logo
Live Both: Mastering The Save Versus Give Paradox

Live Both: Mastering The Save Versus Give Paradox

Forbes20-06-2025
Reducing, removing or overcome financial barrier, financial concept : US dollar bag on a maze ... More puzzle. The image depicting a situation how to overcome financial difficulties and avoid a financial distress. getty
For as long as I've been interested in money, I've wrestled with a personal tension: I want to be generous with what I have, but I also want to be a wise saver. In theory, both goals make sense. But in practice, they often feel like opposites.
Saving helps me achieve goals and manage life's inevitable risks, like losing income during seasons of unemployment or my elder years. Saving is satisfying to me because it is measurable and strategic. It helps me prepare for emergencies and invest in products and services that are a blessing to the world. On the other hand, giving is aligned to love. It is who I am as a Christian since it is who God is. 'For God so loved the world that He gave…' It creates connection, reduces isolation, and reminds me that money isn't just about me. Yet every dollar I give is a dollar I can't save—and every dollar I save is one I'm not using to make a difference today.
For a long time, I treated this as a problem to solve. I searched for the right budget, the perfect ratio, the clean formula. What I discovered instead is that this is not a problem to solve—it's a paradox to navigate.
Eventually, I found that the best way for me to make peace with this tension wasn't through spreadsheets or rules. It was through metaphors. These images helped me understand my relationship with money in a more human and creative way, and they gave me a framework to build a financial life that reflects both responsibility and generosity.
Here are four metaphors that have reshaped how I think about saving and giving: 1. Water
Stagnant water getty
Imagine a lake that has no outlet. Over time, the water becomes stagnant. Nutrients build up. Salt accumulates. Life dies off. That's what happens in places like the Dead Sea. Compare that to a river or a lake that flows—it stays vibrant, oxygenated, and full of life.
That image helped me see that holding onto all my money, even for good reasons, eventually becomes toxic. If there's no outflow, I lose something essential. I become overly cautious. I start to think I never have 'enough.'
But the opposite extreme is no better. If water rushes out without being replenished, the stream dries up. I've been there too—giving more than I could sustain, eventually becoming resentful or dependent on others to meet my needs.
This metaphor reminded me that a healthy financial life needs both inflow and outflow. Saving without giving becomes lifeless. Giving without saving becomes unsustainable. My goal is to find the flow. 2. Barn
A beautiful winter scenic in Alberta, Canada. White horse and red barn. Rolling prairie. getty
A barn isn't built out of fear—it's built out of foresight. Farmers don't build barns because they're selfish. They do it because they know winter is coming. They know that without storing seed and grain, they can't plant again in the spring.
When I think about saving in this way, it no longer feels like hoarding. It becomes a way to protect my ability to contribute long-term. It's not about stockpiling money so I can escape the world. It's about preparing myself to remain useful, even when conditions change.
I've learned that my version of a 'barn' includes an emergency fund, health insurance, and enough margin to say yes when an unexpected opportunity to help someone arises. 3. Tree
Fruit tree getty
A tree does something beautiful: it holds onto what it needs, and it gives away the rest. It stores nutrients in its roots, but it also produces fruit, gives shade, and releases oxygen. It serves both itself and everything around it.
Trees also overproduce. They don't just generate one apple or one acorn. They produce far more than they need. That picture helped me shift from thinking about generosity as a loss to thinking about it as natural overflow.
I don't want to be a tree that's either dried out or bloated. I want to be rooted and resilient, and fruitful. Saving helps me stand firm. Giving helps me reach outward. The two support each other. 4.Amphibian
Red salamander (Pseudotriton ruber) getty
I've always been fascinated by amphibians. They can live in two worlds: water and land. If they stay in the water too long, they suffocate. If they stay on land too long, they dry out.
That's how I feel sometimes with my money. The financial planning world rewards discipline and saving. But the social world I live in—my relationships, my community—runs on giving and connection. If I lean too hard into one world, I lose touch with the other.
Being an amphibian means learning to move between both. I spend time reviewing my savings goals, but I also look for ways to help others, share what I have, and experience the joy of giving. It's not about perfect balance every day. It's about becoming fluent in both environments over time. My Personal Strategy
After years of trial and error, I settled on a simple principle that works for me. I decided that my giving rate should always be at least double my saving rate. This ratio reminds me to prioritize generosity, because it aligns with who I am as a follower of Jesus. I also need to view my savings as a tool to create a more sustainable flow of giving throughout my life, helping me avoid costly debt during seasons of hardship.
This strategy may not be perfect or permanent. But it feels honest. It's rooted in the metaphors that help me make sense of money; and in the values I want to live by. Final Thoughts
If you feel torn between saving and giving, you're not alone. It's not a simple decision, and it may never be. But it doesn't have to be a source of stress. Instead, it can be a creative challenge.
You don't have to find the one right answer. You just need to find the rhythm that works for you. Metaphors can help. They give us new language. They slow us down. They turn pressure into perspective.
Metaphors can also help with the paradoxes of investing, like whether to buy cheap and old or expensive and new. See my Forbes article that discusses using metaphor to navigate an age-old investing paradox here: Forbes Live Both: Mastering The Growth Vs. Value Investing Paradox By Shane Enete
At the end of the day, I'm not looking for a formula. I'm looking for meaning. I want my money to reflect both who I am and who I want to become. And that means learning how to give freely while still saving wisely.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man worries he'll die young — should he spend $500k to retire early?
Man worries he'll die young — should he spend $500k to retire early?

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Man worries he'll die young — should he spend $500k to retire early?

Faced with a history of family members dying young, Sarah's husband wants to spend US$500,000 to retire early. She called The Ramsey Show to find out if fear is a good enough reason. Sarah and her husband, 53, are in a strong financial position. Their house is paid off, they've saved millions for retirement and on paper, they're set. But his family history looms large. With his mother dying at 59 and both of his brothers dying at 55, he's starting to wonder if he should clock out of work early, just in case. That's why he's seriously considering spending the money to buy five years of his pension and retire early. The Ramsey Show hosts pushed back on the idea of making a major financial decision based on fear. 'None of us is promised tomorrow,' said Ken Coleman. Don't Miss Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it The Canadian economy is showing signs of softening amid Trump's tariffs — protect your wallet with these 6 essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes) I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up Buying a pension to retire early? At the heart of the matter is Sarah's husband's fear of dying young. While she called to ask if they should buy the pension, the Ramsey hosts cautioned against making an emotional decision. 'I would not sacrifice the future here on the altar of the immediate,' said Coleman. 'We have to live in the moment, yes, but also not sacrifice our future based on some emotion that's not rooted in facts.' Jade Warshaw echoed his sentiment. 'I don't like that idea,' she said. 'Something about that doesn't feel right.' As the hosts dug deeper, it became clear the couple doesn't need the extra money from the pension to retire early. They own their home outright and have millions saved for retirement. If they spent US$500,000, they'd receive about US$6,000 per month in retirement income. But given their other assets, they likely don't need it to live comfortably. 'You don't need the money, so I certainly wouldn't buy it,' Warshaw said. 'Now it's up to you guys to decide: what is this US$6,000 a month worth to us?' If it's not worth working for seven more years, he could retire now, without buying the pension. Beyond the numbers, Warshaw encouraged the couple to consider using some of their money to assess and improve his health. Lifestyle changes and preventive care could help improve both his quality of life and longevity. Read more: Here are — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? When does it make sense to retire early? Retiring early can be appealing for many reasons. Maybe, like Sarah's husband, you're worried about your health. Maybe you feel burned out or want more time to travel. Whatever the reason, it's important to consider the financial side. If you've spent your working years saving, paid off your house and built a solid nest egg, early retirement might be an option. But if you're still in debt or have minimal savings, this might be the time to buckle down on your financial goals instead. In Sarah's case, her family's strong net worth and paid-off house make early retirement a real possibility. If they had called in with debt or little savings, the advice would've been different. According to a recent Northwestern Mutual survey, Americans believe they'll need US$1.26 million to retire comfortably. Canadians fare similarly, with a BMO survey reporting that they believe they'll need around CA$1.54 million to retire comfortably. Sarah and her husband are already in that ballpark, setting them apart from the average household. And if full retirement doesn't make sense just yet, a gradual approach might. Scaling back to part-time hours — say from 40 to 20 a week — can offer many of the same lifestyle benefits without jeopardizing your financial future. 1. The Ramsey Show Highlights: Pay $500,000 To Retire? (He's Afraid He's Going To Die Early)(June 13, 2025) 2. NorthWestern Mutual: Planning and Progress Study 2025 3. BMO: BMO Retirement Survey: Over Three Quarters of Canadians Worry They Will Not Have Enough Retirement Savings Amid Inflation (Feb 12, 2025) What To Read Next Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio Ramit Sethi says you should hit these 9 'money milestones' before 40 if you want to be rich — how many have you crossed off the list? Pet owners, here's how you can get up to 90% cashback on expensive emergency veterinary bills — and you can even get a free quote in 30 seconds This man from Toronto feels broke making $73,000 a year — his wife recently left him and he has an 18-month-old child. Here's what Dave Ramsey told him This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tesla, Alphabet highlight earnings rush as market hovers near record highs: What to know this week
Tesla, Alphabet highlight earnings rush as market hovers near record highs: What to know this week

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla, Alphabet highlight earnings rush as market hovers near record highs: What to know this week

The S&P 500 (^GSPC) and Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) are both hovering near record highs as escalating tariffs and a growing debate about monetary policy have done little to shake markets. The Nasdaq Composite led the gains last week, rising more than 1.6%. Meanwhile the S&P 500 popped about 0.7% while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) was just above the flat line. In the week ahead, 112 S&P 500 companies are set to report quarterly results. Reports from Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG), Tesla (TSLA), and Chipotle (CMG) will be in focus. Meanwhile, a quiet week of economic data releases will be highlighted by updates on activity in the services and manufacturing sectors as the Federal Reserve enters its blackout period ahead of its July 29-30 policy meeting. Rate debate heats up On Thursday, Fed governor Christopher Waller made his clearest call yet for an interest rate cut in July. During a speech in New York, Waller said the Fed should cut rates in July, adding that the federal funds rate is more than one full percentage point higher than it should be. "With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate," Waller said. However, recent moves in market pricing have shown investors growing less optimistic about rate cuts. Last week, signs of stickiness in consumer inflation combined with a stronger-than-expected June retail sales report and weekly unemployment filings pushed out interest rate cut bets. As of Friday, markets were pricing in just a 5% chance that the Federal Open Market Committee would cut rates in July, per the CME FedWatch Tool. A month ago, markets had priced in closer to a 13% chance. "We expect the committee to arrive at a consensus to cut rates in September as the hawkish case weakens with the job market loosening further and no signs of tariffs spilling over into a broader inflationary trend," Citi chief US economist Andrew Hollenhorst wrote in a note to clients on Friday. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments Earnings scorecard Big banks kicked off the second quarter earnings reporting period with a string of better-than-expected results. Netflix (NFLX) followed those up on Thursday night with an estimate-beating report. Both the streaming giant and the large financial banks said that the US consumer continues to hold strong. On an aggregate level, the S&P 500 is now pacing to report earnings growth of 5.6% compared to the same quarter a year ago, per FactSet data. This is above the 4.8% analysts were expecting just last week. Despite the strong reports, some stocks that had seen massive rallies heading into their reports saw a muted stock reaction in the trading session following their reports. For example, Netflix stock fell nearly 5% on Friday despite raising its full-year revenue guidance. Netflix stock had been up nearly 100% over the past year heading into the release. "An overall 'good' set of results and guide were not good enough for elevated expectations, in our view," William Blair analyst Ralph Schackart wrote in a note titled "Good Quarter, but Tough to Surpass High Expectations." With the broader market at record highs, weak stock reaction after solid earnings reports had been a concern among some Wall Street strategists heading into second quarter earnings. "The challenge is valuation: after a 30% rally off the April lows, the market is trading at 24.7 [trailing twelve-month] earnings, leaving strong results, as Financials demonstrated to start the season, just enough to maintain market altitude while slight disappointments risk material pullbacks," Julian Emanuel, who leads the equity, derivatives, and quantitative strategy team at Evercore ISI, wrote in a note to clients on Friday. Eyes on the 'broadening' Alphabet and Tesla will kick off quarterly releases for the "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks. Once again, that cohort is expected to lead S&P 500 earnings growth this quarter. The Magnificent Seven is expected to have grown earnings by 14.1% compared to the year prior during the second quarter. The other 493 stocks in the index are expected to have seen just 3.4% year-over-year earnings growth. That means the prospect of S&P earnings surprising to the upside largely hinges on Big Tech results. But as the chart below shows, consensus is expecting the other 493 to begin driving a greater share of earnings growth over the next several quarters — a key call among Wall Street strategists hoping for a broadening of the stock market rally that has only come in spurts over the past several years. "It's time for earnings to deliver," Citi strategist Scott Chronert wrote in a note to clients. "Commentary will be key if we hope to see further upside in revisions, and hopefully, some inflections in cyclical sector growth to finally drive broadening. He added, "The issue is the setup. It feels like the market is moving ahead of positive developments. And as we continue to note, sentiment is elevated, and implicit growth expectations are high." Weekly calendar Monday Economic data: Leading index of economic indicators, June (-0.2% expected, -0.1% previously) Earnings: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), Domino's Pizza (DPZ), Steel Dynamics (STLD), Verizon (VZ) Tuesday Economic data: Richmond Fed manufacturing index, July (-4 expected, -7 previously) Earnings: Capital One (COF), Coca-Cola (KO), DR Horton (DHI), Enphase Energy (ENPH), GM (GM), Lockheed Martin (LMT), Philip Morris International (PM), SAP (SAP), Texas Instruments (TXN) Wednesday Economic data: MBA mortgage applications, July 18 (-10% prior); Existing home sales month-over-month, June (-0.7% expected, +0.8% prior) Earnings: Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG), Tesla (TSLA), Chipotle (CMG), Alaska Airlines (ALK), AT&T (T), Fiserv (FI), Freeport-McMoran (FCX), GE Vernova (GEV), General Dynamics (GD), Hasbro (HAS), IBM (IBM), O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY), QuantumScape (QS) Thursday Economic data: Initial jobless claims, week ending July 19 (230,000 expected, 221,000 previously); Chicago Fed national activity index, June (-0.28 previously); S&P Global US manufacturing PMI, July preliminary (52.7 expected, 52.9 previously); S&P Global US services PMI, July preliminary (53.1 expected, 52.9 previously); S&P global US composite PMI, July preliminary (52.9 previously); New home sales, month over month, June (+4.3% expected, -13.7% previously) Earnings: American Airlines (AAL), Blackstone (BX), Deckers (DECK), Dow (DOW), Honeywell (HON), Intel (INTC), Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP), Nasdaq (NDAQ), Nokia (NOK), Southwest Airlines (LUV), Union Pacific (UNP) Friday Economic data: Durable goods orders, June preliminary (-10.8% expected, +16.4% prior) Earnings: Charter Communications (CHTR) Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

I asked Alexa Plus to tackle my to-do list — it mostly failed
I asked Alexa Plus to tackle my to-do list — it mostly failed

The Verge

time10 minutes ago

  • The Verge

I asked Alexa Plus to tackle my to-do list — it mostly failed

One of the best features of Amazon's new Alexa Plus is that I don't have to 'speak Alexa' anymore. I've been testing the voice assistant for about a week now, and it understands what I say, regardless of how I say it — there's no more need for precise phrasing to get Alexa to do what I want. This big shift underpins another headline feature of the revamped generative AI-powered assistant that I've been testing: agentic AI. But this one needs work. The idea is I can talk to Alexa Plus as I would to a real personal assistant and ask it to do tasks, such as reserving a restaurant for my friend's birthday, finding an electrician to fix my broken sprinkler pump, or booking tickets to a Chris Isaak concert. The assistant can then act as an 'AI agent' and navigate online services on my behalf to book everything for me. Combined with better calendar management and the ability to remember things you tell it, Alexa's agentic AI has the potential to make the assistant much more useful. Alexa's AI agent features are neither broad enough nor seamless enough to replace my real-life personal assistant: me At least in theory. In reality, it's too limited. Alexa Plus relies on partnerships with specific services; it can't just roam the web and do my bidding. As of now, that includes Ticketmaster, OpenTable, Uber, and Thumbtack. While impressively, Alexa did manage to complete several steps, overall, the AI agent's current features are neither broad enough nor seamless enough to replace my real-life personal assistant: me. Alexa Plus is still in an Early Access beta phase, and Amazon says more integrations are coming soon. These include ordering groceries by voice (via 'several grocery providers in the US'), delivery through Grubhub, and booking spa visits through Vagaro. These may be more useful to me, especially grocery ordering. I already use Alexa for my shopping list, but I then have to put everything into my Harris Teeter shopping app for pickup or delivery. If Alexa could take that list and add it to a service like Instacart, it would cut out a chunk of work for me. Of the three agentic experiences I tested, the best was booking a ticket to an event through Ticketmaster. After a dodgy start — when I asked about sports events and was told about a youth basketball training session — I tried again. 'What events are there in Charleston next month that you can buy me tickets for?' Alexa produced a list of about 10 local sports events and concerts on the Echo Show 15 I was using (Alexa Plus is much more useful on a screened device). It told me, 'You've got music shows like Blackberry Smoke and Mike Campbell on August 5th and Collective Soul on August 6th. There's also a Cure tribute band on August 2nd. Anything catch your interest?' I spotted a Chris Isaak concert in the list (I love a good Wicked Game) and told it to book me tickets. It found balcony seats for $98.15 each and asked how many I wanted, while also showing me more expensive options. I selected the cheap seats, and it walked me through each step as it added them to my cart, ending with a checkout button where my credit card details were pre-populated. (I'd linked my Ticketmaster account in the Alexa app when I first set up Alexa Plus.) I canceled before purchasing, because I don't love a Wicked Game $200 much, and Alexa confirmed that the tickets were released. However, alarmingly, later that day, a pop-up in the Alexa app told me that anyone with access to my Alexa devices can order tickets. Amazon: I'll take a PIN option here, please. Next, I asked Alexa to 'book a dinner for two in downtown Charleston for tomorrow night at 7PM.' It returned three options, which is just sad — Charleston has a hopping foodie scene. I picked a French spot I'd been to before and changed it up, asking Alexa to 'make it for two weeks on Friday.' Unfazed, Alexa understood, pivoted and confirmed availability for Friday, July 31st, at 7PM, then asked if I wanted to book. After I confirmed, it said it would also add the reservation to my linked Gmail calendar. Handy! Alexa had messed up the date Or so I thought. I then received a text message from OpenTable, confirming my reservation for Thursday, July 31st. Alexa had messed up the date. I told Alexa to switch the reservation to Friday, August 1st, and it did, also updating my calendar. While it eventually booked the table, Alexa took longer to do it and was less accurate than if I'd just opened the OpenTable app on my phone (or more realistically, the Resy app that most restaurants in Charleston use) and done it myself. Finally, I had Alexa tackle a chore I've been putting off for two years: finding an electrician. I've been meaning to get the circuit for my sprinkler pump fixed for ages. It's on the same one as my internet router, so when the pump kicks in, it trips the circuit — and down goes my Wi-Fi. The big difference is that I did all of this hands-free I told Alexa I needed an electrician to fix the sprinkler system, and asked if it could book one. It pulled a list of several 'highly rated electricians' in my area via Thumbtack, highlighting the top three. I picked one and asked it to schedule a visit for a week from now. Alexa asked several follow-up questions about my house and the specific issue — it felt a bit like filling out a webform with my voice. Alexa, then said it was working on sending the request through the Thumbtack website, and that I'd get updates soon. A few hours later, still no word from Alexa. But I received an email from Thumbtack (the first of many…) and a text message from the electrician asking me to call or text to schedule an appointment. Not exactly the seamless set-it-and-forget-it experience I'd hoped for. Still, the big difference is that I did all of this hands-free. I could be setting up dinner dates and finding electricians while cooking dinner or folding laundry. As a working mother of two, anything that helps with multitasking so I can complete my to-do list faster is welcome. But while the tech is impressive, the lack of depth and the failures I experienced in two out of my three tests mean I don't plan to rely on Alexa to do these tasks for me just yet. Photography by Jennifer Pattison Tuohy / The Verge

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store