'A scrap of paper': Philippine VP Duterte wants impeachment complaint dismissed, Asia News
MANILA — Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has described the impeachment complaint against her as "nothing more than a scrap of paper" in her formal response to the Senate, saying the case was baseless and should be dismissed for being unconstitutional.
The impeachment, widely seen as a test of political alliances, comes amid an acrimonious falling out between Duterte and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr that has sparked a broader power struggle ahead of the 2028 presidential election.
Marcos, who has distanced himself from the case, is limited to a single term but is expected to groom a successor to run. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, is viewed as a strong rival contender if she avoids impeachment.
"The Vice President enters a plea of not guilty, without waiving any of her jurisdictional and other objections over the charges," Duterte said in a submission dated June 23.
She dismissed the accusations against her as baseless, calling them "exaggerations and speculations that are not supported by evidence" in the 34-page response to the Senate.
In February, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Duterte for betrayal of public trust and high crimes, sending the case to the Senate. On June 11, the Senate returned the case to the House shortly after convening as an impeachment court.
The Senate also ordered Duterte to respond to the allegations in the case, including that she had plotted to assassinate Marcos and others based on a statement she made in November about hiring an assassin.
She is also accused of misusing public funds both as vice president and during her stint as education secretary.
As well as saying there was nothing substantive for her to answer in the case, Duterte argued the impeachment complaint was the fourth filed against her, with the three earlier ones not acted on by the lower house.
This, she said, violated a constitutional safeguard against more than one impeachment proceeding against the same official within a year, reiterating the arguments she used in asking the Supreme Court to dismiss the complaint. That case is ongoing.
"There are no statements of ultimate facts in the Fourth Impeachment complaint. Stripped of its 'factual' and legal conclusions, it is nothing more than a scrap of paper," Duterte's reply said.
She faces a lifetime political ban if convicted.
Congresswoman Gerville Luistro, a member of the impeachment prosecution panel, confirmed the lower house had received Duterte's reply to the Senate on Monday.
"The entire prosecution team is currently studying each and every allegation contained in the answer. Certainly, we will be filing a reply within 5 days from receipt as provided in the rules," Luistro said in a phone message.
[[nid:718956]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
27 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump tells Congress that Iran had nuclear weapons programme, contradicting US spy agencies, World News
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump told Congress this week that the Iranian sites bombed by the US housed a "nuclear weapons development programme," even though US spy agencies have said no such programme existed. Trump's claim raised questions whether US intelligence backed up his decision to order the strikes on Iran on Sunday. The Republican president made the assertion in a letter dated Monday to House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson, a key ally, and it was posted on the White House's website. "United States forces conducted a precision strike against three nuclear facilities in Iran used by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its nuclear weapons development programme," Trump wrote. The most recent US assessment, presented to Congress in March by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had not ordered the restarting of a nuclear-weapons effort shuttered in 2003. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters last week that the March assessment had not changed. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful uses. President George Bush justified the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by saying intelligence showed the country had weapons of mass destruction. This was later discredited and prompted a political backlash. Trump first cast doubt on intelligence about Iran's nuclear programme last week, when he repudiated the assessment that Gabbard delivered to Congress. "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one," Trump told reporters, referring to a nuclear weapon. Gabbard herself on Friday disputed media accounts of her March testimony, saying on X that US intelligence showed Iran could make a nuclear weapon "in weeks to months" if it chose. According to unclassified US intelligence reports compiled before the strikes, Iran closed a nuclear weapons programme in 2003 — a conclusion shared by the UN nuclear watchdog — and has not mastered all of the technologies required. But Tehran does have the expertise to build a warhead at some point, according to the reports. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites — Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow — on Sunday. It hit deeply buried Fordow, where advanced centrifuges could produce low-enriched uranium for nuclear reactor fuel and highly enriched uranium for warheads, with "bunker busting" bombs. Trump and other top officials said the sites were obliterated. But a preliminary US intelligence assessment found the attack set back Tehran's programme by only months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters on Tuesday. A US official who read the assessment said it contained a number of caveats and a more refined report was expected in the coming days and weeks. [[nid:719454]]
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Trump pressures Congress on his 'big beautiful bill' as debate clouds path forward
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Jun 24) stepped up pressure on Republicans in Congress to advance his sweeping tax-cut and spending bill this week, while hardline conservatives baulked over a closed-door Senate debate that cast doubt on passage of a growing number of proposed spending cuts. Republican leaders are pushing to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act through Congress and to Trump's desk before the Jul 4 Independence Day holiday. They have said they would delay a recess next week until the bill is passed. The Senate debate has spawned Republican infighting. Some lawmakers seek to preserve social programs, including Medicaid healthcare for lower-income Americans, while hardliners in the Senate and House of Representatives want deep spending cuts to limit the growth of the federal deficit. Some lawmakers have said it could take until August to pass the bill. Trump and his allies want to rule out that outcome. "To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK. Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE," Trump said in a post on social media. The emerging Senate legislation would extend expiring provisions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, fund his crackdown on immigration and boost military spending. It would raise the federal borrowing limit on the US$36.2 trillion US debt by another US$5 trillion. The House version could also increase the federal deficit by at least US$2.8 trillion, despite a boost in economic activity, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said last week. Independent analysts predict the Senate version would cost more. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said his chamber is on track to pass the bill this week, with lawmakers saying that could come on Saturday. If that happens, House Speaker Mike Johnson said his chamber would take the legislation up in the ensuing days. "If the Senate does its work on the timeline that we expect, we will do our work as well. And I think everybody's ready for that," Johnson told reporters. The debate has been compounded over the past week by a string of opinions from the nonpartisan Senate parliamentarian, who is ruling on what elements of the bill comply with the procedure Republicans are using to bypass the Senate's 60-vote filibuster. The bill cannot pass without bypassing the filibuster because solid opposition by Senate Democrats will not allow it to garner 60 votes. The parliamentarian has blocked provisions that would cut spending for financial watchdogs, allow offshore gas and oil projects to skirt environmental reviews and glean savings from food assistance programs for the poor and the elimination of green tax credits. Those decisions have caused alarm among House Republican hardliners, who could block the legislation if it returns to their chamber with those provisions absent. "It looks to me like the parliamentarian is killing the bill. She's taking out all of the conservative spending cuts that we very carefully, with a razor's edge, passed in the House," said Representative Keith Self, a prominent hardline Republican. Thune has repeatedly ruled out the possibility of overruling the parliamentarian, whose role is viewed by many lawmakers as vital to the integrity of the Senate. But the South Dakota Republican said this week that the parliamentarian's findings may not be the end of the road for some provisions. "That is a feature that we don't have complete control over. But they're working through it. And in some cases, as things are flagged, we're making counter offers," Thune said.
AsiaOne
18 hours ago
- AsiaOne
'A scrap of paper': Philippine VP Duterte wants impeachment complaint dismissed, Asia News
MANILA — Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has described the impeachment complaint against her as "nothing more than a scrap of paper" in her formal response to the Senate, saying the case was baseless and should be dismissed for being unconstitutional. The impeachment, widely seen as a test of political alliances, comes amid an acrimonious falling out between Duterte and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr that has sparked a broader power struggle ahead of the 2028 presidential election. Marcos, who has distanced himself from the case, is limited to a single term but is expected to groom a successor to run. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, is viewed as a strong rival contender if she avoids impeachment. "The Vice President enters a plea of not guilty, without waiving any of her jurisdictional and other objections over the charges," Duterte said in a submission dated June 23. She dismissed the accusations against her as baseless, calling them "exaggerations and speculations that are not supported by evidence" in the 34-page response to the Senate. In February, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Duterte for betrayal of public trust and high crimes, sending the case to the Senate. On June 11, the Senate returned the case to the House shortly after convening as an impeachment court. The Senate also ordered Duterte to respond to the allegations in the case, including that she had plotted to assassinate Marcos and others based on a statement she made in November about hiring an assassin. She is also accused of misusing public funds both as vice president and during her stint as education secretary. As well as saying there was nothing substantive for her to answer in the case, Duterte argued the impeachment complaint was the fourth filed against her, with the three earlier ones not acted on by the lower house. This, she said, violated a constitutional safeguard against more than one impeachment proceeding against the same official within a year, reiterating the arguments she used in asking the Supreme Court to dismiss the complaint. That case is ongoing. "There are no statements of ultimate facts in the Fourth Impeachment complaint. Stripped of its 'factual' and legal conclusions, it is nothing more than a scrap of paper," Duterte's reply said. She faces a lifetime political ban if convicted. Congresswoman Gerville Luistro, a member of the impeachment prosecution panel, confirmed the lower house had received Duterte's reply to the Senate on Monday. "The entire prosecution team is currently studying each and every allegation contained in the answer. Certainly, we will be filing a reply within 5 days from receipt as provided in the rules," Luistro said in a phone message. [[nid:718956]]
