logo
US FAA not considering replacing L3Harris, Verizon contracts with Musk's Starlink

US FAA not considering replacing L3Harris, Verizon contracts with Musk's Starlink

Reuters3 days ago
WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration told lawmakers it is not considering replacing its current telecommunication contracts it holds with L3Harris (LHX.N), opens new tab or Verizon Communications (VZ.N), opens new tab with Elon Musk's SpaceX's Starlink satellite unit.
"The FAA is not aware of any effort by SpaceX to assume the (telecommunications) contracts. Nor has FAA considered replacing the awardees of those contracts with SpaceX," said FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford in a letter to lawmakers dated Tuesday reviewed by Reuters. "FAA would not use Starlink (or any satellite service) as the sole communications technology for
safety-critical air traffic services."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Americans favor US returning to moon and going to Mars, new poll shows
Most Americans favor US returning to moon and going to Mars, new poll shows

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Most Americans favor US returning to moon and going to Mars, new poll shows

Americans want the U.S. to return to the moon and shoot for Mars, according to a new poll. According to a YouGov/CBS News poll, 67 percent of respondents said they'd like to see the U.S. send astronauts back to the moon for further exploration. Slightly fewer — 65 percent — said they wanted to see the U.S. send explorers to Mars. Respondents aged 30 and older were all fairly consistent in their approval of exploring the cosmos, with 68 percent of people ages 30-44 approving, and 65 percent of respondents aged 45 and over signing onto more space exploration. Younger adults, aged 18-29, were 71 percent in favor of further exploration. The general approval for space exploration extends backwards as well; when asked if they believed the 1969 moon landing was worth the effort, 77 percent of respondents said it was, with only 23 percent saying it did not seem like it was worth the trip. The overall support for space exploration is likely tied to another metric measured in the poll: a fair number of Americans believe that successful journeys to the stars contributes to feelings of national pride. The poll found that 44 percent of respondents believed space exploration added somewhat to the U.S.'s national pride, while 29 percent said it added "a lot" to national pride, and 27 percent said it does not add much. The same number of individuals who believe space exploration adds to national pride — 44 percent — also felt that it contributes some to scientific advances. A smaller number, 33 percent, felt space exploration yields "a lot" of scientific advancement, while 23 percent believed it added little or nothing to scientific discoveries.

Lipstick and fake nails can increase risk of getting asthma in adulthood, study finds
Lipstick and fake nails can increase risk of getting asthma in adulthood, study finds

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lipstick and fake nails can increase risk of getting asthma in adulthood, study finds

Regularly wearing make-up may increase the risk of developing asthma in adulthood, a study has found. Research has shown a potential link between those who use products such as lipstick, eyeshadow and mascara and an increase in late-onset cases of the chronic respiratory condition, which affects around 5.4 million people in the UK. Women who used false nails, cuticle cream, blush and lipstick had a 47 per cent higher risk of being diagnosed with asthma, the study based on nearly 40,000 people found. Just using blush and lipstick five times a week or more increased the risk by 18 per cent. The researchers, from the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, said the association did not prove the products caused the uptick in risk but did suggest common chemicals in make-up could have an effect. Some are thought to weaken the immune system, while others – such as polyfluoroalkyl substances (known as PFAs), parabens, phthalates and phenols may interfere with the body's hormones. 'Our findings reinforce the need for regulation of personal care products and their components,' the researchers said. The study, published in the journal Environment International, used data gathered over 12 years, which was based on the use of 41 different beauty products. At the end of the research period, 1,774 of the women – around 4 per cent – had been diagnosed with adult-onset asthma. Symptoms of the condition include coughing, wheezing, tightness in the chest and shortness of breath. Overall, using the products was associated with a 19 per cent increased risk of asthma. Frequent use corresponded to a 22 per cent increase risk. Previous studies have found that exposure to chemicals contained in beauty products during early pregnancy correlates with an increased risk of the baby going on to develop asthma in childhood. But little research has been conducted on the potential risk to adults. 'Understanding the biological pathways through which EDCs (endocrine-disrupting chemicals) in PCPs (personal care products) may increase the risk of asthma is important for understanding disease development,' the researchers said. 'If our findings are confirmed in other large-scale multi-ethnic prospective studies, they support PCPs as a potentially targetable lifestyle factor to reduce the burden of adult-onset asthma among women.' Dr Samantha Walker, director of research and innovation at Asthma + Lung UK, said: 'We know that women get worse asthma than men and are more likely to be admitted to hospital, but it's not clear why although we believe female hormones play a part. 'More research is needed into this area so we can understand how to keep women well.'

Family of man killed after his tent was crushed by a bulldozer sues Atlanta
Family of man killed after his tent was crushed by a bulldozer sues Atlanta

The Guardian

time22 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Family of man killed after his tent was crushed by a bulldozer sues Atlanta

The family of a man who was killed after city workers crushed his tent with a bulldozer during a sweep of a homeless encampment in Atlanta, Georgia, filed a lawsuit against the city on Friday over his death, calling it 'tragic and preventable'. The lawsuit filed by Cornelius Taylor's sister and son alleges that city employees failed to look to see if there was anyone inside the tents in the encampment before using a bulldozer to clear it in the 16 January sweep. Taylor, 46, was inside one of the tents and was crushed by the truck when his tent was flattened, the lawsuit says. City officials had called for the clearing of the encampment in preparation for the Martin Luther King Jr holiday. The encampment was blocks away from Ebenezer Baptist church, where King had preached. An autopsy report later revealed Taylor's pelvic bone had been broken and that he suffered damage to organs and internal bleeding. 'A tent that was occupied by a human being was crushed by this heavy equipment. That's obviously wrong,' Harold Spence, an attorney, said. 'Nobody looked inside the tent, and if someone who looked inside had taken 10 seconds to do so, this tragedy could have been averted. And if you don't know what's inside, you don't crush it.' The lawsuit filed in Fulton county state court asks for a jury trial and seeks unspecified damages, as well as repayment for medical expenses, funeral costs and legal fees. It was filed against the city and seven unnamed city employees, including the driver of the bulldozer. A spokesperson for Andre Dickens, the mayor of Atlanta, said in a statement 'the incident involving Mr Taylor was a tragedy' but that he could not comment on pending litigation. The US supreme court ruled last year that cities across the country can enforce bans on homeless camping. But clearings are controversial. Taylor's death sparked outrage among local advocates and neighbors at the encampment, who called the city's policies on clearing encampments deeply inhumane. They said the city faces a dire affordable housing shortage that makes it inevitable that people will end up living on the streets. 'The sweep, prior to which the city failed completely to check the tents, is a stopgap measure to try to project a false, sanitized vision of Atlanta,' activists from the Housing Justice League advocate group said in a statement. 'Taylor and everyone else living on the streets deserved much more than to be bulldozed out of the way for MLK weekend festivities. Everyone deserves to live in dignity.' The family's lawyers described the lawsuit as a call for city leaders to treat homeless people as deserving of 'respect and dignity' instead of rushing to clear their communities 'as if they were invisible'. Typically, the city sends social workers and outreach teams to encampments over a period of months before issuing a final order to evacuate. Those teams work to place people in shelters and, ultimately, permanent housing. The city had been working with people at the encampment since April 2024 and had placed many into shelters, said Cathryn Vassell, CEO of the city's homelessness organization, Partners for Home. City officials have said they are taking care to prioritize the safety and dignity of unhoused individuals. Right after Taylor's death, the city put a temporary moratorium on encampment sweeps. However, with the Fifa World Cup coming to Atlanta next year, the city has since resumed clearing encampments with the controversial goal of eliminating all homelessness in the downtown area before then. Last week, the city closed the camp where Taylor lived and said officials coordinated with the local non-profit to offer people living there housing with supportive services. Lawyers said they were grateful for the city's efforts, but more work is needed. Members of the Justice for Cornelius Taylor Coalition said they are still paying for hotel rooms for eight former encampment residents. Taylor's lawyers and family called on Dickens' administration to cut through red tape such as issues with documents and help the others get housing. Taylor's sister Darlene Chaney teared up during a news conference on Friday where lawyers announced the lawsuit as she re-listened to descriptions of the gruesome injuries her brother suffered. She said Taylor loved to read everything from science fiction to the Bible. He was eager to leave the encampment to rebuild his life, and stayed positive about his future even as barriers such as getting him an ID slowed that process down, she said. She misses his 'annoying' weekly calls – and said now she only has one brother to annoy her. She misses having two. 'We're here, just because someone, in my own personal opinion, was lazy,' Chaney said. George Chidi contributed reporting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store