
Is Suzuki right that it's 'too late'? We are in an era of simultaneous wins and losses
I was watching a Disney show on my laptop with my 10-year-old son. But when the show ended, and I closed the tab, the next open tab filled my screen. It was an article from iPolitics with the neck-throttling headline: ''It's too late': David Suzuki says the fight against climate change is lost.'
'What?' cried my son. 'David Suzuki said that!'
I was caught off-guard. 'It's complicated,' I stammered, that last refuge of scoundrels. 'He is wrestling with some despair after trying for so many years.'
He's in good company. Truth is, the article caught many of us off-guard, if my social network is any indication. Some of its readers concur, while others were angry.
'I'm really annoyed about that Suzuki thing. It's irresponsible,' a colleague texted me.
'He is saying out loud the private thoughts that many of us have all the time,' wrote Devika Shah, executive director of Environment Funders Canada on LinkedIn. 'It was a tough read, but we humans are where we are. For my fellow climate peeps who think he is wrong to say this — please recognize that he's earned the right.'
All of us who work on climate have long walked a razor's edge between hope and despair, and the last few months (or years) have made it near impossible to keep one's balance. But I would put the current predicament differently.
While we all know Suzuki as a communicator, he is firstly a scientist and is speaking some basic scientific truths. He's also trying to sound an alarm and rouse us out of a collective stupor, and he's not wrong to want to do that — while polling indicates Canadians are worried about climate change, we are clearly not as scared as we should be.
The scientific community as a whole is worried. The situation is grim — temperature increases are happening faster than predicted, extreme weather events are escalating, planetary boundaries are being breached. The assaults on the people and places we love aren't a distant threat somewhere else, sometime in the future — they are here and now.
Governments throw in the towel
I, too, am losing faith. All of us who work on climate have long walked a razor's edge between hope and despair, and the last few months (or years) have made it near impossible to keep one's balance. We are all wrestling with the jarring and growing disconnect between climate events and our politics.
President Trump's brutal roll-back of climate actions south of the border is throwing us all for a loop. But even in our own country, our federal and provincial governments are acting like a bunch of surrender monkeys, walking away from their climate commitments. Our official climate plans are in a shambles and riddled with incoherence, as governments continue to approve new fossil fuel infrastructure while abandoning carbon pricing, emission caps and, potentially, vehicle mandates. The defeatism is hard to take.
The complicated psychology of now
All that said, I would put the current predicament differently than saying it's 'too late.' More accurately, it both is and isn't too late.
Those of us trying to move the public to action must hold with care the collective psychology of the moment, and engage in responsible truth-telling. For example, the leaders we most remember from the Second World War were outstanding communicators who managed to walk a difficult line — they were forthright with the public about the severity of the threat, while still managing to impart hope. That's what this moment requires. We are motivated by a complicated and highly personal mix of hope and fear, love and anger. All of which needs to be tapped to win this fight.
There is no place for false optimism. But as the climate scientist Kate Marvel says, this battle for our lives doesn't need optimists, it needs heroes — people of courage, which she defines as, 'the resolve to do well without the assurance of a happy ending.'
Ten years ago, the countries of the world signed the Paris Agreement and committed to do what they could to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius. Sadly, on that score, it is indeed too late. Admitting this defeat is not something that should be done nonchalantly; it is a brutal indictment of us all. In Paris, the rallying cry of Pacific Island nations and others from the Global South was '1.5 to stay alive.' That threshold is indeed existential for them, and we have failed them.
But the climate fight is not something we either win or lose. As the saying goes, it functions as a 'matter of degrees.' Each incremental increase in temperature comes with devastating losses to the people and places we love. But it is also the case that each incremental increase we prevent saves millions. While we are already witnessing the death and destruction that comes with 1.5 degrees, a 2-degree world — which can still be prevented — will be that much worse, while a 3-degree world is unimaginable, and a 4-degree world is not one any of us would want our children and grandchildren to inhabit. To not continue to do everything we can to avoid that next incremental increase is obscene.
The awkwardness of the current period is that, for the next many years, we are going to experience both losses and wins simultaneously.
Yes, we need to be eyes wide open to the devastating extreme events now underway. But we also need to be alive to the hopeful trends: China looks to have peaked its GHG emissions, years ahead of schedule; Europe is driving down emissions much faster than Canada; in Norway, 97 per cent of new vehicle sales are now zero-emission; in the UK, emissions are now lower than at any time since the start of the industrial revolution in the late 1800's; and around the world, the adoption of renewable energy is exploding.
The point being, the struggle to tackle the climate emergency is a steep climb down, not a cliff.
This September, the global climate movement will be trying to recapture some of the lost momentum of recent post-pandemic years. At rallies across Canada and around the world, under the banner ' Draw the Line,' people are being invited to shake off their feelings of isolation and join this call:
'Floods, droughts, storms and heatwaves are getting worse. Food and energy costs are going up while a few billionaires profit and prop up the industries that harm people and pollute our lands, air and waters. Indigenous leaders from the Amazon to the Pacific have spoken out: our future is at stake. To solve this crisis, the answer is us — the people… This September we will come together to draw the line against injustice, pollution, and violence — and for a future built on peace, clean energy and fairness. This world is ours. This is our line to draw.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Proportional representation is an antidote to national disunity
Canadians head to the polls for a federal general election on Monday, April 28, 2025. Gavin Young/Postmedia file Canada's political divide is deepening — and our voting system is making it worse. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Alberta has recently seen a surge in separatist sentiment. It's not just economic frustration. It's a feeling that Albertans are not fairly represented in Ottawa — that they vote, but their voices don't shape the national agenda. This frustration is not unique to Alberta. People across the country — in Toronto, in rural Manitoba, in Quebec — are being misrepresented or outright ignored because of our outdated first-past-the-post electoral system. If we want to hold this country together, we need to reform the way we vote. We need proportional representation. First-past-the-post is a winner-takes-all system that distorts election outcomes. A party can win the majority of seats with just 35 per cent of the vote. Whole provinces are painted as monolithic, 'Conservative Alberta,' 'Liberal Toronto,' when in truth, there's political diversity everywhere. The system just hides it. Your weekday lunchtime roundup of curated links, news highlights, analysis and features. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again In Alberta and Saskatchewan, Conservative parties often win nearly every seat federally, even though a third of voters support other parties. In Toronto, the opposite happens: Liberal candidates sweep, leaving Conservative and NDP voters unrepresented. The result? Regional resentment and polarization. First-past-the-post creates the illusion that we are more divided than we really are — and that's dangerous for Canada. Proportional representation can heal these divides. It ensures that every vote counts and that seats in Parliament reflect the actual support each party receives. It's fair, it's democratic and it would give every region voices, not just the dominant one. If Alberta elected MPs under a proportional system, we would see a diversity of political voices — Conservative, centrist, progressive — reflecting the province's true electorate. That would reduce the perception that Alberta is 'shut out' of Ottawa whenever another party forms government. Likewise, Conservative voters in Ontario and Atlantic Canada would finally be fairly represented. One model especially well-suited to Canada is single transferable vote — a ranked ballot system in which multi-member districts elect three to five MPs. Voters rank their preferences, and seats are distributed based on support. This not only improves fairness, but preserves local accountability and voter choice. This isn't some untested theory. The single transferable vote was used right here in Canada — in Alberta and Manitoba urban provincial elections — for nearly 30 years, from the 1920s through the 1950s. It worked. It gave voters more control, produced fairer outcomes and reduced partisan domination.


Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
It's time to change the conversation about the economy and climate change
Another devastating forest fire season is upon us and the eastern U.S. has been sizzling under a record-breaking heat dome. We can no longer ignore that climate change is the cause. Article content Our climate is warming due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and Canadian families are now regularly paying the price: displacement, rising insurance costs, damage to property and, in extreme situations, loss of life. Yet, at the June G7 meeting, world leaders signed the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter without once mentioning climate change. Article content Article content Article content Meanwhile, Canada has fallen behind in meeting emission-reduction targets under the Paris Agreement — an agreement ratified by 194 countries designed to slow climate change. While the oil and gas industry is a major contributor to Canada's economy, it accounts for approximately 30 per cent of Canada's total emissions and is the main reason it is missing its emission targets. Article content Article content Corporate and political leaders have failed to come together to create a serious plan to reduce emissions from the oil and gas sector, while promoting stability in its workforce and economic prosperity more generally. Entrenched positions and political grandstanding have only resulted in ever-increasing emissions from this sector, while the climate change can gets kicked down the road. Article content A recent analysis of public opinion data on climate change by ( finds that while there has been a decline in public prioritization of global warming in part due to economic and sovereignty threats, 'most Canadians are worried about climate change and want governments and industries to tackle the problem.' Article content Article content How do we move forward constructively? Article content First, we must stop the rancorous way we debate the issues. People fleeing forest fires are not interested in the divisiveness and indignation that have characterized past interaction between oil and gas interests, environmental interests, and federal and provincial governments. Instead, honest dialogue and respectful debate will move us toward a shared vision faster than anything else. We need to bring together the best and brightest of all political stripes, Indigenous organizations, the for- and non-profit sectors, levels of government and civil society, all with the capacity to find common ground. Article content Second, provincial, territorial and federal governments must actively recommit to the targets we set under the Paris Agreement, because without setting the bar for emissions and measuring results, there will be no progress on climate policy. While the political conversation has recently shifted away from climate policy, the context for fruitful dialogue is improving. The long shadow of the United States is fading, giving way to an internal will to diversify our economy in preparation for the global economy of 2050 and beyond.


Winnipeg Free Press
11 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trying to find sense in the nonsensical
Opinion What does Trump want? Figuring out U.S. President Donald Trump is a full-time job. In this joyless season of trade talks with his administration, Canadians have had no shortage of role models to choose from in getting a deal. From 'elbows up' (Prime Minister Carney), to 'elbows down' (Alberta Premier Danielle Smith), to enticement (Britain's royal visit invitation), to accommodation (Mexico's military deployment on their U.S. border to interdict drugs and migrants), to flattery (NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte calling Trump 'Daddy'). Nothing seems to work, at least for long. Negotiating with Trump is like nailing Jello to the wall. It seems firm enough but never sticks. Evan Vucci / The Associated Press U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media after arriving at Joint Base Andrews, July 15. Make America Great Again (MAGA) — his signature political philosophy — offers little guidance. It is a reservoir of resentments, a toxic tonic of grievance and vengeance shaken, not stirred, by the president's regular forays of fantastical diversions, U-turns, and just plain lies. He is at once both the lead missionary and faithful servant of MAGA. Simply put, Trump's political identity has no fixed address to serve as a rational basis for negotiation. But he does have fixed ideas. An idée fixe in politics and life is an obsession. A dominating idea or desire that animates the central core of someone's personality and actions. This gets us closer to understanding Trump and what Canada — and the world — is up against. Trump has had a fixed idea about tariffs and trade deficits for decades. That idea is the U.S. is getting 'ripped off' by free trade, losing hundreds of millions of dollars in trade deficits (now billions) and blocked from doing business in other countries. He said this back in the late 1980s and '90s. He's still saying it. So, when Carney mused out loud last week that 'there's not a lot of evidence right now' that the U.S. will agree to any trade deal without tariffs, this should be disappointing but not surprising. Stepping back from one's obsessions is no easy task, personally in life or professionally especially in politics, with its fishbowl lifestyle. Trump's fixed idea about tariffs sits alongside his only other economic fixed idea: tax cuts. His 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' signed into law on their Independence Day, legislated the biggest tax cuts in American history; many aimed at business and rich Americans. Trump speaks in superlatives, all CAPS, to convey that everything he says or does is uber-important. This is the window into three other idées fixes that drove him to run and win a second presidential election (no, the one he lost was not stolen). And that visibly govern his behaviour in the White House today. First, to make money for him and his family by monetizing the office of president of the United States. Forbes estimated his family's net worth in March this year was US$1.2 billion higher than a year ago. From real estate to crypto currency to Trump-branded merch, he is raking it in. Second, punish enemies and detractors at every turn using the power of government to bring lawsuits, dismantle agencies, fire independent officials, make financial threats, and financially sanction universities and institutions with which he disagrees. Third, keep himself as the centre of attention and power. 'I, alone, can fix it', Trump proclaimed in 2016 as he accepted the Republican nomination for the first time. Every Oval Office 'freak-out' with foreign leaders, or late-night social media post, shows he has not wavered in this obsession with the personal. Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. This speaks to Canada's dilemma. Our idée fixe is that, in the end, Trump will capitulate to reason and give Canada the free trade deal we deserve. That we can somehow convince Trump to ignore his idees fixes and negotiate a tariff-free deal because we've done so in the past and it is so obviously the right thing. 'Canada, alone, can have a deal,' we seem to say to ourselves, ignoring the trade tumult around us. Despite the charge he is now 'elbows down,' the prime minister is signalling reality rather than retreat. Visiting the White House in May, Carney said both Canada and the U.S. were in the process of 'redefining that relationship of working together.' There is no 'back to what it was' in that construct. As for Trump? His happy place is winning. But he never seems happy about it. Obsessions are like that. They never let go. Restless, Trump needs and wants more. David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet secretary in the Manitoba government.