
Attending virtual court proceedings from toilet costs Gujarat man ₹1 lakh. Here's what happened
The court also said it is considering sending the person concerned, named Samad Abdul Rehman Shah, to jail as his conduct was contumacious.
"The contemnor has admitted about his conduct during the live-streaming proceedings. Thus, at this stage, we direct the contemnor to deposit ₹ 1 lakh before the registry of this court before the next date of hearing," said a Division Bench of Justices AS Supehia and RT Vachhani.
The High Court also noted that despite its order, the HC Registrar (Information & Technology) has not filed a reply and no steps have been suggested about how such incidents can be stopped.
The counsel appearing for the Registrar told the Division Bench that he would assist the court on the next hearing date.
The case has been listed for the next hearing on July 22.
In June, a video went viral on social media showing Samad attending Gujarat High Court's virtual proceedings while seated on a toilet and apparently relieving himself.
The incident took place on June 20 before the bench of Justice Nirzar S. Desai.
Initially in the video, a closeup of the man featured, showing Samad wearing a Bluetooth earphone.
Subsequently, he was seen keeping his phone at a distance, revealing that he was seated on a toilet.
The man was appearing as a respondent in a case seeking quashing of a first information report (FIR). He was the complainant in the criminal case, Bar and Bench report said citing the court records.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Manual scavenging: HC seeks report from local bodies to ensure they are equipped with necessary infrastructure
To ensure that all local bodies in Gujarat have the equipment and machineries, mandated by the government in a resolution to completely eradicate manual sewer cleaning and for strict compliance of the provisions of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 in the state, a division bench of the Gujarat High Court has directed the Commissioners of Municipalities to get a report from each of the local bodies. In this context, the court has also observed that it is incumbent that all local bodies are equipped with necessary infrastructure either on their own or by engaging a contractor who must be equipped with the necessary machines and equipment to be used by sanitation workers engaged by the local body or the contractor. The court passed an order in this regard on July 7, while acting on a public interest litigation (PIL), seeking strict implementation of the 2013 Act in Gujarat. The PIL was moved by an Ahmedabad-based voluntary organisation, Manav Garima, in 2016, seeking strict implementation of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013, in the state. In the PIL, the petitioner had highlighted repeated incidents of death of people engaged in manual scavenging by contractors hired by the municipalities and municipal corporations as well as other local bodies across the state. Complying with an earlier order of the court, the Commissioner of Municipalities had filed an affidavit before the court, stating that a virtual meeting was convened with the Regional Commissioners of municipalities of six zones, the Mission Director, Swachchh Bharat Mission and Deputy Commissioner (Administration) on April 30 this year wherein they were directed to strictly adhere to the guidelines issued by the state government through its Urban Housing and Urban Development department to all local bodies by a government resolution, dated April 3, 2025. As recorded by the court in its latest order, the guidelines in the government resolution included procurement of 'certain machineries (equipment) for cleaning of drains so that the safety of safai karmi of the local bodies can be ensured.' In its order, the court noted, 'As there is a mandate for cleaning of drains and manholes in a particular manner, there is a requirement to equip the nagarpalika, municipal corporations and other local bodies with these equipment. There is a requirement to make an inquiry as to whether the local bodies in the state are equipped to carry out the mandate of the government resolution dated 03.04.2025…' The court order added, 'We say so, as according to us, payment of compensation, termination of contract, blacklisting of contractor and lodging of first information report against the contractor and erring officers are not a complete answer to the problem. The main issue is about absolute eradication of manual scavenging or manual sewer cleaning in the state of Gujarat by ensuring strict compliance of the provisions of the Act.' 'Once manual scavenging is completely banned, any engagement of a single person as manual scavenger is violation of the legislative prohibition. It is the duty of the executive to ensure strict implementation of the legislative provisions and in this direction, it is incumbent that all local bodies are equipped with necessary infrastructure either on their own or by engaging a contractor who must be equipped with the necessary machines and equipment to be used by safai karmi, engaged by the nagarpalika or the contractor.' It also stated: 'We, therefore, require the Commissioner of Municipalities (Administration), Gandhinagar, to get a specific report from each of the local bodies through the concerned officer…whomsoever is in direct supervision of the local bodies to ensure that all local bodies in the state are equipped with the equipment/machineries as mandated in the government resolution dated 03.04.2025.' The court said that after receiving reports from the officers concerned, the office of Commissioner of Municipalities has to 'compile the same and place it before the court'. 'Considering the seriousness of the issue', the court also said that the Advocate General of the State should be engaged to assist the court in the matter.


Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
Gujarat CMO, secretariat get bomb threat; turns out to be hoax
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Gujarat chief minister's office (CMO) and the state secretariat in Gandhinagar received a bomb threat email, which turned out to be a hoax after a thorough search of the premises, police said on Saturday.A state government official received an email on July 17, in which the sender threatened to blow up the CMO and secretariat complex in the state capital, Deputy Superintendent of Police Divyaprakash Gohil said."The Gandhinagar police , along with the CM security wing, swung into action on the same day and conducted a thorough search in the entire premises with the help of the bomb detection and disposal squad and other agencies," he official said the threat turned out to be a hoax as nothing suspicious was found."An FIR has been registered against the unidentified sender under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act," he said.A few schools, lower courts and the Gujarat High Court had recently received such bomb threats, and they all turned out to be hoaxes.

The Wire
3 days ago
- The Wire
Delhi High Court Quashes Cases Against 70 Indians Accused of Housing Foreign Tablighi Jamaat Participants
Law A total of 16 FIRs were filed against 70 Indian nationals for allegedly having violated the nationwide lockdown and other prohibitory orders by housing foreign nationals for the Tablighi Jamaat during Covid-19 lockdown. New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Thursday (July 17) quashed the chargesheets in 16 cases registered against 70 Indians for allegedly sheltering foreigners who participated in the Tablighi Jamaat congregation during the Covid-19 outbreak in 2020, Bar and Bench reported. 'Chargesheets quashed,' Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said pronouncing the verdict, as quoted in the report. A detailed copy of the judgement is awaited. A total of 16 FIRs had been filed by the Delhi Police. The accused were booked under provisions of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Epidemic Diseases Act, the Disaster Management Act and the Foreigners Act for allegedly having violated the nationwide lockdown and other prohibitory orders by housing foreign nationals. The Tablighi Jamaat was widely criticised for allegedly having caused one of the biggest spikes in coronavirus cases in India in 2020. The police had also named 195 foreign nationals but most of them were not charge-sheeted and the trial court had also refused to take cognisance on the chargesheet, on the grounds of double jeopardy. The accused had approached the high court in 2021 seeking to quash the FIRs against them, stating that the prohibitory orders were only for religious congregations and gatherings and not on providing shelter to the attendees. In January 2022, the Delhi Police opposed the quashing petitions, saying that the accused had not only violated prohibitory orders issued by the Delhi government but also contributed to the spread of coronavirus. Appearing for the petitioners, advocate Ashima Mandla argued that the attendees who were found inside mosques or in houses were merely being provided shelter, LiveLaw reported. The high court had earlier also quizzed the Delhi Police as to where the attendees could have gone when city suddenly imposed a lockdown. The Tablighi Jamaat congregation was held in Delhi's Nizamuddin Markaz in early March, 2020, with more than 9,000 members said to have attended the event. Prohibitory orders for gatherings, in view of the Covid-19 outbreak, was declared in the national capital on March 13. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.