
Should Kids Use ChatGPT AI For School? Parents Are Divided
According to a new survey from Preply, an online language learning platform, students aren't just experimenting with AI. They're integrating it into how they learn, study, and complete assignments. Thirty-six percent use AI both in class and at home. And across Arkansas, Mississippi, and Texas, student AI usage is outpacing national averages.
If you're wondering whether students and parents are worried, 90 percent say they feel confident in their ability to use AI responsibly.
This is the new classroom: powered by ChatGPT, Google Gemini, X's Grok and Microsoft Copilot, and focused on high-stakes subjects like English, math, and history.
The question now isn't if students will use AI, but how well we're preparing them to think alongside it.
The Cognitive Tradeoff Of AI No One Talks About
While the benefits of AI in education are clear—on-demand help, instant feedback, and access to powerful research tools—there's a growing body of evidence suggesting that these gains might come at a hidden cost.
Emerging neuroscience research suggests that relying on AI for language tasks may lead to reduced engagement in the prefrontal cortex — the brain region responsible for reasoning, attention, and decision-making. Supporting this concern, a study by Cornell University and Microsoft Research found that participants who received AI writing assistance performed worse in follow-up critical thinking tasks compared to those who completed the work independently.
In short, when AI does the thinking, our brains may start checking out.
This doesn't mean AI use is inherently harmful. But it does mean we need to be more intentional, especially in education. If students use AI to skip the struggle, they might also skip the learning.
That's why how kids use AI matters just as much as whether they use it. When students rely on AI only to get quick answers, they miss the chance to build deeper thinking skills. But when they use it to challenge their thinking, test ideas, and reflect on what they know, AI can actually strengthen both memory and critical thinking. Parents can help their kids make that shift—by encouraging them to ask follow-up questions, explore alternative perspectives, and talk through what they learn.
'I'm obviously a big believer in AI, but I think we're underestimating just how deeply influential it could become, especially in education. These tools are emotionally engaging, subtly flattering, and incredibly persuasive. It's like the algorithmic influence of social media, but 100 times more powerful. I believe we'll start to see a divide where some parents will treat AI like they did Facebook, keeping their kids away from it entirely, while others will unintentionally enroll them in a real-time experiment with unknown outcomes," Matthew Graham, Managing Partner at Ryze Labs.
AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Learning
The role of a student is changing. From memorizing content to synthesizing it. From answering questions to asking better ones. AI has the potential to accelerate this evolution, but only if used wisely.
The challenge is that many students, and schools, are still figuring it out on the fly. Some districts have embraced AI tools and incorporated digital literacy into the curriculum. Others have banned them outright. That inconsistency creates a new learning divide. One not based on income or geography, but on AI fluency and critical awareness.
And AI literacy is not the same as AI usage. Just because a student knows how to prompt ChatGPT doesn't mean they know how to assess its output for bias, hallucination, or ethical issues.
Or how to keep themselves safe.
In chatting with Sofia Tavares, Chief Brand Officer at Preply, she told me that 'AI has become a widely used tool among students, with 80% reporting they rely on it for schoolwork, especially in language subjects such as English, linguistics, and history. While it offers convenience and quick access to information, over reliance on AI can result in a superficial understanding of the material. Tools like ChatGPT help generate ideas and clarify concepts, but they cannot replicate the emotional intelligence, adaptability, and encouragement that human educators provide. Meaningful learning occurs when students actively engage with challenging material, and this is most effective with human teachers who inspire students to ask questions and build confidence. For this reason, AI should be viewed as a supplement to, not a substitute for, skilled human instructors, like tutors.'
Confidence Is High, But Are We Ready For AI
The Preply survey reports that 90 percent of students and parents feel 'somewhat confident' or 'very confident' about responsible AI use. That optimism is encouraging, but we should also ask: confident in what, exactly?
True readiness means knowing:
And the deeper questions that every user should be asking:
Without that foundation, confidence can lead to complacency.
The Parental AI Divide Is the Next Digital Divide
As AI becomes more embedded in learning, a new cultural rift is forming. Some parents are drawing hard lines, choosing to block tools like ChatGPT until their kids are 18—similar to early restrictions around Facebook or smartphones. Others take the opposite approach, giving their kids free rein with little oversight.
Mickie Chandra, Executive Fellow at The Digital Economist and advocate for school communities, elaborates on the risks when there is little oversight. 'Aside from concerns around privacy and sharing of sensitive information, the ethical concerns are far less overt and understood by parents. A significant number of children who use ChatGPT report that it's like talking to a friend and have no issues with taking advice from them. With engagement as the driving force behind these apps, it's clear to see how children may become hooked. Consequences include developing a false sense of connection with ChatGPT, becoming overly reliant on a bot, and less interested in peer-to-peer interactions. Children do not possess the tools to discern safety or trust worthiness of their interactions with ChatGPT.'
Neither extreme sets students up for success. Withholding access entirely may delay critical digital fluency. Unrestricted access without guidance can breed dependency, misinformation, or even academic dishonesty.
The real opportunity lies in guided exposure. Parents can play a defining role not by banning or blindly allowing AI, but by helping kids navigate it—asking where the information came from, encouraging original thought, and modeling responsible use.
From Chatbots to AI Tutors
Right now, most students use chatbots as reactive tools, asking a question and getting a response. But that is changing quickly.
Next-generation educational AI agents will be proactive. They'll remind students of deadlines, suggest study strategies, and flag gaps in understanding before a teacher ever intervenes. They won't just answer questions. They'll co-drive the learning journey.
OpenAI's new 'study mode' in ChatGPT marks a major shift in how students engage with AI for learning. Rather than simply providing answers, this mode uses Socratic questioning to prompt students to think critically, reflect on their reasoning, and deepen their understanding of assignments.
Early feedback describes it as a 24/7 personalized tutor—always available, endlessly patient, and focused on helping learners build real comprehension. If widely adopted, it could transform traditional study habits and redefine how educational support is delivered across classrooms and homes.
Olga Magnusson, The Digital Economist Senior Executive Fellow, told me that 'We need to understand the impact of AI on the cognitive development of our children. The prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for reasoning, critical thinking, emotional regulation and other high cognitive functions, keeps developing until around 25 years of age. We still don't have a clear understanding and until we do, we need to ask ourselves, what is the price we are willing to pay for progress. Until then, education is our only tool.'
And that opens up a bigger challenge: how do we ensure students don't outsource thinking itself?
Rethinking the Roles With AI: Teachers, Parents, Policymakers
The rise of AI in education doesn't replace teachers. It makes their role more essential than ever. Teachers will need to become facilitators of AI literacy, guiding students on how to think with AI, not just how to use it.
Parents, too, have a new role. They're not just checking homework anymore. They're helping their kids navigate a world where AI can write the homework for them. That means having conversations about ethics, originality, and the long-term value of struggle.
Policymakers have a responsibility to bridge the gap, ensuring all students have access to high-quality AI tools, and that national guidance exists for safe, responsible, and equitable implementation in schools.
The Real Test For AI Is Ahead
Every generation has its transformative technology. The calculator. The internet. YouTube. Now it's AI.
But here's the difference. This time, the tool doesn't just give you answers. It can do your thinking for you if you let it.
The question isn't whether students will use AI. They already are. The real test is whether we'll teach them to use it wisely, and make sure they don't lose the cognitive muscle that built our brightest ideas in the first place.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel stock jumps after Trump calls meeting with CEO Lip-Bu Tan 'interesting,' signals more talks ahead
Intel (INTC) stock jumped Monday as CEO Lip-Bu Tan met with President Trump, who had called for Tan's resignation last week. After the meeting, Trump posted to Truth Social saying that he had met with Tan along with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent. "The meeting was a very interesting one," the president wrote, adding, "His success and rise is an amazing story." Trump said Tan and his cabinet will "spend time together" and "bring suggestions" to him in the next week, without specifying on the topics to be discussed. Intel stock rose 3.5% on Monday during the day as reports circulated about the meeting. After Trump's post landed Monday evening, Intel continued to rise about 2.3% in after-hours trading. Citing unnamed sources, the Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend that Tan was set to meet with Trump on Monday to explain his personal and professional background and to propose ways that Intel and the government can collaborate. Intel did not respond to Yahoo Finance's questions regarding the reported meeting. Last week, Trump called for Tan's resignation in a Truth Social post minutes after Fox Business covered Republican Sen. Tom Cotton's recent criticism of the CEO over his ties with China. In a letter to Intel, Cotton expressed "concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations," given Tan's investments in Chinese businesses through his venture capital firm, Walden International. Trump wrote in his post last Thursday, "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately.' Tan responded by saying reports about his career contained "misinformation." "There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles ... I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem — and I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan wrote in a memo to employees. Intel also issued its own statement following Trump's comments, emphasizing its commitment to "advancing US national and economic security interests" and to making investments "aligned with the President's America First agenda," including domestic semiconductor manufacturing. Tan was named Intel's CEO in March, taking over after his predecessor Pat Gelsinger was ousted by the board last year. The company struggled to stem losses in its manufacturing business, regain market share in its legacy computer chip segment, and develop an AI strategy. Investors cheered Tan's appointment, with the stock rising as much as 15% after the news. Wall Street analysts, as well as several current and former executives and employees, saw Tan as the best possibility to succeed in turning around the troubled company. Intel's gain Monday puts shares of the company up nearly 4% this year, lagging chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which have added roughly 36% and 47% in 2025, respectively. Intel stock's uptick this year follows a 60% drop in 2024. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
James Greig Discusses Trends in Academia, Including Online Education and AI
For 14 years, James W. Greig II has served as an adjunct instructor at Grand Canyon University in Phoenix, Arizona. Prior to his teaching career, Dr. Greig was a member of the U.S. Air Force and went on to pursue higher education. He possesses degrees from Cornell University, Ball State University, University of Colorado Boulder and Capella University, where he received a Doctor of Philosophy in educational psychology. The Pandemic's Impact on Education 'It's not exactly new, but the growth of online education is something I think has raised some concerns,' Dr. Greig says. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on education, forcing elementary, high school and college students to attend online courses to continue their education during the lockdowns. The fallout from that time has caused concern among educators and parents. There are indications that students who had to attend school at the elementary and high school level were noticeably behind where other students would have been at that same point in their education. While college students are more independent and self-motivated, younger students rely more on their parents for assistance. How much parents can help often depends on their own educational experience. Dr. Greig strives to study this topic, concentrating on elementary and high school students. Education is also being impacted by artificial intelligence (AI). 'The concerns about online education should be focused on the elementary grades because that's where the difficulties lie. For college students, the concern is different. There are some concerns that some students may use AI to generate papers,' Dr. Greig explains. It is estimated that between 60% to 70% of college students regularly use AI tools in their coursework. Dr. Greig does believe there is a role for AI in education, but not when it entails writing papers. Instead, he thinks there are practical uses, such as generating an outline or a reference list. Those would be acceptable in his estimation. Expanding Focus and Investing Time Dr. Greig attributes his successful career in academia to his openness to new ideas and knowledge outside his field of expertise. He prides himself on being willing to try new things and invests his time and effort in any project that presents itself. 'I'm never satisfied with something done part way. I want to see projects through to completion,' Dr. Greig says. Dr. Greig enjoys working with others and always maintains an open mind to the suggestions and ideas of others, though he refuses to take shortcuts. His goal is to bring a project to completion by doing things the right way and ensuring the final product can do what is required. It's this willingness to explore 'new areas, new ideas and new efforts' that Dr. Greig believes puts him at the forefront of his field. He has noticed that many people are unwilling to explore beyond their comfort zone, choosing instead to narrow their focus on their area of expertise. 'I've never felt that way, so I'm always willing to explore things that maybe I'm not quite so sure about that helped me grow,' Dr. Greig explains. About Marquis Who's Who®: Since 1899, when A. N. Marquis printed the First Edition of Who's Who in America®, Marquis Who's Who® has chronicled the lives of the most accomplished individuals and innovators from every significant field, including politics, business, medicine, law, education, art, religion and entertainment. Who's Who in America® remains an essential biographical source for thousands of researchers, journalists, librarians and executive search firms worldwide. The suite of Marquis® publications can be viewed at the official Marquis Who's Who® website,


Geek Wire
16 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Seattle entrepreneurs raise cash for new startup aiming to democratize thematic portfolio investing
GeekWire's startup coverage documents the Pacific Northwest entrepreneurial scene. Sign up for our weekly startup newsletter , and check out the GeekWire funding tracker and venture capital directory . Plutus co-founders Shashank Chiranewala (left) and Mitren Chinoy. (Plutus Photo) A new startup founded earlier this year is building a marketplace for high-performance model portfolios, aiming to give everyday investors access to strategies traditionally reserved for hedge funds and ultra-wealthy clients. Plutus lets users browse curated, thematic portfolios from independent research providers, select one that fits their goals, and replicate it automatically in their own brokerage accounts. The Seattle-area company is led by longtime engineers Shashank Chiranewala and Mitren Chinoy, who previously started and sold digital form startup Formloge earlier this year for an undisclosed sum. Chiranewala, a former investment banker and program manager at Microsoft and Meta, said he was frustrated by the lack of access to sophisticated investment strategies without multimillion-dollar minimums. At the same time, he noticed a growing ecosystem of independent research firms serving institutional clients but lacking the technology to bring their portfolios to the mass market. Executing complex portfolios manually is a 'Herculean software engineering effort,' said Chiranewala, the company's CEO. Plutus acts as an advisory marketplace between individual investors and providers such as Citrini Research. Its marketplace offers thematic investment strategies — portfolios for AI and tech, or global clean energy, for example. Unlike passive ETFs or mutual funds, the portfolios are designed for automated rebalancing and potential tax advantages. The company takes a cut of subscription fees set by each portfolio provider. Plutus is initially integrating with Interactive Brokers, a publicly traded online brokerage. Chiranewala said they picked the company for its global market exposure and interest rates. The startup is generating revenue from a handful of customers, including family offices, hedge funds, and others. Its software manages more than $35 million in assets. Plutus also recently raised $452,000 from angel investors. The company has five employees. Chinoy, the company's CTO, was previously a senior software engineer at Snowflake and Microsoft.