Supreme Court deadlocks 4-4 on nation's first religious charter school
The decision by the evenly divided court means that a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court that said the proposal to launch St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School violates both the federal Constitution and state law remains in place.
As there was no majority, the court did not issue a written decision, and the case sets no nationwide precedent on the contentious legal question of whether religious schools must be able to participate in taxpayer-funded state charter school programs.
A key factor in the outcome was that conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who would have been the deciding vote, did not participate in the case. She did not explain why, but it is likely because of her ties with Notre Dame Law School. The law school's religious liberty clinic represents the school.
The one-page decision did not say how each justice voted. During oral arguments last month, most of the court's conservatives indicated support for the school while liberals expressed concern. At least one conservative is likely to have sided with the liberals, most likely Chief Justice John Roberts.
The court will likely be asked to weigh in on the issue in future cases.
St. Isidore would have operated online statewide with a remit to promote the Catholic faith.
The case highlights tensions within the Constitution's First Amendment; one provision, the Establishment Clause, prohibits state endorsement of religion or preference for one religion over another, while another, the Free Exercise Clause, bars religious discrimination.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court had cited the state's interest in steering clear of Establishment Clause violations as a reason not to allow the proposal submitted by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa to move forward.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court had cited the state's interest in steering clear of Establishment Clause violations as a reason not to allow the proposal submitted by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa to move forward.
A state board approved the proposal for St. Isidore in June 2023 despite concerns about its religious nature, prompting Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond to file suit.
The case saw Drummond on the opposite side of fellow Republicans in the state who backed the idea, but he prevailed at the Oklahoma Supreme Court the following year.
The Supreme Court, when Barrett is participating, has a 6-3 conservative majority that often backs religious rights. In recent years it has repeatedly strengthened the Free Exercise Clause in cases brought by conservative religious liberty activists, sometimes at the expense of the Establishment Clause. Some conservatives have long complained that the common understanding that the Establishment Clause requires strict separation of church and state is incorrect.
Lawyers representing the school and the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board sought to portray the dispute as similar to a series of recent rulings in which the court has said that under the Free Exercise Clause states cannot bar religious groups from government programs that are open to everyone else.
The push for religious public charter schools dovetails with the school choice movement, which supports parents using taxpayer funds to send their children to private school. Public school advocates see both efforts as broad assaults on traditional public schools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bolivia election could see lurch to right as once-dominant party's time runs out
In Plaza Murillo, the heart of Bolivia's political capital, La Paz – and home to the presidential palace, parliament and the country's main Catholic cathedral – time may be running out for a clock that runs backwards. Installed atop of the congressional palace during the years of prosperity under former president Evo Morales, 65, the anti-clockwise timepiece was conceived as a symbol of the 'decolonial and anti-imperialist' worldview championed by the left. But it has since become an emblem of the decline of Morales's Movimiento al Socialismo (Mas) party – with some saying that, as the country faces its worst economic crisis in 40 years, Bolivia itself has been moving backwards. And when 7.9 million Bolivians head to the polls this Sunday to choose their next president, Mas not only risks losing power after nearly 20 years – but it could disappear as a political force altogether. Polls point to a potential runoff between two rightwing candidates: the centre-right business tycoon and former planning minister Samuel Doria Medina, 66, followed closely by Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga, 65, a rightwing former president who briefly led the country in 2001 after the resignation of the former dictator Hugo Banzer. The deeply unpopular current president, Luis Arce – a former finance minister under Morales who wrested control of Mas from his former mentor – opted not to seek re-election and instead nominated his 36-year-old minister of government, Eduardo del Castillo. Unlike previous elections in which Morales and then Arce secured outright first-round victories with over 50% of the vote, Del Castillo is now polling below 3%, the minimum threshold for a party to remain eligible to contest future elections. Related: Plotting a comeback, Bolivia's ex-leader defies arrest warrant in jungle hideout 'Arce will go down in history as the one who buried the 'father', seized the party and, in all likelihood, led it to its end,' said the political and economic analyst Gonzalo Chávez Alvarez, a professor at the Universidad Católica Boliviana. Although polling in Bolivia has historically proved unreliable, the prospect of a party that was once hegemonic now teetering on the brink of oblivion is anything but trivial. 'I can bet we won't lose our legal status,' Arce told the Guardian late on Thursday, arguing that polls failed to predict his first-round victory in 2020. Even so, the president showed little confidence in any surprise from the left and said he would respect the result if the right won. 'If they are democratically elected, why not accept it?' he said. 'And we will mobilise to resist, to be the opposition, of course.' 'I had high hopes for this government but now I only feel disappointment,' said Pablo Quispe, 55, who has sold hats for the past 25 years in a street market in El Alto – a booming high-altitude city near La Paz that was once a Mas stronghold. After years of prosperity driven by a natural gas boom, reserves dwindled during the final years of Morales's presidency, triggering an economic crisis that has deepened ever since. 'The gas that should have sustained the country for much longer – and then generated resources to be invested in other sectors, diversifying the economy – wasn't used that way,' said Alvarez. Under Arce, the economy has deteriorated further: by July 2025, annual inflation had reached 24.8%, the highest level since at least 2008. Just as Bolivia celebrates 200 years of independence, there are shortages of fuel and US dollars, leading to scarcities and long queues even for bread. Related: Deadly clashes over Morales candidacy deepen Bolivia crisis in election run-up 'Everything is more expensive, and we're barely getting by,' said Quispe, who previously voted for Mas but now plans to vote for Medina because 'the left just isn't working any more'. Leticia Guarachi Padilla, a 35-year-old leftist entrepreneur who runs a small business installing blinds and curtains, plans to spoil her ballot in protest over Morales's exclusion from the race. The first Indigenous president in Bolivia's history and the country's longest-serving leader, from 2006 to 2019, Morales was barred by the constitutional court, which ruled that he has already exceeded the two-term limit, and the electoral court, which has argued that his party is not formally registered. Since October, he has remained entrenched in central Bolivia, where hundreds of coca farmers have prevented police from executing an arrest warrant issued against him over allegations that he fathered a child with a 15-year-old while in office. In recent weeks, Morales has urged supporters to cast blank votes – claiming that if the number of spoiled ballots exceeds the share won by the top candidate, it would mean he had won. The highest-polling leftwing name is that of Andrónico Rodríguez, a 36-year-old senator, polling third to fifth. Once seen as Morales's natural heir due to his Indigenous roots and leadership in the coca growers' union, Rodríguez was labelled a traitor by his former mentor after deciding to launch his own candidacy and has seemed unable to rally support from the fragmented left. 'I voted for Evo every time he ran, and I don't regret it because he promoted structural changes that favoured the poorest,' said Padilla, who acknowledged the former president's 'problems', including 'his relationships with underage girls and the fact that he sees himself as a saviour, driven more by ego'. But she still believes he should have run. 'Voting for Doria or Quiroga means voting for imperialism and for the US to retake control of Bolivia,' she said. If no candidate wins more than 50% of the vote, or at least 40% with a 10-point lead over the runner-up, a second round will be held on 19 October, which would be unprecedented in the country's history. Doria Medina and Quiroga are running for the fourth time, but still present themselves as political outsiders. Both advocate spending cuts as their main strategy to tackle the economic crisis. Quiroga says he would prioritise relations with the United States, while Doria Medina has promised to restore the supply of dollars and fuel within 100 days. His campaign slogan is '100 días, carajo' (100 days, dammit), a reference not to the Argentine president Javier Milei's libertarian rallying cry 'Viva la libertad, carajo!' (Long live freedom, dammit!), but to the 2005 plane crash Doria Medina survived, after which he said: 'Carajo, no me puedo morir' (I can't die, dammit!). Riding a motorbike decorated with campaign flags, automotive engineer Juan Pablo Rodríguez, 28, attended Doria Medina's final rally in La Paz on Tuesday with his wife, Michelle López, also 28, and their one-year-old daughter. 'Samuel can fix the crisis because he's a great businessman,' he said. One of Bolivia's wealthiest men, with a fortune in cement, hospitality and fast food, Doria Medina told the Guardian that if elected, he plans to restore the Plaza Murillo clock to its original, clockwise direction: 'Rationality will return, at last.' The current clock, he said, symbolised a country 'moving backwards'. The clock – with the number 12 still at the top, but with hands turning to the left to count the hours – was installed in 2014 on the initiative of David Choquehuanca, then foreign minister under Morales and now vice-president under Arce. He claimed it was a way to affirm Bolivia's identity as a 'southern nation', arguing that a southern hemisphere sundial shadow moves left. But physicist Francesco Zaratti, an emeritus professor at the Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, has long argued the clock 'makes no scientific sense', noting that in Bolivia the shadow can sometimes move right. 'When we have a new president, I bet it'll be one of the first things to go, as a symbolic end to Mas's 20-year cycle in power,' said Zaratti. Grover Quispe Lima, 35, looks at the clock every day as he sells maize to feed the hundreds of pigeons in Plaza Murillo. He has been walloped by the crisis, with maize prices rising from 120 (£13) to 200 (£21) bolivianos in a year. 'To me, it's irrelevant whether the clock moves backwards or forwards – the only thing that matters is that the next president improves our country,' he said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Why in the world is Trump punishing Moldova with tariffs?
President Trump's tariff blasts continue. The White House released its latest list on July 31 and it is clear that no nation is safe — not allies, enemies, neighbors or distant lands. No menacing power escapes the vigilance of the president's team, ever alert to those 'ripping off' the United States of America. Case in point: Moldova. Dominating both sides of the Dniester River — well, one side actually — this Eastern European colossus of 2.3 million people (about the size of Houston) could inflict mortal damage on the American economy. In 2024 alone, the U.S. bought nearly $136 million (with an 'm') worth of goods from the Moldovans, whereas they bought only $51 million from us. With the U.S. economy valued at more than $30 trillion (with a 'T') we could probably only bear such abuse for … well, forever. In a July 9 letter to Moldovan President Maia Sandu, Trump made clear that America will not be bullied by Moldova any longer. He imposed a tariff of 25 percent on every bottle of wine or fruit juice the Moldovans force us to buy. Calling the deficit with Moldova a 'major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!' the president warned of even higher tariffs if Moldova retaliates or tries to send goods into the U.S. through transshipment. The letter accuses Moldova of taking advantage of us for 'many years.' Tariff rates are one of Trump's favorite weapons, employed under the dubious premise that the U.S. faces a trade deficit 'emergency.' The legality of such action aside — the Supreme Court has yet to rule — the president uses this weapon for a variety of non-economic goals. He has threatened Canada for indicating it might recognize a Palestinian state, and Brazil to try to save former President Jair Bolsonaro from prosecution. Moldova has committed no such offenses — at least none charged — but Trump wants trade with Moldova and a host of other countries to be based on 'reciprocity.' Whatever the precipitating dynamics, punishing Moldova for its involvement in international trade serves no reasonable Western security or broader policy interests. It undermines them. Sandwiched between Ukraine and Romania, Moldova has a long history of not being a country. The people of this region, who were unwillingly traded between Romania and Russia for nearly a century, gained independence from a collapsing Soviet Union in 1991. With a population that is 75 percent Moldovan-Romanian, some within the Russian and Ukrainian minorities feared the country's absorption into neighboring Romania. During a brief internal war in 1992, Moscow positioned a 'peacekeeping force' on the eastern side of Dniester River to guard the self-proclaimed state of Transnistria — which is still there, not recognized even by Russia. This force is small, locally recruited and considered less than formidable. But it is part of a sustained campaign by Moscow to prevent Moldova from embracing the West. This same motive drove Vladimir Putin to unleash a brutal invasion and occupation of much larger Ukraine. If victorious there, he is unlikely to be more accommodating toward Moldova. Moldova is the poorest country in Europe, and its elected leaders and population have been seeking stability. After Russia invaded Ukraine, Moldova applied to join the EU. It was quickly granted candidate status, and negotiations for membership began. In 2024, the country reelected pro-EU President Sandu and in a referendum enshrined the country's 'European course' in its constitution — despite massive Russian interference and disinformation. The EU has not been cowed by Moscow and developed a generous aid and development package. Most Moldovan goods enter the world's largest trading bloc duty-free, a policy that was further extended to agricultural products last month. Under President Biden, the U.S. had been similarly supportive, providing more than $400 million in military and humanitarian aid in part to help reduce the country's dependence on Russian gas. Trump sees no need for aid to Moldova, or indeed for most foreign assistance. Other moves supporting Trump's 'America First' orientation also penalize Moldova. Eliminating the U.S. Agency for International Development meant the loss of virtually all projects in Moldova — including for democracy promotion and economic and energy development. At the same time, cutting resources for election monitoring and an independent press leaves the field open for Russian interference. Such indifference, along with Trump's shifting attitude toward Ukraine and transactional foreign policy, leaves Moldova exposed. A study by the Stimson Center concluded, 'With a White House that seems increasingly eager to align its perspectives with Moscow at the expense of traditional allies, its willingness to support Moldova's democratic transformation in the face of Russian opposition is now uncertain.' Neighboring Romania, a member of both the EU and NATO, has a huge stake in the fate of Moldova. An intimidated or occupied satellite country — a second Belarus — on the Alliance's more than 400-mile border would dramatically change the strategic equation. This should get Washington's attention — at least of those willing to honor the American commitment to NATO. Preserving an independent and economically healthy Moldova thus serves European and American interests. Increasing the cost of doing business with the U.S. and damaging democratic efforts there does not. Supporting Moldova costs the U.S. very little. Excusing a tiny trade deficit to a strategically important democracy does not make Americans suckers. Helping Moldova does not require a military commitment. The country has been cooperating with NATO but is constitutionally neutral. Rather than punishing the country, the U.S. could and should offer support. This could be based on a view of the geopolitical map — or, even better, from an appreciation of a resilient people's desire for democratic choice. Ronald H. Linden is professor emeritus of political science at the University of Pittsburgh, where he directed the Center for European Studies and the Center for Russian and East European Studies. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House Gets Touchy About Trump's ‘One Hit Wonder' Kennedy Center Pick
The White House took umbrage after a guest on CNN said the Kennedy Center had chosen to honor 81-year-old Gloria Gaynor merely because she is a person of color. On August 13, President Donald Trump unveiled this year's Kennedy Center honorees, which include Gaynor, known for hit songs 'I Will Survive' and 'Eye of the Tiger.' Tia Mitchell, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Washington bureau chief, told CNN's This Morning Weekend Saturday that Gaynor had been selected because of diversity considerations. 'I do believe as much as the Trump administration has attacked [diversity, equity, and inclusion], they wanted a person of color on the list of Kennedy Center Honorees,' Mitchell said. 'The fact that Gloria Gaynor is the one person of color on the list indicates that they struggled ot find a person of color to agree to be on the list.' While the Center usually picks 'people who are icons in their genre of the arts' with 'a huge body of work,' Mitchell described Gaynor as 'basically a one-hit wonder.' White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung took Mitchell to task on X. 'Some dipshit named Tia Mitchell went on CNN to say legendary singer Gloria Gaynor doesn't deserve to be a Kennedy Center Honoree and only chosen because she's Black,' Cheung posted. 'Liberal 'journalists' will twist an inspiring story because it involves Pres. Trump.' 'Total TDS,' he added, employing the oft-used acronym for 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' The other Kennedy Center honorees include action man Sylvester Stallone, the band KISS, country star George Strait, and English actor Michael Crawford. The View's Anna Navarro encouraged Gaynor to turn down the award, saying on X earlier this week, 'Don't do it, Gloria!' 'Look, the woman is a goddess and deserves all the flowers that come her way,' Navarro said. 'But I wish she wouldn't accept an award from the hands of a man who has attacked the rights and history of women, people of color, and LGBTQ.' Tom Cruise also reportedly turned down a lifetime achievement award from the Kennedy Center, The Washington Post reported.
