AIDS Foundation Chicago sues Trump administration over executive orders involving equity, gender
The AIDS Foundation Chicago and two other nonprofits filed a lawsuit Wednesday against President Donald Trump and his administration, challenging executive orders related to diversity, equity and gender.
The AIDS Foundation Chicago, the National Urban League and the National Fair Housing Alliance filed the lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking to halt three recent executive orders.
They're challenging orders that seek to end 'diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility' (DEIA) programs in the federal government and equity-related grants and contracts, and that direct federal agencies to combat DEI in the private sector. They're also suing over an order that said it would be the policy of the U.S. to recognize only two sexes.
The executive order recognizing only two sexes says that its purpose is to stop 'ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex' allowing 'men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women.' Another one of the orders referred to DEI programs as 'illegal and immoral discrimination programs.'
The lawsuit filed Wednesday, however, alleges that the order recognizing two only sexes, 'seeks to erase transgender people from public life and poses an existential threat to transgender people themselves, as well as to the federally funded organizations that seek to support them and advance their civil rights.'
And the lawsuit argues that 'the United States' longstanding and entrenched race and sex inequalities require proactive efforts, including DEIA, to break down barriers to opportunity and resources to both remedy and prevent discrimination.'
The orders are forcing the AIDS Foundation of Chicago and the other nonprofits to either violate their missions or risk losing federal funding, the lawsuit alleges.
The AIDS Foundation Chicago is a not-for-profit that receives most of its funding from the federal government – $34.8 million annually, according to the complaint. The loss of that funding would force the foundation to cease operations, eliminating services for nearly 7,000 people a year, according to the lawsuit, including 1,300 people receiving housing assistance through the foundation. Stable housing is vital for people living with HIV, so they can take their medication and prevent more serious problem, like an AIDS diagnosis, said John Peller, president and CEO of AIDS Foundation Chicago.
The foundation also provides case management services to people living with HIV and helps connect them with health care and mental health and substance use disorder services, Peller said.
'What I think is so problematic about the executive orders that the Trump administration has put out is that they're really trying to ban us from doing the work that is so vital to addressing the HIV epidemic,' Peller said. 'They don't want us to mention trans people. They don't want us to talk about the fact that there are racial health disparities. … They don't want us to train our staff on cultural competency, so that the staff know the best ways to build relationships with clients who are part of the groups who are most impacted.'
The lawsuit alleges that the administration is violating the nonprofit organizations' rights to free speech and due process and is engaging in unlawful discrimination.
Other groups have also filed lawsuits challenging the executive orders.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
U.S.-China Trade Deal ‘Done,' Trump Says
President Donald Trump on Wednesday said a trade agreement was reached between the U.S. and China, pending final approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping, following weeks of escalated tensions between both countries as trade negotiations were carried out. The trade agreement includes full magnets and 'any necessary rare earths' from China as the U.S. ... More makes concessions on student visas. Trump, in a post on Truth Social, said a deal was 'done' between the U.S. and China, which will supply 'any necessary rare earths' and full magnets as the U.S. makes concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. This is a developing story.
San Francisco Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
President Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food aid program, by the numbers: Year: 2008 The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law took effect eliminating a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. Number: 42 million A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the county. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. The money can be spent on most groceries, but Trump's administration recently approved requests by six states — Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah — to exclude certain items, such as soda or candy. Dollars: $295 billion Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion of federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come by shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come by expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. Ages: 7 and 55-64 To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. Percentages: 5%-25% The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. Margin: 1 House Resolution 1, containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts, passed the House last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food aid and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kosovo accepts US request to host third-party deportees
By Fatos Bytyci PRISTINA (Reuters) -Kosovo has accepted a request to receive migrants deported from the United States, with an initial plan to take in 50 deportees per year, the government said in a statement to Reuters on Wednesday. "The government has expressed its readiness to participate, with the opportunity to select individuals from a proposed pool, provided they meet specific criteria related to the rule of law and public order," it said. The United States is on the look-out for partners to receive third party nationals as it seeks to deliver on President Donald Trump's promise of record-level deportations. Kosovo, a Balkan country of 1.6 million people, already has a deal to receive 300 prison inmates from Denmark beginning in 2027 in return for 210 million euros over the next decade, and has expressed interest in receiving deportees from Britain. Kosovo-U.S. relations are particularly strong, given the U.S. lead in supporting independence from Serbia in 2008. "We hold their support in very high regard," the statement said.
