
Identical twins Colin and Graham Whines deny beating and kidnapping Northland man
Graham Whines is also charged with perverting the course of justice after he allegedly sent a text message with images of guns and ammunition to the complainant after the alleged assault.
The court heard the twins had grown up with the complainant, Troy Hansen, in Auckland and then reconnected in the years after 2020 when the families discovered they had all moved to Northland.
At around midnight on February 16, 2023, Hansen opened the door of his Whangārei property to the twins who had turned up unannounced.
After Graham went to the bathroom, he allegedly grabbed hold of Hansen tightly while Colin allegedly struck him across the head with a beer mug.
For the next three hours, the twins allegedly unleashed a brutal onslaught, raining down up to 50 blows with fists, feet and bar stools.
They allegedly strangled him with a tablecloth, doused him in vodka and tried to ignite him. Throughout the ordeal it's alleged they repeatedly threatened to kill Hansen and his family.
Hansen managed to escape and reach help at his parents' house and told them two Māori men had assaulted him at his house. This allegation was recorded on a 111 call and played in court.
After being hospitalised with open wounds, concussion, broken ribs and a collapsed lung, he eventually told police it was not two Māori men but the Whines twins.
When their house was searched, several firearms were located along with ammunition.
Crown lawyer Pablo Hamber said DNA evidence placed the twins at the scene and the brothers had clearly executed a plan to assault Hansen.
'The Crown says when they are trying to escape and you stop them, it's unlawful. They're not consenting and the defendants knew they were not consenting,' Hamber said.
Defence lawyer John Howell told the jury the twins were at the complainant's home but were not present when the violence took place.
'He makes a statement to police that it was two Māori men that did this to me,' Howell said.
'You must keep an open mind right through until verdict and my clients are innocent until proven guilty.'
Judge Keith de Ridder is hearing the trial, which is expected to last one week. Photo / NZME
Hansen gave evidence on Monday about the night he thought he was going to die.
'The first thing Colin said was, as he's got tears coming from his eyes, he's saying, 'we've been planning this for a whole year',' Hansen told the court.
'It was unbelievable'
Hansen said that as he was being strangled, Colin repeatedly punched him – shattering the glasses on his face, then allegedly using the broken shards to try to gouge out his eyes.
'It was full strangulation,' Hansen said.
'How much pressure was being applied?' Hamber asked.
'It was unbelievable.'
He said when his rib popped, Graham allegedly said, 'did you hear his rib crack?'
After allegedly being assaulted for three hours, Hansen could not breathe as his lung had collapsed. He said he had a request of the brothers.
'I said, 'If you're gonna kill me can I have a cigarette and coffee before you do?''
'You can kill me'
Graham made him a coffee while the assaults continued and allegedly told his brother, 'We gotta kill him, Colin'.
Hansen said the brothers were allegedly telling him to make a choice of which family member they would kill, to which he responded, 'You can kill me'.
'Graham was the one doing most of the stuff, he was doing most of the talking but they were both involved from start to finish.'
According to Hansen, the brothers just stopped the assault and left, driving slowly out of his driveway.
'I just thought, this is weird.'
When questioned by Hamber about why he had said it was two Māori men, he said he had made a promise to the accused twins he wouldn't tell anyone.
'I knew these boys had guns. They were threatening to kill my family. But I was always going to tell,' Hansen said.
Under cross-examination by Howell, Hansen said he was not sure what the motive was but they were allegedly making strange comments that did not make sense.
'When he [Colin] was giving me a beating, he was saying, 'you gave me cancer',' Hansen said.
'What you're doing is making things up,' Howell put to the complainant.
'I don't think so, sir.'
Judge Keith de Ridder is overseeing the trial, which is expected to finish on Friday.
Shannon Pitman is a Whangārei-based reporter for Open Justice covering courts in the Te Tai Tokerau region. She is of Ngāpuhi/ Ngāti Pūkenga descent and has worked in digital media for the past five years. She joined NZME in 2023.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Uber driver Jomon Perumayan Joseph loses job after stun gun found on his dashboard
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Jomon Perumayan Joseph was caught with a stun gun on the dashboard of his Uber vehicle. Photo: NZME An Uber driver was found with a homemade stun gun on his dashboard, which a judge has alluded to as being a method of protection for the man. Jomon Perumayan Joseph, 39, was stopped by police for an unrelated traffic matter in New Plymouth about 4pm on 13 November last year. At the time, he was operating as an Uber driver, according to a police summary of facts. Police spotted a "cylindrical device with two metal probes" on the dashboard of Joseph's vehicle. "An expert examination of the device determined it was a homemade stun gun of a form and size held in the hand, which had a push switch that latches when pressed to continually operate the device," the summary stated. Testing of the gun showed it would cause a severe electric shock, electrical burning and could render a person wholly or partially incapable of resistance. Joseph was charged with unlawful possession of a restricted weapon and, when speaking with police, said he made it "as an experiment". Jomon Perumayan Joseph appeared in New Plymouth District Court. Photo: NZME / Tara Shaskey On Tuesday, he appeared in New Plymouth District Court where he advanced an application for a discharge without conviction. Judge Ajit Swaran Singh said Joseph had reported making the stun gun was a "hobby" and he had no intention of using it on anyone. However, the judge noted that during his time in the courts he had seen many cases of Uber, taxi and bus drivers being attacked. "Understandably their concern is self-protection in the event of being attacked. "That is quite a common feature in a lot of offending. Be that as it may, you must understand that having weapons is not acceptable ... there are better ways of dealing with situations." In considering Joseph's application, Judge Swaran Singh said as a result of the charge, Joseph had lost his job as an Uber driver and his passenger licence endorsement had been suspended, "suffering a form of punishment already". The judge considered affidavits from Joseph, his wife and an immigration expert, as well as a presentence report which assessed him as a low risk of reoffending, his genuine remorse, and that he had donated $500 to charity. There were no aggravating features, such as the offending being drug or gang-related, and the immigration expert had advised a conviction could impact Joseph's prospects of remaining in New Zealand, and his possible migration to Australia. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .


NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Uber driver Jomon Perumayan Joseph loses job after stun gun found on his dashboard
Jomon Perumayan Joseph was caught with a stun gun on the dashboard of his Uber vehicle. 'An expert examination of the device determined it was a homemade stun gun of a form and size held in the hand, which had a push switch that latches when pressed to continually operate the device,' the summary stated. Testing of the gun showed it would cause a severe electric shock, electrical burning and could render a person wholly or partially incapable of resistance. Joseph was charged with unlawful possession of a restricted weapon and, when speaking with police, said he made it 'as an experiment'. Jomon Perumayan Joseph appeared in New Plymouth District Court. Photo / Tara Shaskey Yesterday, he appeared in New Plymouth District Court where he advanced an application for a discharge without conviction. Judge Ajit Swaran Singh said Joseph had reported making the stun gun was a 'hobby' and he had no intention of using it on anyone. However, the judge noted that during his time in the courts he had seen many cases of Uber, taxi and bus drivers being attacked. 'Understandably their concern is self-protection in the event of being attacked. 'That is quite a common feature in a lot of offending. Be that as it may, you must understand that having weapons is not acceptable ... there are better ways of dealing with situations.' In considering Joseph's application, Judge Swaran Singh said as a result of the charge, Joseph had lost his job as an Uber driver and his passenger licence endorsement had been suspended, 'suffering a form of punishment already'. The judge considered affidavits from Joseph, his wife and an immigration expert, as well as a presentence report which assessed him as a low risk of reoffending, his genuine remorse, and that he had donated $500 to charity. There were no aggravating features, such as the offending being drug or gang-related, and the immigration expert had advised a conviction could impact Joseph's prospects of remaining in New Zealand, and his possible migration to Australia. The possibility of deportation could also impact his family, the court heard. Judge Swaran Singh accepted that the consequences of a conviction were out of all proportion to the gravity of the offending and granted the discharge without conviction. But Joseph was ordered to pay $661.25 for the independent testing of the stun gun, and the weapon would be destroyed. Tara Shaskey joined NZME in 2022 and is currently an assistant editor and reporter for the Open Justice team. She has been a reporter since 2014 and previously worked at Stuff covering crime and justice, arts and entertainment, and Māori issues.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Bay of Plenty Snapchat predator Raveen Saily admits further offending
By Hannah Bartlett of Snapchat predator Raveen Saily has pleaded guilty to new charges related to grooming and indecent communication with an 11-year-old girl. Photo: NZME Warning: This story deals with details of sexual assault against young people, and may be distressing. Snapchat predator Raveen Saily was on bail, awaiting a rape trial , when he filmed a 13-year-old Rotorua girl performing a sexual act on him. Now it's been revealed the 23-year-old sent that video to an 11-year-old Auckland girl he'd met through Snapchat, whom he'd asked to be his girlfriend, and was also grooming. On Tuesday in the Tauranga District Court, Saily pleaded guilty to grooming for sexual conduct with a young person, indecent communication with a young person and distributing objectionable material. The charges all relate to the Auckland victim. He will be sentenced in December, along with charges related to the sexual violation of the 13-year-old victim from Rotorua. A police summary of facts reveals Saily met the 11-year-old through Snapchat in May 2024. At the time, he was awaiting trial on charges of indecent assault, rape and sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, for an attack on a 16-year-old girl at the Arataki Community Centre in Mount Maunganui. He had also met that teen on Snapchat, where he used the alias "John", and was found guilty by a jury, on all six charges, in August last year. While awaiting trial, Saily continued to contact girls on Snapchat. This was despite bail conditions banning him from accessing the internet, having contact with anyone under 16, or leaving his Pyes Pā home at night. When spoken to by police about his contact with the 11-year-old, he told them he "probably did do these things, but he cannot remember specifics due to the volume of girls he was in communication with, and the time that has passed since his incarceration". Saily never met the 11-year-old victim in person; they lived in different cities and communicated on Snapchat. Their relationship was discovered when the girl's mother looked at her phone, saw the messaging and reported it to police. The police summary of facts stated that during a video call, Saily asked the girl to be his girlfriend. She told him she was only 11, and too young to have a boyfriend. However, Saily continued to pressure her until she agreed, and their conversations continued over text and Snapchat, and audio and video calls. She became "increasingly emotionally dependent" on Saily, believing she was in a relationship with him. Saily told the 11-year-old he loved her, while encouraging her to send him sexually explicit images. He would ask her to "get naked", and tell her about his sexual preferences, describing himself as "freaky". He told her she would be a "good SCAT girl", which describes sexual arousal from faecal matter. He would direct her to places in the house away from her caregiver, while on video calls, and instruct her to perform sexual acts while he watched. He told her he wanted to drive from Tauranga to have sex with her. In June 2024, he filmed the 13-year-old victim from Rotorua performing a sexual act on himself, and sent it to the 11-year-old. The video of the 13-year-old was sent between June 27 and August 27, 2024, with the video found by police when they examined Saily's phone, after arresting him. Last month, Saily pleaded guilty to charges related to the 13-year-old, including grooming, sexual connection with a young person, sexual violation, and possessing objectionable material. He had added that girl on Snapchat in May 2024, claiming he was only 16. He groomed her over a month and encouraged her to send him sexually explicit photographs. They met at night in June 2024, and he drove her to several private locations where he sexually violated her, at times as she cried in pain. She repeatedly told him to stop, but he told her to shut up. It was her first experience of sexual intercourse. This offending was only detected after police pulled the pair over during a routine police stop and became suspicious about their age gap. When being dealt with by police at the traffic stop, the defendant indicated he was not aware of the girl's age and tried to stop her from speaking to the attending officers. Because of the significant age difference between the complainant and the defendant, she was taken to her home and spoken to alongside her mother. That traffic stop happened on Saturday, August 24, just before Saily's Tauranga trial began on August 26. During the Tauranga trial, the court heard how the girl didn't know Saily's proper name, and he didn't use it on any of his social media profiles. They'd met up at Mount Maunganui's Bayfair mall, and then went for a walk to the nearby Arataki Community Centre. There, the girl said she had been forced to perform sexual acts after Saily threatened her with a knife. He then went on to rape and violate her. Saily claimed it had been consensual, but the Crown said this was "utterly fanciful", particularly given the "naive" girl had no sexual experience and it was the first time she'd met up with a boy alone. Saily is currently serving a sentence of nine years and two months' imprisonment for the Tauranga attack, and will be sentenced for the offending against the 13-year-old and 11-year-old in December. If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111. This story first appeared in the New Zealand Herald .