
China warns EV makers to stop price-cutting to protect the economy
In recent months Chinese officials have talked repeatedly of the need to combat 'involution' in sectors suffering from overcapacity, such as EVs, referring to the phenomenon of investing more effort and money for diminishing returns.
Xi Jinping has spoken of the problem directly. In an unusually blunt speech this month, China's president criticised provincial governments for blindly overinvesting in artificial intelligence, in computing power and in new energy vehicles, industries that Beijing has identified as strategic priorities but which are also at risk of overheating.
On 23 July, Xi gave another speech in which he stressed the importance of breaking the cycle of 'involution' that has gripped parts of the Chinese economy, the world's second-biggest after the US.
Some of China's big car companies, including BYD, the EV maker that is seen as China's rival to Tesla, were summoned to meetings with regulators last month to receive warnings about overcapacity.
Hutong Research, an independent advisory firm based in Beijing and Shanghai, said in a recent note: 'Government agencies across China have moved swiftly in response to Xi's recent remarks, pledging to implement supply-side reductions.
'These developments highlight not only the elevated political attention to excess capacity but also the breadth of the problem across China's economy.'
In the hyper-competitive Chinese economy, consumers, unwilling to part with their cash, have come to expect rock-bottom prices. Companies across industries often cut prices to near or below cost levels in a play for market dominance.
China's EV companies are no exception, and many bosses have complained about the phenomenon while also being dragged into it.
BYD has repeatedly cut the price of its low-end Seagull, most recently offering it for 55,800 yuan (£5,862), nearly 20% below the official retail price. In March, it cut prices across the Seagull range by 3,000 yuan. Great Wall Motors, one of BYD's competitors, released a new version of its Ora 3 car in June for about 20% less than the September retail price.
In January, He Xiaopeng, the chief executive of XPeng Motors, reportedly told employees that 'the market will definitely see fiercer competition in 2025' and that some auto companies would not survive the looming price war.
Last month, China revealed a new draft amendment to its law on pricing – the first revision to the law since 1998 – specifically aimed at the price wars.
The amendment would strengthen rules around the government's ability to set price limits, identify 'unfair pricing behaviour' and curb 'involution-style' competition, including using market dominance to influence prices and bulk sales.
But the responses may not go far enough, some analysts said.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Antonia Hmaidi, a senior analyst at Merics, said: 'I am not convinced that the Chinese government will do something to curb in any significant way because so far at least no one's been really punished for investing too much in strategic priorities.'
Hmaidi said few EV companies were actually profitable in China and many others were inextricably linked to local governments that do not want to see them go under.
'We are seeing some changes in specific types of action that the government is taking that are pointing towards this,' she said. 'But we've seen these kinds of actions before, and nothing came of it. And ultimately, you would need to provide an alternative to a lot of these local governments, for instance.'
Hmaidi said one solution to a glut of products in China could be to sell even more overseas, aggravating foreign companies and regulators. 'I think in the short term, there will be more tension with most of its trading partners,' she added.
The flood of Chinese EVs to the European Union has alarmed EU officials who worry that their own carmakers will not be able to compete.
Last year, the EU imposed tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese-built battery EVs, angering Beijing. A recent EU-China summit failed to make any progress on the issue, which has been a major sticking point between the two trading partners.
But Chinese carmakers adapted by pushing plug-in hybrid vehicles instead. In June, Chinese companies reached a 10% share of Europe's EV market, making a full comeback on their pre-tariff market share.
Last week the politburo, the group of leading officials in the Chinese Communist party, met to discuss the economic outlook for the year ahead. While they did not mention the anti-involution campaign specifically, they spoke of the need to 'regulate disorderly competition' in the economy.
Additional research by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Brazil's Lula says he will discuss Trump tariffs with BRICS group
BRASILIA, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva presented himself as a torchbearer for multilateralism in a fractured world in an interview with Reuters on Wednesday, revealing plans to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. "What President Trump is doing is tacit — he wants to dismantle multilateralism, where agreements are made collectively within institutions, and replace it with unilateralism, where he negotiates one-on-one with other countries," Lula said. "What bargaining power does a small Latin American country have against the United States? None." Lula said he will initiate a conversation at the BRICS group of developing nations about how to tackle Trump's tariffs. He said he planned to call Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday, and China's Xi Jinping and other leaders after. The group also has Russia and other emerging economies among its members. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation, what the implications are for each country, so we can make a decision," he said. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have ten countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. Lula stressed that Brazil now holds the presidency of the BRICS and said that he wants to discuss with allies why Trump is attacking multilateralism and what his goals may be. Trump called the BRICS "anti-American" and threatened the bloc's nations with additional 10% tariffs last month, while the group gathered in a summit in Rio de Janeiro.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Angela Rayner orders China to explain redacted mega-embassy plans
The deputy prime minister has told China that it must explain why parts of the plans for its new mega-embassy in London have been redacted as she prepares to rule on whether it can go ahead. Angela Rayner, who is also the minister in charge of planning, has given Beijing two weeks to justify why several areas are blacked out in drawings of its proposed redevelopment of the former home of the Royal Mint. In a letter from her department, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, it was revealed that a decision will be taken on the giant embassy on or before September 9. The department said that while 'no view has yet been formed', Rayner had been made aware of 'concerns' over redacted parts of the plans. It told Beijing that it must provide unredacted versions of the plans or 'identify precisely and comprehensively' the plans that have been redacted and to 'explain the rationale and justification'. The letter also said the Home Office had pointed out that a 'hard perimeter' would be needed around the embassy but that this may need a new planning application. Luke de Pulford, executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, which revealed the letter, told The Times: 'There's such hubris in Beijing that they think they can get away with simply hiding swathes of their mega-embassy from legitimate scrutiny. 'They also think they can bluntly refuse the very modest conditions placed upon their disastrous development by the foreign and home secretaries, and have their plan get the green light regardless. 'The government should stand firm by their conditions, because China won't meet them in time. This letter could be the beginning of the end for this ruinous plan.' The letter from Rayner's department suggested she would need to be persuaded that she could make a 'lawful determination' on the plans if they remained redacted. Beijing plans to move its diplomatic mission in the UK to Royal Mint Court, a 5.5-acre site in East Smithfield on the east side of the City of London. It was home to the Royal Mint until 1967. It would be the largest Chinese embassy in Europe. The 20,000 sq m plot would be transformed into an enormous complex designed by Sir David Chipperfield, the prizewinning architect behind the Neues Museum in Berlin and the Turner Contemporary in Margate. The planning decision for the embassy was called in by Rayner, the housing secretary, last year. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. Sir Keir Starmer's government has attempted to improve relations with China since last year's general election but he has been urged by the United States to block Beijing's plans. The Chinese embassy in London was contacted for comment.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump taking on Modi risks worst of both worlds
Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil were meant to be the bunker buster in Washington's sanctions armoury, a weapon so devastating it would cripple Moscow's economy. Yet by appearing to punish India alone, Donald Trump risks squandering its impact. He may end up with the worst of all worlds: dropping a bomb too small to do significant damage to Russia while alienating a vital ally and counterweight to China. After months of resolutely refusing to punish Russia, the US president has changed tack. Convinced that Vladimir Putin has no interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Mr Trump has concluded that targeting Russia's energy sector – which generates a third of government revenue – is the key pressure point. 'If energy goes down, Putin is going to stop killing people,' he said this week. India has undeniably helped prop up the Kremlin's war machine, buying £42bn of Russian oil last year. But other nations have also helped fund Putin's invasion. China buys more than India, while Turkey, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and even some European Union states are significant consumers. It is possible that Mr Trump may widen his net in the coming days. He has given Putin until Friday to agree to a ceasefire or face consequences. Until now, Russia has faced a 10 per cent tariff, the lowest level Mr Trump applies. That figure is almost certain to rise, but with bilateral trade at £3.9bn last year, such a move will barely trouble the Kremlin. More direct sanctions on Russia's banks or its shadow tanker fleet could follow, but these too seem unlikely to force a change of course. Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil could, in theory, bite harder. Yet, by singling out India with a 25 per cent penalty, the weapon has been fired half-cocked. Analysts speculate that Mr Trump may extend the measures to other countries. If that is his intent, it is curious he would shame India rather than wait 48 hours to announce a broader policy. The strategy risks misfiring. Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, has endured repeated humiliations from a man he once called a friend. Yet in recent months Mr Trump has imposed higher tariffs on India than on most of its Asian competitors and caused anguish by courting Pakistan, which is closely aligned with China. With public anger in India growing over Washington's perceived high-handedness, Mr Modi would find it politically tricky to halt all Russian oil purchases, even if he wished to. Given the importance of the US market for Indian exports, he may have to find a fudge. Any concession, however, will come at a cost. Analysts say India is now likely to edge closer to China and Russia, weakening one of Washington's most valuable relationships in Asia. Even if India reduces imports, it is unclear whether losing a single buyer – even one as important as Delhi – will seriously dent Russia's war economy. A policy that leaves Putin undeterred while estranging India is hardly a triumph of statecraft – though final judgment must wait until Mr Trump reveals the rest of his plan.