US Fed rate cut in September hinges on labour market and inflation: UBI Report
While the market anticipates some monetary easing later this year, the report mentioned that Fed has adopted a cautious and data-dependent stance in the face of growing uncertainty around tariffs and fiscal policy.
It stated 'While a rate cut in September remains possible, it hinges heavily on labour market softness and the inflation trajectory'.
The report also noted that the Federal Reserve is expected to keep interest rates on hold for now, awaiting greater clarity on the evolving global tariff landscape and fiscal developments.
Fed officials, in their recent public remarks, signalled a balanced yet cautious tone, reflecting the challenges of managing inflation risks while being prepared to support the economy if it weakens.
John Williams, President of the New York Fed, highlighted that there is a 'non-negligible' chance that rates could return to zero, pointing to long-term downside risks in the economy.
Meanwhile, Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Mary Daly indicated openness to rate cuts later in 2025. Daly even mentioned the possibility of two rate reductions but emphasized that any policy move would be careful, data-driven, and devoid of political influence.
However, not all officials are aligned. Alberto Musalem, a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee, urged patience, warning that it is too early to determine whether recent inflationary pressures stemming from new tariffs will be temporary or more persistent.
The report said 'their remarks reflect a Fed navigating between guarding against persistent inflation and remaining ready to ease policy if the economic outlook softens'.
Meanwhile, oil prices rose sharply last week, adding pressure on global inflation and the Indian Rupee. Brent crude, which opened at USD 67.64 per barrel on July 7, surged to USD 70.71 before ending the week around USD 71.11 on July 14.
The jump in prices was driven by escalating geopolitical tensions, including the US sending Patriot air defence systems to Ukraine and the European Union preparing an 18th sanctions package on Russia. These actions raised fears of tighter global oil supplies.
However, gains were capped by Saudi Arabia exceeding its OPEC+ output quota and concerns that new US tariffs on goods from the EU and Mexico may hurt global growth and oil demand.
Looking ahead, the report mentioned that the market watchers will closely monitor any new developments around the August 1 tariff deadline, which could influence both inflation trends and the Fed's policy stance in the coming months. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariffs may wreck your holidays — expert warns of a major inflation spike by year-end
When will inflation peak from Donald Trump's tariffs? Live Events Why won't the Fed step in to cut rates? Are we heading for stagflation? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel If you intend to spend a lot of money this holiday season, brace yourself. A top Wall Street economist has warned that Donald Trump's new tariffs could send prices skyrocketing by the end of the year. From gifts to groceries, Americans may soon feel the pinch, and the Fed may have no easy to Apollo's chief economist, Torsten Sløk, Trump's tariffs will likely lead to a significant increase in inflation The president announced sweeping tariffs this year, and Torsten Sløk said he believes they will drive up prices until inflation peaks in November or prices rise and growth slows, he warns of stagflation, a worst-case scenario that could postpone Fed rate cuts and affect American households until 2025 or an interview with Bloomberg this week, Sløk cited consensus inflation expectations that indicate inflation will increase during the final two months of the added that consumer goods are already beginning to "lift-off" from inflation. June saw a 0.7% year-over-year increase in durables prices, the second consecutive month of growth following more than two years of annualized declines, according to the most recent consumer price index the headline figure increased, rising from 2.4% in May to 2.7%, as per a report by Business predicted that services inflation, accounting for 60% of the CPI, would likely accelerate in the near also projected that, depending on the status of tariffs in June, the unemployment rate might increase over the next two years, while inflation might stay at about 3% throughout Trump's mass deportations have a negative effect on wage growth, which increases employment costs for businesses and may lead to price increases, he said. "They must wait in order to witness the peak. And in terms of the Fed and inflation, we have essentially only reached the take-off stage," he stated that rising inflation portends bad news on two fronts. Interest rate reductions from the Fed are unlikely. He stated that before making a more significant monetary policy easing move, central bankers will want to evaluate the maximum harm caused by Trump's onset of a stagflation shock could be imminent. Sløk previously wrote to clients that he thought the US was already experiencing a stagflation shock, which is a scenario in which inflation increases while economic growth is one of the worst possible outcomes for the economy, according to economists, because the Fed cannot lower interest rates to spur economic expansion without escalating inflation.A recent whitepaper by Sløk estimated that stagflation could cause GDP growth in 2025 to more than halve from its peak last year, as per a report by Business late 2025, inflation is expected to peak in November or The Fed wants to wait to see the full impact of the tariffs.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump might fire Jerome Powell, but it could spark a legal war like nothing America's seen before
US President Donald Trump is once again questioning whether Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell should continue in his position. However, removing Jerome Powell could result in a legal battle unlike any other in American history. From Supreme Court precedents to agency independence, this potential battle is already taking shape behind the scenes. Donald Trump may want to fire Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, but doing so could spark a complicated legal battle. With only 10 months left in Powell's term, Trump may simply wait him out. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Digital Marketing Data Science Technology PGDM Artificial Intelligence Product Management Project Management Public Policy Leadership Design Thinking healthcare Cybersecurity Operations Management Others Finance Degree Management Data Analytics Healthcare MBA others CXO MCA Data Science Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategy Search Engine Optimization (SEO) & Content Marketing Social Media Marketing & Advertising Data Analytics & Measurement Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business Professional Certificate Programme in Digital Marketing Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategies Customer Journey Mapping Paid Advertising Campaign Management Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Digital Marketing and Analytics Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details The Fed Chair has been clear about his intentions. His removal is "not permitted by law," he stated earlier this year, and he would not leave if Trump attempted to fire him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo ALSO READ: ESPN anchors go too far - shocking on-air stunt on Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and Kristin Cabot sparks outrage The Wall Street Journal claims that Fed officials have been secretly preparing for a legal battle since Trump's first term, when the president also considered firing the chair. Live Events What makes firing Jerome Powell legally complicated? Jerome Powell's case is strong because it relies on certain Fed autonomy protections that are already included in US law. The Federal Reserve Act, which established the central bank in 1913 and was revised in 1935, stipulates that each Fed board member will serve for a period of 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President,' as per a report. Powell is protected under federal law unless he is removed "for cause," which has never been fully tested in court. The "for cause" requirement was designed to increase the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to remove its president-appointed board members. Although the Supreme Court's stance on the matter is unclear, there are indications that the court would intervene if Trump took action, as per a report. Just this week, a federal judge ruled that Trump's prior firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal, citing a 1935 Supreme Court case, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, that limited the president's power to remove leaders of independent agencies. The judge referenced a Supreme Court decision from ninety years ago that restricts the president's authority to fire independent agency board members unless there is negligence or misconduct. Powell has some protection from that precedent. What does 'for cause' really mean in this context? While the law says 'for cause,' it doesn't define exactly what that means in the context of firing the chair of the Fed, especially since the statute doesn't specifically reference the chair's role. Historically, 'for cause' has been interpreted to mean serious misconduct, like inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. But so far, those standards haven't been tested in court for a Fed chair. Now, Donald Trump and his allies are suggesting a potential reason: the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters. Trump recently claimed there might be fraud involved in the project, telling reporters, 'It's possible there's fraud,' and hinting that it 'sort of is' a fireable offense. Although he clarified that he wasn't actively planning to remove Powell, Trump also said, 'I don't rule out anything.' Kevin Hassett, former National Economic Council director and a rumored contender to replace Powell, said last weekend that the question of presidential firing authority is 'being looked into.' Still, he called it a 'highly uncertain legal matter.' Behind the scenes, White House officials appear unsure of their legal footing. According to Politico, outside attorneys warned that firing Powell over the renovation project would likely not hold up in court. One anonymous official even admitted, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.' Could Donald Trump actually pull it off before Powell's term ends? While the legal challenges would be significant, time may actually be Trump's biggest obstacle. Powell's term ends in less than a year, in May 2026. Some legal scholars think Trump may ultimately decide to let the clock run out. Eric Chaffee, a business law professor at Case Western Reserve University, said he believes Powell would win any court fight. But more importantly, Chaffee says Trump may not see the battle as worth it. FAQs Can Donald Trump legally remove Jerome Powell? Not easy. U.S. law requires "cause" for firing a Fed board member, and Powell has stated that he will oppose any such move. What does Donald Trump accuse Powell of? To justify a potential dismissal, Trump and allies have cited a $2.5 billion Fed building renovation, raising unproven fraud concerns.
The Print
7 hours ago
- The Print
Trump repeats 10% tariff threat on BRICS, says bloc would collapse if it ever united
Trump also said he was committed to preserving the dollar's global status as a reserve currency and pledged to never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency in America. 'When I heard about this group from BRICS, six countries, basically, I hit them very, very hard. And if they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,' Trump said without naming the countries. 'We can never let anyone play games with us.' Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday repeated his threat to slap a 10% tariff on imports from members of the BRICS group of developing nations and said the group would end very quickly if they ever formed in a meaningful way. Trump announced the new tariff on July 6, saying it would apply to any countries aligning themselves with what he called the 'Anti-American policies' of the BRICS group. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of the U.S. president, the BRICS group is presenting itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy. Since issuing the threat, Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the group was set up to hurt the United States and the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. BRICS leaders have rejected the claim that the group is anti-American. Brazil in February nixed plans to push for a common currency during its presidency this year, but the group is advancing work on a cross-border payment system known as BRICS Pay that would facilitate trade and financial transactions in local currencies. The BRICS group expanded last year beyond Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to include members such as Iran and Indonesia. Leaders at the group's summit in Brazil voiced indirect criticism of U.S. military and trade policies. Trump has also taken aim at Brazil specifically, announcing a 50% tariff rate on its imports, starting in August, and launching a separate investigation into what Washington called Brazil's 'unfair' trading practices. This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: India-Pakistan terms of engagement: H-word, M-word & the Trump hyphenation
