logo
Last chance to vote in Bay County municipal runoff elections

Last chance to vote in Bay County municipal runoff elections

Yahoo21-05-2025

BAY COUNTY, Fla. (WMBB) – Tuesday marks the last day to vote in the 2025 Bay County municipal runoff elections.
Robbie Hughes and Daniel Schultz are running for the Panama City Commission Ward One position.
The winner will be replacing Jenna Haligas. She did not seek reelection after eight years on the city commission.
Lynn Haven voters will choose between Judy Tinder and Jeff Snyder for the Seat Four race.
The winner will be replacing Judy Vandergrift, who was appointed to the position in 2023. Vandergrift replaced Tinder after she announced her candidacy for mayor.
Tinder lost the mayoral election to incumbent and current Lynn Haven Mayor Jesse Nelson.
Last month, Tinder missed winning back the commission seat outright by just 1% of votes. But, officials said it's hard to know what to expect in a runoff.
'Typically, municipal turnout is lower. You know, in 2023, I think was the last time we had a runoff. And we actually saw higher turnout in the runoff than the, you know, regular election for municipals. Hopefully, we'll see that today,' Bay County Supervisor of Elections Nina Ward said.
In 2023's Super Tuesday Election, Panama City incumbent mayor Greg Brudnicki got 47% of the vote in a three-way race. Michael Rohan's got into the run-off with 40%. But Rohan beat Brudnicki in the run-off.
Ward said anything can happen and encourages all eligible voters to hit the polls.
'These positions are really the closest to home and have, you know, have an effect on our daily lives. So I can't stress enough how important it is to just get up and get out and vote. You know, this is your opportunity to make your voice heard. I know we say it over and over and over, but it is frustrating for people when we hold elections and then we see these low turnout numbers,' Ward added. 'I hope that everybody that's eligible, you know, exercises their right and gets out and votes today.'
Polls at Panama City City Hall and the Lynn Haven Senior Center close at 7 p.m. on Tuesday.
Mail-in ballots can be turned in at the Bay County Supervisor of Elections Office until 7 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hattiesburg, Sumrall and Lumberton election results are in: See won in municipal races
Hattiesburg, Sumrall and Lumberton election results are in: See won in municipal races

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Hattiesburg, Sumrall and Lumberton election results are in: See won in municipal races

Results for the 2025 municipal elections in Hattiesburg, Lumberton and Sumrall are in, with new leadership in some offices and returning leadership in others. In Hattiesburg, Republican LeAnn Van Slyke Vance won the Ward 3 City Council seat, defeating Democratic candidate Keenon Walker and independent candidate Joe Wiley. Vance pulled in 898 votes or 65% to Walker's 266 votes or 19% and Wiley's 221 votes or 16%. Longtime Ward 3 Councilman Carter Carroll did not see reelection. The remaining mayoral and council seats in Hattiesburg were either unopposed or decided in the primary election since the candidates had no opponents in the general election. In Sumrall, Mayor Joel Lofton easily defeated challenger Dwayne Jones, bringing in 266 votes or 76% of the vote to return for another term. He defeated opponent Dwayne Jones, who had 84 votes or 24%. Alderwoman at Large Brittany Fortenberry received 268 votes or 77% to challenger Trina McLendon's 80 votes or 23%. Ward 1 Alderman Lamar Reed, with 30 votes or 29%, lost to challenger Jeffery Coulter, who had 74 votes or 71%. Lumberton had a full slate, with each alderman and mayoral seat challenged. The aldermen races were close, with some resulting in recounts. Incumbent Mayor Quincy Rogers lost to challenger James Sandifer Jr., who was endorsed by former candidate Kent Crider. Sandifer received 391 votes or 84% to Rogers' 55 votes or 12%. Crider, who gave up his Ward 1 Alderman seat to run for mayor, announced in late May that he was dropping out of the race. He received 19 votes despite dropping out of the race. Ward 1 voters elected a new representative, following Crider's departure to run for mayor. Annette Sandifer won over challenger Tommy Rheams with 67 votes or 53% to Rheams' 59 votes or 47%. It is unclear whether Sandifer is related to the incoming mayor. Incumbent Alderwoman at Large Sandy Kee will return for another term with 165 votes or 35% to former Alderwoman Tina Speights' 157 votes or 34% and Bobby Gibson's 144 votes or 31%. In Ward 2, incumbent Kyle Crider was defeated by challenger Laurie Surla, with only two votes separating the two. Surla won with 32 votes or 52% to Crider's 30 votes or 48%. Former Alderman Jonathan Griffith will return to office in Ward 3 after winning by four votes against incumbent Alderwoman Myrtis Holder. Griffith received 55 votes or 52% to Holder's 51 votes or 48%. Incumbent Ward 4 Alderwoman Jasmin Holder will return to office after defeating former Alderwoman Audrey Davis. Jasmin Holder received 94 votes or 56% to Davis's 75 votes or 44%. All results are unofficial until they are certified. Some of the results do not include affidavit or absentee ballots. Here is the new slate of municipal leaders in Forrest and Lamar County. All new terms begin July 1. Mayor Toby Barker Ward 1 Councilman Jeffrey George Ward 2 Councilman Eric Boney (replacing longtime Councilwoman Deborah Delgado) Ward 3 Councilwoman LeAnn Van Slyke Vance (replacing longtime Councilman Carter Carroll) Ward 4 Councilman Dave Ware Ward 5 Councilman Nicholas Brown Mayor Tony Ducker Alderman at Large Mike Lott Ward 1 Alderman Gerald Steele Ward 2 Alderwoman Kim Stringer Ward 3 Alderman Blake Nobles Ward 4 Alderman Craig Strickland Ward 5 Alderman Drew Brickson Ward 6 Alderman Craig Bullock Mayor Roger Herrin Alderman at Large Wendell Hudson Ward 1 Alderwoman Donna Bielstein Ward 2 Alderman Vernon Hartfield Ward 3 Alderwoman Jerry Smith Ward 4 Alderwoman Deborah Ferrell Mayor Joel Lofton Alderwoman at Large Brittany Fortenberry Ward 1 Alderman Jeffery Coulter Ward 2 Alderwoman Shanna Istre Ward 3 Alderman Pam Birdsong Graves Ward 4 Alderman Darrell Hall Mayor James Sandifer Jr. Alderwoman at Large Sandy Kee Ward 1 Alderwoman Annette Sandifer Ward 2 Alderman Laurie Surla Ward 3 Alderman Jonathan Griffith Ward 4 Alderwoman Jasmin Holder Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@ Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at This article originally appeared on Hattiesburg American: Hattiesburg, Sumrall, Lumberton election results: All the winners

🎥 New names shine as USA crush Jamaica and Canada beat Haiti
🎥 New names shine as USA crush Jamaica and Canada beat Haiti

Yahoo

time04-06-2025

  • Yahoo

🎥 New names shine as USA crush Jamaica and Canada beat Haiti

The women's international break continued on Tuesday with North American sides busy on the pitch. Here is what went down in the latest round of friendly action. USWNT pull off dominant Jamaica win Scorers: Sentnor 19', 28', Biyendolo 60', 89' Advertisement It was one-way traffic at Energizer Park in St. Louis as the United States Women's National team beat Jamaica 4-0. With 21 shots to two and a staggering 82% possession of the ball, the Americans toyed with their opponents on the pitch over 90 minutes. One Ally Sentnor was the star of the first half. Two goals in nine minutes had the hosts in cruise control, with her first seeing the ball struck off the ground to find the left corner. The Utah Royals star then made it for goals in four starts by poking home into the opposite corner from less than 10 yards out. Jamaica frustrated the USA during the second half and impressively kept their attack at bay. However, their initial resistance was broken by the experience of Lynn Biyendolo (formerly Williams). Advertisement After only three minutes on the pitch, the substitute acrobatically forced the ball over the line following a corner kick for 3-0. She then made it a brace of her own after racing into the box and smashing a low cross into the netting from only a few yards out. According to Opta, Biyendolo "has scored 12 goals as a substitute in her #USWNT career, more than any other player since she made her debut in October 2016." Additionally, "Phallon Tullis-Joyce has joined Mary Harvey as the only two goalkeepers to start each of their first three USWNT appearances and keep clean sheets in all of them." Holly Ward impresses as Canada beat Haiti Scorers: Viens 16', 42', Ward 23'; Dumornay 45+2' (P) Advertisement The Canadian Women's National Team cruised to a 3-1 victory over Haiti, with Holly Ward having an impressive individual performance on her first international start. But it was not all smiles on the pitch initially as the hosts were forced into an early change when Liverpool starlet Olivia Smith was stretchered off after receiving a ball to the face from only a few yards out. Having settled after the substitution, Canada captain Jessie Fleming drove to the byline and chipped the ball toward Evelyne Viens, who headed home the opener. Immediately after, it was time for Vancouver Rise attacker Ward to make her mark. The 21-year-old scored her first international goal after directing a header to the back post following Fleming's assist. Minutes later, Ward sent a reverse ball to Viens to set up Canada's third. Advertisement Haiti erased any clean sheet hopes when Melchie Dumornay's penalty found the bottom right corner just before half-time. The goal boosted the visitors' energy, with Haiti registering more shots than Canada (11 to nine) over the 90-minute stretch. A handful of long-range shots from Dumornay threatened to make the game a one-goal affair and called goalkeeper Sabrina D'Angelo to make a last-ditch save in stoppage time. The late surge, however, was too little too late and the Canadians held on for victory. Matches to come: Mexico v Uruguay 📸 Ed Zurga - 2025 Getty Images

Unpacking California bill that would allegedly allow undocumented immigrants to count election ballots
Unpacking California bill that would allegedly allow undocumented immigrants to count election ballots

Yahoo

time03-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Unpacking California bill that would allegedly allow undocumented immigrants to count election ballots

In late May 2025, a rumor spread online that California will allow undocumented immigrants to count ballots in the state's elections. The allegation appeared to originate with a Republican state assembly member, Carl DeMaio, who on May 23 claimed on X that California Democrats "just passed" a bill called Assembly Bill 930 "to allow illegal immigrants" to count ballots. AB 930 is a legitimate bill sponsored by Democratic Assembly Member Christopher Ward. However, both Ward and the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, a nonpartisan group of county officials that supports AB 930, disputed DeMaio's claim. The bill's main purpose is to modernize election processes and clarify existing law. The key language in the bill at the center of DeMaio's claim would amend California's Election Code to allow election officials to appoint "four individuals," instead of "four voters of the county," to a special recount board. In California, a special recount board convenes to oversee a ballot recount when a voter requests it after any election. DeMaio claims this change allows election officials to appoint undocumented immigrants to a recount board under a 2019 state law permitting undocumented immigrants to hold "appointed civil office." However, Ward and the election officials' association disagree, pointing to a provision in California's Elections Code that prohibits nonvoters appointed to a "precinct board" from tallying votes. According to Ethan Jones, a consultant for the California State Assembly Committee on Elections, a "special recount board" likely falls under the definition of a "precinct board," which would mean that Ward and the association are correct and AB 930 would not allow undocumented immigrants to count votes. However, Jones said the law is somewhat ambiguous in this case, meaning DeMaio's claim is not entirely out of the question. In late May 2025, a rumor spread online that California passed a law allowing undocumented immigrants to count ballots in its elections. The claim appeared to originate with state Republican Assembly Member Carl DeMaio, who posted a clip on X denouncing the purported bill. "BREAKING: CA Democrats just passed AB 930 to allow illegal immigrants to COUNT BALLOTS in our elections!" the May 23 post read. Others spread similar messages, some of which included the clip of DeMaio, on X and Facebook; many of these posts claimed California just "legalized" allowing undocumented immigrants to count ballots. AB 930 is a legitimate bill meant to modernize California's election processes and clarify existing law, sponsored by Democratic Assembly Member Christopher Ward. It is not yet law. One of its provisions "repeals requirements that the members of a recount board must be voters," per a May 1 analysis of the bill's text available for download on the California Legislature's website. The bill would apply to ballot recounts in the state for any election. The California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, a nonpartisan group of the state's county officials — and a supporter of AB 930 — says that state law already prohibits nonvoters from counting ballots, meaning AB 930 would not allow undocumented immigrants to count ballots. DeMaio's argument rests on a 2019 law that allows undocumented immigrants to sit on certain boards and commissions. However, both the bill sponsor and the election officials' association say that 2019 law does not apply in this case. According to the association, California election law already prohibits nonvoters from counting ballots, meaning AB 930 does not allow undocumented immigrants to tally ballots. It is likely that the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials are correct — but some ambiguity in the law's wording prevents us from providing a definitive truthfulness rating on this story. AB 930 has also only passed one of California's two legislative chambers as of this writing; it must pass both and be signed by the state's governor to become law. Here's our breakdown of what we know about AB 930. The key language in dispute is the bill's amendment of the election code to read "individuals" instead "voters of the county," the language used in state law as of this writing. A spokesperson for DeMaio, Dylan Martin, pointed to this change in an emailed statement as supposed evidence that the legislation allows undocumented immigrants to sit on a recount board, a group of people who oversee an election ballot recount. California law allows any voter to ask the state for a recount. Here is the relevant text from the legislation, under Section 6 (emphasis ours): Section 15625 of the Elections Code is amended to read: (a) The recount shall be conducted under the supervision of the elections official. The elections official shall convene special recount boards consisting of four individuals appointed by and at the discretion of the elections official. The requester shall reimburse the county for the cost of each member of a recount board. However, a legislative aide in Ward's office, Anthony Reyes, said in an email that the change from "voter" to "individual" was made "solely to provide consistency and clarity across various parts of the Election Code." "It ensures flexibility in describing a broader range of roles (some of which are non-tallying or observational in nature), but does not affect the legal requirement that vote-tallying board members be registered voters," Reyes said. In a May 29 letter to Ward's office obtained via Reyes, the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials said this (emphasis theirs): AB 930 does not allow undocumented immigrants to sit on recount boards. However, it is possible that separately a documented non-citizen could be hired for other election-related work. Counties cannot hire an undocumented immigrant for a county extra help position, as all such employees must be legally cleared to work. As the clerks and elections officials' office noted, it is against federal law for any U.S. employer to knowingly hire an undocumented immigrant. Under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and long-standing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, federal immigration law supersedes state law. Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the Constitution also gives the U.S. Congress broad power over immigration and related laws. As such, federal law, not state law, dictates whether an immigrant can be employed in the United States, including California. DeMaio's office claimed a separate law California passed in 2019, Senate Bill 225, allows undocumented immigrants to sit on recount boards because it permits undocumented immigrants to hold "appointed civil office" to ensure diverse perspectives on local boards and commissions. "They are not employees. This relates to members of the BOARD that oversees the counting. They are appointees," Martin wrote. He pointed to the following section of SB 225 (emphasis ours): (b) Notwithstanding any other law, a person, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, is eligible to hold an appointed civil office if the person is 18 years of age and a resident of the state. (c) Notwithstanding any other law, a person appointed to civil office, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, may receive any form of compensation that the person is not otherwise prohibited from receiving pursuant to federal law, including, but not limited to, any stipend, grant, or reimbursement of personal expenses that is associated with carrying out the duties of that office. As elections officials appoint individuals to the recount boards, Martin argued, the special recount board members count as an "appointed civil office," and as long as they do not receive employee compensation — wages, in other words — they can sit on a recount board per AB 930 and federal law. However, according to Reyes, from the bill sponsor's office, SB 225 does not apply to "temporary, non-civil service assignments like recount boards, which are governed by a separate set of election-specific statutes." Instead, the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, as well as Ward's office, argue that a "special recount board" would fall under California Elections Code 12302, which prohibits nonvoters from tallying votes for a "precinct board" (emphasis ours): (c)(2) A nonvoter appointed to a precinct board pursuant to this subdivision shall not be permitted to do either of the following: (A) Serve as, or perform any of the duties of, the inspector of a precinct board. (B) Tally votes for the precinct board. A "special recount board" as described in AB 930 likely falls under the definition of a "precinct board" per California law (emphasis ours): (a) "Precinct board" is the board appointed by the elections official to serve at a single precinct or a consolidated precinct. In an election conducted using vote centers, "precinct board" means the board appointed by the elections official to serve at a vote center. (b) "Precinct board," when used in relation to proceedings taking place after the polls have closed, likewise includes any substitutive canvassing and counting board that may have been appointed to take the place of the board theretofore serving. As a special recount board takes place after the polls have closed and is a "counting board," it probably counts as a precinct board. But Ethan Jones, chief consultant for the California State Assembly Committee on Elections, said in an email that while there's a "colorable argument" that the restrictions for a precinct board apply to a special recount board, he "wouldn't say that's a slam dunk." "It's somewhat ambiguous whether the restrictions on precinct boards would apply to recount boards, or whether a recount board would be considered a precinct board under the law," Jones said. A search for "special recount board" within the "definitions" section of California's Elections Code returned no results, meaning the state law does not explicitly specify that a special recount board is a precinct board. To summarize, should AB 930 pass, it is likely that it would not permit undocumented immigrants to tally votes in any capacity due to federal employment restrictions and preexisting state law. However, there is a small chance that ambiguity in the existing law may in theory allow California's undocumented immigrants to sit on a special recount board, which convenes when a voter requests a ballot recount. "8 USC 1324a: Unlawful Employment of Aliens." Accessed 28 May 2025. "Bill Text - AB-930 Elections and Voting Procedures." Accessed 28 May 2025. "Bill Text - SB-225 Citizens of the State." Accessed 30 May 2025. "California Code, ELEC 12302." Accessed 30 May 2025. "California Code, ELEC 15625." Accessed 30 May 2025. "Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background | USCIS." 11 May 2021, Accessed 28 May 2025. "Committee Staff | California State Assembly." Accessed 30 May 2025. Constitution Annotated. "ArtVI.C2.1 Overview of Supremacy Clause." Accessed 28 May 2025. "Elections Code - ELEC DIVISION 0.5. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS [1 - 362] ." Accessed 30 May 2025. "Elections Code - ELEC DIVISION 12. PREELECTION PROCEDURES [12000 - 12327] ." Accessed 30 May 2025. Jones, Ethan. ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 930 (Ward). 1 May 2025, Accessed 28 May 2025. "Overview | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." Page, Bob. CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of CLERKS and ELECTION OFFICIALS. CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CLERKS AND ELECTION OFFICIALS, 29 May 2025, Accessed 30 May 2025. "Recounts — Frequently Asked Questions : California Secretary of State." 2025,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store