'Anti-vax' woman died after refusing chemotherapy
Paloma Shemirani, who had declined chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, suffered a fatal heart attack caused by her tumour at the Royal Sussex County Hospital (RSCH) on 24 July last year.
The 23-year-old's mother Kay (Kate) Shemirani, who shared Covid conspiracy theories on social media, has blamed doctors' interventions for her daughter's death.
Paloma had also claimed her human rights had been violated by NHS practitioners, likening it to what the Nazis did during WWII, the inquest was told at Oakwood House in Maidstone, Kent.
In previous written statements - submitted to the family division of the High Court in spring 2024 and read out at the hearing on Monday - she described the alleged violations as akin to experiments carried out at Auschwitz.
Paloma, who grew up in Uckfield, East Sussex, denied even having non-Hodgkin lymphoma, calling it an "absurd fantasy, with no proof".
The Cambridge graduate described the diagnosis as "suspected and unconfirmed", adding that she had a "background in natural healing".
In addition, she feared that if she were to survive chemotherapy it might make her infertile.
"I do not want to undergo such a harsh treatment that could even kill me when there is a possibility this is not cancer", she said.
She described her mother, who was struck off as a nurse in 2021, as "an extremely forceful advocate for natural health" who was often "misquoted".
Paloma had turned to Gerson therapy - a strict organic vegetarian diet involving enemas - on the advice of her mother's ex-fiancee, Dr Patrick Villers, though Cancer Research UK said there was no scientific evidence of it being an effective treatment.
The proceedings, which involve Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, were on the appropriateness of her care and heard how Paloma had said she was "delighted" with her alternative treatment and "sure" she would "make a full recovery" if left to continue it.
The inquest, led by coroner Catherine Wood, continues.
Additional reporting from PA Media.
Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
'Our sister died of cancer because of our mum's conspiracy theories'
Concern mum 'influenced daughter's chemo refusal'
Related internet links
Kent and Medway Coroner's Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
13 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Hackers Steal Passwords From UK's NHS With Sneaky Malware Tool
Ambulances parked outside the emergency department at the National Health Service's Royal Liverpool University Hospital in Liverpool, UK.
New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding
Vaccines using mRNA technology weren't immune to the latest round of federal research cuts. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. The 22 projects are managed by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). 'The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,' Kennedy, a longtime vaccine critic, said in a statement. 'We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.' 4 Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. AP Several studies have demonstrated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were over 90% effective at preventing severe illness and death. Vaccine researchers immediately took issue with the fiscal gutting, calling it a major setback for science. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' said Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations. Here's a closer look at how mRNA vaccines work. What is mRNA? All living cells have ribonucleic acid, an essential biological molecule known as RNA. RNA's primary role in the body is to make proteins, which are needed for virtually every cellular process, from building and repairing tissues to defending the body from bacteria and viruses and transporting nutrients and oxygen. 4 The COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by Pfizer and Biontec is administered during a clinical trial. EPA/Biontech SE/Handout Proteins are synthesized using three main types of RNA — messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). MRNA's job is to carry information for protein making from DNA to the cell's ribosomes, where it's translated into proteins. How do mRNA vaccines work? MRNA can be created in a laboratory and injected into the body to instruct cells to make a protein associated with a specific virus. The body recognizes the protein as foreign and produces antibodies to combat it. When the actual virus or pathogen invades the body, the immune system is ready to neutralize it, preventing or reducing the severity of illness. Though mRNA was discovered in the early 1960s, the first mRNA vaccine wasn't approved for human use until 2020. 4 German firm BioNTech, Pfizer's partner on its Covid vaccine, is developing mRNA-based vaccines for cancers at a rapid pace. Photothek via Getty Images The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in December 2020 and later granted full approval. The vaccine uses mRNA to tell cells to make a harmless piece of the coronavirus's spike protein. Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine was also granted full approval by the FDA. MRNA vaccines are being explored for the treatment of cancer, food allergies and infectious diseases. Researchers say that mRNA vaccines can be developed faster than traditional vaccines because they do not require the time-consuming process of growing live virus cultures in a lab. 'The theoretical advantage of mRNA-based vaccines lies in their rapid adaptability,' Grant Hansman, senior research fellow at the Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics at Griffith University in Australia, wrote this week in The Conversation. 'They will potentially allow annual updates to match circulating strains.' 4 University College London Hospital (UCLH) in London is testing novel cancer immunotherapy that aims to prevent skin cancer from recurring. The mRNA-based technology is for people who have already had high-risk melanomas removed. PA Images via Getty Images The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that mRNA vaccines do not contain any live viruses or pathogens and do not alter a person's DNA. The mRNA molecule eventually breaks down in the body. The Cleveland Clinic reports that the risks of mRNA vaccines include pain or swelling at the injection site, fever, fatigue, headaches, muscle aches and allergic reactions. In his statement, Kennedy said that mRNA vaccines will be phased out in favor of whole killed virus vaccines, a traditional approach that uses entire pathogens that have been inactivated through heat, radiation or chemicals. Though it's a tried-and-true method of immunization, critics have raised concerns that these vaccines produce a weaker immune response than mRNA vaccines and pose manufacturing and logistical challenges. With Post wires
