Derek Finkle: Pro-drug injection site activists were dangerously wrong on closures
'A lot more people are going to die.'
Article content
This was the dire prediction oft-repeated back in March by a busload of lawyers who supported a legal challenge filed by an injection site in Toronto that claimed recent Ontario legislation forcing the closure of sites within 200 metres of schools and daycare facilities violates the Charter rights of drug users.
Article content
The two expert witnesses for that site, in the Kensington neighbourhood of Toronto, are employed by the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, a hospital-run research centre. MAP had played a key role in the establishment of the city's first injection sites in 2017. Dr. Ahmed Bayoumi and Dr. Dan Werb both submitted evidence that overdose deaths in Toronto would increase sharply if half of the city's ten injection sites closed at the end of March because of the legislation.
Article content
Fred Fischer, a lawyer representing Toronto's Board of Health, one of the intervenor groups in the case, also told Justice John Callaghan of the Ontario Superior Court that reducing harm reduction services in Toronto during the ongoing opioid crisis would have severe consequences — more people will overdose and die.
Article content
Article content
A lawyer for another intervenor, a harm reduction coalition, put an even finer point on it. He said that one of the Toronto injection sites not affected by the legislation was anticipating such an immediate and overwhelming increase in overdose deaths in April, after the closures, that the site was in the process of hiring grief counsellors for its staff.
Article content
More than two months have passed since then, and now that we're in June, you might be wondering: How many more people ended up dying because of the closure of these sites?
Article content
According to data that's compiled by Toronto Paramedic Services and Toronto Public Health, the answer, so far, is none. In fact, the number of overdoses in Toronto for the month of April, the first month after the sites had closed, dropped notably.
Article content
Article content
Toronto had 13 fatal overdose calls in April, one less than in March, when the now-closed injection sites were still open. Thirteen is less than half the number of fatal overdoses across the city in April of last year, and significantly below the monthly average for all of 2024 (19).
Article content
Article content
Thirteen fatal overdoses are far lower than the average monthly number during the period of Covid-19 emergency between April 2020 and May 2023 (25). The last time 13 was the norm for monthly fatal overdoses was prior to the pandemic.
Article content
The number of calls for non-fatal overdoses in April was 161. This may sound like a lot but it's the lowest monthly total so far this year in Toronto. And 161 non-fatal overdoses are 55 per cent less than the 359 that occurred in April of 2024.
Article content
Remarkably, in the third week of April, there were zero fatal overdose calls, something that hasn't happened in Toronto in months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
Calls for multiple sclerosis drug coverage
Vancouver Watch B.C. is the only province that doesn't cover the cost of a powerful and pricey medication for people with multiple sclerosis.
CTV News
31 minutes ago
- CTV News
Eye contact and earlier diagnosis: How AI is transforming front-line health care in B.C.
British Columbia's medical community is buzzing with enthusiasm and ideas, personal anecdotes and concerns, as the adoption of artificial intelligence becomes increasingly mainstream – and valuable. While a handful of family doctors have been using tools like AI scribes for years, Dr. Inderveer Mahal began relying on Heidi Health for summaries of her patient interactions last year, and is considered an early adopter of the technology. 'We're often busy typing while also speaking to our patients, and it is so nice to be able to look at a patient, look at their body language, be focused on how I communicate versus also trying to type and document the visits,' she explained. There are currently no requirements to notify patients that an app is listening and generating a synopsis of a visit when the audio isn't being recorded, but Mahal makes sure that she mentions it at the start of an appointment. And while she has to review the generated summary to ensure it's accurate and make corrections, Mahal said she saves hours per week, meaning 'less screen time, less mental fatigue, less administrative tasks.' A second set of eyes for diagnosis The University of British Columbia now has a special hub for staff, students and clinicians working at the intersection of artificial intelligence, research, and health care, putting the university at the forefront of this new frontier. 'A few years ago, as the AI revolution took hold, there were some fears among some clinicians that they could replaced,' said UBC associate professor of biomedical engineering Roger Tam. 'Now, in many cases, it's used basically as what they call a second reader, so the AI provides an opinion, but the radiologists are the clinician is still in the driver's seat and they are the ones who still make the primary call.' Tam explained that while radiologists are highly skilled at identifying cancers from medical scans, for example, machine learning algorithms are trained on thousands of images, which allows them to detect some serious illnesses before the patient shows any of the typical signs. 'These diseases can be asymptomatic for a long time,' he said. '(AI) is able to see things that humans can't, that's why the two work so well together.' New medical school will incorporate AI The founding dean of Simon Fraser University's coming medical school in Surrey has been dabbling with artificial intelligence tools for a decade and expects that scribe summaries will be the norm within the next five years in family doctors' offices. That's why Dr. David Price is already planning for incoming medical students to incorporate artificial intelligence technologies from day one. 'It's going to be a core part of the curriculum, absolutely, and it's going to be really embedded through everything that we do,' he said. 'I'm sure every medical school is helping their students in their residence and their fellowship to understand how to use these tools responsibly.' Price believes that aside from being a significant time-saver for clerical tasks, artificial intelligence software can be a powerful tool for researching symptoms and treatments – as long as it's drawing from reputable, verified, reliable sources. 'So many times, a recommendation comes up and it may or may not be appropriate for you and in your particular life circumstances in your particular value set, your desires, for your own health,' he said. 'We need to understand those nuances so that at the end of the day, (the treatment) is a decision between the patient and their physician or their clinician.' This is the first part in a CTV Vancouver series taking a deep dive into the use of artificial intelligence in health care.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Nunavik's tuberculosis outbreaks are a result of decades of colonial neglect, professor says
Nunavik is on track to set another record number of tuberculosis cases, which one scholar says is unacceptable in this day and age. There have been 56 cases so far this year of tuberculosis reported in the region, according to Quebec's health department. On Monday, the region's 14 mayors released a letter, calling on the Quebec government to declare a public health emergency over the rates of tuberculosis. The Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services has said the incidence of tuberculosis in the region is 1,000 times higher than among non-Indigenous people born in Canada. Health Minister Christian Dubé told CBC News he "will continue to follow the recommendations of public health experts on the subject," though he stopped short of committing to a declaration. Natasha MacDonald, a McGill University professor from Kuujjuaraapik who researches culturally responsive care for tuberculosis in Nunavik, said she doesn't believe Quebec is treating the tuberculosis situation in Nunavik with the same urgency as elsewhere in the province. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. What do you make of this call from the mayors to declare a public health emergency over the tuberculosis situation? It's unfortunate that we are in a time and place where we have to make such calls to action. Under a number of international, national and provincial jurisdictions, including the Viens Commission, the Quebec government has a responsibility to ensure that health care in our communities is adequate and is on par with those of non-Indigenous populations. Because of the urgent situation that Nunavik is in right now, the mayors have had no choice but to unite together as one voice to demand that the government do its job. Why do you think we're seeing this upward trajectory in cases of tuberculosis, in 2025? What's unbelievable is that we are a first world nation in Canada, and we have a third world disease within Canada. It exists in Nunavik in our Inuit communities, and it's the same strain that has been in Nunavik since 1928. Quebec made efforts with the City of Montreal, not that long ago, to stop the spread of tuberculosis. Cases were found, contact tracing was done, people were isolated and medicated. In Nunavik, it has been left to grow and we have outbreaks in six of our 14 communities. This is unacceptable, and it should not happen. We are part of Quebec, we are part of Canada. You've alluded to the damage that tuberculosis has wreaked on families historically, with Inuit being sent south for care. Given that history, what do you believe we, as a society, still don't understand treating tuberculosis in Nunavik? What's happening in Nunavik is a result of decades of systemic colonial neglect. Inuit are expected to adapt to those systems, rather than the government adapting those systems to meet the needs of Inuit. The way the regional health board has been implanted by the provincial government makes it a very program-centred health-care system and not a person-centred health-care program. One of the infectious disease nurses said at one point, in all of Nunavik, they ran out of sputum testing kits. So she had to beg and plead from the province of Manitoba to send over 40,000 sputum testing kits. Quebec didn't have any and it wouldn't procure more. There aren't even X-rays in most of our communities, much less X-ray technicians in those communities. And Inuit feel uncomfortable going to the clinic or hospital because of decades of mistrust in medical care and the systemic and individual racism that exists. One of the calls to action in the mayors' letter is about Inuit health sovereignty. What does that look like? For things to change in our communities, Inuit need to be the ones who determine how our programs and systems run, so that they are tailored to the way we think and work. Inuit are being expected to move around the calendars and schedules of health-care workers, and they are workers are told they should not be going house to house for testing. If it were Inuit leading our organizations, we would have a better understanding on how to do more screening. It's not somebody from Quebec City who should be dictating how much money should be going toward basic equipment, We should be. We're the ones in our communities. We're the ones that know that the X-ray machine is broken in this one town, or that we have a new graduate who's just finished their radiography course who could be hired into a position within their community. What we are talking about here is structural change. Can you compare what the system looks like now with Nunavik's health organizations, to that ideal vision you've just talked about? Systemic change would come when Inuit are able to create a new system altogether, through self-determination or self-government. Or if we can appropriate the system and have an Inuk lead who can hire resources, because we know best on how to allocate our resources and where the needs are. The midwifery program in Nunavik is a perfect example of that. This is a system where Inuit have designed how our mothers want to give birth in a community with support, in an Inuit way, and it is unbelievably successful. This is not rocket science. We also understand that translators are as key as any doctor or nurse. Right now, you have French-speaking nurses and doctors that come into our community, and English is often the lingua franca because most Inuit in Nunavik still speak Inuktitut. When you're translating, for example, with a term like tuberculosis, you have to be very careful to make the difference between tuberculosis, which is a disease that can kill you, and something like bronchitis. You can't just say it's a lung problem. I understand that we have to collaborate with the Ministry of Health in Quebec, but at the same time, they have to understand we are not just another region within Quebec. We are distinct and we have needs that have not been met for decades. It's also an example of systemic racism because Inuit in Nunavik have been ignored, have been left behind, have been left to die for decades, and this is unacceptable. It was unacceptable after the first TB case. It was unacceptable after the first death. It's unacceptable now when our numbers are record high. We have nurses who are burnt out. And if this were anywhere else in Quebec, there would be an outcry and the government would be immediately addressing this, so we are expecting the same.
