
Freed from jail, Columbia University activist seizes his new platform
During the three months Khalil was held at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana, the Trump administration escalated its battle.
The administration also arrested other foreign pro-Palestinian students.
It revoked billions of dollars in research grants to Columbia, Harvard and other private schools.
These campuses had been embroiled in the growing student protest movement — a movement in which Khalil played a prominent role.
ADVERTISING
"I absolutely don't regret standing up against a genocide," Khalil, 30, said in an interview at his Manhattan apartment, less than two weeks after US district judge Michael Farbiarz ordered him released on bail while he challenges the effort to revoke his permanent residency green card and deport him.
He believes the government is trying to silence him, but has instead given him a bigger platform.
Returning to New York after his release, Khalil was welcomed at the airport by US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a political foe of Trump.
Supporters waved Palestinian flags as he reunited with his wife and infant son, whose birth he missed in jail.
Two days later, he was the star of a rally on the steps of a cathedral near Columbia's Manhattan campus, castigating the university's leaders.
"I did not choose to be in this position: ICE did," Khalil said, referring to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who arrested him.
He missed his May graduation ceremony and emerged from jail unemployed. The government could win its appeal and jail him again, so Khalil said his priority is spending as much time as possible with his son and wife, a dentist.
Khalil was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria; his wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, is a US citizen and he became a US lawful permanent resident last year.
Khalil moved to New York in 2022 to begin graduate studies.
He soon became a key student negotiator between Columbia's administration and protesters.
The demonstrators set up tent encampments on campus, demanding the university divest its US$14 billion endowment from weapons manufacturers and companies supporting Israel's military.
Khalil has not been charged with any crime.
However, the US government is invoking an obscure immigration statute.
It argues that Khalil and other international pro-Palestinian students should be deported because their "otherwise lawful" speech could harm US foreign policy interests.
The federal judge overseeing the case has ruled that the Trump administration's main rationale for deporting Khalil is likely an unconstitutional violation of free-speech rights. The government is appealing.
Khalil, in the interview, condemned anti-Semitism and called Jewish students an "integral part" of the protest movement.
He said the government was using anti-Semitism as a pretext to reshape American higher education, which Trump, a Republican, has said is captured by anti-American, Marxist and "radical left" ideologies.
The Trump administration has warned Columbia and other universities that federal research grants — mostly for biomedical work — will not be restored unless the government is given more oversight.
This includes control over admissions, hiring and academic content.
The administration says this is necessary to ensure intellectual diversity.
Unlike Harvard, Columbia has not challenged the legality of the grant revocations.
The university has agreed to at least some of the Trump administration's demands.
He urged Columbia and other universities targeted by Trump to heed their students.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump gains Native American support amid economic concerns
TUBA CITY: Rising gas prices and economic frustrations have led some Native American voters to shift their political allegiance toward US president Donald Trump, marking a surprising trend in traditionally Democratic-leaning communities. Nita Mexican, a 77-year-old Navajo Nation resident, voted for Trump last November, citing his hardline stance on immigration and focus on American jobs. 'America has to come first,' she told AFP. 'Us Natives, we are Americans and we should have the jobs first.' Mexican, a former power plant worker, lives in Tuba City, a remote Arizona desert town within the vast Navajo reservation. She and her husband spend $40 (RM170) daily on gasoline to tend to their sheep, a financial strain worsened by inflation. 'Sometimes we don't have enough to get groceries for the both of us,' she admitted. Trump made notable gains in Navajo County during the last election, doubling his margin from 2020. Similar shifts were seen in other Native American communities, where economic concerns outweighed traditional Democratic loyalty. However, not all residents support Trump. Gilberta Cortes, a 42-year-old mother, criticises his policies and rhetoric, including his mockery of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Native heritage. 'You see a lot of racism,' she said. 'When I go out, I feel like I'm just walking on eggshells.' Others worry about Trump's environmental policies and potential cuts to federal assistance programs. Elbert Yazzie, a Navajo resident, fears reduced food aid will hurt low-income families. 'They voted for him because they thought there would be more jobs,' he said. 'But instead, he's cutting off food stamps.' - AFP


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump revives India-Pakistan conflict claims over jet losses
US President Donald Trump said up to five jets were shot down during recent India-Pakistan hostilities that began after an April attack in India-administered Kashmir, with the situation calming after a ceasefire in May. Trump, who made his remarks at a Friday dinner with some Republican US lawmakers at the White House, did not specify which side's jets he was referring to. 'In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually,' Trump said while talking about the India-Pakistan hostilities, without elaborating or providing further detail. Pakistan claimed it downed five Indian planes in air-to-air combat. India's highest-ranking general said in late May that India switched tactics after suffering losses in the air on the first day of hostilities and established an advantage before a ceasefire was announced three days later. India also claimed it downed 'a few planes' of Pakistan. Islamabad denied suffering any losses of planes but acknowledged its air bases suffered hits. Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire that he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India has differed with Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and his threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. India is an increasingly important US partner in Washington's effort to counter China's influence in Asia, while Pakistan is a US ally. The April attack in India-administered Kashmir killed 26 men and sparked heavy fighting between the nuclear-armed Asian neighbours in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. New Delhi blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not directly blame Islamabad. — Reuters


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
The Epstein files obsession, explained
Jack Posobiec, a far-right political activist, carrying a binder labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' as he exited the White House in February. — Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times) FOR months, Trump administration officials faced mounting pressure by the far right and online influencers to release the so-called Epstein files, the remaining investigative documents of the sex-trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a multimillionaire who hanged himself in a federal jail in New York in 2019. On July 7, the US Justice Department issued a memo that sought to put an end to the matter, following what it said had been an exhaustive investigation: 'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'...There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.' This came at the heels of former White House adviser Elon Musk's suggestion that Trump was in the Epstein files – a loaded accusation that implies the president might somehow be connected to the financier's crimes. Musk, who made the claim after a vindictive online battle with the US president did not offer any evidence, but soon added, 'The truth will come out.' Simply being mentioned in such files does not necessarily mean much. Criminal case files are frequently full of victim identities, and the names of witnesses and other innocent people who came into contact with suspects or evidence in a case. Trump and Epstein had crossed paths over the years, both fixtures of wealthy social circles in New York and Florida. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump said he had known Epstein for 15 years, calling him a 'terrific guy' who was 'a lot of fun to be with.' In that same interview, Trump added, 'it is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' In 2019, after Epstein had been arrested again, the president distanced himself. 'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' he said. 'I don't think I have spoken with him for 15 years. I was not a fan.' The Epstein case has long been a focus of self-styled internet sleuths, conspiracy theorists and partisans who try to link Epstein's crimes to either Democratic or Republican politicians. It generated intense public interest because the first criminal charges Epstein faced were resolved with an unusual plea agreement, which exacted little punishment for what were described as years of sexual abuse of high school girls whom he paid for 'massages.' In July 2019, Epstein was arrested again and charged with more serious federal crimes. He hanged himself in a jail cell the following month while awaiting trial on those charges. But the handling of his case, and his death, have incited years of speculation that powerful people may have covered up their connections to him, leading to demands that the entire case file be released. In February, Trump administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, released what she called 'Phase 1' of the Epstein files, which were greeted with scorn and derision when it became clear that most of the material had previously been made public. Since then, Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel had enlisted dozens of agents and prosecutors to scrutinise and prepare other Epstein files for release, according to people familiar with the work who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal law enforcement operations. 'Phase 2' of the Epstein files has not been released. For months, federal law enforcement officials assigned to the task had wrestled with how to responsibly handle such information, especially when there is a possibility that innocent people named in the documents may suffer significant damage to their reputations when the files are ultimately released. But the clamour for the files, particularly from right-wing online influencers, has been relentless. Often those demands are for release of a 'client list.' That term, however, has little connection to the known facts of the case, in which Epstein repeatedly hired girls to work for him at his homes, giving him 'massages' that he quickly turned into sexual acts. — ©2025 The New York Times Company