
We only have £250 a month left after bills due to a shared-ownership nightmare
WHEN Wendy Green bought a shared ownership two-bed flat she had no idea it would turn into a financial nightmare.
But twenty years later the 48-year-old says she is trapped with hardly any disposable income due to soaring service charges and rent costs.
3
3
3
The policies and procedures manager, who lives with her retired husband in southeast London, has seen her home's service charges skyrocket from £1,000 a year to an eye-watering £6,100.
The increased costs have left her and her husband with just £250 a month in disposable income between them.
Shared ownership schemes allow first-time buyers to purchase a share of a property if they can't afford to take out a mortgage for the total value of the home.
They can help by offering lower upfront costs that let you gradually build up how much of the property you own.
You basically rent a portion of the property from a housing association and get a shared ownership mortgage to pay for the rest.
Wendy told The Sun that when she bought her share in the property, she put down a deposit of £10,000 for an £81,000 share.
At the time she was paying service charges of roughly £75 to £80 a month.
Her home had been valued at £280,000 - although within months it had dropped to £230,000.
She said shared ownership had seemed like the "best option" and it was "what we could afford" at the time as she didn't have a large deposit to put down.
"But we didn't realise that we'd be in this position in 20 years' time," she said.
"I thought we'd be able to buy within about 10 years... but I'm never going to be able to own my own home. I'm going to be renting after I retire."
Best schemes for first-time buyers
That's because in the last three years alone the property's service charges have doubled, and she's now paying a huge £508 per month.
On top of that, the couple are paying rent at £826 a month and for their mortgage - so in total their housing costs are £1,334 a month.
The rent had initially been £393 so it's gone up by a huge £434 a month.
Wendy is also expecting the mortgage costs to rise soon as she will be coming off her very low five-year fixed rate next year.
The couple then spend about £500 on bills per month and another £300 on food.
Wendy works in Cambridge, so she's also spending at least £100 per month on petrol.
Other expenses include food, insurance and a health plan for their two cats.
Wendy's husband has a small private pension but she says it's "not a huge amount" and all these costs leave them with about £250 a month between them to spend.
"If I need a new washing machine, for example, that's got to come out of the £250 somewhere," Wendy explains.
She says the couple are "frugal" and she is "forever saying no" to social events with friends to save money.
The couple don't have Spotify, Apple TV, or Netflix.
But the increased costs mean they are unable to save, and they're also unable to put any more towards their mortgage.
What is shared ownership?
Consumer reporter Emily Mee looks at what you need to know about shared ownership schemes...
Shared ownership can be a way of helping first-time buyers get on the housing ladder if they can't afford a full mortgage.
Buyers usually purchase between 10% and 75% of the property, and the rest will be owned by a housing association.
Like with a normal mortgage, you would need to come up with a deposit and there will be an interest rate to pay.
But the deposit can be as low as 5%, making it easier for those with only moderate savings to get on the ladder.
You'll need to make monthly mortgage payments, but the housing association will also charge rent on its portion of the property.
The rent is decided by the housing association but is usually below the market rate and around 3% of its share.
That means if you bought a 25% share of a £300,000 property, you would need to pay rent on the remaining 75%, or £225,000.
Based on a 3% charge, this would work out as £562.50 per month.
On top of the rent and mortgage, buyers will need to pay any service charges.
You can use the shared ownership scheme if you have a household income of £80,000 or less, or £90,000 in London.
You must be a first-time buyer or have sold your home and be unable to afford a new one.
Wendy says she has tried several times to buy a larger share of her flat, which is known as staircasing.
Staircasing lets you increase the share you own of the property by making small payments.
These payments are based on a percentage of the value of the property.
For example, if you wanted to buy an additional 10% share of a £300,000 property, you would need to pay £30,000.
The aim with staircasing is that those with a shared ownership property could end up owning their home outright, making it easier to sell on later.
But Wendy says each time she has tried to increase her share, she has been "pretty much laughed out of the bank" because she couldn't pass affordability checks.
"When I consider my mortgage and my rent, I could actually afford it," she says.
"But because the service charges are so high, they're not going to give me [a bigger loan]."
Wendy says she feels trapped in her home because if she were to sell her share, she wouldn't get much equity.
This is partly because the block of flats she's living in was found to have dangerous cladding after the devastating Grenfell Tower fire.
At one point, a waking watch - when people patrol a building 24/7 for signs of a fire - had to be implemented to keep residents safe.
It means insurance costs are high at the property and the service charges have increased, so Wendy would likely need to drop the price of her share to get a buyer.
"I am at that stage where I want to consider moving but am unable to because most people won't get a mortgage with the service charge levels," she says.
She adds: "When I think about it, I don't know that I would make any money [from a sale]."
Wendy says her mortgage is at £60,000 as she hasn't been able to pay it off much over the years.
"My lease is at 80 years, so buying additional years would cost me approximately £25,000," she says.
"On paper it looks like I would get £50k equity, but it will be less when you consider other costs."
The 48-year-old also says she would need to move out of London if she sold because she wouldn't have enough for a deposit in the capital now.
Currently her sister lives nearby and she has friends in the area.
What are the pros and cons of shared ownership?
Although shared ownership schemes can help you get onto the housing ladder, there are some hidden dangers to watch out for.
For example, you could get hit by high service charges, short leases or even the risk of being evicted.
Here are the pros and cons to weigh up…
Pros
You'll only need a small deposit because you're only buying a share of the property and therefore can get a smaller mortgage.
You won't need to to be able to afford the full market value of a property you're interested in.
You could see your share go up in value over time, meaning you're building equity on the property.
Cons
You'll usually need to pay a service charge to cover the cost of cleaning and maintenance. The initial charge isn't fixed so this cost can end up soaring over the years. Plus, the cost of the service charge doesn't depend on the share of the property you own so you could end up paying the same as someone with a 75% share even if you only have a 25% share.
Shared ownership properties are leasehold, so you would own the property for a set number of years but you don't own the land it's on. When the term of the lease expires, the property will belong to the landowner unless you extend the lease. If you want to apply for a lease extension from your landlord, this could cost tens of thousands of pounds.
The property becomes harder to sell the more years you have left on the lease. Therefore you could be forced to reduce your asking price to encourage someone to buy the property.
High monthly mortgage payments and rent could mean that you do not save any money compared with just getting a mortgage.
Just like with renting, you're still at risk of being evicted by your landlord as you pay rent on the portion of the property you don't own. This could happen if you fail to pay rent, sub-let your home or are a nuisance. If you're evicted there is a risk that you could lose the proportion of the home you have already bought as you do not own it fully in the eyes of the law until you have staircased up to 100%. The housing association is not legally obliged to reimburse you if you are evicted, although you are legally entitled to be paid for your share on the sale of the property.
The stress of everything has had a huge impact on Wendy's day-to-day life.
"I have actually been at the doctors over the past couple of years discussing the service charges and building safety issues," she says.
"It's not been great for my mental health."
If Wendy had known how everything would unfold, she would never have got a shared ownership home.
She says she loves the place she lives in and she'd initially been excited to have her own space.
"For at least a year I'd walk through that door and just think 'this is us'," she said.
But 20 years down the line, she's no closer to properly owning her home - and she can't see how that will change.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why the BBC thinks it can get Labour to give it more funding
Tim Davie struck a gloomy tone when discussing the BBC's finances on Tuesday, as he renewed calls for extra funding. 'I want proper investment and not begrudging, grinding cuts to the BBC, which you've had in the last 10 years, which have just not helped,' the director general said. The timing of his comments was key. Davie is currently locked in talks with ministers ahead of the BBC's Charter renewal in 2027, as he fights for the future of the licence fee. Bosses in W1A acknowledge that the funding model requires reform in the modern media age. But how this will affect the BBC's stretched finances is a critical question as it continues to lose viewers at an alarming rate. Identity crisis The licence fee has existed in some guise since the BBC's launch in 1922, when the government decided the new broadcaster should be publicly funded. This, the corporation says, allows its UK output to remain 'free of advertisements and independent of shareholder and political interest'. While the BBC was initially limited to radio services, the first combined radio and TV licence was issued in 1946 for £2. Fast-forward to the 21st century and the BBC has transformed from a fledgling broadcaster into a public service behemoth. Income from the licence fee stood at £3.7bn last year, a significant chunk of the UK's entertainment and media market, which is valued at around £100bn by PwC. However, this scale does not tell the full story. With the emergence of streaming rivals such as Netflix and Disney, as well as social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok, the BBC is facing an identity crisis. While the public service broadcaster continues to dominate the UK media space – around 86pc of adults consume its services each week, according to the latest Ofcom figures – it is losing ground. This is particularly acute among 16 to 24-year-olds, who spend just 5pc of their in-home video time with the BBC, compared to the 23pc for over-35s. Waning interest has meant lower income as viewers vote with their feet. The number of households paying the licence fee dropped to 23.9m last year – a 500,000 fall that sucked £80m from the BBC's budget. The figure is 2.3m lower than the peak of 26.2m between 2017 and 2019. Cost is likely to be a factor. At £174.50 per year, the licence fee comes in at around £14.50 a month. That compares to £5.99 a month for Netflix's ad tier, or £12.99 for its standard ad-free service. Disney charges £4.99 with ads and £8.99 without. While the BBC argues it offers good value for money given the breadth of its service, this is unlikely to win over apathetic youngsters who consider Auntie irrelevant. The fall in licence fee payers is not the only driving force behind the BBC's squeezed finances, however. Over the last 15 years, repeated government interventions have taken their toll. In 2010, George Osborne announced the licence fee would be frozen for seven years at £145.50. Nadine Dorries, former culture secretary, then froze the levy again in 2022, even as inflation surged. The fee will now increase in line with inflation until the end of the Charter in 2027, but only after another Tory culture secretary, Lucy Frazer, stepped in to prevent a 9pc – or £15 – rise amid concerns it would fuel the cost of living crisis. Adding further strain to the budget, the government in 2015 forced the BBC to take over the cost of providing free licence fees to the over-75s, while it also handed over the main burden of funding the World Service. Analysis shows that Government interference, coupled with a decline in licence fee payers, amounts to a real-terms decrease of around 30pc – or £1.4bn – in the broadcaster's domestic funding over the last 15 years. The question, then, is how to plug the gap. Davie has been wielding the axe on both staff and programming as he seeks to strip £700m from the BBC's annual budget. Yet this whittling down of resources has fuelled anger and concern about the impact on the quality of the broadcaster's output, with spending on new shows poised to fall by £150m this year. The BBC has also ramped up enforcement of the licence fee, with 41m warnings sent out in the 2024 financial year – an increase of almost 13pc year on year. Another method championed by Davie, the former BBC Studios boss, is to boost the broadcaster's commercial income to help balance the books. Measures so far have included taking full control of BritBox International, the BBC's joint streaming venture with ITV, after buying out its rival for £225m. The BBC has also struck a co-production deal with Disney to air Doctor Who overseas, worth an estimated $100m (£73m). But other schemes, such as its plan to run adverts around radio and podcast output, have been scrapped in the face of fierce opposition from commercial rivals. Despite its bold aims, the BBC's commercial income fell to £1.7bn last year from just under £2bn the year before. Overall, the BBC is forecasting a £33m deficit for the coming year. While this is down from the eye-watering £500m shortfall the previous year, it highlights the ongoing strain on the corporation's finances. It is against this precarious backdrop that the BBC has entered discussions with the Government. Ministers have made it clear, however, that reform, or even scrapping, of the licence fee is top of the agenda. While the licence fee is now lower as a proportion of average household income – 0.46pc last year compared to 0.64pc in 2012 – the levy is facing scrutiny in a world where viewers have a plethora of entertainment options. What's more, the licence fee is regressive, with poorer households paying more relative to their income and women disproportionately prosecuted for not paying. So if the licence fee were to be scrapped, what could take its place? One option is replacing it with a subscription model, similar to those of streaming services. However, critics have warned that such a move risks undermining the BBC's ability to serve its audiences and would limit the scope of its output. 'A subscription funding model would be antithetical to the BBC's public service mission, necessarily ending universality of access and undermining its breadth of content,' said analysts at Enders Analysis. Similarly, funding the BBC through advertising has been viewed as a non-starter as it would draw too much money away from the commercial TV and radio sector. Both Davie and Samir Shah, the BBC chairman, have pushed to retain the licence fee with reforms, acknowledging the shortcomings of a regressive flat tax. But what would this look like? Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, has pushed back against the idea of funding the BBC through general taxation, saying it would leave the broadcaster exposed to political interference. Another option is a household tax similar to the one used in Germany. This would boost the BBC's income by widening the payment of the licence fee to all households, rather than just those who use its services. It could also be linked to council tax bands, creating a more progressive system where wealthier households pay more. Other options under consideration include linking the levy to broadband bills – a measure that would take on particular relevance as Britain prepares to switch off terrestrial TV and move to a streaming-only model. It is thought that any of these reforms would reduce the rate of evasion, though ministers will no doubt be reluctant to introduce new taxes, especially in light of the upcoming spending review. In a speech last month, Davie said: 'When it comes to funding, we are not asking for the status quo. We want modernisation and reform. But in doing so, we must safeguard universality.' Alternatively, as the BBC's Charter comes up for renewal, ministers could opt for a bolder rethink. The corporation retains its Reithian principles to inform, educate and entertain. But in the modern age, does the BBC still need to be all things to all people? Some industry watchers note that the BBC could drop some of its more peripheral services, such as its education unit Bitesize. BBC bosses are themselves alive to this possibility, and the broadcaster in March launched its largest ever public survey to ask audiences what they want from the broadcaster in the future. A more radical view espoused by a number of industry bigwigs is a merger between the UK's public service broadcasters. Sir Peter Bazalgette, the former chairman of ITV, says: 'There's no doubt in my mind that there ought to be mergers between domestic broadcasters, not just in England, but right across Europe, in order for those broadcasters to survive and have big enough businesses in their streaming services.' Speaking at a conference in London this week, Sony Pictures international boss Wayne Garvie said: 'We've got five public service broadcasters in Britain. The rest of the world might have one. 'It is unsustainable and the future has got to be, surely, Channel 4 and the BBC coming together.' The idea of slimming down the BBC or combining it with its rivals will no doubt rankle supporters who view the universality of access as a key tenet of its purpose. But as competition grows and audiences continue to defect, it is clear the status quo cannot continue.


Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Budget airline to launch more flights to one of the world's cheapest holiday destinations
And what it is like flying with the airline according to the Sun's Head of Travel for Digital TAKING OFF Budget airline to launch more flights to one of the world's cheapest holiday destinations Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BUDGET airline is increasing flights to an affordable holiday destination - less than a year after they first launched. Norse Atlantic Airways started the new route from London Gatwick to Cape Town in October 2024. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Norse Atlantic Airways is adding even more flights to Cape Town Credit: Getty 3 Cape Town is often named a top affordable winter sun destination Credit: Alamy And the huge demand for the South African route has since seen them extend the flight season as well as add more flights. Previously offering three flights a week, this was increased to four earlier this year. And the airline has now increased it even further, with six flights a week being launched. And the seasonal route previously only operated until the end of April. Read more on airlines LONDON CALLING Little-known airline to launch first ever flights from London airport However the new season will operate from October 2, 2025 until May 2026. Bård Nordhagen, Norse Chief Commercial Officer, said: "Following the success of our inaugural season we see great opportunity in the South African market. 'By expanding services, we wish to show to the trade and consumer markets we are committed to this route.' Andrew Fish, Head of UK & South African Sales at Norse Atlantic Airways added: 'We are seeing exceptional momentum on this route, and this frequency increase reflects both customer confidence and Norse Atlantic Airlines' long-term growth strategy." Cape Town was named the best value long-haul holiday destination in Post Office Travel Money's Long Haul Holiday Report last year. Not only is it affordable, but don't expect any jet lag either with no time difference. Best Value Winter Sun Long Haul Destinations And it is a great winter sun hotspot, with highs of 27C in November and January. The Sun's Head of Travel (Digital) Caroline McGuire recently visited Cape Town with her family. She said: "Everything in Cape Town is so accessible that we landed at 8.30am, got our hire car, checked into the hotel and were on the glorious Camps Bay beach in swimsuits by 11.30am. "Camps Bay suburb feels like a cross between Cannes and a fancy California town, with its white sandy beach, backdrop of Table Mountain and smart restaurants lining the beachfront. What is it like flying on Norse? The Sun's Head of Travel (Digital) Caroline McGuire recently tried the airline's Premium Economy out. Norse doesn't do online check-in - everyone checks in at the airport. And Premium passengers are given their own lane, so we waited about five minutes before dropping off our bags and getting our tickets. Most importantly, the chairs are very roomy. With a very decent recline that allowed my whole family to get a decent night's sleep. My son pretty much slept uninterrupted from 10pm to 7am, while I snatched a manageable 5ish hours, which is far more than I've ever done before in Economy on a long haul flight. Crew hand over ear plugs, eye masks, pillows and blankets at the start of the flight, as well as headphones for the TVs (you have to pay £5 for these in Economy). Two meals are also included - I had a decent tortellini, side salad and cheesecake-type evening meal with complimentary wine, and a hot cooked breakfast, plus a croissant, yogurt and mini fruit salad. To give you an idea of price, return fares for two adults and one child in premium economy cost £3,583 to Cape Town next March, while return fares in Premium Economy on a rival airline cost £5,000. "Better still, the one-hour time difference meant we had no jet lag, so we could get stuck in straight away without the need to sleep it off. "The famous mountain was the first adventure spot on our list. "And it made for a great family day out thanks to the rotating gondolas that slowly spin to offer panoramic views on the ascent to the top. " Norse currently offers six long-haul destinations, including Miami, New York, Bangkok and Cape Town. Here are some of the other new flights that have launched this year.


Scottish Sun
2 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Tesco shopper fury as supermarket axes dinner staple from shelves
We reveal what other notable products have been discontinued below OUT OF STOCK OUT OF STOCK Tesco shopper fury as supermarket axes dinner staple from shelves Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TESCO will no doubt have sparked shopper fury after axing a dinner staple from shelves. The UK's biggest supermarket has discontinued the BBQ essential and own-brand line. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Tesco has discontinued its own-brand eight packs of beef sausages Credit: Tesco Tesco eight packs of beef sausages are no more after it is understood the supermarket stopped stocking them. The meaty item is also showing as "currently out of stock" on the chain's website. Customers can still buy six packs of Tesco Finest Aberdeen Angus Beef Sausages for £3 and four packs of Tesco Finest Pork and Beef smoked sausages for £4. Retailers often discontinue products to make way for newer items on shelves and based on sales and customer demand. Tesco recently confirmed it axed popular southern fried chicken flavour instant noodles, for example. The pack costed around 50p and was available in store and online, but was dropped and replaced with another chicken flavour shoppers could buy. Tesco also recently cut its own-brand tomato and basil soup from its chilled range. The retailer confirmed it had made the change because it adjusts its soup range across the year to reflect seasonal demand. Tesco shoppers were also shocked to find the supermarket no longer stocks six-pint cartons of milk. OTHER DISCONTINUED PRODUCTS The Sun exclusively revealed last month Cadbury's has axed Fry's Coffee Cream after first launching it in 2023. Weetabix discontinues popular cereal flavour Cadbury didn't say when the Fry's Coffee Cream multi-packs were discontinued - just that they were available while stocks lasted. Carlsberg Britvic has also axed Tango Dark Berry Sugar Free after customers reported struggling to find it on shelves. A spokesperson for the drinks maker said it stopped making the fizzy drink earlier this year. Meanwhile, Sainsbury's recently confirmed it had discontinued its Patisserie Valerie cake slices from branches. Aldi also axed its popular Deli smoke pork sausages across 100 stores leaving shoppers devastated. Lidl dropped beloved fridge essential Dairy Manor lactose-free skimmed milk from shelves recently too. Sainsbury's has also axed popular own-brand Meat Free Steaks to customer frustration. Baked goods giant Greggs recently caused a stir after dropping ham salad baguettes from menus, as exclusively revealed by The Sun. The lunch item was axed in favour of other fresh baguettes, despite its popularity among hungry shoppers. Why are products axed or recipes changed? ANALYSIS by chief consumer reporter James Flanders. Food and drinks makers have been known to tweak their recipes or axe items altogether. They often say that this is down to the changing tastes of customers. There are several reasons why this could be done. For example, government regulation, like the "sugar tax," forces firms to change their recipes. Some manufacturers might choose to tweak ingredients to cut costs. They may opt for a cheaper alternative, especially when costs are rising to keep prices stable. For example, Tango Cherry disappeared from shelves in 2018. It has recently returned after six years away but as a sugar-free version. Fanta removed sweetener from its sugar-free alternative earlier this year. Suntory tweaked the flavour of its flagship Lucozade Original and Orange energy drinks. While the amount of sugar in every bottle remains unchanged, the supplier swapped out the sweetener aspartame for sucralose. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories