Ukraine offers its front line as test bed for foreign weapons
Under the "Test in Ukraine" scheme, companies would send their products to Ukraine, give some online training on how to use them, then wait for Ukrainian forces to try them out and send back reports, the group said in a statement.
"It gives us understanding of what technologies are available. It gives companies understanding of what is really working on the front line," Artem Moroz, Brave1's head of investor relations, told Reuters at a defence conference in Wiesbaden, Germany.
Moroz said there has been strong interest in the scheme, but did not name any companies that have signed on to use it and declined to go into more detail on how it would operate or what, if any, costs would be involved.
More than three years after their invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces are pressing a grinding offensive across the sprawling, more than 1,000-km (620-mile) front line and intensifying air strikes on Ukrainian cities.
Ukraine is betting on a budding defence industry, fuelled in part by foreign investment, to fend off Russia's bigger and better-armed war machine.
Brave1 - set up by the government in 2023 with an online hub where Ukrainian defence companies can seek investment, and also where Ukrainian military units can order up arms - had drawn up a list of the military technologies it wanted to test, Moroz added.
"We have a list of priorities. One of the top of those would be air defence, like new air defence capabilities, drone interceptors, AI-guided systems, all the solutions against gliding bombs," he said.
Unmanned systems in the water and electronic profile systems on the ground are also on Ukraine's list of priorities, as are advanced fire control systems or AI guidance to make howitzers more accurate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
What are the pros and cons of introducing digital identity cards?
The prime minister is said to be 'seriously considering' a national system of digital identification, both to make it easier to access online services, including government ones, and to clamp down on illegal working by irregular migrants. Given the push to introduce artificial intelligence in so many areas of our lives, it may be an idea whose time has come. But there are political, as well as practical, complications. What is digital ID? It would in essence be a virtual ID card, and using it in the existing, and enhanced, Government Gateway would make it easier for people to manage everything from tax records and social security entitlements to driving licences, education, citizenship and probate – a vast array of areas in which the individual has dealings with the state. It could also be used, as a passport or driving licence is now, to help with all sorts of other activities, such as banking or getting a job. There is a separate, and obviously sensitive, question about whether digital ID should also encompass someone's medical history, voluntarily or otherwise. Why digital ID now? According to the briefings, the aim is to reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of the government machine, so that, for example, people don't have to spend hours on hold when contacting a government agency. Unavoidably, though, it is also a way to detect people who shouldn't be in the country or working in the UK. That, the theory goes, means less of a 'pull factor' for certain sorts of migrant. Would it work? In a sense it is working already, in that almost everyone must have a unique tax reference, a national insurance number, a driving licence number, an NHS number and so on, and can, if they wish, share this information with others. But at the moment the system is compartmentalised and clunky, even if more and more interactions are taking place online and with chatbots. What stage are we at? Reports emanating from a 'senior minister' say that the prime minister has ordered a 'comprehensive and expansive look' at the proposal: 'Keir is leading on it,' they said. 'This is a serious piece of work. After a year in government, it is clear that technology is underpinning everything. Digital ID is foundational. Things are moving forward.' Didn't we have identity cards before? They were introduced as plain cardboard documents during the Second World War as a national security measure. People had to use them to get rationed food and petrol, and had to be ready to produce them on demand, a serious infringement of the traditional British way of doing things. The request for 'Papers, please' has always been regarded as an alien phenomenon. In the words of Boris Johnson in 2004: 'If I am ever asked, on the streets of London, or in any other venue, public or private, to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am ... then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it in the presence of whatever emanation of the state has demanded that I produce it.' (He subsequently brought in compulsory photo ID for elections.) Even now, a driver stopped by the police is granted 14 days to produce their driving licence at a police station. The wartime measures were resented, and were abolished in 1952. Mandatory ID would be a minor revolution. What about the ID cards Tony Blair wanted? He still does, by the way. Much of the present momentum for change comes from the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), as if the former PM has never given up the struggle. At any rate, the current prime minister's chief aide, Morgan McSweeney, commissioned the TBI to produce proposals, and is said to be 'forceful' in making the case for them to No 10. Certainly, a more primitive version of this project was very much 'on the cards 20 years ago' when the Blair administration tried to bring in ID cards, but it ran into enormous resistance and administrative problems. The motives, in essence, were no different from today. In 2003, the then home secretary, David Blunkett, argued that cards with biometric data were needed so that 'people don't work if they are not entitled to work, they don't draw on services which are free in this country, including health, unless they are entitled to', and that 'when we find people we can identify quickly that they are not entitled and get them out'. When a limited, entirely voluntary ID card was introduced in 2010, some 15,000 were in circulation, but the incoming Conservative-Liberal Democrat government scrapped the entire scheme, after £5bn had been spent. A voluntary biometric residence permit is available as an option for foreign students or workers. Official photo ID cards for voting have also been introduced in recent years. What does the opposition say? Despite showing little interest in it while in government, earlier this year the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, conceded that digital ID could help tackle 'illegal' immigration. But Nigel Farage remains stubbornly libertarian, and opposes digital ID because he 'doesn't trust this government' and claims that it 'hurts law-abiding citizens'. Labour, and the Tories, could use his reluctance to argue that, given he is not prepared to use every possible measure in the fight against irregular migration, Farage wouldn't succeed in his own ambition to stop the boats. Will it happen? With 40 Labour backbenchers recently calling for change and the Conservatives warming to the idea, alongside the trend towards digitising everything, it feels pretty inevitable, like it or not. Will it work? To some extent, but there are ways to get around any system, and digital is no different from paper in that respect. It could make things worse for some. If a fraudster managed to 'steal' a vulnerable person's digital ID, for example, then it would be 'open sesame' on their entire life, and comprehensive identity theft might become more common. Leaks cannot be ruled out. There's also the grim possibility that a migrant who wanted to come to the UK to work, deprived of any ID, would just melt into the underground economy, and become even more exposed to crime and exploitation. In a worst-case scenario, some criminals or a malign foreign government could execute a mega-hack in which millions of people's data is stolen or frozen and held to ransom. Last, we must reflect on British governments' past lamentable record on grand digital integration schemes – and the fact that the current proposal, which would potentially bring together HMRC, the DWP, the DVLA, the Passport Office, criminal records, local authority records, and the NHS database, would be hugely more ambitious, and hazardous, than anything attempted before.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The tech company winning big from Trump's presidency
Alex Karp, the chief executive of Palantir Technologies, was in no mood to be humble as the US tech giant revealed its results on Monday. 'I have been cautioned to be a little modest about our bombastic numbers,' Karp said. Yet in a note to shareholders, he said the company's current growth rate was 'without precedent or comparison'. Palantir, which develops artificial intelligence (AI) and data mining technology, reported a 48pc jump in its quarterly revenues to a record $1bn (£753m). Dan Ives, a technology analyst, said Palantir had 'blown away' expectations. Growth has been delivered in part thanks to the company's close ties to Washington and the US defence establishment, with US government sales up 52pc. Since Donald Trump's election victory in November, Palantir's stock has risen by almost 300pc. 'This is the perfect time for Palantir,' Karp told investors on a call. Palantir and Karp, a one-time Democratic Party donor and supporter of Kamala Harris, are well-placed to benefit from the Trump White House's focus on defence, homeland security and securing its borders. Last week, the US army signed a deal with Palantir worth up to $10bn over the next decade. Its work with the US military includes developing AI-powered mobile command trucks and a high-tech targeting system called Maven, which can do the work of a regiment of soldiers with just 20 people. Founded in 2003 by Karp and Peter Thiel, the outspoken Republican donor, Palantir's tools can synthesise vast pools of data for analysis or business decision-making. Its early work included contracts with the CIA and other intelligence services. The business and its leaders have always been outspoken believers in America's role as the bulwark of Western civilisation. In a military context, for instance, Palantir can gather information from an army's databases, satellites and drones, then combine it with publicly available information to help commanders make tactical decisions. However, it is not just military and intelligence chiefs who covet Palantir's technology. Its services have also been hotly sought after by corporations and the public sector. It is also a major supplier to the NHS. One relationship that has been under intense recent scrutiny is Palantir's work with the US immigration and customs enforcement (Ice) agency. Its technology has been deployed on the US border and Palantir has worked with Ice since 2014, largely on tools to aid criminal investigations. A deal signed in 2022 to extend this work was worth $95m. Its border work most recently expanded with a $30m deal in April to build an 'ImmigrationOS'. This, according to a federal contract, will help track known criminals, identify people overstaying their visas, and track deportation data. 'Palantir is the only source that can provide the required capabilities and prototype of ImmigrationOS without causing unacceptable delays,' a US tender document says. The contract was single sourced, meaning it was not offered in a competitive process. The Trump White House has already claimed victory over immigration and illegal border crossings. In a post on X, the White House claimed to have achieved the 'first negative net migration for the first time in 50 years'. Trump has hailed a dramatic fall in illegal border crossings as evidence that his policies of tougher border security and mass deportations of immigrants, shackled in chains and handcuffs, are working. However, the president's uncompromising approach to the issue has led to criticism of Palantir by association. Its offices have been targeted by 'Purge Palantir' demonstrators, mirroring the earlier 'Tesla Takedown' protests against Elon Musk's car business. Former staff, meanwhile, signed an open letter claiming Palantir executives were enabling a 'dangerous expansions of executive power' through their work for Trump. The company has previously admitted employees have 'left over disagreements on our work, now and in the past, and we pride ourselves on a culture of fierce internal dialogue'. Karp has repeatedly dismissed criticism from the 'haters' (although in one rebuke, Palantir published an over 4,000 word response to an article in the New York Times that interrogated its US government deals). 'Palantir gets attacked just because we help make this country even better,' Karp told investors on Monday. 'The people who think we are wrong have to be a little jealous.' Palantir is not the only tech company benefiting from the second Trump presidency. The 'big beautiful bill' earmarked a total of $6bn for border security technology, including AI-powered surveillance towers. These are likely to be designed by Anduril, another US defence technology start-up backed by Thiel, Palantir's founder. In fact, according to news organisation The Intercept, Anduril is a shoo-in. The law states that the towers must be certified by the US border patrol to get the funding – and only Anduril's technology meets that requirement. The bill has also given Ice a budget larger than many global militaries, climbing from $8bn to almost $28bn. Palantir pointed out in its financial results that its commercial sales have also soared as businesses have sought to use tools originally designed for the world's security agencies. Its US business sales climbed 93pc. 'The growth rate of our business has accelerated radically, after years of investment on our part and derision by some,' Karp wrote in a letter to investors on Monday. 'The sceptics are admittedly fewer now, having been defanged and bent into a kind of submission. Yet we see no reason to pause, to relent, here.'
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Online retailer Zalando raises 2025 guidance after About You acquisition
Aug 5 (Reuters) - German online fashion marketplace Zalando ( opens new tab raised its 2025 guidance on Tuesday after adjusting its projections to include newly acquired About You ( opens new tab. The Berlin-based company said it expected gross merchandise volumes to grow by 12-15%, up from a previously expected range of 4-9%. Zalando is investing heavily in its European logistics network, which it has also opened up to partners as it seeks to drive growth amid faltering consumer spending and competition from fast-fashion retailers such as Chinese rival Shein. The About You ( opens new tab acquisition was completed in early July, valuing Zalando's smaller rival at 1.13 billion euros ($1.31 billion). The company also said it achieved second-quarter gross merchandise volumes of 4.06 billion euros, up from 3.86 billion euros a year earlier. ($1 = 0.8634 euros)
