wanted to be able to tell her four grandchildren that she did everything she could to prevent a climate disaster.
"We're in a climate emergency,,, people are dying from climate disasters. We can't afford to burn the coal already out of the ground, let alone mining more."
Andrews was also unhappy with the "undemocratic process" under the Fast Track Bill.
She said it placed the decision-making process in the hands of a few people who had shown that they didn't care about the environment and were proud to support more mines.
Protest was the only way for the public to intervene in the fast-track process, she said.
"There is no longer any way for members of the public to voice concerns about proposed projects like this coal mine on kiwi habitat. The New Zealand government has effectively forced communities to take actions like this if we want to be heard."
Andrews spent part of the April protest in a "nest in one of pylons" and was trespassed from Stockton.
She said a lot of thought had gone into planning an action like this. But any consequences would be worth it, to be able to say she had done everything she could to prevent a disaster for future generations.
"I don't take the consequences lightly."
Andrews said many organisations were committed to stopping fast-tracked mines and were in it for the long haul.
"We will continue doing everything we can to oppose Bathurst Resources' proposed mine ... We will not stand idly by and accept this destruction," she said.
The International Court of Justice recently said countries must address the "urgent and existential threat" of climate change by curbing emissions and yet New Zealand was encouraging more mines and more drilling for oil and gas.
Andrews said the proposed mine on Denniston would generate at least 53 million tonnes of emissions, close to New Zealand's entire net emissions of 59 million tonnes.
"We can't afford to keep destroying the planet," she said.
Westport sergeant Georgie Were said police would be negotiating with the protesters to get them to come down.
She said they were in a remote location which made communication difficult.
The News tried unsuccessfully to contact Bathurst Resources Ltd for comment.
During a recent panel discussion on how Buller could transition from coal, Bathurst chief executive Richard Tacon acknowledged the right to protest but said climbing into coal buckets was dangerous. The protesters could have accidentally flicked a lever, flipped the bucket and fallen to their deaths, he said.
Locals took to Facebook today in support of the mine and local employment, with some suggesting starting the ropeway or enlisting the fire brigade to point a hose at the protesters to get them to come down.
*This story originally appeared in the
Westport News.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Two former Labour MPs vie for seats on Hamilton City Council
Photo: RNZ / Isra'a Emhail Two former Labour MPs will vie for a seat on the Hamilton City Council at the local body elections in October. Sue Moroney and Jamie Strange will run against a field of 26 candidates , including former National MP Tim Macindoe, in the East Ward. Six seats available in each of Hamiltons East and West wards. Macindoe, an incumbent councillor, is also standing for mayor. Moroney left Parliament in 2017 and has been the chief executive of the Community Law centres for the past seven years. Strange, a former school music teacher and church minister, exited Parliament in 2023. In total there were 51 candidates vying for a place on the council, including 12 for mayor. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Forest & Bird slams reform as 'conservation retreat', but minister defends economic push
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon wants to make concessions easier to obtain. Photo: RNZ / Giles Dexter A major overhaul of conservation land law has sparked sharp criticism, with Forest & Bird accusing the government of gutting longstanding protections in favour of commercial interests. The government's intended changes to the Conservation Act , unveiled at the National Party conference in Christchurch on Saturday, aims to "unleash growth" by increasing the number of concessions - or permissions - granted to businesses wishing to operate on conservation land. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said many businesses already run on conservation land, but the current regime was "totally broken", with concessions "often taking years to obtain or renew". However, Forest & Bird said the Bill's changes will shift the focus of conservation law "from protection to exploitation". "This is not conservation reform, it's conservation retreat," said chief executive Nicola Toki. "We should not be making it easier to sell off conservation land for commercial gain. "Our laws should uphold the promise to protect nature for its own sake, for future generations and for all those who hold these places dear." She said the consultation document proposed making about five million hectares of public conservation land available for exchange or disposal, if deemed "surplus" or to "support other government priorities". Toki said this represented "the most significant weakening of conservation law in a generation", warning it would increase pressure on native species and transform the Department of Conservation (DOC) from a protector of biodiversity into a land-use manager. "They dismantle the very purpose of our national parks and conservation lands," she said. "Our national parks are not theme parks - they are taonga with deep cultural and ecological significance. "This feels less like policy and more like an international online auction of the very places that define who we are." Conservation Minister Tama Potaka pushed back on claims the government was selling off conservation land. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka has pushed back on Forest & Bird claims. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He said the changes were about creating a clearer, faster and more consistent concessions process for a wide range of land uses. "There's a huge backlog - some concessions were taking five-six years," Potaka said. "We've already halved that backlog in the last six months, but we need to change the system, so those backlogs don't build up again." Potaka highlighted that DOC land was already used for various infrastructure and business purposes, including cellphone towers, bridges, guided walks and concerts. He said the government's reforms aimed to bring more transparency and efficiency to how those uses are managed, and to re-invest revenue into biodiversity protection and pest control. "We're trying to get the right balance between the environment and nature, and the economy, but we do need to drive more economic outcomes out of the things we do own as a country," Potaka said. "That land [currently] makes about $50-60 million [annually]. In anyone's language, that might not be enough, especially if we want to re-invest into biodiversity, and ensure more jobs and high wages." Potaka rejected the notion that the reforms shifted DOC from its ecological mission. He said the changes would actually improve conservation outcomes by making the system more navigable for all types of users, including environmental educators and community groups. "People who host outdoor education camps need concessions too," he said. "Often they're more about community and kids than making money." Potaka also pointed to recent funding announcements - including $30m for weed and pest control, and heritage site upgrades - as evidence of the government's commitment to conservation. In addition to changes to land management, the government has proposed charging international visitors between $20-$40 to access four of the country's most popular natural attractions - Cathedral Cove, the Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound and Aoraki/Mount Cook. New Zealanders would not be charged. The prime minister said the new charges could generate an estimated $62m annually, all of which would be re-invested in the same areas. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: The politics of PayWave
Photo: 123RF "Can someone get the Beehive a press secretary who can understand a news cycle?" asked the host of Herald Now show Ryan Bridge, opening his show last Tuesday with a bit of a broadside at the government's political management. "Yesterday we had a 10-minute sermon - that's the opposition's words - from Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon about the cost of living crisis," he said, referring to Monday's post-Cabinet press conference . That was timed for the first anniversary of their tax cuts - so why was that timing so bad? Bridge flourished The Herald 's own front page that day with a scoop about big boosts to the fees that Crown bodies can pay board members. "It's probably the worst headline you could have at a time like this," he spluttered. "Now I'm not saying they don't deserve it, but the timing... come on!" In bad economic times, stuff that looks bad can end up looking a lot worse no matter what day it goes public. The lead story on Herald Now that day also looked like it was timed with optics in mind - banning surcharges on in-store contactless transactions. "Those pesky surcharges on card payments are gone-skis," Bridge declared, echoing the government's own announcement. "Most customers will be very happy to see an end to the horrible little curled up handwritten coffee stain stickers on the EFTPOS machine," Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson told Ryan Bridge. But Bridge was not distracted by the aesthetics of EFTPOS terminals. He wanted to know who would really reap the benefit of the estimated $150 million saved from the surcharges salami-sliced out at stores as things stand. "That will be absorbed into the retail system," the minister said. "Right. Higher prices, in other words?" Bridge asked. "It's not much over the entire New Zealand commercial marketplace," the minister countered. But if so, it would not really cut the cost of living very much at all - and was not really a strong lead story at a time with so much else going on. "We can only pray that Luxon and Willis understand that shifting $90 million from banks to consumers is irrelevant in the context of a $430 billion economy, including the $7.2 billion the banks made in profits last year," columnist Matthew Hooton said in The Herald on Friday. Consumer NZ was not stoked that credit card surcharges applied to online payments were not covered by the ban. "This is disappointing because your flight or accommodation booking or any other online purchases could still attract a surcharge," Consumer NZ said. "Those transactions are generally much more expensive to process because... they have to protect against online scams, online fraud," Nicola Willis told RNZ's First Up . "We've kept them out of the regime for now because part-passing on the charge to the consumer makes more sense there," she added. But banks also deal with that and their charges are regulated - and it is far from transparent now how those costs are covered for online credit card transactions. While the Prime Minister had said on Monday: "You will no longer be penalised for your choice of payment method," media scrutiny this week revealed that users of EFTPOS and cash payers might end up penalised by a ban. "Any transaction where someone pays by swiping or inserting, is free for a retailer. But as people move to contactless... a higher percentage of their transactions will incur a fee," Retail NZ's Carolyn Young told RNZ 's Morning Report . The Commerce Commission recently moved to cap the interchange fees banks charge each other. That was also meant to reduce the cost to retailers. More people now using PayWave could wipe out the other potential benefits. "I think it's really just performative. If we're paywaving everywhere and then the costs are shared across everyone," Dan Brunskill of told RNZ 's Nine to Noon on Tuesday when asked about the PayWave surcharge ban. The same day BusinessDesk pointed out that just 10 days earlier the Commerce Commission had claimed its interchange fee cap would save businesses $90 million a year in payment costs. The Commission [ also said it was already exploring what regulation may be needed to address excessive surcharging, which it estimated at about $45 million to $60 million a year. But Business Desk's headline Government beats Commerce Commission to card surcharge ban showed that in this case, the government might have got its PR timing right to take the credit for reduced credit card payment costs now. The media scrutiny also illuminated another duopolistic aspect of our economy: Visa and MasterCard dominating this payment trade. Alternatives do exist, BusinessDesk tech reporter Peter Griffin pointed out on Wednesday . But he said after the surcharge ban, PayWavers here will be less likely to seek out cheaper solutions if they cannot see they are cheaper. "We should now focus on reducing the underlying costs of payment processing, not simply regulating away the only mechanism for acknowledging those costs. In the world of payments, as in so much else, what's visible on the bill is only the start of the story." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.